Efficacy research issues in AAC: interactive storybook reading

References

• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (1992). Guide-lines for meeting the communication needs of persons with severe disabilities. Asha, 34, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Barlow, D. H., & Hersen, M. (1984). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change (2nd ed.). New York: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bedrosian, J. L. (1998). Effect of intervention on interactive story-book reading. Western Michigan University. Manuscript in preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Bedrosian, J. L., Hoag, L. A., Calculator, S. N., & Molineux, B. (1992). Variables influencing perceptions of the communicative competence of an adult augmentative and alternative commu-nication system user. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35,1105–1113.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bedrosian, J. L., Hoag, L., Johnson, D., & Calculator, S. (1998). Communicative competence as perceived by adults with severe speech impairments associated with cerebral palsy. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 4/, 667–675.
   Google Scholar
• Bedrosian, J. L., Roberts, B., Raap, D., Neynaber, M., & James, K. (1995, December). Facilitating participatory storybook read-ing in young children using AAC systems. Paper presented at the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Conven-tion, Orlando, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R., & Mirenda, P. (1998). Augmentative and alterna-tive communication: Management of severe communication dis-orders in children and adults. (2nd ed.) Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Calculator, S. N. (1988). Evaluating the effectiveness of AAC pro-grams for persons with severe handicaps. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4,177–179.
   Google Scholar
• Calculator, S. N. (1991). Evaluating the efficacy of AAC interven-tion for children with severe disabilities. In J. Brodin & E. Björk-Akesson (Eds.), Proceedings of the First ISAAC Research Sym-posium in Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Methodological issues in research in augmentative and alter-native communication (pp. 22–35). Stockholm: Swedish Hand-icap Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Calculator, S. N. (1997). Fostering early language acquisition and AAC use: Exploring reciprocal influences between children and their environments. Augmentative and Alternative Communica-tion, 13, 149–157.
   Google Scholar
• Cazden, C. B. (1983). Adult assistance to language development: Scaffolds, models, and direct instruction. In R. P. Parker & F. A. Davis (Eds.), Developing literacy: Young children's use of lan-guage (pp. 3–13). Newark, DE: International Reading Associa-tion.
   Google Scholar
• Halle, J. W. (1982). Teaching functional language to the handi-capped: An integrative model of natural environment teaching techniques. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 7,29–37.
   Google Scholar
• Halle, J., Marshall, A., & Spradlin, J. (1979). Time delay: A tech-nique to increase language use and facilitate generalization in retarded children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 431–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., & Bedrosian, J. L. (1995). Subject selection in AAC research: Decision points. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 11–13.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. (1985). The Picture Communication Symbols: Book II. Salana Beach, CA: Mayer-Johnson.
   Google Scholar
• Kearns, K. P. (1986). Flexibility of single-subject experimental designs. Part II: Design selection and arrangement of experi-mental phases. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 51, 204–213.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• King-DeBaun, P., & Musselwhite, C. R. (1994, October). Magic tricks: Creative intervention yields creative kids Paper presented at the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication Conference, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Kirchner, D. (1991). Reciprocal book-reading: A discourse-based intervention strategy for the child with atypical language devel-opment. In T. Gallagher (Ed.), Pragmatics of language: Clinical practice issues (pp. 307–332). San Diego, CA: Singular Pub-lishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1988). Interaction involving individuals using augmenta-tive and alternative communication systems: State of the art and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communi-cation, 4,66–82.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1997). "Let's go star fishing": Reflections on the contexts of language learning for children who used aided AAC. Aug-mentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 158–171.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Binger, C., & Kelford-Smith, A. (1994). The story reading interactions of preschoolers who use AAC and their mothers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10, 255–268.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & Kelford-Smith, A. (1993). Home literacy experiences of preschoolers who use AAC systems and of their nondisabled peers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9, 10–25.
   Google Scholar
• Marvin, C. (1994). Home literacy experiences of preschool children with single and multiple disabilities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 4, 436–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McReynolds, L. V., & Kearns, K. P. (1983). Single-subject experi-mental designs in communicative disorders. Baltimore: Univer-sity Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• McReynolds, L. V., & Thompson, C. K. (1986). Flexibility of single-subject experimental designs. Part I: Review of the basics of single-subject designs. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disor-ders, 51, 194–203.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moerk, E. L. (1985). Picture-book reading by mothers and young children and its impact upon language development. Journal of Pragmatics, 9, 547–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ninio, A. (1983). Joint book reading as a multiple vocabulary acqui-sition device. Developmental Psychology, 19, 443–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ninio, A., & Bruner, J. S. (1978). The achievement and antecedents of labeling. Journal of Child Language, 5,1-15. Olswang, L. B. (1990). Treatment efficacy research: A path to quality assurance. Asha, 32,45–47.
   Google Scholar
• O'Rourke, A. M., Bedrosian, J. L., & Light, J. (1994, October). Enhancing storybook participation by an AAC user: Effect of facilitator training. Poster session presented at the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication Con-ference, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, P. L., & McWilliam, P. J. (1993). Emerging literacy and chil-dren with severe speech and physical impairments (SSPI): Issues and possible intervention strategies. Topics in Language Disorders, /3,47–56.
   Google Scholar
• Reichle, J., & Johnston, S. S. (1992). Evaluating the efficacy of AAC interventions. In D. J. Gardner-Bonneau (Ed.), Proceed-ings of the Second ISAAC Research Symposium in Augmenta-tive and Alternative Communication: Methodological issues in research in augmentative and alternative communication (pp. 44–54). Philadelphia: ISAAC.
   Google Scholar
• Remington, B. (1991). Why use single subject methods in AAC? In J. Brodin & E. Björk-Akesson (Eds.), Proceedings of the First ISAAC Research Symposium in Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Methodological issues in research in augmen-tative and alternative communication (pp. 74–78). Stockholm: Swedish Handicap Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M., & Sevcik, R. (1988). Augmentative and alternative communication systems: Considerations for persons with severe intellectual disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 83–93.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. (1999). Comparative efficacy of interventions in aug-mentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 00–00.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., & Braun, U. (1992, August). Toward a compre-hensive efficacy evaluation of AAC intervention. In D. J. Gard-ner-Bonneau (Ed.), Methodological issues in research in aug-mentative and alternative communication (pp. 36–43). Proceedings of the Second ISAAC Research Symposium in Augmentative and Alternative Communication, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., & Braun, U. (1994). Efficacy of AAC interven-tions: Methodological issues in evaluating behavior change, generalization, and effects. Augmentative and Alternative Com-munication, 10, 207–223.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C., & Ninio, A. (1986). The contracts of literacy: What chil-dren learn from learning to read books. In W. H. Teale & E. Sulzby (Eds.), Emergent literacy (pp. 116–138). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehurst, G. J., Falco, F. L., Lonigan, C. J., Fische, J. E., DeBaryshe, B. D., Valdez-Menchaca, M. C., & Caufield, M. (1988). Accelerating language development through picture book reading. Developmental Psychology, 24, 552–559.
   Google Scholar
• Yorkston, K. M. (1996). Treatment efficacy: Dysarthria. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, S46–S57.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar