857
Views
85
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Social validation of interventions in augmentative and alternative communication

Pages 234-247 | Published online: 12 Jul 2009

References

  • Angelo, D. H., & Goldstein, H. (1990). Effects of a pragmatic teach-ing strategy for requesting information by communication board users. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55,231–243.
  • Bedrosian, J. L., Hoag, L. A., Calculator, S. N., & Molineux, B. (1992). Variables influencing perceptions of the communicative competence of an adult augmentative and alternative commu-nication system user. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35,1105–1114.
  • Beukelman, D. R. (1986). Evaluating the effectiveness of inter-vention programs. In S. W. Blackstone (Ed), Augmentative com-munication: An introduction (pp. 423–445). Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
  • Beukelman, D. R. (1988). She was setting a world's record, and we thought she was drowning, right Dad? Augmentative and Alter-native Communication, 4,122–123.
  • Beukelman, D. R., & Ansel, B. M. (1995). Research priorities in augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 131–134.
  • Blackstone, S. (1995). AAC stakeholders: It's all relative. Aug-mentative Communication News, 8, 4.
  • Bower Hulme, J., Bain, B., Hardin, M., McKinnon, A., & Waldron, D. (1989). The influence of adaptive seating devices on vocaliza-tion. Journal of Communication Disorders, 22, 137–145.
  • Dattilo, J., & Camarata, S. (1991). Facilitating conversation through self-initiated augmentative communication treatment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 369–378.
  • DeRuyter, F. (1992). Evaluating AAC service delivery programs: What should we really be evaluating? In D. J. Gardner-Bonneau (Ed.), Proceedings of the Second ISAAC Research Symposium in Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Methodolog-ical Issues in Research in Augmentative and Alternative Com-munication (pp. 114–119). Philadelphia: ISAAC.
  • DeRuyter, F. (1995). Evaluating outcomes in assistive technology: Do we understand the commitment? Assistive Technology, 7,3–16.
  • Dowden, P., Beukelman, D. R., & Lossing, C. (1986a). Serving non-speaking patients in acute care settings: Intervention out-comes. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2, 38–44.
  • Dowden, P., Honsinger, M. J., & Beukelman, D. R. (1986b). Serv-ing nonspeaking patients in acute care settings: An intervention approach. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2, 25–32.
  • Fawcett, S. B. (1991). Social validity: A note on methodology. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 235–239.
  • Fuqua, R. W., & Schwade, J. (1986). Social validation of applied behavioral research: A selective review and critique. In A. D. Poling & R. W. Fuqua (Eds.), Research methods in applied behavior analysis (pp. 265–292). New York: Plenum.
  • Goldstein, H. (1990). Assessing clinical significance. In L. B. Olswang, C. K. Thompson, S. F. Warren, & N. J. Minghetti (Eds.), Treatment efficacy research in communication disor-ders. Proceedings of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Foundation's National Conference on Treatment Efficacy (pp. 91-98). San Antonio, TX: ASHA.
  • Hamilton, B. L., Snell, M. E. (1993). Using the milieu approach to increase spontaneous communication book use across envi-ronments by an adolescent with autism. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9, 259–272.
  • Heller, W. K., Allgood, M. H., Davis, B., Arnold, S. E., Castelle, M. D., & Taber, T. A. (1996). Promoting non-task related communication at vocational sites. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 12, 169–180.
  • Hoag, L. A., & Bedrosian, J. L. (1992). Effects of speech output type, message length, and reauditorization on perceptions of the communicative competence of an adult AAC user. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35,1363–1367.
  • Kazdin, A. E. (1977). Assessing the clinical or applied significance of behavior change through social validation. Behavior Modifi-cation, /, 427–452.
  • Kazdin, A. E. (1980). Acceptability of alternative treatments for deviant child behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 259–273.
  • Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-case research designs. Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Kazdin, A. E., & Matson, J. L. (1981). Social validation in mental retardation. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 2,39–53.
  • Kendall, P., & Norton-Ford, J. (1982). Therapy outcome research methods. In P. Kendall, & J. Butcher (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in clinical psychology (pp. 429–460). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Kennedy, C. H. (1992). Trends in the measurement of social valid-ity. The Behavior Analyst, /5,147–156.
  • Kozleski, E. B., & Sands, D. J. (1992). The yardstick of social validity: Evaluating quality of life as perceived by adults without disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 27, 119–131.
  • Kraat, A. W. (1985). Communication interaction between aided and natural speakers: An IPCAS study report. Toronto: Cana-dian Rehabilitation Council for the Disabled.
  • Light, J. (1988). Interaction involving individuals using augmenta-tive and alternative communication systems: State of the art and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communi-cation, 4, 66–82.
  • Light, J. (1989). Toward a definition of communicative competence for individuals using augmentative and alternative communication sys-tems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5,137–144.
  • Light, J., Binger, C., Agate, T. L., & Ramsey, K. N. (1999). Teach-ing partner-focused questions to individuals who use augmen-tative and alternative communication to enhance their commu-nicative competence. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 42,251–255.
  • Light, J., Dattilo, J., English, J., Gutierrez, L., & Hartz, J. (1992). Instructing facilitators to support the communication of people who use augmentative communication systems. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35,865–875.
  • McEwen, I. (1992). Assistive positioning as a control parameter of social-communicative interactions between students with pro-found multiple disabilities and class-room staff. Physical Ther-apy, 72,634–646.
  • McNaughton, D., & Tawney, J. (1993). Comparison of two spelling instruction techniques for adults who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Com-munication, 9, 72–82.
  • Norris, L., McGinnis, J., & Rothschild, N. (1996). "How are we doing?" Client and family perceptions of AAC service delivery. In Proceedings of the 7th Biennial Conference of ISAAC (p. 318). Vancouver, BC.
  • O'Keefe, B. M., & Dattilo, J. (1992). Teaching the response-recode form to adults with mental retardation using AAC systems. Aug-mentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 224–233.
  • Reid, D. H., & Hurlbut, B. (1977). Teaching nonvocal communica-tion skills to multihandicapped retarded adults. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 591–603.
  • Schlosser, R. W. (1995). Effectiveness of three teaching strategies on Blissymbol learning, retention, generalization, and use. (Doc-toral dissertation, Purdue University, 1994). Dissertation Abstracts International, 56(038), 892.
  • Schlosser, R. W., Blischak, D. M., Belfiore, P. J., Bartley, C., & Bar-nett, N. (1998). The effects of synthetic speech output and orthographic feedback on spelling in a student with autism: A preliminary study. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disor-ders, 28, 319–329.
  • Schlosser, R. W., & Braun, U. (1994). Efficacy of AAC interven-tions: Methodologic issues in evaluating behavior change, gen-eralization, and effects. Augmentative and Alternative Commu-nication, 10, 207–223.
  • Schlosser, R. W., & Lloyd, L. L. (1993). Effects of initial element teaching in a story-telling context on Blissymbol acquisition and generalization. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 979–995.
  • Schlosser, R. W., & Lloyd, L. L. (1997). Effects of paired-associ-ate learning versus symbol explanations on Blissymbol learning and use. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 12, 226–238.
  • Schwartz, I. S., & Baer, D. M. (1991). Social validity assessments: Is current practice state of the art? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24,189–204.
  • Sobsey, D., & McDonald, L. (1988). Special education. Coming of age. In B. L. Ludlow, A. P. Turnbull, & R. Luckasson (Eds.), Transition to adult life for people with mental retardation-Principles and practices (pp. 21–44). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
  • Soto, G., Belfiore, P., Schlosser, R. W., & Haynes, C. (1993). Teaching specific requests: A comparative analysis of skill acquisition and preference using two augmentative and alter-native communication aids. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 28, 169–178.
  • Storey, K., & Horner, R. H. (1991). An evaluative review of social validation research involving persons with handicaps. The Jour-nal of Special Education, 25,352–401.
  • Test, D. W. (1994). Supported employment and social validity. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19,116–129.
  • Van Houten, R. (1979). Social validation: The evolution of stan-dards of competency for target behaviors. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 581–591.
  • White, D. (1986). Social validation. In F. R. Rusch (Ed.) Compet-itive employment issues and strategies (pp. 199–213). Balti-more: Paul H. Brookes.
  • Winett, R. A., Moore, J. F., & Anderson, E. S. (1991). Extending the concept of social validity: Behavior analysis for disease pre-vention and health promotion. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 215–230.
  • Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective mea-surement, or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.