Empowering system users in peer training

References

• Balkom, H., & Heim, M. (1990). Challenges in conducting obser-vational research to address interactional issues in the AAC field. In J. Brodin & E. Bjorck-Akesson (Eds.), Methodological issues in research in augmentative and alternative communi-cation (pp. 36–56). Stockholm: The Swedish Handicap Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. (1992). Augmentative and alter-native communication: Management of severe communication disorders in children and adults. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., & Yorkston, K. (1980). Nonvocal communication: Performance evaluation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 61, 272–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau, A. (1986). Communication in the back-channel: Social structural analyses of nonspeech/speech conversations. Un-published doctoral dissertation, City University of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Buzolich, M. J. (1984). Interaction analyses of augmented and normal adult communicators (Doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Francisco, November, 1983). University Microfilms International, Publication #82-03,722.
   Google Scholar
• Buzolich, M. J., & Wiemann, J. M. (1988). Turn taking in atypical conversations: The case of the speaker/augmented-communi-cator dyad. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 31, 3–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Calculator, S., & Dollaghan, C. (1982). The use of communica-tion boards in a residential setting: An evaluation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 281–287.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Calculator, S., & Luchko, C. (1983). Evaluating the effectiveness of a communication board training program. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 48, 185–191.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Colquhoun, A. (1982, November). Augmentative communication systems: The interaction process. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Speech-Language-Hear-ing Association, Toronto, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Corsaro, W. A. (1979). Sociolinguistic patterns in adult-child interaction. In E. Ochs & B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (pp. 373–390). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Culp, D. (1982). Communication interactions of non-speaking chil-dren using augmentative systems. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Culp, D., & Carlisle, M. (1988). PACT: Partners in augmentative communication training. Tucson, AZ: Communication Skill Builders.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, S. (1972). Some signals and rules for taking speaking turns in conversations. Journal of Personality and Social Psy-chology, 23 (2), 283–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrier, L. D., Yorkston, K. M., Marriner, N., & Beukelman, D. (1985). Conversational control in nonimpaired speakers using an AAC system. Augmentative and Alternative Communica-tion, 1, 65–73.
   Google Scholar
• Garvey, C. (1979). Contingent queries and their relations in discourse. In E. Ochs & B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (pp. 363–369). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, D. (1982). Communicative interaction processes involving nonvocal physically handicapped children. Topics in Language Disorders, 2(2), 21–37.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, P., Alwell, M., & Goetz, L. (1991). Interacting with peers through conversation turn-taking with a communication book adaptation. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 117–126.
   Google Scholar
• Kraat, A. W. (1985). Communicative interaction between aided and natural speakers: An IPCAS study report. Toronto: Cana-dian Rehabilitation Council for the Disabled.
   Google Scholar
• Labov, W., & Fanshel, D. (1977). Therapeutic discourse. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1988). Interaction involving individuals using AAC sys-tems: State of the art and future directions for research. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 66–83.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1989). Toward a definition of communicative compe-tence for individuals using AAC systems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5,137–144.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Collier, B., & Parnes, P. (1985). Communicative inter-action between young nonspeaking physically disabled chil-dren and their primary caregivers: Part ll - Communicative functions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1, 98–107.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., McNaughton, D., & Fames, P. (1986). A protocol for the assessment of the communicative interaction skills of non-speaking severely handicapped adults and their facilitators. Toronto: Augmentative Communication Service, Hugh MacMil-lan Medical Centre.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, J., & Gillette, Y. (1986). Ecological communication system (ECO). Columbus, OH: Nisonger Center, Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Manolson, A. (1985). It takes two to talk: A Hanen early language parent book. Toronto: Hanen Early Language Resource Centre.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, D., & Light, J. (1989). Teaching the facilitators to support the communication skills of an adult with severe cog-nitive disabilities: A case study. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5,35–41.
   Google Scholar
• Prutting, C. (1982). Pragmatics as social competence. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 123–133.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rees, N. (1978). Pragmatics of language: Applications to normal and disordered language development. In R.L. Schiefelbusch (Ed.), Bases of language intervention (pp. 191–268). Balti-more: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiemann, J. M. (1977). Explication and test of a model of com-municative competence. Human Communication Research, 3, 195–213.
   Google Scholar