Augmentative and alternative communication: An historic perspective

References

• Adams, M. J. (1991a). Beginning to read. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, M. J. (1991b). Why not phonics and whole language? In W. Ellis (Ed.), All language and the creation of literacy. Balti-more: Orton Dyslexia Society.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, M. R. (1966). Communication aids for the patient with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 31, 274–275.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Adler, J., Lubenow, G., & Malone, M. (1988). Reading God's mind. Newsweek, 24, 56–59.
   Google Scholar
• Aiello, S. C. (1980). Non-oral communication survey: A one county needs assessment and demographic study. Unpub- lished educational study, Pleven School, Fountain Valley, CA. Albright, E. (1989). Personal communication.
   Google Scholar
• Amedofu, G. K., & Eulenberg, J. B. (1988, Spring). Extending augmentative communication devices to new language com-munities: The case of Earl in Ghana, Togu, & Benin. Commu-nication Outlook, 9,15–17.
   Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1981). Posi-tion statement on nonspeech communication. Asha, 23, 577–581.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1991). Re-port: Augmentative and alternative communication. Asha, 33 (Suppl. 5), 9–12.
   Google Scholar
• Anthony, D. (1971). Seeing essential English. Anaheim, CA:
   Google Scholar
• Anaheim School District, Educational Services Division. Axline, V. M. (1964). Dibs: In search of self New York: Ballantine Books.
   Google Scholar
• Azevedo, L. M. F. (1991). Technical aids and the transfer of technology to developing countries. Augmentative and Alter-native Communication, 7,143–146.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, S. (1983). Blissymbolics and aphasia therapy: A case study. In C. Code & D. Muller (Eds.), Aphasia therapy (pp. 178–186). London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, B. (1983). Communication disabilities-An overview. Reha-bilitation World, 1, 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, B. (1985). The use of words and phrases on a MINSPEAK communication system. Communication Outlook, 7,8–11.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, B. (1986). Using images to generate speech. Byte, 3, 160–168.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, B. D., McCoy, K., Stuart, S., & Nyberg, E. H. (1991). Vocabulary selection for intelligent parsing in an AAC system for aphasics. In Jessica J. Presperin (Ed.), Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of RESNA (pp. 112–114). Washing-ton, DC: RESNA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bank-Mikkelsen, N. (1969). A metropolitan area in Denmark: Copenhagen. In W. Wolfensberger & R. Kugel (Eds.), Chang-ing patterns in residential services for the mentally retarded (pp. 227–254). Washington, DC: President's Committee on Mental Retardation.
   Google Scholar
• Basil, C., & Ruiz, R. (1984). Sistemas de comunicacio no vocal per a nens amb disminucions fisiques. Catalunya: Depar-tament d'Ensenyament.
   Google Scholar
• Basil, C., & Ruiz, R. (1985). Sistemas de comunication no vocal para ninos con disminuciones fisicas. Catalunya: Departament d'Ensenyament.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, E. (1976). Language and context: The acquisition of pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgart, D., Johnson, J., & Helmsetter, E. (1990). Augmenta-tive and alternative systems for persons with moderate and severe disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Bedrosian, J., Hoag, L., Calculator, S., & Molineaux, B. (1992). Variables influencing perceptions of communicative compe-tence of an adult augmentative and alternative communication system. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 1105–1113.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Begab, M. J. (1977). Closing session address: Some priorities for research in mental retardation. In P. Mittler (Ed.), Research to practice in MR-volume 1: Core and prevention (pp. A21-A30). Baltimore: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benaroya, S., Wesley, S., Ogilvie, H., Klein, L.S., & Meany, M. (1977). Sign language and multisensory input training of chil-dren with communication and related developmental disor-ders. Journal of Autism and Childhood Schizophrenia, 7, 23–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berger, S. L. (1972). Systematic development of communication modes: Establishment of a multiple-response repertoire for non-communicating deaf children. Report of the Proceedings of the 45th Meeting of the Convention of American Instructors of the Deaf (pp. 118–122). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. (1985). The weakest ink is stronger than the strongest memory. Augmentative and Alternative Communica-tion, 1, 55–57.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. (1988a). Augmentative communication systems for the adult. In D. E. Yoder & R. D. Kent (Eds.), Decision making in speech-language pathology (pp. 76–77). Toronto: BC Decker.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. (1988b). She was setting a world's record, and we thought she was drowning, right dad? Augmentative and Alter-native Communication, 4, 122–123.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. (1990). Be sure to give me credit, Dad. Augmen-tative and Alternative Communication, 6,159–161.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., & Garrett, K. (1988). Augmentative and alterna-tive communication for adults with acquired severe communi-cation disorders. Augmentative and Alternative Communica-tion, 2, 104–121.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., McGinnis, J., & Morrow, D. (1991). Vocabulary selection in augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7,865–875.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. (1992). Augmentative and alterna-tive communication: Management of severe communication disorders in children and adults. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., Yorkston, K., & Dowden, P. (1985). Communica-tion augmentation: A casebook of clinical management. San Diego, CA: College Hill Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biklen, D. (1990). Communication unbound: Autism and praxis. Harvard Educational Review, 60(3), 291–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biklen, D. (1993). Communication unbound: How facilitated com-munication is challenging views of autism and ability/disability. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biklen, D., & Crossley, R. (Eds.). (1992). Facilitated communica-tion: Implications for people with autism and other develop-mental disabilities. Topics in Language Disorders, 2(4), iv–82.
   Google Scholar
• Birdwhistell, R. (1970). Kinesics and context. Philadelphia: Uni-versity of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bjorck-Akesson, E., & Brodin, J. (1992). Evaluation of a visual telecommunication system for persons with moderate mental retardation [Abstract]. Augmentative and Alternative Commu-nication, 8, 115.
   Google Scholar
• Blackstone, S. (1986). Augmentative communication: An intro-duction. Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Blackstone, S. W., Carter, G., Berg, M. H., & Biondi, J. (1992). Quality in the schools: An AAC consumer satisfaction ques-tionnaire [Abstract]. Augmentative and Alternative Communi-cation, 8, 116.
   Google Scholar
• Blackstone, S., & Isaacson, R. (1988). Service delivery in aug-mentative communication. In L. E. Bernstein (Ed.), The vocally impaired: Clinical practice and research (pp. 312–329). Phila-delphia: Grune & Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• Blaisus, J. (1990, Spring). Augmentative communication equip-ment in a tropical environment: Report from Saipan. Commu-nication Outlook, 11, 8–9.
   Google Scholar
• Bligh, S., & Kupperman, P. (in press). Evaluation procedure for determining the source of the communication in facilitated communication accepted in a court case. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.
   Google Scholar
• Bliss, C. K. (1965). Semantography. Sydney: Semantography Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, L. (1970). Language development: Form and function in emerging grammars. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bloomberg, K., & Johnson, H. (1992). Communication without speech: A guide for parents and teachers. Victoria, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Bodine, C., & Beukelman, D. R. (1991). Prediction of future speech performance among potential users of AAC systems: A survey [Abstract]. Augmentative and Alternative Communi-cation, 7, 100–111.
   Google Scholar
• Boenick, I. U., & Rossdeutscher, I. W. (1988). Eine Kommunica-tionshilfe mit BLISS-Symbolen far Kinder ohne aktive Lauter-sprache. Berlin: Fachgebiet Biomedizinische Technik im Institut kir Feinwerktechnik und Biomedizinische Technik.
   Google Scholar
• Borden, P. A., Berliss, J., & Vanderheiden, G. (1993). Trace resource book: Assist/ye technologies for communication, con-trol, and computer access (1993-94 ed.). Madison, WI: Trace Resource and Development Center.
   Google Scholar
• Bornstein, H. A. (1974). Signed English: A manual approach to English language development. Journal of Speech and Hear-ing Disorders, 39,330–343.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boulton, (1969, October). A typewriting system for the seriously handicapped. Digest of the International Electronics Confer-ence Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Bowe, F. G. (1992). Empowerment: Dependence vs. inde-pendence. OSERS News in Print 5(2), 4–7.
   Google Scholar
• Bowler, D. M. (1991). Need for theory in studies of augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 127–132.
   Google Scholar
• Brandenburg, S., & Vanderheiden, G. (Eds.). (1987). Communi-cation, control and computer access for disabled and elderly individuals. (Resource Books 1–3). Waltham, MA: College Hill Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, G., Jerkier, B., & Speldt, P. (1974). Communication dis-play/printout aid with memory. In K. Copeland (Ed.), Aids for the severely handicapped (pp. 116–118). New York: Grune & Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• Brodin, J., & Bjorck-Akesson, E. (Eds.). (1990, August). Methodo-logical issues in research in augmentative and alternative communication [Papers]. Proceedings of the First ISAAC Re-search Symposium in Augmentative and Alternative Commu-nication. Toronto: ISAAC.
   Google Scholar
• Broehl, D. (1990). Hear our voices-An empowerment initiative. Communication Outlook, 12, 12–13.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, C. (1954). My left foot. London: Secker and Warbug. Bruno, J., & Sauer, M. (1992). AAC services: Impact of the service elivery model [Abstract]. Augmentative and Alternative Com- munication, 8, 120.
   Google Scholar
• Bulwer, J. B. (1644). The natural language of the hand. London: R. Whitaker.
   Google Scholar
• Bunnell, H. T., Polikoff, J., Peters, S., Kadambe, S., & Mineo, B. (1992). Progress in computer enhancement of dysarthric speech [Abstract]. Augmentative and Alternative Communica-tion, 8, 121.
   Google Scholar
• Burrows, N. L., & Lloyd, L. L. (1972). Programming consid-erations for the deaf-retarded. Report of the Proceedings of the 45th Meeting of the Convention of American Instructors of the Deaf. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Buzolich, J. M., King, J. S., & Baroody, S. M. (1991). Acquisition of the commenting function among system users. Augmenta-tive and Alternative Communication, 7,88–99.
   Google Scholar
• Calculator, S. (1988). Promoting the acquisition and generaliza-tion of conversational skills by individuals with severe disabili-ties. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2, 94–103.
   Google Scholar
• Calculator, S. N. (1992a). Facilitated communication: Calculator responds. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 1(2), 23–24.
   Google Scholar
• Calculator, S. N. (1992b). Perhaps the emperor has clothes after all: A response to Biklen. American Journal of Speech Lan-guage Pathology, 1(2), 18–20.
   Google Scholar
• Calculator, S. N., & Jorgensen, C. (1991). Integrating AAC in-struction into regular education settings: Expounding on best practices. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 204–214.
   Google Scholar
• Calculator, S. N., & Singer, K. (1992). Letter to the editor: Pre-liminary validation of facilitated communication. Topics in Lan-guage Disorders, 13, ix-xvi.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Rehabilitation Council for the Disabled. (1984). Con-versations with non-speaking people. Toronto: Canadian Re-habilitation Council for the Disabled.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, F. L. (1984). Picsyms categorical dictionary. Lawrence, KS: Baggeboda Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, E. G., Binkoff, J. A., Kologinnsky, E., & Eddy, E. (1978). Acquisition of sign language by autistic children. I. Expressive labelling. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 489–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrier, J. K. (1974). Application of functional analysis to a non-speech response mode to teaching language. In L. V. McReynolds (Ed.), Developing systematic procedures for training children's language (pp. 47-95). Rockville, MD: ASHA Monograph No18a.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll-Thomas, S. (1988). Predictive planning in progressive neurological disease [Abstract]. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 159.
   Google Scholar
• Cerreti, P., Emiliani, L., & Tronconi, A. (1986). Computerized communication aid for Italian motor-disabled people [Ab-stract]. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2, 78.
   Google Scholar
• Charlebois-Marois, C. (1985). Everybody's technology: A sharing of ideas in augmentative communication. Montreal: Charel-coms enr.
   Google Scholar
• Chaves, T., & Solar, J. (1974). Pedro Ponce de Leon: First teacher of the deaf. Sign Language Studies, 5,48–63.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, L. Y. (1968). "Talking hand" for aphasic patients. Geriat-rics, 23, 145–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, C. R., Davies, C. 0., & Woodcock, R. W. (1974). Standard Rebus glossary. Minneapolis, MN: American Guidance Serv-ice.
   Google Scholar
• Clement, M. (1961). Morse code method of communication for the severely handicapped cerebral palsied child. Cerebral Palsy Review, 15–16.
   Google Scholar
• Cody, I. E. (c. 1970). Indian talk: Hand signals of the American Indians. Healdsburg, CA: Naturegraph.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L. K. (1976). Communication aids for the brain damaged adult. Minneapolis, MN: Sister Kenny Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, C. L., Cook, A. M., & Meyers, L. S. (1980). Assessing non-oral clients for assistive communication devices. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 45, 515–526.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coleman, P. P., & Steelman, J. D. (1992). Emergent literacy and AAC users: Research and practice [Abstract]. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 124.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, D. W. (1974). Patient Initiated Light Operated Telecontrol (PILOT). In K. Copeland (Ed.), Aids for the severely handi-capped (pp. 31–41). New York: Grune & Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• Copeland, K. (Ed.). (1974). Aids for the severely handicapped. New York: Grune & Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• Cornforth, A. R., Johnston, K., & Walker, M. (1974). Makaton Vocabulary: Teaching sign language to the deaf mentally handicapped. Apex, 2, 23-24. tion symbol taxonomy. Augmentative and Alternative Commu-nication, 8, 67–74.
   Google Scholar
• Furth, H. G. (1961). A psychologists' view on the slow learning deaf child. Report of the Proceedings of the 40th Meeting of the Convention of American Instructors of the Deaf (pp. 189–196). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Galyas, K., Fant, G., & Hunnicutt, S. (1993). Voice output com-munication aids. Valingby, Sweden: Handikappinstitutet.
   Google Scholar
• Galyas, K., & Hunnicutt, S. (1986). Recent developments with speech synthesis at the Royal Institute of Technology [Ab-stract]. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2, 88.
   Google Scholar
• Galyas, K., Lundman, M., & Lagerman, U. (Eds.). (1982). Kom-munication for gravt talhandikappede. Bromma, Sweden: Hand ikappinstitutet.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, J. (1968). No easy victories. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, R. A., & Gardner, B. T. (1979). Teaching sign language to a chimpanzee. In R. L. Schiefelbusch & J. H. Hollis (Eds.), Language intervention from ape to child (pp. 171-204). Balti-more: University Park Press. (Reprinted from Science, 1969, 165, 664–672.)
   Google Scholar
• Gardner-Bonneau, D. (Ed.). (1992, August). Methodological is-sues in research in augmentative and alternative communica-tion [Papers]. Proceedings of the Second ISAAC Research Symposium in Augmentative and Alternative Communication. Toronto: ISAAC.
   Google Scholar
• Garretson, M. D. (1976). Total communication. In D. R. Frizina (Ed.), A bicentennial monograph on hearing impairment: Trends in the USA (pp. 88–95). Washington, DC: Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, K. L., Beukelman, D. R., & Low-Morrow, D. R. (1989). A comprehensive augmentative communication system for an adult with Broca's aphasia. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5,55–61.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, S., & Kraat, A. (1992). Use of a developmental model of language acquisition: Applications to children using AAC sys-tems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., & Dimino, J. (1993). Visions and revisions: A special education perspective on the whole language controversy. Remedial and Special Education, 14(4), 5–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gertenrich, R. (1966). A simple mouth-held writing device for use with cerebral palsy patients. Mental Retardation, 4, 13–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glass, A., Gazangia, M., & Premack, D. (1975). Artificel language training in global aphasics. Neuropsychologia, 11, 95–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glennen, S. L. (1991). The effect of communication aid charac-teristics on the interaction skills of nonspeaking persons and their adult speaking partners. In Jessica J. Presperin (Ed.), Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of RESNA (pp. 254–256). Washington, DC: RESNA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, H. R., & Fenton, J. (1960). Aphonic communication for those with cerebral palsy: Guide for the development and use of a communication board. New York: United Cerebral Palsy of New York State.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H., & Cameron, H. (1952). New method of communi-cation for the aphasic patient. Arizona Medicine, 8, 17–21.
   Google Scholar
• Goossens', C., & Crain, S. (1985a). Augmentative communica-tion assessment resource. Lake Zurich, IL: Don Johnson De-velopmental Equipment.
   Google Scholar
• Goossens', C., & Crain, S. (1985b). Augmentative communica-tion intervention resource. Lake Zurich, IL: Don Johnson De-velopmental Equipment.
   Google Scholar
• Goossens', C., Crain, S., & Elder, P. (1993). Engineering the preschool environment for interactive symbol communica-tion: 18 months to 5 years developmentally. Birmingham, AL: Southeast Augmentative Communication Conference Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Goossens', C., Crain, S., & Elder, P. (in press a). Communica-tions displays for engineered preschool environments. Bir-mingham, AL: Southeast Augmentative Communication Conference Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Goossens', C., Crain, S., & Elder, P. (in press b). Engineering daily living and vocational training environments for interactive symbol communication with adolescents and adults who are moderately to severely developmentally delayed. Birmingham, AL: Southeast Augmentative Communication Conference Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gorga, D. (1989). Occupational therapy treatment practices with infants in early intervention. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 43, 733.
   Google Scholar
• Granstrom, M., & Sjoberg, I. (1982). The Swedish Institute for the Handicapped and its role in the provision of technical aids. Bromma, Sweden: The Swedish Institute for the Handicapped.
   Google Scholar
• Green, G. (1993, May/June). Q & A: What is the balance of proof for or against facilitated communication? AAMR News & Notes, 6(3), 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Greenfield, J. (1978). A place for Noah. New York: Holt, Rine-hart.
   Google Scholar
• Greenfield, J. (1979). A child called Noah. New York: Washington State Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grove, N., & Walker, M. (1990). The Makaton Vocabulary: Using manual signs and graphic symbols to develop interpersonal communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communica-tion, 6,15–28.
   Google Scholar
• Guess, D., Sailor, W., & Baer, D. (1976a). Functional speech and language training for the severely handicapped. Part 1: Per-sons and things. Lawrence, KS: H & H Enterprises.
   Google Scholar
• Guess, D., Sailor, W., & Baer, D. (1976b). Functional speech and language training for the severely handicapped. Part 2: Ac-tions with persons and things. Lawrence, KS: H & H Enter-prises.
   Google Scholar
• Gustason, G., Pfetzing, D., & Zawolkow, E. (1972). Signing exact English. Roosmoor, CA: Modern Signs Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S., & Conn, T. (1972). Current trends in services for the deaf retarded in schools for the deaf and residential facilities for the mentally retarded. Report of the Proceedings of the 46th Meeting of the Convention of the American Instructors of the Deaf. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S., & Talkington, L. (1970). Evaluation of a manual approach to programming for deaf retarded. American Journal on Mental Deficiency, 75,378–380.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hall, S., & Talkington, L. (1972). The Redwood Project. Training School Bulletin, 69, 10–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Halsey, W. D., & Friedman, E. (1985). Collier's Encyclopedia, 22, 408–409.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, J. C. (1983). Cerebral palsy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Pren-tice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Harrington, K., & Harrington, R. (1991). Living: Leaving home. Communicating Together, 9,8–9.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, D. (1974). Designing a developmentally structured com-munication system for non-vocal persons. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association on Mental Deficiency, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Harris-Vanderheiden, D., & Vanderheiden, G. (1977). Basic con-siderations in the development of communicative and interac-tive skills for non-vocal severely handicapped children. In E. Sontag, J. Smith, & N. Certo (Eds.), Educational programming for the severely and profoundly handicapped (pp. 335–358). Reston, VA: Division on Mental Retardation, Council for Ex-ceptional Children.
   Google Scholar
• Hebbeler, K. M., Smith, B. J., & Black, T. L. (1991). Federal early childhood specialized policy: A model for the improvement of services for children with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 58, 104–112.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heckathorne, C. W., Voda, J. A., & Leibowitz, L. J. (1987). Design rationale and evaluation of the portable anticipatory communi-cation aid-PACA. Augmentative and Alternative Communica-tion, 3,170–180.
   Google Scholar
• Hehner, B. (1980). Blissymbols for use. Toronto: Blissymbolics Communication Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., Mathy-Laikko, P., & Yoder, D. E. (1988). Studying conversations of augmentative communication us-ers. In L. Bernstein (Ed.), The vocally impaired: Clinical prac-tice and research (pp. 265–294). New York: Grune & Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, D., & Leary, M. (1993). Movement disturbance: A clue to hidden competency in autism and related disorders. Madison, WI: DRI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsh, I. J. (1952). The measurement of hearing. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Hixon, J., & Hardy, J. (1964). Restricted mobility of the speech articulators in cerebral palsy. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 29, 293–306.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoffmeister, R., & Farmer, A. (1972). The development of manual sign language in mentally retarded deaf individuals. Journal of Rehabilitation of the Deaf, 6,19–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofman, A. (1982). The many faces of funding. Mill Valley, CA: Phonic Ear.
   Google Scholar
• Holzman, L. H. (1982). The politics of autism: A socio-historical view. Topics in Language Disorders, 3,64–71.
   Google Scholar
• Honsinger, M. (1989). Midcourse intervention in multiple sclero-sis: An inpatient model. Augmentative and Alternative Com-munication, 5,71–73.
   Google Scholar
• Honsinger, M., Yorkston, K., & Dowden, P. (1987). Communica-tion options for intubated patients. Respiratory Management, 17, 45–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoolihan, C. (1984). Too little, too soon: The literature of deaf education in 17th century Britain (Part 1). Volta Review, 86, 347–353.
   Google Scholar
• Hoolihan, C. (1985). Too little, too soon: The history of deaf education in 17th century Britain (Part 2). Volta Review, 87, 28–44.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, A., Melita, B., & Arnold, N. (1993). Brief report: A case study assessing the validity of facilitated communication. Jour-nal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 23(91), 165–173.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huer, M. B., & Lloyd, L. L. (1988). Perspectives of AAC users. Communication Outlook, 9(2), 10–18.
   Google Scholar
• Iacono, T. A. (1992). Individual language learning style and AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 33–40.
   Google Scholar
• International Project on Communication Aids for the Speech Im-paired (IPCAS). (1984). Conversations with nonspeaking peo-ple. Toronto: Canadian Rehabilitation Council for the Disabled.
   Google Scholar
• ISAAC Bulletin. (1992, August). Norwegian support for AAC in Egypt. The ISAAC Bulletin, 30, 1.
   Google Scholar
• ISAAC Bulletin. (1992, May). Finland University trains special ed. students from Africa in AAC. The ISAAC Bulletin, 29, 3. ISAAC Committee on Developing Countries. (1993). The ISAAC Bulletin, 34, 3.
   Google Scholar
• ISAAC Developing Countries Committee. (1990). Report from the ISAAC Developing Countries Committee. The ISAAC Bulletin, 32, 2.
   Google Scholar
• James, W. C. (1963). Mentally retarded deaf children in a Cali-fornia state hospital. In Report of the Proceedings of the International Congress on Education of the Deaf and the Forty-First Meeting of the Convention of American Instructors of the Deaf (pp. 573–577). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Johannsen-Horbach, H., Cegla, B., Mager, V., & Schempp, B. (1985). Treatment of global aphasia with a nonverbal commu-nication system. Brain and Language, 24, 74–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, H., & Bloomberg, K. (1986). Severe communication impairment in Victoria, Australia [Abstract]. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2, 93.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. (1981). The picture communication symbols. Selena Beach, CA: Mayer-Johnson.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. (1985). The picture communication symbols: Book IL Selena Beach, CA: Mayer-Johnson.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. K. (1963). The institutionalized mentally retarded deaf. In Report of the Proceedings of the International Con-gress on Education of the Deaf and the Forty-First Meeting of the Convention of American Instructors of the Deaf (pp. 568–573). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, K., & Cregan, A. (1986). Sign and symbol communication for mentally handicapped people. Beckenham, England: Groom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. (1961). Electrical communication devices. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 15, 110–111.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jordan, E., Gustason, G., & Rosen, R. (1976). Current commu-nication trends and programs for the deaf. American Annals of the Deaf 121, 527–532.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kamphuis, H. (1990). Enhancing communication rate: Two input systems for augmentative communication aids [Abstract]. Aug-mentative and Alternative Communication, 6,95.
   Google Scholar
• Kangas, K. A. (1991). Relationship of communication speed rate to the perceived competence of high school AAC users. Un-published doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, West La-fayette, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Kangas, K., & Lloyd, L. (1988). Early cognitive skills as prereq-uisites to AAC use: What are we waiting for? Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3,211–221.
   Google Scholar
• Kapoor, H. (1990, Fall). High quality speech for laryngectomized persons. Communication Outlook, 12, 16–20.
   Google Scholar
• Kates, B., & McNaughton, S. (1975). The first application of Blissymbolics as a communication medium for non-speaking children, 1971-1974. Toronto: Blissymbolics Communication Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, B. (1976). Son-Rise. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Kaul, S. (1990). Sounds of silence. Communication Outlook, 11(3), 6–9.
   Google Scholar
• Kavanaugh, R. N., Holmlund, B. A., & Krause, A. E. (1966, September). Communications systems for the physically handicapped. Digest of the Canadian Medical and Biological Engineering Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Kiernan, C., Reid, B., & Jones, L. (1982). Signs and symbols: A review of literature and survey of the use of non-vocal commu-nication. London: Heinemann Educational Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kissick, L. (1984). Communication devices and an enriched life: An autobiography. The Exceptional Parent, 14, 9–14.
   Google Scholar
• Kissick, L. (1987a). Spotlight: Entrepreneur with a heart. The Disabled Challenger, 2, 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Kissick, L. (1987b). The disabled challenger newsletter. Minnea-polis, MN: Kissick's Consultants.
   Google Scholar
• Kladde, A. G. (1974). Nonoral communication techniques: Project summary #1, August 1967. In Beverly Vicker (Ed.), Nonoral Communication System project 1964/1973 (pp. 57–104). Iowa City: Campus Stores.
   Google Scholar
• Kojima, T., lwatate, S., Hayashi, K., & Matsumoto, Y. (1988). Application of Japanese-based graphic symbols system with a nonspeaking boy [Abstract]. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 143.
   Google Scholar
• Konstantareas, M. M., Oxman, J., & Webster, C. D. (1977). Simultaneous communication with autistic and other severely dysfunctional children. Journal of Communicative Disorders, 10, 267–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konstantareas, M. M., Webster, C. D., & Oxman, J. (1979). Manual language acquisition and its influence on other areas of functioning in four autistic and autistic-like children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 20, 337–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopchick, G., & Lloyd, L. (1976). Total communication program-ming for the severely language impaired: A 24-hour approach. In L. L. Lloyd (Ed.), Communication assessment and interven- tion strategies (pp. 501–521). Baltimore: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koppenhaver, D. A. (1991). The implications of emergent literacy research for children with developmental disabilities. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 1, 38–44.
   Google Scholar
• Koppenhaver, D. A., Evans, D. A., & Yoder, D. E. (1991). Child-hood reading and writing experiences of literate adults with severe speech and motor impairments. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7,20–33.
   Google Scholar
• Koppenhaver, D. A., Hedrick, W. B., Abraham, L. M., & Yoder, D. E. (1992). Social and academic organization of literacy lessons for AAC users [Abstract]. Augmentative and Alternative Com-munication, 8, 144.
   Google Scholar
• Koppenhaver, D., & Yoder, D. (1992). Literacy issues in per-sons with severe speech and physical impairments. In R. Gaylord-Ross (Ed.), Issues and research in special educa-tion (Vol. 2) (pp. 156–201). New York: Teacher's College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koppenhaver, D. A., & Yoder, D. E. (1993). Classroom literacy instruction for children with severe speech and physical impair-ments (SSPI): What is and what might be. Topics in Language Disorders, 13, 1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostraba, J., Sauer, M., Brown, C., Frische, E., & Wyatt, C. (1992). Research on the efficacy of eyegaze/headpointing technology and mental retardation [Abstract]. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 144.
   Google Scholar
• Kraat, A. (1985). Communication interaction between aided and natural speakers: A state of the art report and appendi-ces. Toronto: Canadian Rehabilitation Council for the Dis-abled.
   Google Scholar
• Kraat, A. (1993). ISAAC's voices grow louder and stronger. The ISAAC Bulletin, 29, 10–11.
   Google Scholar
• Lagerwall, T. (1991). International agencies in development co-operation. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 139–141.
   Google Scholar
• Leshin, G. J. (1961). The slow-learning deaf child. In Report of the Proceedings of the Fortieth Meeting of the Convention of the American Instructors of the Deaf (pp. 197–203). Washing-ton, DC: US Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, R. (Ed.). (1967). A Plato reader. Boston: Houghton-Mif-flin.
   Google Scholar
• Licklider, J. C. R., & Miller, G. A. (1951). The perception of speech. In S. S. Stevens (Ed.), Handbook of experimental psychology (pp. 1040–1074). New York: J. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1988). Interaction involving individuals using augmen-tative and alternative communication systems: State of the art and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Commu-nication, 2, 66–82.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Beesley, M., & Collier, B. (1988). Transition through multiple augmentative and alternative communication sys-tems: A three-year case study of a head injured adolescent. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 2–14.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & Binger, C. (1992). Story reading experiences of preschoolers using AAC systems [Abstract]. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 148.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Datillo, J., English, J., Guitierrez, L., & Hartz, J. (1992). Instructing facilitators to support the communication of people who use augmentative communication systems. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35,865–875.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Light, J., & Lindsay, P. (1991). Cognitive science and augmenta-tive and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alter-native Communication, 7, 186–203.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, P. H., Cambria, R. J., & McNaughton, S. (1986). The educational needs of nonspeaking students and their teachers or primary caregivers [Abstract]. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2, 97–98.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, P. H., McNaughton S., Vanderheiden, M., Ellis, V., Krogh, K., & McNamara, A. (1992). A model of literacy acquisition in the AAC user [Abstract]. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 148–149.
   Google Scholar
• Llewellyn-Jones, M. (1983). Signed reading project-Computer programme (Unpublished report). Nottingham, England: Ar-nold Derrymount School.
   Google Scholar
• Llewellyn-Jones, M. (1984). Computer-program-HANDS (Unpub-lished progress report). Nottingham, England: Arnold Derry-mount School.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. (1980). Unaided nonspeech communication for severely handicapped individuals: An extensive bibliography. Educa-tion and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 15, 15–34.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. (1986). Editorial. Augmentative and Alternative Commu-nication, 2, 67–68.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L. (Ed.). (1976). Communication assessment and inter-vention strategies. Baltimore: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L. (1985). Comments on terminology. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1, 95–97.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L., & Fuller, D. R. (1986). Toward an augmentative and alternative communication symbol taxonomy: A proposed su-perordinate classification. Augmentative and Alternative Com-munication, 2(4), 165–171.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L., & Kangas, K. A. (1988). Unaided and aided alterna-tive and augmentative communication. In D. E. Yoder & R. D. Kent (Eds.), Decision making in speech-language pathology (pp. 78–81). Toronto: BC Decker.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L., & Karlan, G. R. (1984). Nonspeech communication symbols and systems: Where have we been and where are we going? Journal of Mental Deficiency Research, 28, 3–30.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L., & Koul, R. (1992). Survey of course offerings in US colleges and universities. Unpublished data, Purdue Univer-sity, West Lafayette, Indiana.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L., Menyuk, P., Wilbur, R., Hoffmeister, R., & Fristoe, M. (1979, September). Use of signs with retarded persons: Re-search, theory and applications. Symposium conducted at the 87th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Asso-ciation, New York City.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L., Quist, R. W., & Windsor, J. (1990). A proposed augmentative and alternative communication model. Augmen-tative and Alternative Communication, 6,172–183.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, P. A., & Mirenda, P. (1992). Roles and responsibilities of special education teachers serving on teams delivering AAC services. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 200–214.
   Google Scholar
• Lorrett, L. (1969). A method of communication for non-speaking severely subnormal children. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 4, 64–66.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lovaas, 0. I. (1966). A program for the establishment of speech in psychotic children. In J. K. Wing (Ed.), Early childhood autism. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lovaas, 0., Berberich, J., Perloff, B., & Schaeffer, B. (1966). Acquisition of imitative speech by schizophrenic children. Sci-ence, 151, 705–707.
   Google Scholar
• Lundman, M. (1978). Technical aids for the speech-impaired: An international survey on research and development projects. Stockholm: The Swedish Institute for the Handicapped.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, S., & Howey, A. (1992). Education in isolation [Ab-stract]. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 150–151.
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, E., & King, G. (1992). Service delivery via electronic mail for individuals with physical disabilities [Abstract]. Aug-mentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 151.
   Google Scholar
• Maling, R. G., & Clarkson, D. C. (1963). Electronic controls for the tetraplegic (POSSUM). Paraplegia, 1, 162–174.
   Google Scholar
• Mallery, G. (1972). Sign language among North American Indi-ans: Compared to that among other people and deaf-mutes. Paris: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Mangan, K. (1963). A state program of services for the mentally retarded deaf child. In Report of the Proceedings of the Inter- national Congress on Education of the Deaf and the Forty-First Meeting of the Convention of American Instructors of the Deaf (565–568). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Matas, J., Mathy-Laikko, P., Beukelman, D., & Legreley, K. (1985). Identifying the nonspeaking population: A demo-graphic study. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1, 17–31.
   Google Scholar
• Mayberry, R. (1976). If a chimp can learn sign language, surely my nonverbal client can, too. Asha, 18, 223–228.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McDonald, E. (1974). Aids for developing language and facilitat-ing communication in nonvocal cerebral palsy children. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association on Mental Deficiency, Toronto, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, E., & Schultz, A. (1973). Communication boards for cerebral palsied children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 38, 73–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McDonald, J., Murphy, N., & Huskey, R. (1972). Language boards: Supplementing oral communication and developing language in clients whose potential for intelligible speech is poor. Scientific exhibit presented at the 47th Annual Conven-tion of the American Speech and Hearing Association, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• McEwen, I., & Lloyd, L. (1990). Some considerations about the motor requirements of manual signs. Augmentative and Alter-native Communication, 6,207–216.
   Google Scholar
• McLean, J., & Snyder-McLean, L. (1978). A transactional ap-proach to early language training. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, D. (1992). Spelling instruction for adults who use AAC [Abstract]. Augmentative and Alternative Communica-tion, 8, 153–154.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, S. (1976). Bliss symbols-An alternate symbol sys-tem for the non-verbal pre-reading child. In G. C. Vander-heiden & K. Grilley (Eds.), Non-vocal communication techniques and aids for the severely physically handicapped (pp. 85–104). Baltimore: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, S. (Ed.). (1985). Communicating with Blissym-bolics. Toronto: Blissymbolic Communication Institute.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, S. (1990). Gaining the most from AAC's growing years. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 6,2–14.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, S. (1993). ISAAC governance and related activi-ties: The 'parenting' of ISAAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9,142–143.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, S., & Kates, B. (1974). Visual symbols: Communi-cation system for the pre-reading physically handicapped child. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association on Mental Deficiency, Toronto, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• McReynolds, L. V., & Kearns, K. P. (1983). Single subject experi-mental designs in communicative disorders. Baltimore: Univer-sity Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, A., & Miller, E. E. (1973). Cognitive development training with elevated boards and sign language. Journal of Autism and Childhood Schizophrenia, 3,65–85.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller, G. A. (1951). Language and communication. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A., Heise, G., & Lichten, W. (1951). The intelligibility of speech as a function of the context of the test materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41, 329–335.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller, J., & Carpenter, C. (1964). Electronics for communication: Approaches to the problem of communication in children with severe cerebral palsy. American Journal of Occupational Ther-apy, 18, 20–23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller, J., & Yoder, D. (1974). An ontogenetic language teaching strategy for retarded children. In R. Schiefelbusch & L. Lloyd (Eds.), Language perspectives- Acquisition, retardation and intervention (pp. 505–528). Baltimore: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mineo, B. (Ed.). (1990, March). Augmentative and alternative communication in the next decade [Papers]. Proceedings of the Visions Conference. Wilmington, Delaware: A. I. duPont Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P. (1992). School to post school transition planning for augmentative and alternative communication users. Seminars in Speech and Language, /3(2), 130–142.
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P., & Beukelman, D. (1990). A comparison of intelligi-bility among the natural speech and seven speech synthesiz-ers with listeners from three age groups. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 6,61–68.
   Google Scholar
• Monfort, M., Rojo, A., & Juarez, A. (1982). Programa elemental de comunicacion bimodel. Madrid: Ciencias de la Educacion Preescolar y Especial.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, J. (1980). To say I am. Mendocino, CA: Lawren Productions.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, S. (1990). British Telecommunications, Inc. helps the multiply handicapped. Communication Outlook, 1, 10–11.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, S., Donova, B., Hudson, A., Dykstra, J., & Lawrence, J. (1993). Evaluation of facilitated communication: Eight case studies. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, D., Collett, P., Marsh, P., & O'Shaughnessy, M. (1979). Gestures: Their origins and distributions. London: Jonathan Cape.
   Google Scholar
• Mulick, J. A. (1993, May/June). Q & A: What is the balance of proof for or against facilitated communication? AAMR News & Notes, 6(3), 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, A. (1987). Reflections. Communicating Together, 5, 7. Musselwhite, C., & St. Louis, K. (1982). Communication program- ming for the severely handicapped: Vocal and non-vocal strategies. San Diego, CA: College Hill Press.
   Google Scholar
• Musselwhite, C., & St. Louis, K. (1988). Communication program-ming for persons with severe handicaps: Vocal and augmen-tative strategies (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: College Hill Press.
   Google Scholar
• Musselwhite, C. R. (1991). Mini-grants and volunteers: Develop-ing support for augmentative communication programs. Bir-mingham, AL: Southeast Augmentative Communication Conference Publications.
   Google Scholar
• NASBE Study Group on Special Education. (1992). Winners all: A call for inclusive schools. Alexandria, VA: National Associa-tion of State Boards of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Nathanson, J. H. (Ed.). (1991). Issues in international rehabilita-tion. OSERS News in Print, 4(2).
   Google Scholar
• National Joint Committee for the Communication Needs of Per-sons with Severe Disabilities. (1992). Guidelines for meeting the communication needs of persons with severe disabilities. Asha, 34 (Suppl. 7), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, A. F. (1974). The talking brooch: A communication aid. In K. Copeland (Ed.), Aids for the severely handicapped. London: Sector Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, A. F., & Nabaui, C. D. (1969). VOTEM: The voice oper-ated typewriter emploting Morse code. Journal of Scientific Instruments, Series 2,2,104–108.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, J. A., & Damico, J. S. (1990). Whole language in theory and practice: Implications for language intervention. Lan-guage, Speech, & Hearing Services in the Schools, 21, 212–220.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, L., Parnes, P., Boschen, K., & Schuller, R. (1992). Evalu-ation of a new approach to augmentative communication serv-ice delivery [Abstract]. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 158.
   Google Scholar
• Nova. (1980). Finding a voice [Film]. Paramis, NJ: WGBH Edu-cational Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Paget, R. (1951). The new sign language. London: The Welcome Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Parnes, P. (1989, November). Augmentative communication services: An organizational model. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, St. Louis, MO.
   Google Scholar
• Patson, P. (1993). AAC-Communication colonization? Communi-cation Outlook, /5(2), 14–16.
   Google Scholar
• Perron, J. V. (1965). Typewriter control for an aphasic quadraple-gic patient. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 92, 557–559.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Phillips, V., & McCullough, L. (1990). Consultation-based pro-gramming: Instituting the collaboration ethic in schools. Excep-tional Children, 56,291–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poock, G. K., Blackstone, S. W., & Berg, M. H. (1992). Measuring the effectiveness of communication displays: Information the-ory and multiattribute analysis [Abstract]. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 162.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, R. K., Kopp, G. A., & Green, H. C. (1947). Visible speech. New York: Van Nostrand.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, R. K., & Peterson, G. E. (1948). The representation of vowels and their movements. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 20, 528–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Premack, D. (1971). Language in chimpanzees? Science, 172, 808–822.
   Google Scholar
• Premack, D., & Premack, A. (1974). Teaching visual language to apes and language-deficient persons. In R. L. Schiefelbusch & L. Lloyd (Eds.), Language perspectives: Acquisition, retar-dation and intervention (pp. 347–375). Baltimore: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pressman, D. E. (Ed.). (in press). Handbook of augmentative communication. Stoneham, MA: Andover Medical Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Rabine, R. (1985). Six parts love: A family's battle with Lou Gehrig's disease. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Raghavendra, P., Rosengren, E., & Hunnicutt, S. (1992). Multi-Talk II: An evaluation of the updated VOCA from Sweden [Abstract]. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 162.
   Google Scholar
• Reichle, J., & Karlan, G. (1987). Decision rules for the adoption of augmentative techniques. In R. Schiefelbusch & L. Lloyd (Eds.), Language perspectives II (pp. 321–339). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Reichle, J., & Yoder, D. (1985). Communication board use in severely handicapped learners: A critique of decision rules. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in the Schools, 16, 146–157.
   Google Scholar
• Reichle, J., York, J., & Sigafoos, J. (1991). Communication pro-gramming for persons with severe handicaps: Vocal and aug-mentative strategies. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Remington, B., & Clark, S. (1993a). Simultaneous communication and speech comprehension, part I: Comparison of two meth-ods of teaching expressive signing and speech comprehen-sion. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9,36–48.
   Google Scholar
• Remington, B., & Clark, S. (1993b). Simultaneous communication and speech comprehension, part II: Comparison of two methods of overcoming selective attention during expressive sign train-ing. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9,49–60.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, J.K. (1992). An augmentative telephone booth: Obser-vance of the first year of service [Abstract]. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 163.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., & Sevcik, R. (1988). Augmentative and alternative communication systems: Considerations for individuals with severe intellectual disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2, 83–93.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., Sevcik, R., & Pate, J. (1988). The establishment of symbolic communication in persons with severe mental retardation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 53, 97–107.
   Google Scholar
• Rosch, W. (1989). The evolution of the PC microprocessor. PC Magazine, 8, 96–97.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, 0. Z. (1965). Technical note: A communication system for the handicapped. Medical Electronic and Biological Engineer-ing: Vol. 3 (pp. 427–429). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rumbaugh, D. M. ( 1977). Language learning by a chimpanzee: The Lana Project. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rumbaugh, D., Gill, T. V., & von Glasserfield, E. C. (1973). A rejoinder to language in man, monkeys and machine. Science, 185, 871–872.
   Google Scholar
• Sabin, L. A., & Donnellan, A. M. (1993). A qualitative study of the process of facilitated communication. Journal of the Associa-tion for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 18, 200–211.
   Google Scholar
• Sailor, W., Anderson, J. L., Halvorsen, A. T., Doering, K., Filler, J., & Goetz, L. (1989). The comprehensive local school: Regu-lar education for all students with disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Santayana, G. (1905–1906). The life of reason. New York: Char-les Scribner's Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Savage, R. D., Evans, L., & Savage, J. F. (1981). Psychology and communication in deaf children. Sydney: Grune & Stratton. Sayre, J. (1963). Communication for the non-verbal cerebral palsied. Cerebral Palsy Review, 24, 3–8.
   Google Scholar
• Schaeffer, B., Kolinzas, G., Musil, A., & McDowell, P. (1977). Spontaneous verbal language for autistic children through signed speech. Sign Language Studies, 17, 287–328.
   Google Scholar
• Schaeffer, B., Musil, A., & Kolinzas, G. (1980). Total communica-tion: A signed speech program for nonverbal children. Cham-paign, IL: Research Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scheerenberger, R. C. (1987). A history of mental retardation: A quarter century of promise. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes. Schiefelbusch, R. A. (Ed.). (1977). Nonspeech language inter- vention strategies. Baltimore: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schiefelbusch, R. L. (Ed.). (1980). Non-speech language and communication: Analysis and intervention. Baltimore: Univer-sity Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schiefelbusch, R. L., & Lloyd, L. L. (Eds.). (1974). Language perspectives: Acquisition, retardation and intervention. Balti-more: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W. (1991). Professional credit from a student perspective: Expanding on Beukelman. Augmentative and Al-ternative Communication, 7,221–223.
   Google Scholar
• Schubert, A. (1993, May/June). Q & A: What is the balance of proof for or against facilitated communication? AAMR News & Notes, 6(3), 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Schumacher, J., & Rosenbek, J. (1986). Behavioral treatment of dysarthria: Further investigation of aided speech. Asha, 28, 145.
   Google Scholar
• Schure, A. (1961). Basic transistor. New York: J. F. Rider. Segalman, R. (1992). Speech interpreters for dysarthric speak- ers: Function, protocol, selection and training [Abstract]. Aug- mentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 166.
   Google Scholar
• Seligman-Wine, J. (1988). Developing countries: Ongoing dia-logue. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1, 52–53.
   Google Scholar
• Shane, H. C. (1993). F.C. facilitated or 'factitious' communica-tion. Communicating Together, 11(2), 11–13.
   Google Scholar
• Shane, H. C., & Bashir, A. S. (1980). Election criteria for the adoption of an augmentative communication system: Prelimi-nary considerations. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disor-ders, 45, 408–414.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shane, H. C., & Sauer, M. (1986). Augmentative and alternative communication. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Shane, H. C., & Wilbur, R. (1989, November). A conceptual framework for an AAC strategy based on sign language pa-rameters. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, St. Louis, MO.
   Google Scholar
• Shuk-Kuen, T. (1987). Rehabilitation technology in Hong Kong. Communication Outlook, 4, 10.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, G. (1963). Adult verbal behavior in "play therapy" ses-sions with retarded children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, Monograph Supplement 10, 34–38.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, F. (1980). Communication for the speechless. Engle-wood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, F. (1989). Communication for the speechless (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, H., McNaughton, S., & Kates, B. (1978). Handbook of Blissymbolics. Toronto: Blissymbolics Communication Insti-tute.
   Google Scholar
• Sitver, M., & Kraat, A. (1982). Augmentative communication for the person with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Asha, 24, 783. Skelly, M. (1977). Amerind clarified. Asha, 19, 746–747.
   Google Scholar
• Skelly, M. (1979). Amer-Ind gestural code based on universal American Indian Hand Talk. New York: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Skelly, M., Schinsky, L., Smith, R., Donaldson, R., & Griffen, J. (1975). American Indian Sign: A gestural communication sys-tem for the speechless. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 56, 156–160.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skelly, M., Schinsky, L., Smith, R., & Fust, R. (1974). American Indian Sign (AMERIND) as a facilitator of verbalization for the oral verbal apraxic. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 39,445–456.
   Google Scholar
• Sklar, M., & Bennett, D. (1956). Initial communication chart for aphasics. Journal of the Association of Physical and Mental Rehabilitation, 10, 43–53.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. D., & Belcher, R. G. (1993). Brief report: Facilitated communication with adults with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 23(1), 175–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. M. (1992a). Spelling abilities of nonspeaking students [Abstract]. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 168.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. M. (1992b). Reading abilities of nonspeaking students: Two case studies. Augmentative and Alternative Communica-tion, 8, 57–66
   Google Scholar
• Soede, M., Stassen, H. G., Lunteren, A. V., & Luitse, W. J. (1974). A lightspot-operated typewriter (LOT). In K. Copeland (Ed.), Aids for the severely handicapped (pp. 42–53). New York: Grune & Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• Sonnenmeier, R. (1993). Co-construction of messages during facilitated communication. Facilitated Communication Digest, 1(2), 7–9.
   Google Scholar
• Soto, G. (1992). A semiotic approach to AAC [Abstract]. Augmen-tative and Alternative Communication, 8, 155.
   Google Scholar
• Soto, G., & Olmstead, W. (1993). A semiotic perspective for AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9,134–141.
   Google Scholar
• Stainback, S., Stainback, W., & Forest, M. (1989). Educating all students in the mainstream of education. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Stainback, W., & Stainback, S. (1990). (Eds.). Supportive net-works for inclusive schooling: Interdependent integrated edu-cation. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Steele, R., Weinrich, R., Wertz, R., Kleczewska, M., & Carlson, G. (1989). Computer-based visual communication in aphasia. Neuropsychologia, 27, 409–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokoe, W. (1960). Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication system of the American deaf Washing-ton, DC: Galludet College.
   Google Scholar
• Swiffin, A. L., Arnott, J. L., Pickering, A., & Newell, A. F. (1987). Adaptive and predictive techniques in a communication pros-thesis. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3,181–191.
   Google Scholar
• Szempruch, J., & Jacobson, J. W. (1993). Evaluating facilitated communications of people with developmental disabilities. Re-search in Developmental Disabilities, 14, 253–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tambay, M. (1992). Happy talking: Communication for nonspeak-ing children and parents. Calcutta, India: Spastic Society of Eastern India.
   Google Scholar
• Task Force on Clinical Standards, American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1993). Preferred practice patterns for the profession of speech language pathology and audiology: 30.3 Augmentative and alternative communication assess-ment. Asha, 35 (Suppl. 11), 61–62.
   Google Scholar
• Tindal, G., Shinn, M. R., & Rodden-Nord, K. (1990). Contextually based school consultation: Influential variables. Exceptional Children, 56,324–336.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, G. A. (1992). Synthesis of foreign language vocabularies at ADAM LAB [Abstract]. Augmentative and Alternative Com-munication, 8, 174.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (1971). Declaration of general and special rights of the mentally retarded. New York: Author.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Education. (1978). First annual report to Con-gress on the implementation of Public Law 94–142: The Edu-cation for All Handicapped Children Act. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Van Balkom, H., & Donker-Gimbrere, M. W. (1988). Kiezen voor communicatie: Een handboek over communica tie van mensen met een motorische of meervoudige handicap [Choosing for communication: A handbook about the communication of mo-toric and multiple handicapped children]. Nijkerk: Uitgeverij Intro.
   Google Scholar
• Van Biervliet, A., & Parette, H. P. (1992). Preliminary examina-tion of rate enhancement techniques for graphic-based AAC aids [Abstract]. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 174.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden, G. (1974). Communication aids for the non-vocal physically handicapped. Paper presented at the annual con-vention of the American Association on Mental Deficiency, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden, G., & Harris-Vanderheiden, D. (1976). Communi-cation techniques and aids for the nonvocal severely handi-capped. In L. L. Lloyd (Ed.), Communication assessment and intervention strategies (pp. 607–652). Baltimore: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden, G. C. (Ed.). (1978a). Non-vocal communication resource book. Baltimore: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden, G. C. (1978b). Technically speaking. Communi-cation Outlook, 1, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden, G. C. (1984). Technology needs of individuals with communication impairments. Seminars in Speech and Language, 5,59–67.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden, G. C. (1991). Technology in developing countries. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7,142-143. Vanderheiden, G. C. (1993). Personal communication.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden, G. C., & Grilley, K. (1976). Non-vocal communi-cation techniques and aids for the severely physically handi-capped. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden, G. C., & Kelso, D. P. (1987). Comparative analysis of fixed-vocabulary communication acceleration techniques. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3,196–206.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden, G. C., & Lloyd, L. L. (1986). Communication systems and their components. In S. W. Blackstone (Ed.), Augmentative communication: An introduction (pp. 49–161). Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Associa-tion.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden, G. C., & Luster, M. J. (1976). Communication techniques and aids to assist in the education of non-vocal physically handicapped children: A state-of-the-art review. Madison, WI: Trace Research and Development Center for the Severely Communicatively Handicapped, University of Wis-consin.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden, G. C., & Mendenhall, J. (1993a). Analyzing virtual reality applications as they relate to disability access. Madison, WI: Trace Research and Development Center.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden, G. C., & Mendenhall, J. (1993b). Use of a two class model to analyze applications and barriers to the use of virtual reality by people with disabilities. Madison, WI: Trace Research and Development Center.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden, G. C., & Smith, R. 0. (1989). Application of com-munication technologies to an adult with high spinal cord in-jury. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5,62–66.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden, G. C., & Yoder, D. E. (1986). Overview. In S. W. Blackstone (Ed.), Augmentative communication: An introduc-tion (pp. 1–28). Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hook, K., & Stohr, P. (1973). The development of manual communication in a profoundly retarded hearing population. Asha, 15, 437.
   Google Scholar
• Vernon, M. (1972). Mind over mouth: A rationale for "total com-munication." Volta Review, 74, 529–540.
   Google Scholar
• Vicker, B. (Ed.). (1974). Nonoral Communication System Project 1964/1973. Iowa City, IA: Campus Stores.
   Google Scholar
• Waldo, A. L. (1978). Sacajawea. New York: Avon Publisher. Waller, A., & Van Der Walt, R. (1988). "Interface": The first five years [Abstract]. Augmentative and Alternative Communica- tion, 4, 150.
   Google Scholar
• Wampler, D. (1971). Linguistics of visual English. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, M., & Llewellyn-Jones, M. (1984a). Teachers handbook: Hands on. Nottingham, England: Signit Project, Arnold Derry-mount School.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, M., & Llewellyn-Jones, M. (1984b). User manual: Hands on. Nottingham, England: Signit Project, Arnold Derrymount School.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, M. (1973). An experimental evaluation of the success of a system of communication for the deaf mentally handicapped. Unpublished master's thesis, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, M. (1987). The Makaton Vocabulary: Uses and effective-ness. Paper presented at the first International AFASIC sym-posium, University of Reading, England.
   Google Scholar
• Wasson, P., Tynan, T., & Gardiner, P. (1982). Test adaptations for the handicapped. San Antonio, TX: Education Service Center, Region 20.
   Google Scholar
• Wehman, P. (1993). (Ed.). The ADA demand for social change. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Weinrich, R., Steele, R., Carlson, G., Kleczewska, R., & Baker, E. (1989a). Processing of visual syntax in a globally aphasic patient. Brain and Language, 36,391–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinrich, M., Steele, R., Carlson, G., Kleczewska, M., Baker, E., & Worta, R. (1989b). Representations of verbs in a computer-ized visual communication system. Aphasiology, 3,501–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler, D. L., Jacobson, J. W., Paglieri, R. A., & Schwartz, A. A. (1993). An experimental assessment of facilitated commu-nication. Mental Retardation, 31, 49–60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Windsor, J., & Lloyd, L. (1987). Core (or basic) references on augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3, 102–111.
   Google Scholar
• Yorkston, K., Beukelman, D., & Bell, K. (1988). Clinical manage-ment of dysarthric speakers. San Diego, CA: College Hill Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yorkston, K., & Dowden, P. (1983). Nonspeech language and communication systems. In A. Holland (Ed.), Language disor-ders in adults: Recent advances (pp. 283–312). San Diego, CA: College Hill Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yorkston, K. M. (1989). Early intervention in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A case presentation. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5,67–70.
   Google Scholar
• Yorkston, K. M. (1992). Augmentative communication in the medical setting. Tucson, AZ: Communication Skill Builders.
   Google Scholar
• Zangari, C., Kangas, K., & Lloyd, L. (1988). Augmentative and alternative communication: A field in transition. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2, 60–65.
   Google Scholar