An application of the theory of normative social behavior to bystander intervention for sexual assault

References

• Rape, Abuse, & Incest National Network. Statistics. Rape, Abuse, & Incest National Network Website. https://rainn.org/statistics?gclid=CIXQksn3kKcCFRhzgwodMFUSbw. Accessed July 20, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Justice. Protecting students from sexual assault. United States Department of Justice Website. https://www.justice.gov/ovw/protecting-students-sexual-assault. Published March 1, 2017. Accessed July 20, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Sinozich S, Langton L. Special Report: Rape and Sexual Assault Victimization among College-Age Females, 1995–2013. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice; 2014. Bureau of Justice Statistics publication NCJ 248471.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Understanding and Addressing Violence against Women: Sexual Violence. World Health Organization Web site. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/77434/1/WHO_RHR_12.37_eng.pdf. Published 2012. Accessed July 20, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Rimal RN, Real K. How behaviors are influenced by perceived norms: a test of the theory of normative social behavior. Commun Res. 2005;32(3):389–414. doi:10.1177/0093650205275385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banyard VL, Moynihan MM, Plante EG. Sexual violence prevention through bystander education: an experimental evaluation. J Commun Psychol. 2007;35(4):463–481. doi:10.1002/jcop.20159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimal RN, Lapinski MK. A re-explication of social norms, ten years later. Commun Theor. 2015;25(4):393–409. doi:10.1111/comt.12080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rape, Abuse, & Incest National Network. What consent looks like. Rape, Abuse, & Incest National Network Web site. https://www.rainn.org/articles/what-is-consent. Accessed July 20, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Health and Human Services. Sexual assault. United States Department of Health and Human Services Web site. https://www.womenshealth.gov/files/documents/fact-sheet-sexual-assault.pdf. Published September 18, 2015. Accessed July 20, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Turchik JA, Hassija CM. Female sexual victimization among college students: assault severity, health risk behaviors, and sexual functioning. J Interpers Violence. 2014;29(13):2439–2457. doi:10.1177/0886260513520230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dworkin ER, Menon SV, Bystrynski J, Allen NE. Sexual assault victimization and psychopathology: a review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2017;56:65–81. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2017.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langton L. Special Report: Socio-Emotional Impact of Violent Crime. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice; 2014. Bureau of Justice Statistics publication NCJ 247076.
   Google Scholar
• Randall M. Sexual assault law, credibility, and “ideal victims”: consent, resistance, and victim blaming. Can J Wom Law. 2010;22(2):397–433. doi:10.3138/cjwl.22.2.397.
   Google Scholar
• Campus Sexual Violence Elimination Act, S 128, 113th Cong, 1st Sess. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Banyard VL, Plante EG, Moynihan MM. Bystander education: bringing a broader community perspective to sexual violence prevention. J Community Psychol. 2004;32(1):61–79. doi:10.1002/jcop.10078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Planty M. Third-Party Involvement in Violent Crime, 1993–1999. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice; 2012. Bureau of Justice Statistics publication NCJ 247076.
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini RB, Reno RR, Kallgren CA. A focus theory of normative conduct: recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990;58(6):1015–1026. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapinski MK, Rimal RN. An explication of social norms. Commun Theory. 2005;15(2):127–147. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2005.tb00329.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapinski MK, Anderson J, Shugart A, Todd E. Social influence in child care centers: a test of the theory of normative social behavior. Health Commun. 2014;29(3):219–232. doi:10.1080/10410236.2012.738322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mabry A, Turner MM. Do sexual assault bystander interventions change men's intentions? Applying the theory of normative social behavior to predicting bystander outcomes. J Health Commun. 2016;21(3):276–292. doi:10.1080/10810730.2015.1058437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimal RN, Lapinski MK, Cook RJ, Real K. Moving toward a theory of normative influences: how perceived benefits and similarity moderate the impact of descriptive norms on behaviors. J Health Commun. 2005;10(5):433–450. doi:10.1080/10810730591009880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimal RN. Modeling the relationship between descriptive norms and behaviors: a test and extension of the theory of normative social behavior (TNSB). Health Commun. 2008;23(2):103–116. doi:10.1080/10410230801967791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimal RN, Real K. Understanding the influence of perceived norms on behaviors. Commun Theory. 2003;13(2):184–203. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003.tb00288.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith JR, Louis WR. Do as we say and as we do: the interplay of descriptive and injunctive group norms in the attitude–behaviour relationship. Br J Soc Psychol. 2008;47(4):647–666. doi:10.1348/014466607X269748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolf J, Rimal RN, Sripad P. Understanding the influence of proximal networks on high school athletes' intentions to use androgenic anabolic steroids. J Sport Manage. 2014;28(1):8–20. doi:10.1123/jsm.2013-0046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel H. Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annu Rev Psychol. 1982;33(1):1–39. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser MW, Hawkins JD. The social networks of opioid abusers. Int J Addict. 1984;19(8):903–917. doi:10.3109/10826088409061994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House JS, Landis KR, Umberson D. Social relationships and health. Science. 1988;241(4865):540–545. doi:10.1126/science.3399889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen PN, Rothgerber H, Wood W, Matz DC. Social norms and identity relevance: a motivational approach to normative behavior. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2004;30(10):1295–1309. doi:10.1177/0146167204264480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Carcioppolo N, Jensen JD. Perceived historical drinking norms and current drinking behavior: using the theory of normative social behavior as a framework for assessment. Health Commun. 2012;27(8):766–775. doi:10.1080/10410236.2011.640973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park HS, Klein KA, Smith S, Martell D. Separating subjective norms, university descriptive and injunctive norms, and US descriptive and injunctive norms for drinking behavior intentions. Health Commun. 2009;24(8):746–751. doi:10.1080/10410230903265912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach. New York, NY: Psychology Press; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Aiken LS, West SG. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Neighbors C, LaBrie JW, Hummer JF, et al. Group identification as a moderator of the relationship between perceived social norms and alcohol consumption. Psychol Addict Behav. 2010;24(3):522–528. doi:10.1037/a0019944.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini RB, Demaine LJ, Sagarin BJ, et al. Managing social norms for persuasive impact. Soc Influence. 2006;1(1):3–15. doi:10.1080/15534510500181459
   Google Scholar