660
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Subversive Completions: Turn-Taking Resources for Commandeering the Recipient’s Action in Progress

, &

References

  • Antaki, C., & Wetherell, M. (1999). Show concessions. Discourse Studies, 1, 7–27. doi:10.1177/1461445699001001002
  • Bloch, S. (2011). Anticipatory other-completion of augmentative and alternative communication talk: A conversation analysis study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33, 261–269. doi:10.3109/09638288.2010.491574
  • Bolden, G. B. (2003). Multiple modalities in collaborative turn sequences. Gesture, 3, 187–212. doi:10.1075/gest
  • Bolden, G. B., & Mandelbaum, J. S. (2017). The use of conversational co-remembering to corroborate contentious claims. Discourse Studies, 19, 3–29. doi:10.1177/1461445616683593
  • Drew, P. (1987). Po-faced receipts of teases. Linguistics, 25, 219–253. doi:10.1515/ling.1987.25.1.219
  • Goodwin, M. H. (1983). Searching for a word as an interactive activity. In J. N. Deely & M. D. Lenhart (Eds.), Semiotics (pp. 129–138). New York, NY: Plenum.
  • Hayashi, M. (1999). Where grammar and interaction meet: A study of co-participant completion in Japanese conversation. Human Studies, 22, 475–499. doi:10.1023/A:1005492027060
  • Hayashi, M. (2003a). Joint utterance construction in Japanese conversation. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
  • Hayashi, M. (2003b). Language and the body as resources for collaborative action: A study of word searches in Japanese conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 36, 109–141. doi:10.1207/S15327973RLSI3602_2
  • Helasvuo, M. L. (2004). Shared syntax: The grammar of co-constructions. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1315–1336. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2004.05.007
  • Hepburn, A., & Bolden, G. B. (2017). Transcribing for social research. London, UK: Sage.
  • Hepburn, A., & Potter, J. (2011). Designing the recipient: Managing advice resistance in institutional settings. Social Psychology Quarterly, 74, 216–241. doi:10.1177/0190272511408055
  • Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. New York, NY: Polity Press.
  • Heritage, J. (2011). Territories of knowledge, territories of experience: Emphatic moments in interaction. In T. Stivers, L. Mondada, & J. Steensig (Eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation (pp. 159–183). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Heritage, J., & Raymond, G. (2005). The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68, 15–38. doi:10.1177/019027250506800103
  • Iwasaki, S. (2011). The multimodal mechanics of collaborative unit construction in Japanese conversation. In J. Streeck, C. Goodwin, & C. LeBaron (Eds.), Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Iwasaki, S. (2013). Emerging units and emergent forms of participation within a unit in Japanese interaction. In B. Szczepek & G. Raymond (Eds.), Units of talk - Units of action (pp. 243–276). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.
  • Kim, K.-H. (1999). Phrasal unit boundaries and organization of turns and sequences in Korean conversation. Human Studies, 22, 425–446. doi:10.1023/A:1005431826151
  • Koshik, I. (2002). Designedly incomplete utterances: A pedagogical practice for eliciting knowledge displays in error correction sequences. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 35, 277–309. doi:10.1207/S15327973RLSI3503_2
  • Lerner, G. H. (1987). Collaborative turn sequences: Sentence construction and social action. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of California at Irvine.
  • Lerner, G. H. (1989). Notes on overlap management in conversation: The case of delayed completion. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 53, 167–177. doi:10.1080/10570318909374298
  • Lerner, G. H. (1991). On the syntax of sentences-in-progress. Language in Society, 20, 441–458. doi:10.1017/S0047404500016572
  • Lerner, G. H. (1994). Responsive list construction: A conversational resource for accomplishing multifaceted social action. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 20–33. doi:10.1177/0261927X94131002
  • Lerner, G. H. (1996a). Finding “face” in the preference structures of talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 303–321. doi:10.2307/2787073
  • Lerner, G. H. (1996b). On the “semi-permeable” character of grammatical units in conversation: Conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 238–276). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lerner, G. H. (2004a). Collaborative turn sequences. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 225–256). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
  • Lerner, G. H. (2004b). On the place of linguistic resources in the organization of talk-in-interaction: Grammar as action in prompting a speaker to elaborate. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37, 154–184. doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi3702_3
  • Lerner, G. H., & Takagi, T. (1999). On the place of linguistic resources in the organization of talk-in-interaction: A co-investigation of English and Japanese grammatical practices. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 49–75. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00051-4
  • Potter, J., & Hepburn, A. (2010). Putting aspiration into words: ‘Laugh particles’, managing descriptive trouble and modulating action. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 1543–1555. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2009.10.003
  • Reddington, E., & Waring, H. Z. (2015). Understanding the sequential resources for doing humor in the language classroom. Humor, 28, 1–23. doi:10.1515/humor-2014-0144
  • Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
  • Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735. doi:10.1353/lan.1974.0010
  • Schegloff, E. A. (1982). Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh‘ and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Analyzing discourse: Text and talk (pp. 71–93). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  • Schegloff, E. A. (1991). Conversation analysis and socially shared cognition. In L. B. Resnick, J. Levine, & S. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 150–171). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Schegloff, E. A. (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1295–1345. doi:10.1086/229903
  • Schegloff, E. A. (2016). Increments. In J. D. Robinson (Ed.), Accountability in Social Interaction (pp. 239–263). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361–382. doi:10.1353/lan.1977.0041
  • Shaw, C., Hepburn, A., & Potter, J. (2013). Having the last laugh: On post-completion laughter particles. In P. J. Glenn & E. Holt (Eds.), Studies of laughter in interaction (pp. 91–106). London, UK: Bloomsbury.
  • Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T. (Eds.). (2013). The handbook of conversation analysis. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Szczepek, B. (2000a). Formal aspects of collaborative productions in English conversation. InLiSt, 17, 1–36.
  • Szczepek, B. (2000b). Functional aspects of collaborative productions in English conversation. InLiSt, 21, 1–37.
  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. ( Translated by G.E.M. Anscombe). New York, NY: Macmillian.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.