363
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Efficacy of communication intervention for presymbolic communicators

&
Pages 25-37 | Published online: 12 Jul 2009

References

  • Bates, E., Benigni, L., Bretherton, I., Camaioni, L., & Volterra, V. (1979). The emergence of symbols. New York: Academic Press.
  • Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. (1998). Augmentative and alterna-tive communication: Management of severe communication dis-orders in children and adults (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
  • Blockberger, S. (1994). From efficacy to effectiveness in AAC inter-vention. Unpublished manuscript, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
  • Bloomberg, K., & West, D. (1998), The Picture It Project. Mel-bourne: Spastic Society of Victoria. Manuscript in preparaton.
  • Bretherton, I., & Bates, E. (1979). The emergence of intentional communication. In I. C. Uzgiris (Ed.), Social interaction and communication during infancy (pp. ). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1992). Ecological systems theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of child development. Six theories of child devel-opment: revised formulations and current issues (pp. ). Lon-don: Jessica Kingsley, 187-249.
  • Bronfenbrenner, U., & Ceci, S. (1994). Nature-nurture reconcep-tualized in developmental perspective: A bioecological model. Psychological Review, 101, 568–586.
  • Burgoon, J. K., LePoire, B. A., & Rosenthal, R. (1995). Effects of preinteraction expectancies and target communication on per-ceiver reciprocity and compensation in dyadic interaction. Jour-nal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3/, 287–321.
  • Calculator, S. (1990). Evaluating the efficacy of AAC intervention for children with severe disabilities. In J. Brodin & E. Björck-Akesson (Eds.), Methodological issues in research in augmen-tative and alternative communication (pp. 22–35). Stockholm: The Handicap Institute.
  • Chadsey-Rusch, J., Drasgow, E., Reinoehl B., & Halle, J. (1993). Using general-case instruction to teach spontaneous and gen-eralized request for assistance to learners with severe disabili-ties. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Hand-icaps, 18, 177–187.
  • Cobb, S. (1994). "Theories of responsibility": The social construc-tion of intentions in mediation. Discourse Processes, 18, 165–186.
  • Coupe, J., Barton, L., Barber, M., Collins, L., Levy, D., & Murphy, D. (1985). Affective communication assessment. Manchester: Melland School.
  • Dennett, D. C. (1987). The intentional stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • De Paepe, P., Reichle, J., Doss, S., Shriner, C., & Cameron, J. (1994). A preliminary evaluation of written individualized habil-itation objectives and their correspondence with direct imple-mentation. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19, 94–104.
  • Dunst, C., Cushing, P., & Vance, S. (1985). Response contingent learning in profoundly handicapped infants: A social systems perspective. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Dis-abilities, 5,33–47.
  • Ellis, A., & Beatti, G. (1986). The psychology of language and communication. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
  • Fogel, A. (1993). Two principles of communication: Co-regulation and framing. In J. Nadel & L. Camaioni (Eds.), New perspectives in early communicative development (pp. 9–22). London: Rout-ledge.
  • Goldbart, J. (1994). Opening the communication curriculum to stu-dents with PMLDs. In J. Ware (Ed.), Educating children with pro- found and multiple learning difficulties (pp. 15–62). London: David Fulton.
  • Granlund, M. (1984). Flerhandikapp [Multiple disabilities]. Stock-holm: Stiftelsen ALA.
  • Granlund, M. (1993). Communicative competence in persons with profound mental retardation. In M. Granlund (Ed.), Acta Uni-versitatis Upsaliensis, Studia Psychologica Clinica, 3. Stock-holm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.
  • Granlund, M., Blackstone, S., & Norris, L. (1998). The outcome of communication intervention-Defining outcomes. In E. Bjorck-Akesson & P. Lindsay (Eds.), Methodological issues in research in augmentative and alternative communication. Proceedings from the Fourth ISAAC Research Symposium (pp. 203–216). Toronto: ISAAC.
  • Granlund, M., & Bjorck-Akesson, E. (1998a). Reagera och reglera-beteendestilar hos barn med funktionsnedsättning [Reactivity and self-regulation-Behavior style in preschool chil-dren with disabilities]. In K. Sonnander, M. Soder, & K. Erisson (Eds.), Forskare om utvecklingsstoming [Researchers discuss intellectual disability-Perspectives, knowledge, challenges] (pp. 52–76). Uppsala: Uppsala University Press.
  • Granlund, M., & Bjorck-Akesson, E. (1998b). Behavioural style in children with disabilities-an observational study. In review.
  • Granlund, M., Bjorck-Akesson, E., Brodin, J., & Olsson, C. (1995). Communication intervention for persons with profound disabili-ties: A Swedish perspective. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 49–59.
  • Granlund, M., & Olsson, C. (1993). Investigating communicative functions in profoundly retarded persons: A comparison of two methods of obtaining information about communicative behav-iors. Mental Handicap Research, 6,50–68.
  • Granlund, M., Olsson, C., Norman, E., & Ostling, A-C. (1993). Dif-ferential effects of staff inservice training in communication intervention with the profoundly disabled. In M. Granlund (Ed.), Communicative competence in persons with profound mental retardation (pp. 88–95). Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, Studia Psychologica Clinica, 3. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell Inter-national.
  • Granlund, M., & Sundin, M. (1998). Funktionalitet i mal och metoder [Functionality and goal attainment]. Stockholm: Stif-telsen ALA.
  • Granlund, M., Terneby, J., & Olsson, C. (1992). Creating commu-nicative opportunities through a combined inservice training/supervision package. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 7,229–252.
  • Grove, N., Porter, J., Bunning, K., & Olsson, C. (in press). Inter-preting the meaning of communication by people with severe and profound learning disabilities: Theoretical & methodological issues. Applied Research in Intellectual Disability.
  • Guess, D., Rues, J., Roberts, S., & Siegel-Causey, E. (1993). Extended analysis of behavior state, environmental events, and related variables among students with profound disabilities-final report. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas.
  • Haley, S., Coster, W., Ludlow, L., Haltiwanger, J., & Andrellos, P. (1992). Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI). New England: New England Medical Center Hospitals.
  • Hildén, A. (1995). Hantera, aktivera och kommunicera [Manipulate, activate and communicate]. Umeâ: SIH Läromedel.
  • Holt, K. (1977). Developmental pediatrics: Perspectives and prac-tice. London: Butterworth.
  • Hunt, P., & Farron-Davies, F.(1992). A preliminary investigation of IEP quality and content associated with placement in general education versus special education classes. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 17, 247–253.
  • Iacono, T., Carter, M., & Hook, J. (1998). Identification of intentional communication in students with severe and multiple disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, /4,102–114.
  • Kaiser, A., & Goetz, L. (1993). Enhancing communication with per-sons labeled severely disabled. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 18, 137–142.
  • Kaiser, A., Yoder, P., & Keetz, A. (1992). Evaluating milieu teach-ing. In S. Warren & J. Reichle (Eds.), Causes and effects in communication and language intervention (pp. 9–47). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
  • Kiersuk, T., Smith, A., & Cardillo, J. (1994). Goal Attainment Scal-ing: Applications, theory, and measurement. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Knapp, M. (1995). How shall we study comprehensive, collabora-tive services for children and families? Educational Researcher, 24,5–16.
  • Light, J. (1988). Interaction involving individuals using augmenta-tive and alternative communication systems: State of the art and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communi-cation, 4, 66–82.
  • Light, J. (1989). Toward a definition of communicative competence for individuals using augmentative and alternative communica-tion systems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 137–144.
  • Light, J. (1999).
  • Nakken, H. (1997). The education of individuals with profound mul-tiple disabilities. European Journal on Mental Disability, 4, 19–26.
  • Ogletree, B., Wetherby, A., & Westling, D.(1992). Profile of the prelinguistic intentional communicative behaviors of children with profound mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 97, 186–196.
  • Reichle, J. (1997). Communication intervention with persons who have severe disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 31, 110–134.
  • Reichle, J., Mirenda, P., Locke, P., Piché, L., & Johnston, S. (1992). Beginning augmentative communication systems. In S. Warren & J. Reichle (Eds.), Causes and effects in communica-tion and language intervention (pp. 131–156). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
  • Romski, M., & Sevcik, R. (1992). Developing language in children with severe mental retardation. In S. Warren & J. Reichle (Eds.), Causes and effects in communication and language intervention (pp. 113–130). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
  • Romski, M., & Sevcik, R. (1993). Language learning through aug-mented means: The process and its products. In A. Kaiser & D. Gray (Eds.), Enhancing children's communication. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
  • Rowland, C., & Schweigert, P. (1993). Analyzing the communica-tive environment to increase functional communication. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 18, 161–176.
  • Rutter, M. (1985). Family and school influences: Meanings, mech-anisms and implications. In A. R. Nicol (Ed.), Longitudinal stud-ies in child psychology and psychiatry. New York: Wiley, 357–401.
  • Sailor, W., Gee, K., Goetz, L., & Graham, M. (1988). Progress in educating students with the most severe disabilities: Is there any yet? Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Hand-icaps, 13, 87–99.
  • Schweigert, P., & Rowland, C. (1992). Early communication and microtechnology: Instructional sequence and case studies of children with severe multiple disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 273–286.
  • Simeonsson, R. (1995). Intervention in communicative disability: Evaluation issues and evidence. In J. Rönnberg & E. Hjelmquist (Eds.), Communicative disability: Compensation and develop-ment. Linkoping, Sweden: Linkoping University Press.
  • Simeonsson, R. J. (1978). Carolina Record of Individual Behavior. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina.
  • Sontag, J. C. (1996). Toward a comprehensive theoretical frame-work for disability research: Bronfenbrenner revisited. The Jour-nal of Special Education, 30, 319–344.
  • Stamp, G. H., & Knapp M. L. (1990). The construct of intent in inter-personal communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 76, 282–299.
  • Terneby, J. (1996). Inventering av vuxna personer med gray begavningsnedsattning IAlvsborgs Ian [A survey of adults with profound mental retardation in Alvsborgs County]. G6teborg: Psykoligiska Institutionen, Göteborgs Universitet.
  • Terneby, J., Granlund, M., & Olsson, C. (1994). Kommunikation hos personer med flerhandika pp—en jam förelse mellan olika alders grupper [Communication in persons with profound multi-ple disabilities—A comparison of age groups]. Stockholm: Stif-telsen ALA.
  • Vlaskamp, C. (1997). The implementation of a care programme for individuals with profound multiple disabilities. European Journal on Mental Disability, 4, 3–12.
  • von Tetzchner, S. (1997). Theoretical perspectives on language development and language intervention. Helsinki: Sillala pa bron seminari.
  • Ware, J. (1994). Using interaction in the education of pupils with PMLDs: Creating contingency sensitive environments. In J. Ware (Ed.), Educating children with profound and multiple learn-ing difficulties (pp. 126–149). London: David Fulton.
  • Ware, J., & Healey, I. (1994). Conceptualizing progress in children with profound and multiple learning difficulties. In J. Ware (Ed.), Educating children with profound and multiple learning difficul-ties (pp. 1–14). London: David Fulton.
  • Warren, S., Yoder, P., Gazdag, G., Kim, K., & Jones, H. (1993). Facilitating prelinguistic communication skills in young children with developmental delay. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36,83–97.
  • Watson, J. (1994). Using interaction in the education of pupils with PMLDs: Intensive interaction, two case studies. In J. Ware (Ed.), Educating children with profound and multiple learning difficul-ties. London: David Fulton, 150–159.
  • Westlake, C., & Kaiser, A. (1991). Early childhood services for children with severe disabilities. In L. H. Meyer, C. A. Peck, & L. Brown (Eds.), Critical issues in the lives of people with severe disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes, 429–458.
  • Wetherby, A. M., Cain, D., Yonclas, D., & Walker, V. (1988). Analy-sis of the intentional communication of normal children from the prelinguistic to the multi-word stage. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 3/, 240–252.
  • Wolery, M. (1991). Instruction in early childhood special education: Seeing through a glass darkly . . . Knowing in part. Exceptional Children, 58,127–134.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.