‘Mechanical restraint—confounders, risk, alliance score’: testing the clinical validity of a new risk assessment instrument

References

• Bak J, Brandt‐Christensen M, Sestoft DM, Zoffmann V. Mechanical restraint—which interventions prevent episodes of mechanical restraint?—a systematic review. Perspect Psychiatr Care 2012;48:83–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson ME. Violence and restraint reduction efforts on inpatient psychiatric units. Issues Ment Health Nurs 2010;31:181–97.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stewart D, Van der Merwe M, Bowers L, Simpson A, Jones J. A review of interventions to reduce mechanical restraint and seclusion among adult psychiatric inpatients. Issues Ment Health Nurs 2010;31:413–24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scanlan JN. Interventions to reduce the use of seclusion and restraint in inpatient psychiatric settings: what we know so far a review of the literature. Int J Soc Psychiatry 2010;56:412–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laiho T, Kattainen E, Åstedt‐Kurki P, Putkonen H, Lindberg N, Kylmä J. Clinical decision making involved in secluding and restraining an adult psychiatric patient: an integrative literature review. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2013;20:830–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gildberg FA, Fristed F, Makransky G, Moeller EH, Nielsen LD, Bradley SK. As time goes by: reasons and characteristics of prolonged episodes of mechanical restraint in forensic psychiatry. J Forensic Nurs 2015;11:41–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundheds-og-Aeldreministeriet. Bekendtgørelse af lov om anvendelse af tvang i psykiatrien [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2016 12. 10]. Available from: https://www.retsinformation.dk/Forms/R0710.aspx?id =174248
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen LD, Gildberg FA, Bech P, Dalgaard JL, Munksgaard G, Hounsgaard L. Forensic mental health clinician´s experiences with and assessment of alliance regarding the patient´s readiness to be released from mechanical restraint. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2016. [Epub ahead of print]. DOI:10.111/inm.12300.
   Google Scholar
• Sande R, Nijman HLI, Noorthoorn EO, Wierdsma AI, Hellendoorn E, Staak CPFvd, et al. Aggression and seclusion on acute psychiatric wards: effect of short-term risk assessment. Br J Psychiatry 2011;199:473–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh JP, Serper M, Reinharth J, Fazel S. Structured assessment of violence risk in schizophrenia and other psychiatric disorders: a systematic review of the validity, reliability, and item content of 10 available instruments. Schizophr Bull 2011;37:899–912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daffern M. The predictive validity and practical utility of structured schemes used to assess risk for aggression in psychiatric inpatient settings. Aggress Violent Behav 2007;12:116–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khiroya R, Weaver T, Maden T. Use and perceived utility of structured violence risk assessments in English medium secure forensic units. BJ Psych Bull 2009;33:129–32.
   Google Scholar
• Beghi M, Peroni F, Gabola P, Rossetti A, Cornaggia CM. Prevalence and risk factors for the use of restraint in psychiatry: a systematic review. Riv Psichiatr 2013;48:10–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgieva I, Vesselinov R, Mulder CL. Early detection of risk factors for seclusion and restraint: a prospective study. Early Interv Psychiatry 2012;6:415–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keski-Valkama A, Sailas E, Eronen M, Koivisto A-M, Lönnqvist J, Kaltiala-Heino R. The reasons for using restraint and seclusion in psychiatric inpatient care: a nationwide 15-year study. Nord J Psychiatry 2010;64:136–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui A, Middleton H, Völlm B, The uses of coercive measures in forensic psychiatry: a literature review. In: Völlm B, Nedopil N, editors. The use of coercive measures in forensic psychiatric care. Switzerland: Springer; 2016, p. 151–84.
   Google Scholar
• Bak J, Zoffmann V, Sestoft DM, Almvik R, Siersma VD, Brandt-Christensen M. Comparing the effect of non-medical mechanical restraint preventive factors between psychiatric units in Denmark and Norway. Nordic J Psychiatry 2015;69:433–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL. Measurement in medicine: a practical guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Polit DF, Beck CT, Nursing research: generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia: Kluwer; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J, Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger RA, Casey MA, Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nursing Health 2006;29:489–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Health 2007;30:459–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res 1986;35:382–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis LL. Instrument review: getting the most from a panel of experts. Appl Nurs Res 1992;5:194–7.
   Google Scholar
• Grant JS, Davis LL. Selection and use of content experts for instrument development. Res Nurs Health 1997;20:269–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WMA. Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Brazil: 64th WMA General Assembly [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2016 16. 11]. Available from: http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/.
   Google Scholar
• Hvidhjelm J. Prevention of aggression and violence on psychiatric wards via structured risk assessment - evaluation of Brøset Violence Checklist in Denmark [PhD thesis]. University of Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Beauford JE, McNiel DE, Binder RL. Utility of the initial therapeutic alliance in evaluating psychiatric patients' risk of violence. Am J Psychiatry 1997;154:1272–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BVC. Brøst Violence Checklist (BVC) [Internet] [cited 2016 12. 10]. Available from: https://laeringsportalen.helse-sorost.no/mohiverepository/content/2d5d1472-8718-4ab9-8921-06b5488b186d/course/asset/main.html
   Google Scholar
• Abderhalden C, Needham I, Dassen T, Halfens R, Haug H-J, Fischer JE. Structured risk assessment and violence in acute psychiatric wards: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2008;193:44–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Østergaard SD, Lemming OM, Mors O, Correll CU, Bech P. PANSS-6: a brief rating scale for the measurement of severity in schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2016;133:436–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almvik R, Woods P, Rasmussen K. The Brøset violence checklist: sensitivity, specificity, and interrater reliability. J Interpers Violence 2000;15:1284–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar