Analysis of Research Activity Among Ophthalmology Fellows

References

• Ali M, Saeed S, Zafar S, Golnik KC, Woreta F. Predictors of matching into an ophthalmology fellowship for international medical graduates: a San Francisco match analysis. Int Ophthalmol. 2023;43(6):2029–2035. doi:10.1007/s10792-022-02602-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ophthalmology AoUPo. Ophthalmology Fellowship Match Statistics & Demographics Dec 2021. 2022. https://aupo.org/news/2022-03/ophthalmology-fellowship-match-statistics-demographics-dec-2021
   Google Scholar
• Yousuf SJ, Akinyemi OA, Nnorom SO, Nguyen NS, Guiseppi R, Jones LS. Retina fellowship match outcomes and trends in program characteristics. Ophthalmol Retina. 2022;6(11):1107–1108. doi:10.1016/j.oret.2022.06.007.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burton E, Arsiwala LT, Johnson TV, Srikumaran D, Zafar S, Woreta FA. Applicant characteristics associated with glaucoma fellowship match from 2010 to 2017. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. Mar-Apr, 2022;5(2):233–240. doi:10.1016/j.ogla.2021.08.004.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arsiwala LT, Burton E, Mishra K, Zafar S, Woreta F. Trends in cornea fellowship applications and applicant characteristics: a San Francisco match analysis. J Aca Ophthalmol. 2022;14(2):e216–e223. doi:10.1055/s-0042-1756199.
   Google Scholar
• Dotan G, Karr DJ, Levin AV. Pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus fellowship match outcomes, 2000-2015. J Aapos. 2017 [06/1/2017];21(3):e181.1–.e181.8. doi:10.1016/j.jaapos.2017.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gershoni A, Vainer I, Reitblat O, et al. Research productivity across different ophthalmic subspecialties in the United States. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):1–9. doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4590-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vought R, Vought V, Lin M, et al. Gender representation among ophthalmology fellowship directors in 2022. Am J Ophthalmol. Nov 7 2023; 259: 166–171. 10.1016/j.ajo.2023.11.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vought R, Vought V, Shah E, Khouri AS. Demographics and Research Activity Among 2023 Academic Glaucoma Specialists. Seminars in Ophthalmology. 2023;1–6. doi:10.1080/08820538.2023.2293029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargoud AR, Thangamathesvaran L, Patel VR, Henseler R, Kass W, Khouri AS. Quantifying the impact of research on matching into ophthalmology residency. J Aca Ophthalmol. 2018;10(1):e133–e139. doi:10.1055/s-0038-1668575.
   Google Scholar
• Svider PF, Lopez SA, Husain Q, Bhagat N, Eloy JA, Langer PD. The association between scholarly impact and national institutes of health funding in ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. Jan 2014;121(1):423–428. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.08.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dotan G, Qureshi HM, Gaton DD. Chairs of United States academic ophthalmology departments: a descriptive analysis and trends. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018;196:26–33. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2018.08.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendiratta D, Herzog I, Vought R, et al. The relative citation ratio: an impartial assessment of productivity in academic otolaryngologists. Laryngoscope. 2024;134(2):592–599 doi:10.1002/lary.30876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eloy JA, Kilic S, Yoo NG, et al. Is industry funding associated with greater scholarly impact among academic neurosurgeons? World Neurosurg. 2017;103:517–525. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.03.110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gershoni A, Vainer I, Reitblat O, et al. Research productivity across different ophthalmic subspecialties in the United States. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):778. doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4590-3. 2019/11/1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Influence Module. National Institute of Health. 2022. https://icite.od.nih.gov/user_guide?page_id=ug_infl#:~:text=The%20Relative%20Citation%20Ratio%20is,the%20corresponding%20year%20of%20publication
   Google Scholar
• Ali MJ. Forewarned is forearmed: the h-index as a scientometric. Semin Ophthalmol. 2021/02/17. 2021;36(1–2):1–1. doi:10.1080/08820538.2021.1894889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hang A, Pradeep T, Jessani H, et al. Predictive factors of research productivity among ophthalmology residents: a benchmark analysis. J Aca Ophthalmol. 2022;14(2):e147–e152. doi:10.1055/s-0042-1750021.
   Google Scholar
• Huang A, Kim S, Zhu H, et al. A bibliometric analysis of ophthalmology resident research productivity in the United States. J Aca Ophthalmol. 2022;14(2):e263–e270. doi:10.1055/s-0042-1758565.
   Google Scholar
• Patel PA, Gopali R, Reddy A, Patel KK. The relative citation ratio and the h-index among academic ophthalmologists: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis. Ann Med Surg (Lond). Nov, 2021;71:103021. doi:10.1016/j.amsu.2021.103021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zafar S, Bressler NM, Golnik KC, et al. Fellowship match outcomes in the U.S. from 2010 to 2017: analysis of San Francisco match. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020;218:261–267. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2020.06.008. 2020/10/1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer AM, Henderson A, CE M, Keith JN. Factors associated with matching into surgical specialties. J Surg Res. 2022;270:300–312. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2021.09.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinard JR, Mahabir RC. Successfully matching into surgical specialties: an analysis of national resident matching program data. J Grad Med Educ. Sep, 2010;2(3):316–321. doi:10.4300/jgme-d-09-00020.1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen SA, Pershing S. Relative importance of applicant characteristics in ophthalmology residency interview selection: a survey of program directors. J Aca Ophthalmol. 2022;14(2):e246–e256. doi:10.1055/s-0042-1756122.
   Google Scholar
• Nallasamy S, Uhler T, Nallasamy N, Tapino PJ, Volpe NJ. Ophthalmology resident selection: current trends in selection criteria and improving the process. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(5):1041–1047. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.07.034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AAO. Residency match basics for ophthalmology. https://www.aao.org/medical-students/residency-match-basics
   Google Scholar