110
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Effects of Trust, Public Engagement, Conflict, and Social Networks on Satisfaction with Ecological Restoration

, , , &
Received 07 Mar 2023, Accepted 26 Feb 2024, Published online: 20 Apr 2024

References

  • Åberg, E. U., and S. Tapsell. 2013. Revisiting the river skerne: The long-term social benefits of river rehabilitation. Landscape and Urban Planning 113:94–103. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.01.009.
  • Abrams, L. C., R. Cross, E. Lesser, and D. Z. Levin. 2003. Nurturing interpersonal trust in knowledge-sharing networks. Academy of Management Perspectives 17 (4):64–77. doi: 10.5465/ame.2003.11851845.
  • Baker, S., K. Eckerberg, and A. Zachrisson. 2014. Political science and ecological restoration. Environmental Politics 23 (3):509–24. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2013.835201.
  • Baldwin, T. T., M. D. Bedell, and J. L. Johnson. 1997. The social fabric of a team-based M.B.A. program: Network effects on student satisfaction and performance. Academy of Management Journal 40 (6):1369–97. doi: 10.5465/257037.
  • Beilin, R., N. T. Reichelt, B. J. King, A. Long, and S. Cam. 2013. Transition landscapes and social networks: Examining on-ground community resilience and its implications for policy settings in multiscalar systems. Ecology and Society 18 (2):30–45. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26269309. doi: 10.5751/ES-05360-180230.
  • Bernhardt, E. S., M. A. Palmer, J. D. Allan, G. Alexander, K. Barnas, S. Brooks, J. Carr, S. Clayton, C. Dahm, J. Follstad-Shah, et al. 2005. Synthesizing US river restoration efforts. Science (New York, N.Y.) 308 (5722):636–7. doi: 10.1126/science.1109769.
  • Bodin, Ö., and C. Prell. 2011. Social network analysis in natural resource governance: Summary and outlook. In Social networks in natural resource management: Uncovering the social fabric of environmental governance, edited by Örjan Bodin and Christina Prell, 347–73. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bodin, Ö., M. M. García, and G. Robins. 2020. Reconciling conflict and cooperation in environmental governance: A social network perspective. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 45 (1):471–95. doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-011020-064352.
  • Bodin, Ö., S. Ramirez-Sanchez, H. Ernstson, and C. Prell. 2011. A social relational approach to natural resource governance. In Social networks and natural resource management: Uncovering the social fabric of environmental governance, edited by Örjan Bodin and Christina Prell, 1–54. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Borgatti, S. P., A. Mehra, D. J. Brass, and G. Labianca. 2009. Network analysis in the social sciences. Science (New York, N.Y.) 323 (5916):892–5. doi: 10.1126/science.1165821.
  • Borgatti, S. P., and D. S. Halgin. 2011. On network theory. Organization Science 22 (5):1168–81. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0641.
  • Borgatti, S. P., and M. G. Everett. 2000. Models of core/periphery structures. Social Networks 21 (4):375–95. doi: 10.1016/S0378-8733(99)00019-2.
  • Borgatti, S. P., M. G. Everett, and L. C. Freeman. 2002. UCINET 6 for windows: Software for social network analysis, vol. 6.730. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
  • Borgatti, S. P., M. G. Everett, J. C. Johnson, and F. Agneessens. 2024. Analyzing social networks, 2nd ed. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, Ltd.
  • Cammann, C., M. Fichman, D. Jenkins, and J. Klesh. 2008. Michigan organizational assessment questionnaire- -Job satisfaction subscale. (MOAQ-JSS) [Database record]. APA PsychTests. doi: 10.1037/t09214-000.
  • Carlsson, L., and F. Berkes. 2005. Co-management: Concepts and methodological implications. Journal of Environmental Management 75 (1):65–76. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.11.008.
  • Chua, R. Y. J., P. Ingram, and M. W. Morris. 2008. From the head and the heart: Locating cognition-and affect-based trust in managers’ professional networks. Academy of Management Journal 51 (3):436–52. doi: 10.5465/amj.2008.32625956.
  • Cockburn, J., E. Rosenberg, A. Copteros, S. F. Cornelius, N. Libala, L. Metcalfe, and B. van der Waal. 2020. A relational approach to landscape stewardship: Towards a new perspective for multi-actor collaboration. Land 9 (7):224–44. doi: 10.3390/land9070224.
  • Coleman, J. S. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94:S95–S120. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2780243. doi: 10.1086/228943.
  • Davenport, M. A., J. E. Leahy, D. H. Anderson, and P. J. Jakes. 2007. Building trust in natural resource management within local communities: A case study of the Midewin National Tallgrass Prairie. Environmental Management 39 (3):353–68. doi: 10.1007/s00267-006-0016-1.
  • Dickson, E. S., S. C. Gordon, and G. A. Huber. 2009. Enforcement and compliance in an uncertain world: An experimental investigation. The Journal of Politics 71 (4):1357–78. doi: 10.1017/S0022381609990235.
  • Dillman, D. A. 2011. Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method–2007 Update with new Internet, visual, and mixed-mode guide. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Earle, T. C., and M. Siegrist. 2008. On the relationship between trust and fairness in environmental risk management. Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis 28 (5):1395–414. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01091.x.
  • Fliervoet, J. M., G. W. Geerling, E. Mostert, and A. J. M. Smits. 2016. Analyzing collaborative governance through social network analysis: A case study of river management along the Waal River in The Netherlands. Environmental Management 57 (2):355–67. doi: 10.1007/s00267-015-0606-x.
  • Germain, R. H., D. W. Floyd, and S. V. Stehman. 2001. Public perceptions of the USDA Forest Service public participation process. Forest Policy and Economics 3 (3-4):113–24. doi: 10.1016/S1389-9341(01)00065-X.
  • Gray, S., R. Shwom, and R. Jordan. 2012. Understanding factors that influence stakeholder trust of natural resource science and institutions. Environmental Management 49 (3):663–74. doi: 10.1007/s00267-011-9800-7.
  • Hahn, T., P. Olsson, C. Folke, and K. Johansson. 2006. Trust-building, knowledge generation and organizational innovations: The role of a bridging organization for adaptive comanagement of a wetland landscape around Kristianstad, Sweden. Human Ecology 34 (4):573–92. doi: 10.1007/s10745-006-9035-z.
  • Hanneman, R. A., and M. Riddle. 2005. Introduction to social network methods. Riverside, CA: University of California, Riverside. http://faculty.ucr.edu/∼hanneman/.
  • Harrison, J. L., C. A. Montgomery, and J. C. Bliss. 2016. Beyond the monolith: The role of bonding, bridging, and linking social capital in the cycle of adaptive capacity. Society & Natural Resources 29 (5):525–39. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2015.1103389.
  • Hayes, A. F. 2012. PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf.
  • Hayes, A. F. 2015. An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research 50 (1):1–22. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2014.962683.
  • Helliwell, J. F. 2006. Well‐being, social capital and public policy: What’s new? The Economic Journal 116 (510):C34–C45. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2006.01074.x.
  • Holl, K. D., and R. B. Howarth. 2000. Paying for restoration. Restoration Ecology 8 (3):260–7. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-100x.2000.80037.x.
  • IBM Corporation. 2016. IBM SPSS statistics for windows, 24th ed. Armonk, NY, USA: IBM Corp.
  • Jehn, K. A., L. Greer, S. Levine, and G. Szulanski. 2008. The effects of conflict types, dimensions, and emergent states on group outcomes. Group Decision and Negotiation 17 (6):465–95. doi: 10.1007/s10726-008-9107-0.
  • Johnson, J. C., J. S. Boster, and L. A. Palinkas. 2003. Social roles and the evolution of networks in extreme and isolated environments. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology 27 (2-3):89–121. doi: 10.1080/00222500305890.
  • Krackhardt, D. 1988. Predicting with networks: Nonparametric multiple regression analysis of dyadic data. Social Networks 10 (4):359–81. doi: 10.1016/0378-8733(88)90004-4.
  • Labianca, G. 2014. Negative ties in organizational networks. In Contemporary perspectives on ­organizational social networks (research in the sociology of organizations), vol. 40, 239–59. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Labianca, G., and D. J. Brass. 2006. Exploring the social ledger: Negative relationships and negative asymmetry in social networks in organizations. Academy of Management Review 31 (3):596–614. doi: 10.5465/amr.2006.21318920.
  • Labianca, G., D. J. Brass, and B. Gray. 1998. Social networks and perceptions of intergroup conflict: The role of negative relationships and third parties. Academy of Management Journal 41 (1):55–67. doi: 10.5465/256897.
  • Lachapelle, P. R., and S. F. McCool. 2012. The role of trust in community wildland fire protection planning. Society & Natural Resources 25 (4):321–35. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2011.569855.
  • Lachapelle, P. R., S. F. McCool, and M. E. Patterson. 2003. Barriers to effective natural resource planning in a" messy" world. Society & Natural Resources 16 (6):473–90. doi: 10.1080/08941920309151.
  • Lah, T. J., Y. Park, and Y. J. Cho. 2015. The four major rivers restoration project of South Korea: An assessment of its process, program, and political dimensions. The Journal of Environment & Development 24 (4):375–94. doi: 10.1177/1070496515598611.
  • Lauer, F. I., A. L. Metcalf, E. C. Metcalf, and J. J. Mohr. 2018. Public engagement in social-ecological systems management: An application of social justice theory. Society & Natural Resources 31 (1):4–20. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2017.1364456.
  • Levesque, V. R., A. J. Calhoun, K. P. Bell, and T. R. Johnson. 2017. Turning contention into collaboration: Engaging power, trust, and learning in collaborative networks. Society & Natural Resources 30 (2):245–60. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2016.1180726.
  • Lijeblad, A., W. T. Borrie, and A. E. Watson. 2009. Determinants of trust for public lands: Fire and fuels management on the Bitterroot National Forest. Environmental Management 43 (4):571–84. doi: 10.1007/s00267-008-9230-3.
  • McAllister, D. J. 1995. Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal 38 (1):24–59. doi: 10.5465/256727.
  • Metcalf, E. C., J. J. Mohr, L. Yung, P. Metcalf, and D. Craig. 2015. The role of trust in restoration success: Public engagement and temporal and spatial scale in a complex social‐ecological system. Restoration Ecology 23 (3):315–24. doi: 10.1111/rec.12188.
  • Mohr, J. J., and E. C. Metcalf. 2018. The business perspective in ecological restoration: Issues and challenges. Restoration Ecology 26 (2):381–90. doi: 10.1111/rec.12564.
  • Nahapiet, J., and S. Ghoshal. 1997. Social capital, intellectual capital and the creation of value in firms. Academy of Management Proceedings 1997 (1):35–9. doi: 10.5465/ambpp.1997.4980592.
  • Niehoff, B. P., and R. H. Moorman. 1993. Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal 36 (3):527–56. doi: 10.5465/256591.
  • Owen, A. L., and J. Videras. 2008. Trust, cooperation, and implementation of sustainability programs: The case of Local Agenda 21. Ecological Economics 68 (1–2):259–72. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.006.
  • Palmer, M. J., D. Allan, J. Meyer, and E. S. Bernhardt. 2007. River restoration in the twenty‐first century: Data and experiential knowledge to inform future efforts. Restoration Ecology 15 (3):472–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00243.x.
  • Peretz, R. A., G. Luria, Y. Kalish, and D. Zohar. 2021. Safety climate strength: The negative effects of cliques and negative relationships in teams. Safety Science 138:105224. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105224.
  • Peterson, R. A. 2000. A meta-analysis of variance accounted for and factor loadings in exploratory factor analysis. Marketing Letters 11 (3):261–75. doi: 10.1023/A:1008191211004.
  • Preacher, K. J., and A. F. Hayes. 2008. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods 40 (3):879–91. doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879.
  • Robertson, P. J., and T. Choi. 2012. Deliberation, consensus, and stakeholder satisfaction: A simulation of collaborative governance. Public Management Review 14 (1):83–103. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2011.589619.
  • Robins, G., L. Bates, and P. Pattison. 2011. Network governance and environmental management: Conflict and cooperation. Public Administration 89 (4):1293–313. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01884.x.
  • Rydin, Y., and N. Holman. 2004. Re‐evaluating the contribution of social capital in achieving sustainable development. Local Environment 9 (2):117–33. doi: 10.1080/1354983042000199561.
  • Sandström, A. 2011. Social networks, joint image building, and adaptability: The case of local fishery management. In Social networks and natural resource management: Uncovering the social fabric of environmental governance, edited by Örjan Bodin and Christina Prell, 288–321. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sandström, A., and C. Rova. 2010. Adaptive co-management networks: A comparative analysis of two fishery conservation areas in Sweden. Ecology and Society 15 (3):24–47. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26268159. doi: 10.5751/ES-03531-150314.
  • Sanginga, P. C., R. N. Kamugisha, and A. M. Martin. 2010. Strengthening social capital for adaptive governance of natural resources: A participatory learning and action research for bylaws reforms in Uganda. Society & Natural Resources 23 (8):695–710. doi: 10.1080/08941920802653513.
  • Schielzeth, H. 2010. Simple means to improve the interpretability of regression coefficients. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 1 (2):103–13. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00012.x.
  • Schnegg, M. 2018. Institutional multiplexity: Social networks and community-based natural ­resource management. Sustainability Science 13 (4):1017–30. doi: 10.1007/s11625-018-0549-2.
  • Sharp, E. A., R. Thwaites, A. Curtis, and J. Millar. 2013. Trust and trustworthiness: Conceptual distinctions and their implications for natural resources management. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 56 (8):1246–65. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2012.717052.
  • Smith, J. M., D. S. Halgin, V. Kidwell-Lopez, G. Labianca, D. J. Brass, and S. P. Borgatti. 2014. Power in politically charged networks. Social Networks 36:162–76. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2013.04.007.
  • Smith, J. W., J. E. Leahy, D. H. Anderson, and M. A. Davenport. 2013. Community/agency trust and public involvement in resource planning. Society & Natural Resources 26 (4):452–71. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2012.678465.
  • Smith, P. D., and M. H. McDonough. 2001. Beyond public participation: Fairness in natural resource decision making. Society and Natural Resources 14 (3):239–49. doi: 10.1080/08941920120140.
  • Teodoro, J. D., C. Prell, and L. Sun. 2021. Quantifying stakeholder learning in climate change adaptation across multiple relational and participatory networks. Journal of Environmental Management 278 (Pt 2):111508. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111508.
  • Vanek, C., and S. McDaniel. 2006. SurveyGizmo.
  • Venkataramani, V., G. (J.). Labianca, and T. Grosser. 2013. Positive and negative workplace relationships, social satisfaction, and organizational attachment. The Journal of Applied Psychology 98 (6):1028–39. doi: 10.1037/a0034090.
  • Villegas, C., N. X. Gómez-Andújar, M. Harte, S. M. Glaser, and J. R. Watson. 2021. Cooperation and conflict in the small-scale fisheries of Puerto Rico. Marine Policy 134:104809. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104809.
  • Wolf, E. J., K. M. Harrington, S. L. Clark, and M. W. Miller. 2013. Sample size requirements for structural equation models: An evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety. Educational and Psychological Measurement 76 (6):913–34. doi: 10.1177/0013164413495237.
  • Wortley, L., J. ‐M. Hero, and M. Howes. 2013. Evaluating ecological restoration success: A review of the literature. Restoration Ecology 21 (5):537–43. doi: 10.1111/rec.12028.
  • Yung, L., S. Schwarze, W. Carr, F. Stuart Chapin, III, and E. Marris. 2013. Engaging the public in novel ecosystems. In Novel ecosystems: Intervening in the new ecological world order, edited by Richard J. Hobbs, Eric S. Higgs, and Carol A. Hall, 247–56. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781118354186.ch30.
  • Zagenczyk, T. J., R. L. Purvis, M. K. Shoss, K. L. Scott, and K. S. Cruz. 2015. Social influence and leader perceptions: Multiplex social network ties and similarity in leader-member ­exchange. Journal of Business and Psychology 30 (1):105–17. doi: 10.1007/s10869-013-9332-7.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.