Toward a sociolinguistic perspective on augmentative and alternative communication

References

• Baker B. (1996). Lecture tour: Three Presentations: 3. Second language acquisition and augmentative communication . . . deep parallels. Swinstead, Lincolnshire: Liberator.
   Google Scholar
• Balandin, S. (1996). Topics and vocabulary prediction: Can we do it? Paper presented at the Seventh Biennial Conference of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Com-munication, Vancouver, BC.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, S. (1989). Working with interpreters. In D. M. Duncan (Ed.), Working with bilingual language disability (pp. 91–112). London: Chapman Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, S. Communication loss: Adulthood and cerebral palsy. Manuscript in preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, S., & Bax, M. (1996). Communication and young adults with cerebral palsy. London: Report for Scope.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R., & Mirenda, P. (1992). Augmentative and alter-native communication: Management of severe communication disorders in children and adults. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Bjorck-Akesson E, & Lindsay P. (1996). Communication . .. natu-rally: Theoretical and methodological issues in augmentative and alternative communication. In: Proceedings of the Fourth ISAAC Research Symposium, Vancouver. Vasteres, Sweden: Malakdalen University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blackstone, S. (1991). Takes at least "two" to tango: Spotlighting the partners of persons who use augmentative and alternative communication techniques. Augmentative Communication News, 4(2), 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Blackstone, S. (1993a). Cultural sensitivity and augmentative and alternative communication services. Augmentative Communi-cation News, 6(2), 3–5.
   Google Scholar
• Blackstone, S. (1993b). Technology and employment of people who use augmentative and alternative communication. Aug-mentative Communication News, 6(4), 6–7.
   Google Scholar
• Bode, T. (1996). Visual-graphic symbol users and language acqui-sition. Paper presented at the Seventh Biennial Conference of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Com-munication, Vancouver, BC.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, S. (1996). Referring expressions in conversations between aided and natural speakers. In S. von Tetzchner & M. H. Jensen (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives (pp. 89–100) London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Coupland, N., & Giles, H. (1988). The communicative contexts of accommodation. Language and Communication, 8, 175–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, C., & Debose, C. (1977). Simplified registers, broken language, and pidginization. In A. Valdman (Ed.), Pidgin and creole linguistics (pp. 99–129). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1972). Attitude and motivation in second language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
   Google Scholar
• Genesee, F., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1988). Evaluative reactions to lan-guage choice strategies: The role of sociostructural factors. Language and Communication, 8, 229–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamers, J. F., & Blanc, M. H. A. (1989). Bilinguality and bilingual-ism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, J. (1992). An introduction to sociolinguistics. Harlow, Essex: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Houston, J. (Ed.). (1990). Thesaurus of ERIC descriptors (12th ed.). Phoenix: Oryx.
   Google Scholar
• Hurford, J. R. (1991). The evolution of the critical period for lan-guage-acquisition. Cognition, 40, 159–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hymes, D. H. (1972). On communicative competence. In: J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kegl, J. (1994). The Nicaraguan sign language project: An overview. Signpost, 1, 24–31.
   Google Scholar
• Kyle, J. G., & Woll, B. (1985). Sign language:The study of deaf people and their language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1988). Interaction involving individuals using augmenta-tive and alternative communication systems: State of the art and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communi-cation, 4, 66–82.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1989). Towards a definition of communicative compe-tence for individuals using augmentative and alternative com-munication systems. Augmentative and Alternative Communi-cation, 5, 137–144.
   Google Scholar
• Mayberry, R. I., & Eichen, E. B. (1991). The long-lasting advantage of learning sign language in childhood-Another look at the crit-ical period for language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 486–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, A. E. (1994). Augmentative and alternative communication and linguistic theory. In: J. Brodin & E. Bjorck-Akesson (Eds.), Methodological issues in research in augmentative and alter-native communication: Proceedings from the 3rd ISAAC Research Symposium, Kerkrade, The Netherlands. Jönkoping, Sweden: Jönkoping University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nafstad, A. N. (1994). Congenital deaf-blindness and pre-requi-sites for a first language-Theoretical framework for a new study. In A. M. Vonen, K. Arnesen, R. T. Enerstvedt, & A. N. Nafstad (Eds.), Bilingualism and literacy concerning deafness and deaf-blindness: Proceedings of an International Workshop, November 1994 (pp. 239–247). Oslo: Skadalen Resource Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, G., Kirkland, J., & Dunne, L. (1996). Developing functional use of augmentative and alternative communication within holis-tic group programmes. Paper presented at the Seventh Biennial Conference of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication, Vancouver, BC.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, A., & Gibbs, D. (1989). The bilingual child with special educational needs. In D. M. Duncan (Ed.), Working with bilin-gual language disability (pp. 176–197). London: Chapman Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, A. (1996). Whose message? Issues of ownership. Paper presented at the Institute of Education, London, May 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Romaine, S. (1988). Pidgin and creole languages. Harlow, Essex: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M., & Sevcik, R. (1996). Breaking the speech barrier: Language development through augmented means. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M., Sevcik, R., & Adamson, L. (1997). Framework for studying how children with developmental disabilities develop language through augmented means. Augmentative and Alter-native Communication, 13, 172–178.
   Google Scholar
• Savignon, S. (1983). Communicative competence: Theory and classroom experience. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Singleton, J. L., Morford, J. P., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1993). Once is not enough: Standards of well-formedness in manual com-munication created over three different timespans. Language, 69, 683–715.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M., Grove, N. (1997). Input/output asymmetries: Language development in AAC. ISAAC Bulletin, 50, 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Smith-Lewis, M. R. (1994). Discontinuity in the development of aided augmentative and alternative communication systems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10, 14–26.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton-Spence, R. L., & Woll, B. (1998). The linguistics of BSL: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Svebak, E. M. (1989). Aldri for tidlig—Aldri for sent [Never too early—Never too late]. Oslo: Statens Speciallaererhögskole. Swift, J. (1986). Gulliver's travels: A voyage to Laputa. Oxford, UK:
   Google Scholar
• Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1726)
   Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S. (1985). Words and chips—Pragmatics and pidginization of computer aided communication. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 1, 295–305.
   Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S. (1996). The contexts of early aided language acquisition. Paper presented at the Seventh Biennial Confer-ence of the International Society for Augmentative and Alterna-tive Communication, Vancouver, BC.
   Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S., & Jensen, H. M. (Eds.). (1996). Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives. Lon-don: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Woll, B. (1994). Bilingualism and deaf education: The need for definitions. In J. G. Kyle (Ed.), Growing up in sign and word (pp. 18–25). Bristol: Centre for Deaf Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Woll, B., Sieratzki, J. S., Calvert, G., Brammer, M. (1998). An analysis of differential impairments of language abilities in Lan-dau-Kleffner Syndrome: Insight into neuro-patho-mechanisms and remediation through sign language. Paper presented at the Ninth TENN ET Conference, Montreal.
   Google Scholar