Augmentative and alternative communication in developing countries: challenge of the future

References

• Beukelman, D., & Yorkston, K. (1982). Communication interaction of adult communication augmentation system use. Topics in Language Disorders, 2(2), 39–54.
   Google Scholar
• Bryen, D. N., & Joyce, D. G. (1986). Sign language and the severely handicapped. The Journal of Special Education, 20, 193–194.
   Google Scholar
• Burgemeister, B. B., Blum, L. H., & Lorge, I. (1972). Columbia mental maturity scale (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Buzolich, M. J., & Wiemann, J. M. (1988). Turn taking in atypical conversations: The case of the speaker/augmented-communi-cator dyad. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 31, 3–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Calculator, S. N. (1988). Evaluating the effectiveness of AAC pro-grams for persons with severe handicaps. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 177–179.
   Google Scholar
• Calculator, S., & Luchko, C. D. (1983). Evaluating the effectiveness of a communication board training program. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 48, 185–191.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Culp, D. M. (1989). Developmental apraxia and augmentative or alternative communication: A case example. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5,27–34.
   Google Scholar
• Fried-Oken, M., & Stuart, S. (1992, August). A few selected words about word selection: Vocabulary issues in AAC. Paper pre-sented at Session 5: Vocabulary research in AAC. Second ISAAC Research Symposium in Augmentative and Alternative Communication. Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, J. (1986). Kristi and her talker. The Exceptional Parent, 16, 23–28.
   Google Scholar
• Fishman, S., Timler, G., & Yoder, D. E. (1985). Strategies for the prevention and repair of communication breakdown in interac-tions with communication board users. Augmentative and Alter-native Communication, 1, 38–51.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, E. (1954). Straight language for the deaf Washington, DC: Volta Bureau.
   Google Scholar
• Goossens', C., & Kraat, A. (1985). Technology as a tool for con-versation and language learning for the physically disabled. Topics in Language Disorders, 6(2), 56–70.
   Google Scholar
• Gustason, G., Pfetzing, D., & Zawoklow, E. (1972). Signing exact English. Rossmoor, CA: Modern Signs Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, D. (1982). Communication interaction processes involving nonvocal physically handicapped children. Topics in Language Disorders, 3(1), 21–37.
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, J., & Sebba, J. (1987). Profound retardation and multiple impairment: Vol 1. Development and learning. Rockville, MD: Aspen Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper, J., Connell, T.M., & Flett, P. J. (1987). Blissymbols and manual signs: A multimodal approach to intervention in a case of multiple disability. Augmentative and Alternative Communi-cation, 3,67–76.
   Google Scholar
• Iacono, T., Mirenda, P., & Beukelman, D. (1993). Comparison of unimodal and multimodal AAC techniques for children with intel-lectual disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communica-tion, 9,83–94.
   Google Scholar
• Kretschmer, R. R., & Kretschmer, L. W. (1989). Communication competence: Impact of the pragmatics revolution on education of hearing impaired individuals. Topics in Language Disorders, 9(1), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Kropka, B. I., & Williams, C. (1986). The epidemiology of hearing impairment in people with a mental handicap. In D. Ellis (Ed.), Sensory impairments in mentally handicapped people (pp. 35–60). London: Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Leiter, R. G. (1959). Leiter adult intelligence scale. Chicago: Stoelt-ing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1988). Interaction involving individuals using augmenta-tive and alternative communication: State of the art and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 66–82.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Collier, B., & Fames, P. (1985). Communication interac-tion between young nonspeaking physically disabled children and their primary caregivers: Part II-communicative function. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1, 98–133.
   Google Scholar
• Lossing, C., Yorkston, K., & Beukelman, D. (1985). Communica-tion augmentation systems: Quantification in natural settings. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 66,380–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, A. (1984). Blissymbolics and manual signing-a com-bined approach. Communicating Together, 2(4), 20–21.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, E. T., & Schultz, A. R. (1973). Communication boards for cerebral-palsied children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 38, 73–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McEwen, I. R., & Karlan, G. R. (1990). Case studies: Why and how. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 6,69–75.
   Google Scholar
• Moeller, M. P., Osberger, J. J., & Eccarius, M. (1986). Cognitively based strategies for use with hearing-impaired students with comprehension disorders. Topics in Language Disorders, 6(4), 37–50.
   Google Scholar
• Raven, J. C. (1956). Coloured progressive matrices. London: H. K. Lewis & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Reichle, J., & Ward, M. (1985). Teaching discriminative use of an encoding electronic communication device and Signing Exact English to a moderately handicapped child. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 16, 58–63.
   Google Scholar
• Sobsey, D., & Wolf-Schein, D. G. (1991). Sensory impairments. In F. P. Orelove & D. Sobsey (Eds.), Educating children with mul-tiple disabilities: A transdisciplinary approach (2nd ed., pp. 119–153). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Stremel-Campbell, K. (1982). The development of language in the mentally retarded hearing-impaired child: Instructional meth-ods. In D. Tweedie & E. H. Shroyer (Eds.), The multihandi-capped hearing impaired: Identification and instruction (pp. 211–248). Washington, DC: Gallaudet College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Udwin, 0., & Yule, W. (1987). Augmentative communication modes taught to cerebral palsied children: Findings from a lon-gitudinal study. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 10, 202–206.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden, G. C., & Lloyd, L. L. (1986). Communication systems and their components. In S. W. Blackstone (Ed.), Augmentative communication: An introduction (pp. 49–161). Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden, G. C., & Yoder, D. E. (1986). Overview. In S. W. Blackstone (Ed.), Augmentative and alternative communication: An introduction (pp. 1–28). Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock, R. W. (1967). Peabody rebus reading program. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Yorkston, D. M., Honsinger, M. J., Dowden, P. A., & Marriner, N. (1989). Vocabulary selection: A case report. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5,101–108.
   Google Scholar
• Yorkston, K. M., Smith, K., & Beukelman, D. (1990). Extended com-munication samples of augmented communicators I: A compar-ison of individualized versus standard single word vocabularies. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55,217–224.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar