Construct validity of the Mechanical Restraint – Confounders, Risk, Alliance Score (MR-CRAS): a new risk assessment instrument

References

• Hui A, Middleton H, Völlm B. The uses of coercive measures in forensic psychiatry: a literature review. In: Völlm B, Nodopil N, editors. The use of coercive measures in forensic psychiatric care: legal, ethical and practical challenges. Schwitzerland (CH): Springer; 2016. p.151–184.
   Google Scholar
• CPT. Report to the government of Denmark on the visit to Denmark carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 28 January to 4 February 2002. Strasbourg (F): CPT (editors); 2002. (CPT/Inf (2002) 18)
   Google Scholar
• CPT. Report to the government of Denmark on the visit to Denmark carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 11 to 20 February 2008. Strasbourg (F): CPT (editors); 2008. (CPT/Inf (2008) 26).
   Google Scholar
• CPT. Report to the government of Denmark on the visit to Denmark carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 4 to 13 February 2014. Strasbourg (F): CPT (editors); 2014. (CPT/inf (2014) 25).
   Google Scholar
• Sundhedsdatastyrelsen. Tvang i psykiatrien – årlige indikatorer og milepaele – tabel med årlig indikatorer, baseline og milepael [Internet]. København (DK): Sundhedsdatastyrelsen; 2017 [cited 2019 Jan 15]. Available from: www.esundhed.dk.
   Google Scholar
• Mckenna B, McEvedy S, Maguire T. Prolonged use of seclusion and mechanical restraint in mental health services: a statewide retrospective cohort study. Int J Mental Health Nurs. 2017;26(5):491–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gildberg FA, Fristed P, Makransky G, et al. As times goes by: reasons and characteristics of prolonged episodes of mechanical restraint in forensic psychiatry. J Forensic Nurs. 2015;11(1):41–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noorthoorn EO, Lepping P, Janssen WA, et al. One-year incidence and prevalence of seclusion: Dutch findings in an international perspective. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2015;50(12):1857–1869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinert T, Lepping P, Bernhardsgrütter R, et al. Incidence of seclusion and restraint in psychiatric hospitals: a literature review and survey of international trends. Soc Psychiat Epidemiol. 2010;45(9):889–897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tingleff EB, Bradley SK, Gildberg FA, et al. "Treat me with respect". A systematic review and thematic analysis of psychiatric patients' reported perceptions of the situations associated with the process of coercion. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017;24(9-10):681–698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans D, Wood J, Lambert L. Patient injury and physical restraint devices: a systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2003;41(3):274–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakhmatullina M, Taub A, Jacob T. Morbidity and mortality associated with the utilization of restraints: a review of literature. Psychiatr Q. 2013;84(4):499–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewington J. Best practices for reducing the use of coercive measures. In: Völlm B, Nodopil N, editors. The use of coercive measures in forensic psychiatric care: legal, ethical and practical challenges. Schwitzerland (CH): Springer; 2016. p.285–314.
   Google Scholar
• Goulet M-H, Larue C, Dumais A. Evaluation of seclusion and restraint reduction programs in mental health: a systematic review. Aggress Violent Behav. 2017;34:139–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sande RVD, Nijman HLI, Noorthoorn EO, et al. Aggression and seclusion on acute psychiatric wards: effect of short-term risk assessment. Br J Psychiatry. 2011;199(6):473–478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danske Regioner. Retspsykiatri – kvalitet og sikkerhed [Internet]. København (DK): Danske Regioner; 2017 [cited 2019 Jan 15]. Available from: www.regioner.dk
   Google Scholar
• Daffern M. The predictive validity and practical utility of structured schemes used to assess risk for aggression in psychiatric inpatient settings. Aggress Violent Behav. 2007;12(1):116–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khiroya R, Weaver T, Maden T. Use and perceived utility of structured violence risk assessments in English medium secure forensic units. Psychiatr Bull. 2009;33(4):129–132.
   Google Scholar
• Deichmann Nielsen L, Bech P, Hounsgaard L, et al. 'Mechanical restraint-confounders, risk, alliance score': testing the clinical validity of a new risk assessment instrument. Nord J Psychiatry. 2017;71(6):441–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almvik R, Woods P, Rasmussen K. The Brøset Violence Checklist: sensitivity, specificity, and interrater reliability. J Interpers Violence. 2000;15(12):1284–1296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hvidhjelm J, Sestoft D, Skovgaard LT, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of the Brøset Violence Checklist as predictor of violence in forensic psychiatry. Nord J Psychiatry. 2014(8);68:536–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abderhalden C, Needham I, Dassen T, et al. Structured risk assessment and violence in acute psychiatric wards: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2008;193(1):44–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods P, Olver M, Muller M. Implementing violence and incident reporting measures on a forensic mental health unit. Psychol Crime Law. 2015;21(10):973–986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Østergaard SD, Lemming OM, Mors O, et al. PANSS-6: a brief rating scale for the measurement of severity in schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2016;133(6):436–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay SR, Fiszbein A, Opler LA. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 1987;13(2):261–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obermeier M, Schennach-Wolff R, Meyer S, et al. Is the PANSS used correctly? a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry. 2011;11(1):113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen LD, Gildberg FA, Bech P, et al. Forensic mental health clinician´s experiences with and assessment of alliance regarding the patient´s readiness to be released from mechanical restraint. Int J Mental Health Nurs. 2018;27:116–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundheds-OG-Aeldreministeriet. Bekendtgørelse af lov om anvendelse af tvang i psykiatrien [Internet]. København (DK): Sundheds-og-Aaeldreministeriet; 2015 [cited 2019 Jan 15]. Available from: www.retsinformation.dk
   Google Scholar
• Brøset Violence Checklist. BVC. [Internet]. Norge (N): Dr. Roger Almvik; 2000 [cited 2019 Jan 15]. Available from: www.riskassessment.no
   Google Scholar
• De Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, et al. Measurement in medicine: a practical guide. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. 9th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Kluwer; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Forensic Psychiatric Nursing [Internet]. Denmark: Gildberg F. A; 2017 [cited 2019 Jan 15]. Available from: www.F-P-N.dk.
   Google Scholar
• Bech P. Clinical psychometrics. 1st ed. Chichester, West Sussex (UK): Wiley-Blackwell; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Mokken RJ. A theory and procedure of scale analysis: with applications in political research. Berlin (D): Mouton; 1971.
   Google Scholar
• World Medical Association [Internet]. Brazil (BR): 64th WMA General Assembly; 2013. WMA declaration of Helsinki:Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects [cited 2019 Jan 15]. Available from: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/
   Google Scholar
• Theodoridou A, Schlatter F, Ajdacic V, et al. Therapeutic relationship in the context of perceived coercion in a psychiatric population. Psychiatry Res. 2012;200(2-3):939–944.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roche E, Madigan K, Lyne JP, et al. The therapeutic relationship after psychiatric admission. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2014;202(3):186–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewitt J, Coffey M. Therapeutic working relationships with people with schizophrenia: literature review. J Adv Nurs. 2005;52(5):561–570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Leeuw M, Van Meijel B, Grypdonck M, et al. The quality of the working alliance between chronic psychiatric patients and their case managers: process and outcomes. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2012;19(1):1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bo S, Abu-Akel A, Kongerslev M, et al. Risk factors for violence among patients with schizophrenia. Clin PsychoL Rev. 2011;31(5):711–726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volavka J. Violence in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Psychiatr Danub. 2013;25(1):24–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keski-Valkama A, Sailas E, Eronen M, et al. The reasons for using restraint and seclusion in psychiatric inpatient care: a nationwide 15-year study. Nord J Psychiatry. 2010;64(2):136–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knutzen M, Bjørkly S, Eidhammer G, et al. Mechanical and pharmacological restraints in acute psychiatric wards-why and how are they used? Psychiatry Res. 2013;209(1):91–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson SA, Joesch JM, West II, et al. Risk for physical restraint or seclusion in the psychiatric emergency service (PES). Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2014(1);36:113–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgieva I, Vesselinov R, Mulder CL. Early detection of risk factors for seclusion and restraint: a prospective study. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2012;6(4):415–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'shea LE, Dickens GL. Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START): systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Assess. 2014;26(3):990–1002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hvidhjelm J. Prevention of aggression and violence on psychiatric wards via structured risk assessment – evaluation of Brøset Violence Checklist in Denmark [dissertation]. Copenhagen (DK): University of Copenhagen: 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll A. Are violence risk assessment tools clinically useful?. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2007;41(4):301–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamont S, Brunero S. Risk analysis: an integrated approach to the assessment and management of aggression/violence in mental health. JPI. 2009;5(1):25–32.
   Google Scholar
• Bak J, Brandt-Christensen M, Sestoft DM, et al. Mechanical restraint—which interventions prevent episodes of mechanical restraint?—a systematic review. Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2012;48(2):83–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gildberg FA, Bradley SK, Fristed P, et al. Reconstructing normality: characteristics of staff interactions with forensic mental health inpatients. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2012;21(2):103–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos C, Ross J, Stewart D, et al. The antecedents of violence and aggression within psychiatric in-patient settings. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2012;125(6):425–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noda T, Sugiyama N, Sato M, et al. Influence of patient characteristics on duration of seclusion/restrain in acute psychiatric settings in Japan. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2013;67(6):405–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor K, Mammen K, Barnett S, et al. Characteristics of patients with histories of multiple seclusion and restraint events during a single psychiatric hospitalization. J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2012;18(3):159–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beghi M, Peroni F, Gabola P, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for the use of restraint in psychiatry: a systematic review. Riv Psichiatr. 2013;48(1):10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luciano M, Sampogna G, Del Vecchio V, et al. Use of coercive measures in mental health practice and its impact on outcome: a critical review. Expert Rev Neurother. 2014;14(2):131–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knutzen M, Bjørkly S, Eidhammer G, et al. Characteristics of patients frequently subjected to pharmacological and mechanical restraint – a register study in three Norwegian acute psychiatric wards. Psychiatry Res. 2014;215(1):127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob T, Sahu G, Frankel V, et al. Patterns of restraint utilization in a community hospital's psychiatric inpatient units. Psychiatr Q. 2016;87(1):31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reitan SK, Helvik AS, Iversen V. Use of mechanical and pharmacological restraint over an eight-year period and its relation to clinical factors. Nord J Psychiatry. 2018;72(1):24–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Migon MN, Coutinho ES, Huf G, et al. Factors associated with the use of physical restraints for agitated patients in psychiatric emergency rooms. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2008;30(3):263–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nawka A, Kalisova L, Raboch J, et al. Gender differences in coerced patients with schizophrenia. BMC Psychiatry. 2013;13:257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumais A, Larue C, Drapeau A, et al. Prevalence and correlates of seclusion with or without restraint in a Canadian psychiatric hospital: a 2-year retrospective audit. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2011;18(5):394–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korkeila JA, Tuohimäki C, Kaltiala-Heino R, et al. Predicting use of coercive measures in Finland. Nord J Psychiatry. 2002;56(5):339–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar