Comparison of two selection techniques used in augmentative and alternative communication

References

• Barlow, D. H., & Hayes, S. C. (1979). Alternating treatments design: One strategy for comparing the effects of two treat-ments in a single subject. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 199–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R., & Mirenda, P. (1992). Augmentative and Alter-native Communication: Management of severe communication disorders in children and adults. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, A., & Coleman, C. (1987). Selecting augmentative commu-nication systems by matching clients' skills and needs to system characteristics. Seminars in Speech and Language, 8, 153–166.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, A., Coleman, C., Preszler, A., & Dahlquist, D. (1983). A hierarchy of augmentative communication system characteris-tics useful for matching devices to clients' needs and skills. In Proceedings from the Sixth Annual Conference on Rehabilita-tion Engineering (pp. 185–186). Bethesda, MD: Rehabilitation Engineering Society of North America.
   Google Scholar
• Fishman, I. (1987). Electronic communication aids: Selection and use. Boston: College Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Foulds, R. (1985). Observations on interfacing in nonvocal com-munication. In: C. Barry & M. Bryne (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Communication Through Technology for the Physically Disabled (pp. 46–51). London: The International Cerebral Palsy Association.
   Google Scholar
• Gunderson, J. (1985). Interfacing the motor impaired for control and communication. In J. Webster, A. Cook, W. Tompkins, & G. Vanderheiden (Eds.), Electronic devices for rehabilitation (pp. 190–229). London: Capman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, D. (1982). Communicative interaction processes involving nonvocal physically handicapped children. Topics in Language Disorders, 2, 21–27.
   Google Scholar
• Lent, J. R., & McLean, B. M. (1976). The trainable retarded: The technology of teaching. In N. G. Haring & R. L. Schiefelbusch (Eds.), Teaching special children (pp. 197–231). New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1988). Interaction involving individuals using augmenta-tive and alternative communication systems: State of the art and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communi-cation, 4, 66–82.
   Google Scholar
• Mathy-Laikko, P., & Yoder, D. (1986). Future needs and direc-tions in augmentative communication. In S. Blackstone & D. Bruskin (Eds.), Augmentative communication: An introduction (pp. 471–494). Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Mizuko, M., & Esser, J. (1991). The effect of direct selection and circular scanning on visual sequential recall. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 43–48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Newborg, J., Stock, J., Wnek, L., Guidubaldi, J., & Svinicki, J. (1984). Battelle Developmental Inventory. Allen, TX: DLM Teaching Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, R., & House, L. (1984). Decision-making processes in aug-mentative communication. Journal of Speech and Hearing Dis-orders, 49(1), 18–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, A. (1994). Comparison of the relative demands implicated in direct selection and scanning: Considerations from normal chil-dren. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10, 67–74.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden, G., & Harris-Vanderheiden, D. (1976). Communi-cation techniques and aids for the non-vocal severely handi-capped. In L. Lloyd (Ed.), Communication assessment and intervention strategies (pp. 607–652). Baltimore: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden, G., & Lloyd, L. (1986). Communication systems and their components. In S. Blackstone & D. Bruskin (Eds.), Augmentative communication: An introduction (pp. 49–162). Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Yoder, D., & Kraat, A. (1983). Intervention issues in nonspeech communication. In J. Miller, D. Yoder, & R. L. Schiefelbusch (Eds.), Contemporary issues in language intervention. ASHA Reports, 12, 27–51. Rockville, MD: American Speech-Lan-guage-Hearing Association.
   Google Scholar