217
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Language treatment approach for users of AAC: experimental single-subject investigation

, &
Pages 230-243 | Published online: 12 Jul 2009

References

  • Aldus. (1989). Supercard 1.6 [Computer program]. San Diego, CA: Silicon Beach Software.
  • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1985). Guide-line for identification audiometry. Asha, 27, 49–52.
  • Angelo, D. H., & Goldstein, H. (1990). Effects of a pragmatic teach-ing strategy for requesting information by communication board users. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55,231–243.
  • Arthur, G. (1980). The Arthur adaptation of the Leiter International Performance Scale. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
  • Bloom, L., & Lahey, M. (1978). Language development and lan-guage disorders. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Bloom, L., Lifter, K., & Hafitz, J. (1980). Semantics of verbs and the devel-opment of verb inflections in child language. Language, 56,386–412.
  • Braine, M. D. S. (1976). Children's first word combinations. Mono-graphs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 41 (Serial No. 164).
  • Campbell, R. (1988). Dear ZOO. Markham, ON: Penguin Books Canada.
  • Clark, R. (1974). Performing without competence. Journal of Child Language, 1, 1–10.
  • Clark, R. (1980). Errors in talking to learn. First Language, 1, 7–32.
  • Craig, H. K. (1991). Pragmatic characteristics of the child with spe-cific language impairment: An interactionist perspective. In T. M. Gallagher (Ed.), Pragmatics of language: Clinical practice issues (pp. 163–198). San Diego, CA: Singular Press.
  • Dore, J. (1974). A pragmatic description of early language devel- opment. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 3,343-350. Dukes, W. F. (1965). N = 1. Psychological Bulletin, 64,74-79. Dunn, L., & Dunn, L. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
  • Fey, M. E. (1986). Language intervention with young children. San Diego, CA: College Hill Press.
  • Fey, M. E. (1988). Generalization issues facing language inter-ventionists: An introduction. Language Speech Hearing Ser-vices in the Schools, 19, 272–281.
  • Fishman, I. (1987). The vocabulary capabilities of communication aids and how to use them. In I. Fishman (Ed.), Electronic com-munication aids (pp. 108–116). Toronto: College Hill Publication.
  • Fitzgerald, E. (1949). Straight language for the deaf A system of instruction for deaf children. Washington, DC: The Volta Bureau.
  • Gerber, S., & Kraat, A. (1992). Use of a developmental model of language acquisition: Applications to children using AAC sys-tems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 19–32.
  • Goossens', C., & Crain, S. (1986). Augmentative communication intervention resource. Lake Zurich, IL: Don Johnston Develop-mental Equipment.
  • Harris, D. (1982). Communicative interaction processes involving nonvocals physically handicapped children. Topics in Language Disorders, 2, 21–38.
  • Harris, L. M. (1993a). Interactive discourse program: Guess Who? [Computer program]. London, ON: University of Western Ontario.
  • Harris, L. M. (1993b). Interactive reading program: Dear Zoo [Com-puter program]. London, ON: University of Western Ontario.
  • Harris, L. M. (1993c). Language acquisition in AAC: A treatment efficacy study. Unpublished master's thesis, University of West-ern Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
  • Iacono, T. A. (1992). Individual language learning styles and aug-mentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 33–40.
  • Johnston, J. (1988). Generalization: The nature of change. Lan-guage Speech and Hearing Services in the Schools, 19, 314–329.
  • Kirchner, D. M. (1991). Reciprocal bookreading: A discourse based intervention strategy for the child with atypical language develop-ment. In T. M. Gallagher (Ed.), Pragmatics of language: Clinical practice issues (pp. 307–332). San Diego, CA: Singular Press.
  • Kirchner, D. M., & Prutting, C. (1987). Spontaneous verbal repeti-tion: A performance based strategy for language acquisition. Clinical Linguistic & Phonetics, 1, 147–169.
  • Light, J. (1988). Interaction involving individuals using augmenta-tive and alternative communication systems: State of the art and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communi-cation, 4, 66–82.
  • Light, J., Binger, C., & Kelford Smith, A. (1994). The storyreading interactions between preschoolers who use AAC and their moth-ers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10, 255–268.
  • Light, J., Collier, B., & Parnes, P. (1985). Communicative interaction between young nonspeakers of physically disabled children and their primary caregivers: Part III-modes of communication. Aug-mentative and Alternative Communication, 1, 125–133.
  • Light, J., McNaughton, D., & Parnes, P. (1986). A protocol for the assessment of the communicative interaction skills of non-speaking severely handicapped adults and their facilitators. Toronto: Hugh MacMillan Medical Centre.
  • Mayer, R., & Johnson, T. (1988). The picture communication sym-bols. Solano Beach, CA: Mayer-Johnson.
  • McReynolds, L. V., & Kearns, K. P. (1983). Single-subject experi-mental designs in communicative disorders. Baltimore: Univer-sity Park Press.
  • Miller, J. (1991). Quantifying productive language disorder. In J. Miller (Ed.), Research on child language disorders (pp. 211–220). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
  • Miller, L., & Yoder, D. E. (1984). Miller-Yoder language compre- hension test: Clinical edition. Baltimore: University Park Press.
  • Moe, A., Hopkins, C., & Rush, R. T. (1982). The vocabulary of first grade children. Springfield, IL: Charles Thomas.
  • Nelson, K. (1973). Structure and strategy in learning to talk. Mono- graphs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 38. Peters, A. M. (1983). The units of language acquisition. Cam- bridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Peters, A. M. (1985). Language segmentation: Operating principles for the perception and analysis of language. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition volume 2: Theo-retical issues (pp. 1029–1064). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Peters, A. M., & Boggs, S. T. (1986). Interactional routines as cul-tural influences upon language acquisition. In B. Schieffelin & E. Ochs (Eds.), Language socialization across cultures (pp. 80–96). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Snow, C. E., & Goldfield, B. A. (1983). Turn the page please: Situ-ation-specific language acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 10, 551–569.
  • Snow, C. E., Perlmann, R., & Nathan, D. (1987). Why routines are dif-ferent: Toward a multiple-factors model of the relation between input and language acquisition. In K. E. Nelson &A. vanKleeck (Eds.), Chil-dren's language (Vol. 6, pp. 65–97). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Sparrow, S., Balla, D., & Cicchetti, D. (1984). Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.
  • Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse analysis: A programmatic introduction. In M. Stubbs (Ed.), Discourse analysis the sociolinguistic analysis of natural language (pp. 1–37). Oxford, Great Britain: Basil Blackwell. Tawney, J. W., & Guest, D. L. (1984). Single subject research in special education. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
  • Whitehurst, G. J., Falco, F. L., Lonigan, C. J., Fische, J. E., DeBaryshe, B. D., Valdez-Menchaca, M. C., & Caulfield, M. (1988). Accelerating language development through picture book reading. Developmental Psychology, 24, 552–559.
  • Wolf Nelson, N. (1992). Performance is the prize: Language com-petence and performance among AAC users. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 3–18.
  • Wolf Nelson, N. (1993). Childhood language disorders in context: Infancy through adolescence. New York: Macmillan.
  • Yoder, D., & Kraat, A. (1983). Intervention issues in nonspeech communication. In J. Miller, D. Yoder, & R. Schiefelbusch (Eds.), Contemporary issues in language intervention (pp. 27–51). Rockville, MD: ASHA.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.