Research and data-sharing policy in Sweden – neoliberal courses, forces and discourses*

References

• Ahlbäck-Öberg, S. and Sundberg, E. (2016) ‘Avkollegialiseringen av den svenska högskolan’ [The De-collegialization of Swedish Universities] in Ahlbäck-Öberg, S., Bennich-Björkman, L., Hermansson, J., Jarstad, C., Karlsson, A. and Widmalm, S. (eds) Det Hotade Universitetet [The threatened university], Dialogos Förlag, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Argyres, N. and Liebeskind, J. (1998) ‘Privatizing the intellectual commons: universities and the commercialization of biotechnology’, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 35, 4, pp.427–54, doi:10.1016/S0167-2681(98)00049-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. (2012) ‘Performativity, commodification and commitment: an I-Spy guide to the neoliberal university’, British Journal of Educational Studies, 60, 1, pp.17–28, doi:10.1080/00071005.2011.650940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, J., Chandler, J. and Clark, H. (2001) ‘Between the ivory tower and the academic assembly line’, Journal of Management Studies, 38, 1, pp.88–101, doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennich-Björkman, L. (2007) ‘Has academic freedom survived? – An interview study of the conditions for researchers in an era of paradigmatic change’, Higher Education Quarterly, 61, 3, pp.334–61, doi:10.1111/j.1468-2273.2007.00358.x
   Google Scholar
• Bennich-Björkman, L. (2013) ‘Down the slippery slope: the perils of the academic research industry’ in Rider, S., Hasselberg, Y. and Waluszewski, A. (eds) Transformations in Research. Higher Education and the Academic Market, Higher Education Dynamics, vol. 39, Springer, Dordrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Cannella, G. and Lincoln, Y. (2015) ‘Critical qualitative research in global neoliberalism. Foucault, inquiry, and transformative possibilities’ in Denzin, N. A. and Giardina, M. (eds) Qualitative Inquiry and the Politics of Research, Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Castel, R. (2000) ‘The roads to disaffiliation: insecure work and vulnerable relationships’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24, 3, pp.519–35, doi:10.1111/1468-2427.00262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. (2015) ‘Coda. The death of data?’ in Denzin, N. and Giardina, M. (eds) Qualitative Inquiry and the Politics of Research. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. and Giardina, M. (2006) ‘Introduction. Qualitative inquiry and the conservative challenge’ in Denzin, N. and Giardina, M. (eds) Qualitative Inquiry and the Conservative Challenge, Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. and Giardina, M. (2015) ‘Introduction. Qualiative inquiry and the politics of research’ in Denzin, N. and Giardina, M. (eds) Qualitative Inquiry and the Politics of Research, Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, California, pp.9–25.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. and Giardina, M. (2017) ‘Introduction. Qualitative inquiry in neoliberal times’ in Denzin, N. K. and Giardina, M. (eds) Qualitative Inquiry in Neoliberal Times, Routledge, New York.
   Google Scholar
• DiGiacomo, S. (2005) ‘Audit culture and the politics of accountability: a comparative perspective’, Anthropology in Action, 12, 1, pp.57–63, doi:10.3167/096720105780644308
   Google Scholar
• Dir. (2013) Kommittédirektiv 2013: 8,Förutsättningar för Registerbaserad Forskning, Beslut vid regeringssammanträde den 17 Januari, Justitiedepartementet, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Dir. (2016) Kommittédirektiv 2016: 15,Dataskyddsförordningen, Beslut vid regeringssammanträde den 25 Februari, Justitiedepartementet, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Donoghue, F. (2009) ‘Why academic freedom doesn’t matter’, South Atlantic Quarterly, 108, 4, pp.601–21, doi:10.1215/00382876-2009-010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donoghue, F. (2015) ‘Academic freedom, the “teacher exception„, and the diminished professor’, Ethics, Science and Environmental Politics, 15, 1, pp.7–15, doi:10.3354/esep00162
   Google Scholar
• Duménil, G. and Lévy, D. (2005) The Neoliberal (Counter) Revolution Neoliberalism: A Critical Reader, Pluto Press, London, pp.9–19.
   Google Scholar
• Engelmark, S. (2015) ‘Ny registerlag kan bli försenad’, Curie, Swedish Research Council, 19 March, available from https://www.tidningencurie.se/nyheter/2015/03/19/ny-registerlag-kan-bli-forsenad/ [accessed July 2018].
   Google Scholar
• EU. (2012) EU Commission’s Recommendations on Access to and Preservation of Scientific Information (C4890), available from https://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/recommendation-access-and-preservation-scientific-information_en.pdf [accessed July 2018].
   Google Scholar
• EU. (2016) General Data Protection Regulation (EU 2016/679), available from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679&from=EN [accessed July 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Fransson, J., Kjellberg, S., Sedvall, K., Tengstam, O., Tapia Lagunas, P., Du Toit, M., Widmark, J., Holmström, T. and Höie, H. (2016) På väg mot ett Forskarstöd Kring Hantering och Tillgängliggörande av Forskningsdata [Towards a Research Support for the Management of and Access to Research Data], Malmö Högskola, Malmö.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, M. and Burdon, P. (2013) ‘Academic resistance to the neoliberal university’, Legal Education Review, 23, 2, pp.379–401.
   Google Scholar
• Holmwood, J. (2013a) ‘Commercial enclosure. Whatever happened to open access?’, Radical Philosophy, 181, September/October, available from https://www.radicalphilosophy.com/commentary/commercial-enclosure [accessed July 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Holmwood, J. (2013b) ‘Universities in crisis: markets vs publics?’, Paper presented at the School of Sociology, University College Dublin, available from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=COWrlYyeqys [accessed July 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Holmwood, J. (2017) ‘The university, democracy and the public sphere’, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38, 7, pp.927–42, doi:10.1080/01425692.2016.1220286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmwood, J. (2018) ‘Inegalitarian populism and the university: British reflections on Newfield’s The Great Mistake: how We Wrecked Public Universities and How We Can Fix Them’, British Journal of Sociology, 69, 2, pp.510–17, doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12339_5
   Google Scholar
• House, E. (2006) ‘Methodological fundamentalism and the quest for control(s)’ in Denzin, N. and Giardina, M. (eds) Qualitative Inquiry and the Conservative Challenge, Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2017) ‘Varieties of academic capitalism and entrepreneurial universities’, Higher Education, 73, 6, pp.853–70, doi:10.1007/s10734-017-0120-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnsson, M. and Lassi, M. (2015) Hantering av Forskningsdata vid Fakulteterna inom Lunds Universitet - en Lägesbeskrivning Hösten 2015 [Management of Research Data at Lund University's Faculties - a Progress Autumn 2015], Universitetsbiblioteket, Lunds Universitet, Lund.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I. (1784/2014) ‘An answer to the question: ‘What is enlightenment?” (Schmidt trans.) in Schmidt, J. (ed.) What is Enlightenment? Eighteenth-century Answers and Twentieth-century Questions, EBSCO Publishing, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Karran, T. (2007) ‘Academic freedom in Europe: a preliminary comparative analysis’, Higher Education Policy, 20, 3, pp.289–313, doi:10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300159
   Google Scholar
• Karran, T., Beiter, K. and Appiagyei-Atua, K. (2017) ‘Measuring academic freedom in Europe: a criterion referenced approach’, Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 1, 2, pp.209–39, doi:10.1080/23322969.2017.1307093
   Google Scholar
• Kirsebom, L. (2016) ‘Ökad press på universitetslärarna’ [Increased pressure on university teachers], Curie, 31 May, available from https://www.tidningencurie.se/en/nyheter/2016/05/31/increased-pressure-on-university-teachers/ [accessed July 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Kniivilä, K. (2016) ‘Universitetets planeringschef: smärtgränsen är nära’ [University Planning Director: The pain limit is close], Sydsvenskan, 30 May, available from https://www.sydsvenskan.se/2016-05-30/universitetets-planeringschef-smartgransen-ar-nara [accessed July 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Koro-Ljungberg, M., Montana Cirell, A., Gong, B.-G. and Tesar, M. (2017) ‘The importance of small form: “Minor“ data and “BIG„ neoliberalism’ in Denzin, N. and Giardina, M. (eds) Qualitative Inquiry in Neoliberal Times, Routledge, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (2006) ‘This is your father’s paradigm: government intrusion and the case of qualitative research in education’ in Denzin, N. and Giardina, M. (eds) Quantitative Inquiry and the Conservative Challenge, Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA, pp.31–56.
   Google Scholar
• Lippit, V. (2010) ‘Social structure of accumulation theory’ in McDonough, T., Reich, M. and Kotz, D. (eds) Contemporary Capitalism and Its Crises: Social Structure of Accumulation Theory for the 21st Century, Cambridge University Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• MacGregor, S. (2005) ‘The welfare state and neoliberalism’ in Saad-Filho, A. and Johnston, D. (eds) Neoliberalism: A Critical Reader, Pluto Press, London, 142–48.
   Google Scholar
• Mauthner, N. and Doucet, A. (2003) ‘Reflexive accounts and accounts of reflexivity in qualitative data analysis’, Sociology, 37, 3, pp.413–31, doi:10.1177/00380385030373002
   Google Scholar
• Mauthner, N. and Parry, O. (2009) ‘Qualitative data preservation and sharing in the social sciences: on whose philosophical terms?’, Australian Journal of Social Issues, 44, 3, pp.291–307, doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1839-4655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauthner, N., Parry, O. and Backett-Milburn, K. (1998) ‘The data are out there, or are they? Implications for archiving and revisiting qualitative data’, Sociology, 32, 4, pp.733–45. available from https://www.slis.indiana.edu/faculty/hrosenba/www/Research/methods/mauthner_archive-qual.pdf [ accessed July 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R. (1942/1973) ‘The normative structure of science’ in Merton, R. (ed.) The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P. (2011) Science-Mart: Privatizing American Science, ProQuest Ebook Central, http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/linkoping-ebooks/detail.action?docID=3301138 Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA and London, England.
   Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P. (2012) ‘The modern commercialization of science is a passel of Ponzi Schemes’, Social Epistemology, 26, 3–4, pp.285–310, doi:10.1080/02691728.2012.697210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2001) Scientific Research in Education, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2015) Frascati Manual. Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development, OECD, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Olssen, M. and Peters, M. (2007) ‘Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: from the free market to knowledge capitalism’, Journal of Education Policy, 20, 3, pp.313–45, doi:10.1080/02680930500108718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong, A. (2006) Neoliberalism as Exception. Mutations in Citizenship and Sovereignty, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M. (2013) ‘Managerialism and the neoliberal university: prospects for new forms of ‘open management’ in higher education’, Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice, 5, 1, pp.11–26.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. (1999) The Audit Society, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Proposition 2016/17:50. (2016) Kunskap and Samverkan - för Samhällets Utmaningar och Stärkt Konkurrenskraft [Knowledge and Collaboration - For Society’s Challenges and Increased Competitiveness], Utbildningsdepartementet, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Radice, H. (2013) ‘How we got here: UK higher education under neoliberalism’, International Journal for Critical Geographies, 12, 2, pp.407–18.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1998) Inventing ourselves. Psychology, power, and personhood, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1999) Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Shore, C. (2010) ‘Beyond the multiversity: neoliberalism and the rise of the schizophrenic university’, Social Anthropology, 18, 1, pp.15–29, doi:10.1111/(ISSN)1469-8676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shore, C. and Wright, S. (2015) ‘Governing by numbers: audit culture, rankings and the new world order’, Social Anthropology, 23, 1, pp.22–28, doi:10.1111/1469-8676.12098
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter, S. and Rhoades, G. (2004) Academic Capitalism and the New Economy. Markets, State, and Higher Education, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Slavnic, Z. (2011) ‘Arkivering och återanvändning av kvalitativa data - Policy trender och akademiska kontroverser’ [Archiving and reuse of qualitative data - Policy trends and academic controversies], Sociologisk Forskning, 48, 4, pp.87–88.
   Google Scholar
• Slavnic, Z. (2013) ‘Towards qualitative data preservation and re-use - policy trends and academic controversies in UK and Sweden’, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 14, 2, article 10.
   Google Scholar
• SOU 2014:45. (2014) Unik Kunskap Genom Registerforskning - Betänkande av Registerforskningsutredningen, Utbildningsdepartementet, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• SOU 2017:39. (2017) Ny Dataskyddslag Kompletterande Bestämmelser till EU: s Dataskyddsförordning [New Data Protection Act. Supplementary Regulations to the EU Data Protection Regulation], Justitiedepartementet, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Stockholms Universitet. (2016) Hantering av Forskningsdata vid Stockholms Universitet. Förslag till Strategi och Struktur [Management of Research Data at Stockholm University. Proposal for Strategy and Structure], Stockholms universitet, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Strathern, M. (ed) (2000) Audit Cultures. Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Svensk Författningssamling. (1998) Personuppgiftslag 1998: 204 (Personal Data Act), available from https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/lag-2003460-om-etikprovning-av-forskning-som_sfs-2003-460 [accessed February, 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Svensk Författningssamling. (2003) Lag om etikprövning av forskning som avser människor 2003:460, available from https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/lag-2003460-om-etikprovning-av-forskning-som_sfs-2003-460 [accessed November, 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Svensk Författningssamling. (2009) Förordning med Instruktion för Vetenskapsrådet 2009:975 [Instruction for the Swedish Research Council], available from http://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/forordning-2009975-med-instruktion-for_sfs-2009-975 [ accessed February 2013] Regeringskansliet, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, H. (2006) ‘Research qualitv and research governance in the United Kingdom. From methodology to management’ in Denzin, N. and Giardina, M. (eds) Qualitative Inquiry and the Conservative Challenge, Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA.
   Google Scholar
• UKÄ. (2015) Universitet och Högskolor. Årsrapport, Universitetskanslersämbetet, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2005) Towards Knowledge Societies, UNESCO Publishing, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Vetenskapsrådet. (2006) Vetenskapsrådets Guide till Infrastrukturen - En Kartläggning och Rekommendationer för Svenska Forskares Tillgång till Forskningsinfrastruktur på lång sikt [Swedish research council’s guide to infrastructure], VR Rapportserie 14, Vetenskapsrådet, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Vetenskapsrådet. (2007) Vetenskapsrådets Guide till Infrastrukturen - Rekommendationer för Forskningsinfrastruktur på lång sikt från Forskningsråden och VINNOVA, VR Rapportserie, 11, Vetenskapsrådet, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Vetenskapsrådet. (2008). The Swedish Research Councils Guide to Infrastructure - Recommendations on long-term research infrastructures by the research councils and VINNOVA, Vetenskapsrådet. 5:2008, Vetenskapsrådet, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Vetenskapsrådet. (2011) Vetenskapsrådets Guide till Infrastrukturen 2012, VR Rapportserie, 8, Vetenskapsrådet, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Vetenskapsrådet. (2015a) Vetenskapsrådets Guide till Infrastruktur 2014, VR Rapportserie, Vetenskapsrådet, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Vetenskapsrådet. (2015b) Förslag till Nationella Riktlinjer för öppen Tillgång till Vetenskaplig Information [Proposal for National Guidelines for Open Access to Scientific Information], Vetenskapsrådet, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Vetenskapsrådet. (2016) Bilaga till Vetenskapsrådets Guide till Infrastrukturen, Vetenskapsrådet, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar