The Norwegian network for personality disorders – development, contributions and challenges through 30 years

References

• Karterud S, Pedersen G, Friis S, et al. The Norwegian network of psychotherapeutic day hospitals. Ther Communities. 1998;1:15–28.
   Google Scholar
• Rosie JS. Partial hospitalization: a review of recent literature. Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1987;38(12):1291–1299.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karterud S. The primary task of open heterogenous groups in a therapeutic community. J Oslo City Hosp. 1981;31:71–74. PMID7320792
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karterud S, Vaglum S, Friis S, et al. Day hospital therapeutic community treatment for patients with personality disorders: an empirical evaluation of the containment function. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1992;180(4):238–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaglum P, Friis S, Irion T, et al. Treatment response of severe and nonsevere personality disorders in a therapeutic community day unit. J Personal Disord. 1990;4(2):161–172.
   Google Scholar
• Piper WE. Psychotherapy research in the 1980s: defining areas of consensus and controversy. Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1988;39(10):1055–1063.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Budman SH, Demby A, Soldz S, et al. Time-limited group psychotherapy for patients with personality disorders: outcomes and dropouts. Int J Group Psychother. 1996;46(3):357–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piper WE, Rosie JS, Azim HF, et al. A randomized trial of psychiatric day treatment for patients with affective and personality disorders. Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1993;44(8):757–763.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karterud S, Pedersen G, Bjordal E, et al. Day hospital treatment of patients with personality disorders. Experiences from a Norwegian treatment research network. J Personal Disorders. 2003;17(3):243–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storebø OJ, Stoffers-Winterling JM, Völlm BA, et al. Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;5:CD012955.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karterud S, Wilberg T, Pedersen G, et al. Quality assurance of psychiatric day hospital treatment. II: ward level. Nordisk Psykiatrisk Tidsskrift. 1998;52(4):327–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urnes Ø, Karterud S, Pedersen G, et al. Quality assurance of psychiatric day hospital treatment. I: individual level. Nordisk Psykiatrisk Tidsskrift. 1998;52(3):251–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilberg T, Karterud S, Pedersen G, et al. Quality assurance of psychiatric day hospital treatment. III: health care system level. Nordisk Psykiatrisk Tidsskrift. 1998;52(5):431–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris MA, Weistroffer HR. A new look at the relationship between user involvement in systems development and system success. Commun Assoc Inf Syst. 2009;24:739–756.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang MI, Thorn RG. The effect of user engagement on system success: a meta-analytical integration of research findings. Inf Manag. 1999;35(4):229–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bano M, Zowghi D. A systematic review on the relationship between user involvement and system success. Inf Softw Technol. 2015;58:148–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kujala S. User involvement: a review of the benefits and challenges. Behav Inf Technol. 2003;22(1):1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baronas AK, Louis MR. Restoring a sense of control during implementation: how user involvement leads to system acceptance. MIS Q. 1988;12(1):111–126. https://www.jstor.org/stable/248811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barki H, Hartwick J. Rethinking the concept of user involvement. MIS Q. 1989;13(1):53–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurish ME. Introduction. In: Maurish ME, editor. Handbook of psychological assessment in primary care settings. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers; 2000. p. 3–41.
   Google Scholar
• Zeffane R, Cheek B, Meredith P. Does user involvement during information systems development improve data quality? Hum Syst Manag. 1998;17(2):115–121.
   Google Scholar
• Howcroft D, Wilson M. Paradoxes of participatory practices: the Janus role of the systems developer. Inf Organ. 2003;13(1):1–24. (02)00023-4
   Google Scholar
• Andersen ES, Grude KV, Haug T. Goal directed project management: effective techniques and strategies. 4th ed. London (UK): Kogan Page Publishers; 2009. ISBN 0749457554, 9780749457556
   Google Scholar
• Wilberg T, Karterud S, Pedersen G, et al. Outpatient group psychotherapy following day treatment of patients with personality disorders. J Pers Disord. 2003;17(6):510–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvarstein E, Karterud S. Large variations of global functioning over five years in treated patients with personality traits and disorders. J Pers Disord. 2012;26(2):141–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rai A, Lang SS, Welker RB. Assessing the validity of IS success models: an empirical test and theoretical analysis. Inf Syst Res. 2002;13(1):50–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moos RH. Ward atmosphere scale manual. 3rd ed.. Palo Alto (CA): Mind Garden; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Costa PT, McCrae RR. Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five factor inventory (NEO-FFI), Professional Manual. Odessa (FL): Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Verheul R, Andrea H, Berghout CC, et al. Severity indices of personality problems (SIPP-118): development, factor structure, reliability, and validity. Psychol Assess. 2008;20(1):23–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derogatis LR. SCL-90-R: symptom checklist-90-R: administration, scoring and procedures manual. Minneapolis (MN): National Computer Systems; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Bagby RM, Parker JDA, Taylor GJ. The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia scale—I. Item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure. J Psychosom Res. 1994;38(1):23–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan KA, Clark CL, Shaver PR. Self-report measurement of adult attachment: an integrative overview. In: Simpson JA, Rholes WS, editors. Attachment theory and close relationships. New York (NY): Guilford Press; 1998. p. 46–76.
   Google Scholar
• Gratz KL, Roemer L. Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2004;26(1):41–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friis S. How to help clinically relevant research survive? Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2015;132(6):439–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundet R. Forsker og terapeut - sammenfletting av roller som grunnlag for en forskende klinisk praksis. TPH. 2014;11(1):35–43.
   Google Scholar
• Callaghan P, David A, Lewis S, et al. Developing support for mental health clinical research: the Mental Health Research Network experience. Clin Invest. 2012;2(5):459–463.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart R. Mental disorders and mortality: so many publications, so little change. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2015;132(5):410–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopelman S. Tit for tat and beyond: the legendary work of Anatol Rapoport. Negotiation Confl Manage Res. 2020;13(1):60–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark DM, Layard R, Smithies R, et al. Improving access to psychological therapy: initial evaluation of two UK demonstration sites. Behav Res Ther. 2009;47(11):910–920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns S, Karterud S. Guidelines for art group therapy as part of day treatment program for patients with personality disorders. Group Anal. 2004;37(3):419–432.
   Google Scholar
• Karterud S, Pedersen G. Short-term day hospital treatment for personality disorders: benefits of the therapeutic components. Ther Communities. 2004;25:43–54.
   Google Scholar
• Karterud S, Urnes Ø. Short-term day treatment programs for personality disorders. What is the optimal composition? Nord J Psychiatry. 2004;58(3):243–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leirvåg H, Pedersen G, Karterud S. Long-term continuation treatment after short-term day treatment of female patients with severe personality disorders: body awareness group therapy versus psychodynamic group therapy. Nord J Psychiatry. 2010;64(2):115–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvarstein E, Karterud S, Pedersen G. Treatment course of the most severe borderline patients in the Norwegian Network of Psychotherapeutic Day Hospitals. Ther Communities. 2004;25:120–130.
   Google Scholar
• Hummelen B, Wilberg T, Karterud S. Interviews of female patients with borderline personality disorder who dropped out of group treatment. Int J Group Psychother. 2007;57(1):67–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnevik E, Wilberg T, Urnes Ø, et al. Psychotherapy for personality disorders: 18 months’ follow-up of the Ullevål Personality Project. J Pers Disord. 2010;24(2):188–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gullestad F, Wilberg T, Klungsøyr O, et al. Is treatment in a day hospital step-down program superior to outpatient individual psychotherapy for patients with personality disorders? – results from a randomized clinical trial comparing different modalities. Psychother Res. 2012;22(4):426–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvarstein EH, Pedersen G, Urnes Ø, et al. Changing from a traditional psychodynamic treatment programme to mentalization-based treatment for patients with borderline personality disorder – does it make a difference? Psychol Psychother. 2015;88(1):71–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvarstein EH, Pedersen G, Folmo E, et al. Mentalization-based treatment or psychodynamic treatment programs for patients with borderline personality disorder - the impact of clinical severity. Psychol Psychother. 2019;92(1):91–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morken KTE, Binder P-E, Arefjord NM, et al. Mentalization based treatment from the patients’ perspective–what ingredients do they emphasize? Front Psychol. 2019;10:1327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morken KT, Karterud SW. Mentalization-Based Group Therapy (MBT-G) in a pilot study of female personality disordered and substance-abusing patients. Gruppenpsychotherapie Und Gruppendynamik. 2019;55(3):183–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditlefsen IT, Nissen-Lie HA, Andenaes A, et al. “Yes, there is actually hope!” — a qualitative investigation of how patients experience mentalization-based psychoeducation tailored for borderline personality disorder. J Psychother Integration. 2021;31(3):257–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folmo EJ, Stänicke E, Johansen MS, et al. Development of therapeutic alliance in mentalization-based treatment—goals, bonds, and tasks in a specialized treatment for borderline personality disorder. Psychother Res. 2021;31(5):604–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilberg T, Karterud S, Pedersen G, et al. The impact of avoidant personality disorder on psychosocial impairment is substantial. Nord J Psychiatry. 2009;63(5):390–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eikenaes I, Hummelen B, Abrahamsen G, et al. Personality functioning in patients with avoidant personality disorder and social phobia. J Pers Disord. 2013;27(6):746–763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eikenaes I, Egeland J, Hummelen B, et al. Avoidant personality disorder versus social phobia: the significance of childhood neglect. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0128737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eikenaes I, Pedersen G, Wilberg T. Attachment styles in patients with avoidant personality disorder compared with social phobia. Psychol Psychother. 2016;89(3):245–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonsen S, Eikenaes IU-M, Bach B, et al. Level of alexithymia as a measure of personality dysfunction in avoidant personality disorder. Nord J Psychiatry. 2021;75(4):266–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvarstein EH, Antonsen BT, Klungsøyr O, et al. Avoidant personality disorder and social functioning: a longitudinal, observational study investigating predictors of change in a clinical sample. Personal Disord. 2021;12(6):594–605.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sørensen KD, Wilberg T, Berthelsen E, et al. Lived experience of treatment for avoidant personality disorder: searching for courage to be. Front Psychol. 2019;10:2879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen KD, Råbu M, Wilberg T, et al. Struggling to be a person: lived experience of avoidant personality disorder. J Clin Psychol. 2019;75(4):664–680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersen MS, Moen A, Børøsund E, et al. Therapists’ experiences with mentalization-based treatment for avoidant personality disorder. Eur J Qual Res Psychotherapy. 2021;11:143–159. https://ejqrp.org/index.php/ejqrp/article/view/126
   Google Scholar
• Hummelen B, Pedersen G, Wilberg T, et al. Poor validity of the DSM-IV schizoid personality disorder construct as a diagnostic category. J Personal Disord. 2015;29(3):334–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummelen B, Pedersen G, Karterud S. Some suggestions for the DSM-5 schizotypal personality disorder construct. Compr Psychiatry. 2012;53(4):341–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karterud S, Øien M, Pedersen G. Validity aspects of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition, narcissistic personality disorder construct. Compr Psychiatry. 2011;52(5):517–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakkevig JF, Karterud S. Is the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition, histrionic personality disorder category a valid construct? Compr Psychiatry. 2010;51(5):462–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paap MCS, Braeken J, Pedersen G, et al. A psychometric evaluation of the DSM-IV criteria for antisocial personality disorder: dimensionality, local reliability, and differential item functioning across gender. Assessment. 2020;27(1):89–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvarstein EH, Zahl KE, Stänicke L, et al. Vulnerability of personality disorder during the Covid-19 crises – a multicenter survey of treatment experiences among patients referred to treatment. Nord J Psychiatry. 2022;76(1):52–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvarstein EH, Zahl KE, Stänicke L, et al. Vulnerability of personality disorder during Covid-19 crises - a multicenter survey of mental and social distress among patients referred to treatment. Nord J Psychiatry. 2022;76(2):138–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen G, Tybring-Petersen K, Tønder M, et al. Spørreskjema for måling av kroppsopplevelse. Tidsskrift for Norsk Psykologforening. 2013;50:992–998. https://psykologtidsskriftet.no/fagartikkel/2013/10/sporreskjema-maling-av-kroppsopplevelse
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen G, Hagtvet KA, Karterud S. Interpersonal problems: self-therapist agreement and therapist consensus. J Clin Psychol. 2011;67(3):308–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen G, Hagtvet KA, Karterud S. Generalizability studies of the global assessment of functioning (GAF) - split version. Compr Psychiatry. 2007;48(1):88–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folmo EJ, Karterud SW, Bremer K, et al. The design of the MBT-G adherence and quality scale. Scand J Psychol. 2017;58(4):341–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karterud S, Pedersen G, Engen M, et al. The MBT Adherence and Competence Scale (MBT-ACS): development, structure and reliability. Psychother Res. 2013;23(6):705–717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streit F, Awasthi S, Rietschel M, et al. TH50. Genome-wide association study of borderline personality disorder – first results from The International Borderline Genomics Consortium. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2021;51:e221. 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2021.08.222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association (APA). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed., DSM-5. Washington (DC): American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• First MB, Williams JBW, Karg RS, et al. User’s guide for the SCID-5-PD (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Personality Disorder). Arlington (VA): American Psychiatric Association; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Hummelen B, Johan, Braeken J, Christensen TB, et al. A psychometric analysis of the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders Module I (SCID-5-AMPD-I): level of personality functioning scale. Assessment. 2021;28(5):1320–1333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO [Internet]. ICD-11 clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines for mental and behavioural disorders. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2022. Available from: gcp.network/en/private/icd-11-guidelines/disorders
   Google Scholar
• Bach B, Kramer U, Doering S, et al. The ICD-11 classification of personality disorders: a European perspective on challenges and opportunities. Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2022;9(1):12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar