Clinicians’ experiences on patients’ demands and shared decision making in Finnish specialized mental health care

References

• Armstrong D. Professionalism, indeterminacy and the EBM project. BioSocieties. 2007;2:73–84.
   Google Scholar
• Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the clinician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49:651–661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper B. Evidence-based mental health policy: a critical appraisal. Br J Psychiatry. 2003;183:105–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliacin J, Salyers MP, Kukla M, et al. Factors influencing patients' preferences and perceived involvement in shared decision-making in mental health care . J Ment Health. 2015;24:24–28. DOI: 10.3109/09638237.2014.954695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goossensen A, Zijlstra P, Koopmanschap M. Measuring shared decision making processes in psychiatry: skills versus patient satisfaction. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;67:50–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goss C, Moretti F, Mazzi MA, et al. Involving patients in decisions during psychiatric consultations. Br J Psychiatry. 1993;5:416–421.
   Google Scholar
• Maassen EF, Schrevel SJC, Dedding CWM, et al. Comparing patients’ perspectives of “good care” in Dutch outpatient psychiatric services with academic perspectives of patient-centred care. J Ment Health. 2016;26:84–94. DOI: 10.3109/09638237.2016.1167848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caiata-Zufferey M, Schulz PJ. Physicians' communicative strategies in interacting with internet-informed patients: results from a qualitative study. Health Communication. 2012;27:738–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hautamäki L. Uncertainty work and temporality in psychiatry: how clinicians and patients experience and manage risk in practice? Health Risk Soc. 2018;20:43–62. DOI: 10.1080/13698575.2018.1442918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill SA, Laugharne R. Decision making and information seeking preferences among psychiatric patients. J Ment Health. 2006;15:75–84. DOI: 10.1080/09638230500512250.
   Google Scholar
• Rose N. Disorders without borders? The expanding scope of psychiatric practice. BioSocieties. 2006;1:465–484.
   Google Scholar
• Speed E. Discourses of consumption or consumed by discourse? A consideration of what “consumer” means to the service user. J Ment Health. 2007;16:307–318. DOI: 10.1080/09638230701299210.
   Google Scholar
• Toiviainen H, Vuorenkoski L, Hemminki E. Physicians' opinions on patients' requests for specific treatments and examinations. Health Expect. 2005;8:43–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson S, Doody G. Parallel paths? Patient and doctor priorities in psychiatric outpatient consultations. J Ment Health. 2010;19:461–469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drake RE, Deegan PE. Shared decision making is an ethical imperative. Psychiatr Serv. 2009;60:1007. DOI: 10.1176/ps.2009.60.8.1007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drake RE, Deegan PE, Rapp C. The promise of shared decision making in mental health. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2010;34:7–13. DOI: 10.2975/34.1.2010.7.13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikesell L, Bromley E, Young AS, et al. Integrating client and clinician perspectives on psychotropic medication decisions: developing a communication-centered epistemic model of shared decision making for mental health contexts. Health Commun. 2016;31:707–717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koivusalo M, Ollila E, Alanko A. Johdanto. In: Koivusalo M, Ollila E, Alanko A, editors. Kansalaisesta kuluttajaksi. Markkinat ja muutos terveydenhuollossa. Helsinki: Gaudeamus; 2009. p. 9–20.
   Google Scholar
• Hamann J, Mendel R, Cohen R, et al. Psychiatrists' use of shared decision making in the treatment of schizophrenia: patient characteristics and decision topics. Psychiatr Serv. 2009;60:1107–1112. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.60.8.1107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamann J, Mendel R, Bühner M, et al. How should patients behave to facilitate shared decision making-the doctors' view. Health Expect. 2012;15:360–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigrunarson V, Moljord IEO, Steinsbekk A, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing self-referral to inpatient treatment and treatment as usual in patients with severe mental disorders. Nord J Psychiatry. 2017;71:120–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strand M, von Hausswolff-Juhlin Y. Patient-controlled hospital admission in psychiatry: a systematic review. Nord J Psychiatry. 2015;69:574–586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellegaard T, Bliksted V, Lomborg K, et al. Use of patient-controlled psychiatric hospital admissions: patients' perspective. Nord J Psychiatry. 2017;71:370–377. DOI: 10.1080/08039488.2017.1302505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moljord IEO, Lara-Cabrera ML, Salvesen Ø, et al. Twelve months effect of self-referral to inpatient treatment on patient activation, recovery, symptoms and functioning: a randomized controlled study. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100:1144–1152. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.01.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellegaard T, Mehlsen M, Lomborg K, et al. Use of patient-controlled psychiatric hospital admissions: mental health professionals' perspective. Nord J Psychiatry. 2017;71:362–369. DOI: 10.1080/08039488.2017.1301548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metz MJ, Veerbeek MA, Twisk JWR, et al. Shared decision-making in mental health care using routine outcome monitoring: results of a cluster randomised-controlled trial. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2019;54:209–219. DOI: 10.1007/s00127-018-1589-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristensen S, Mainz J, Baandrup L, et al. Conceptualizing patient-reported outcome measures for use within two Danish psychiatric clinical registries: description of an iterative co-creation process between patients and healthcare professionals. Nord J Psychiatry. 2018;72:409–419. DOI: 10.1080/08039488.2018.1492017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamann J, Leucht S, Kissling W. Shared decision making in psychiatry. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2003;107:403–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo A, Bendelow G, Fulford B, et al. Evaluating the influence of implicit models of mental disorder on processes of shared decision making within community-based multi-disciplinary teams. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56:1557–1570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seale C, Chaplin R, Lelliott P, et al. Sharing decisions in consultations involving anti-psychotic medication: a qualitative study of psychiatrists' experiences. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62:2861–2873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angell B, Bolden GB. Justifying medication decisions in mental health care: psychiatrists' accounts for treatment recommendations. Soc Sci Med. 2015;138:44–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee A, McGarty C, Banfield M. Barriers to genuine consumer and carer participation from the perspectives of Australian systemic mental health advocates. J Ment Health. 2016;25:231–237. DOI: 10.3109/09638237.2015.1124383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helén I, Hämäläinen P, Metteri A. Komplekseja ja katkoksia: psykiatrian hajaantuminen suomalaiseen sosiaalivaltioon. In: Helén I, editor. Reformin pirstaleet: mielenterveyspolitiikka hyvinvointivaltion jälkeen. Tampere: Vastapaino; 2011. p. 11–69.
   Google Scholar
• Ethical Board internet guideline of the University Hospital of Helsinki. Available from: https://www.helsinki.fi/en/research/research-ethics
   Google Scholar
• Silverman D. Doing qualitative research: a practical handbook. London: Sage; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Potter J, Wetherell M. Unfolding discourse analysis. In: Wetherell M, Taylor S, Yates SY, editors. Discourse theory and practice: a reader. London: Sage; 2001. p. 198–209.
   Google Scholar
• Noble LM, Douglas BC, Newman SP. What do patients expect of psychiatric services? A systematic and critical review of empirical studies. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52:985–998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallerstein RS. Merton Gill, psychotherapy, and psychoanalysis: a personal dialogue. J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 1997;45:233–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons M. 2000. The dove that returns, the dove that vanishes. Paradox and creativity in psychoanalysis. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hildén HM. Making decisions in the face of death: physicians’ and nurses’ views of end-of-life decision-making and patient participation. Helsinki: Yliopistopaino; 2005.
   Google Scholar