Comparison of speed and accuracy for selected electronic communication devices and input methods

REFERENCES

• Adaptive Communication Systems, Inc. (1990). The New SpeechPAC/Epson and ScanPAC (Promotional literature). Pittsburgh, PA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R., & Yorkston, K. M. (1977). A communication system for the severely dysarthric speaker with an intact lan-guage system. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 42, 265–270.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beukelman, D., & Yorkston, K. (1984). Computer enhancement of message formulation and presentation for communication augmentation system users. Seminars in Speech and Lan-guage, 5, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Buzolich, M. J., & Higginbotham, D. J. (1985 November). Analyz-ing and facilitating the communicative competence of augmen-tative system users. Short course presented at the Annual Convention of the American Speech Language Hearing Asso-ciation, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, P. C., & Roe, B. D. (1985). Bums/Rowe informal reading inventory: Preprimer to twelfth grade. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Co.
   Google Scholar
• Chapanis, A., Ochsman, R. B., Parrish, R. N., & Weeks, G. D. (1977). Studies in interactive communication II: The effects of four communication modes on the linguistic performance of teams during cooperative problem solving. Human Factors, 19, 101–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, D. R. (1958). Planning of experiments. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Culp, D. (1987). Outcome measurement: The impact of commu-nication augmentation. Seminars in Speech and Language, 8, 169–181.
   Google Scholar
• Dabbagh, H. H., & Damper, R. I. (1985). Average selection length and time as predictor of communication rate. In Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Conference on Rehabilitation Technol-ogy: Technology-A Bridge to Independence, (pp. 404–406). Memphis, TN: Rehabilitation Society of North America.
   Google Scholar
• Demsetz. L. A., Rosen, M. J., & Goodenough-Trepagnier, C. (1983). Communication Rate Prediction: Preliminary Studies. In Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Conference on Rehabilita-tion Engineering (pp. 156–158). Bethesda, MD: Rehabilitation Society of North America.
   Google Scholar
• Don Johnston Developmental Equipment, Inc. (1990). (Product catalog). Wanconda, IL: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Fishman, I. (1987). Electronic communication aids: Selection and use. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Foulds, R. (1980). Communication rates for nonspeech expres-sion as a function of manual tasks and linguistic constraints. In Proceeding of the First International Conference on Reha-bilitation Engineering. Toronto, Canada: Rehabilitation Soci-ety of North America.
   Google Scholar
• Fry, E. (1977). Fry's readability graph: Clarification, validity and extension to level seventeen. Journal of Reading, 20, 242–252.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J. (1992). Evaluation of keystroke savings across five assistive communication technologies. Augmenta-tive and Alternative Communication, 8, 258–272.
   Google Scholar
• Horstmann, H. M., & Levine, S. P. (1990). Modeling of user performance with computer access and augmentative commu-nication systems for handicapped people. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 6,231–241.
   Google Scholar
• Keppel, G. (1973). Design and analysis: A researcher's hand-book, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kraat, A. (1985). Communication interaction between aided and natural speakers: A state of the art report. Toronto: Canadian Rehabilitation Council for the Disabled.
   Google Scholar
• Kraat, A. (1986). Developing intervention goals. In S. W. Black-stone (Ed.), Augmentative communication: An introduction (pp. 197–266). Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1989). Toward a definition of communicative compe-tence for individuals using augmentative and alternative com-munication systems. Augmentative and Alternative Communi-cation, 5, 137–144.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Lindsay, P., Siegel, L., & Parnes, P. (1990). The effects of message encoding techniques on recall by literate adults using AAC systems. Augmentative and Alternative Communi-cation, 6,184–201.
   Google Scholar
• Mathy-Laikko, P., & Yoder, D. E. (1986). Future needs and directions. In S. W. Blackstone (Ed.), Augmentative communi-cation: An introduction (pp. 471–494). Rockville, MD: Ameri-can Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Norusis, M. J. (1986). SPSS/PC+ for the IBM PC/XT/AT. Chicago: SPSS Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, W. H. (1971). Speech pathology. St. Louis, MO: C. V. Mosby Co.
   Google Scholar
• Prentke Romich Co. (1990). Changing lives (Product brochure). Wooster, OH: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Reichle, J., Mustonen, T., Sigafoos, J., Hinderscheit, L., Wie-mann, G., & Locke, P. (1989). Comments on augmentative and alternative communication evaluation and system selection: A response to Woltosz. Augmentative and Alternative Communi-cation, 5,204–207.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, M. J., & Goodenough-Trepagnier, C. (1981). Factors affecting communication rate in non-vocal communication sys-tems. In Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Conference on Rehabilitation Engineering, (pp. 194–196). Washington, DC: Rehabilitation Society of North America.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, M. J., Goodenough-Trepagnier, C., Felts, T., & Genoese-Zerbi, F. (1987). Quantification of device evaluation. In Pro-ceedings of the Tenth Annual Conference on Rehabilitation Technology: Technology—Meeting the Challenge (pp. 180–182). San Jose, CA: Rehabilitation Society of North America.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, M. J., Goodenough-Trepagnier, C., Miller, J., Dalrymple, G., Jandura, L., Getschow, C., Leung, S., & Lee, S. (1985). Computer aided motor assessment and rate prediction for assistive communication devices. In Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Conference on Rehabilitation Technology: Technol-ogy—A Bridge to Independence (pp. 326–328). Memphis, TN: Rehabilitation Society of North America.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, A. H., & Koenig, M. A. (1987). A comparison of micro-computer based and dedicated communication systems. Semi-nars in Speech and Language, 8, 143–151.
   Google Scholar
• Seibel, R. (1972). Data entry devices and procedures. In H. Vancott & R. G. Kincade (Eds.), Human engineering guide to design. Washington, DC: American Institute for Research.
   Google Scholar
• Shingledecker, C. A. (1981). Handicap and human skill. In D. H. Holding (Ed.), Human skills. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. K., Thurston, S., Light, J., Parnes, P., & O'Keefe, B. (1989). The form and use of written communication produced by physically disabled individuals using microcomputers. Aug-mentative and Alternative Communication, 5,115–124.
   Google Scholar
• Szeto, A. Y. J., Allen, E. J., & Rumelhart, M. A. (1987). Employ-ability enhancement through technical communication de-vices. American Rehabilitation, 13(2), 8–11,26-29.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden, G. C. (1983). Non-conversational communication technology needs of individuals with handicaps. Rehabilitation World, 7, 11.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden, G. C., & Lloyd, L. L. (1986). Communication systems and their components. In S. W. Blackstone (Ed.), Augmentative communication: An introduction (pp. 49–162). Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Associa-tion.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden, P. J. (1985). Writing aids. In J. G. Webster, A. M. Cook, W. J. Tompkins, & G. C. Vanderheiden (Eds.), Electronic devices for rehabilitation, (pp. 262–282). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Words+, Inc. (1985). Equalizer (Product brochure). Lancaster, CA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Words+, Inc. (1987). The Equalizer user's manual. Lancaster, CA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Zygo Industries. (1990). (Catalog). Portland, OR: Author.
   Google Scholar