Publication Cover
Accountability in Research
Ethics, Integrity and Policy
Volume 30, 2023 - Issue 7
1,577
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Research done wrong: A comprehensive investigation of retracted publications in COVID-19

ORCID Icon

References

  • Ahmed, K. 2020. “Academic Integrity: Challenges and Strategies for Asia and the Middle East.” Accountability in Research 27 (5): 256–270. doi:10.1080/08989621.2019.1646646.
  • Anderson, C., K. Nugent, and C. Peterson. 2021. “Academic Journal Retractions and the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Journal of Primary Care and Community Health 12. doi:10.1177/21501327211015592.
  • Ataie-Ashtiani, B. 2018. “Erratum To: World Map of Scientific Misconduct.” Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (5): 1657. doi:10.1007/s11948-017-9939-6.
  • Aviv-Reuven, S., and A. Rosenfeld. 2021. “Publication Patterns’ Changes Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Longitudinal and Short-term Scientometric Analysis.” Scientometrics 126 (8): 6761–6784. doi:10.1007/s11192-021-04059-x.
  • Bawaskar, H. S. 2011. “Checking for Plagiarism, Duplicate Publication, and Text Recycling.” The Lancet 377 (9775): 1403. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60567-9.
  • Callaway, E. 2020. “Ewen Callaway.” Will the Pandemic Permanently Alter Scientific Publishing? 582: 167–168. doi:10.1038/d41586-020-01520-4.
  • Campos-Varela, I., and A. Ruano-Raviña. 2019. “Misconduct as the Main Cause for Retraction. A Descriptive Study of Retracted Publications and Their Authors.” Gaceta Sanitaria 33 (4): 356–360. doi:10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.01.009.
  • Cortegiani, A., G. Catalisano, M. Ippolito, A. Giarratano, A. R. Absalom, and S. Einav. 2021. “Retracted Papers on SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19.” British Journal of Anaesthesia 126 (4): 155–156. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2021.01.008.
  • Dal-Ré, R., L. M. Bouter, P. Cuijpers, C. Gluud, and S. Holm. 2020. “Should Research Misconduct Be Criminalized?” Research Ethicss 16 ((1–2): 1–12). doi:10.1177/1747016119898400.
  • Else, H. 2020. “How a Torrent of COVID Science Changed Research Publishing — In Seven Charts.” Nature 588 (24/31): 553. doi:10.1038/d41586-020-03564-y.
  • Fang, F. C., R. Grant Steen, and A. Casadevall. 2012. “Misconduct Accounts for the Majority of Retracted Scientific Publications.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109 (42): 17028–17033. doi:10.1073/pnas.1212247109.
  • Gasparyan, A. Y., L. Ayvazyan, N. A. Akazhanov, and G. D. Kitas. 2014. “Self-correction in Biomedical Publications and the Scientific Impact.” Croatian Medical Journal 55 (1): 61–72. doi:10.3325/cmj.2014.55.61.
  • Grieneisen, M. L., and M. Zhang. 2012. “A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature.” PLoS ONE 7 (10): e44118. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0044118.
  • Homolak, J., I. Kodvanj, and D. Virag. 2020. “Preliminary Analysis of COVID-19 Academic Information Patterns: A Call for Open Science in the Times of Closed Borders.” Scientometrics 124 (3): 2687–2701. doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03587-2.
  • Kakuk, P. 2009. “The Legacy of the Hwang Case: Research Misconduct in Biosciences.” Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (4): 545–562. doi:10.1007/s11948-009-9121-x.
  • Korpela, K. M. 2010. “How Long Does It Take for the Scientific Literature to Purge Itself of Fraudulent Material?: The Breuning Case Revisited.” Current Medical Research and Opinion 26 (4): 843–847. doi:10.1185/03007991003603804.
  • Liu, S. V. 2006. “Top Journal’s Top Retraction Rates.” Science Ethics 1: 91–93.
  • Martinson, B. C., M. S. Anderson, and R. de Vries. 2005. “Scientists Behaving Badly.” Nature 435 (7043): 737–738. doi:10.1038/435737a.
  • McGrail, M. R., C. M. Rickard, and R. Jones. 2006. “Publish or Perish: A Systematic Review of Interventions to Increase Academic Publication Rates.” Higher Education Research and Development 25 (1): 19–35. doi:10.1080/07294360500453053.
  • Moylan, E. C., and M. K. Kowalczuk. 2016. “Why Articles are Retracted: A Retrospective Cross-sectional Study of Retraction Notices at BioMed Central.” Ethics Research 6 (11): 1–7. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012047.
  • Palayew, A., O. Norgaard, K. Safreed-Harmon, T. H. Andersen, L. N. Rasmussen, and J. V. Lazarus. 2020. “Pandemic Publishing Poses a New COVID-19 Challenge.” Nature Human Behaviour 4 (7): 666–669. doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0911-0.
  • Palla, I. A., M. Singson, and S. Thiyagarajan. 2020. “A Comparative Analysis of Retracted Papers in Health Sciences from China and India.” Accountability in Research 27 (7): 401–416. doi:10.1080/08989621.2020.1754804.
  • Qamar, F. 2021. “‘Fund and Faculty’ Count in Higher Education Rankings.” Accessed 08 October 2021. https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/fund-and-faculty-count-in-higher-education-rankings/article36578080.ece
  • Qiu, J. 2010. “Publish or Perish in China: The Pressure to Rack up Publications in High-impact Journals Could Encourage Misconduct, Some Say.” Nature 463 (7278): 142. doi:10.1038/463142a.
  • Rahman, H., and S. Ankier. 2020. “Dishonesty and Research Misconduct within the Medical Profession.” BMC Medical Ethics 21 (22): 1–6. doi:10.1186/s12910-020-0461-z.
  • Roger, J. 2002. “Research Misconduct.” Family Practice 19 (2): 123–124. doi:10.1093/fampra/19.2.123.
  • Rossner, M. 2007. “Hwang Case Review Committee Misses the Mark.” Journal of Cell Biology 176 (2): 131–132. doi:10.1083/jcb.200612154.
  • RW. 2018. “Retraction Watch.” Accessed 11 October 2021. https://retractionwatch.com/privacy-policy/
  • RW. 2021a. “Retraction Watch.” Accessed 11 October 2021. https://retractionwatch.com/
  • RW. 2021b. “25,000: That’s How Many Retractions are Now in the Retraction Watch Database.” World Wide Web. Accessed 01 December 2021. https://retractionwatch.com/2021/04/02/25000-thats-how-many-retractions-are-now-in-the-retraction-watch-database/
  • Sabir, H., S. Kumbhare, A. Parate, R. Kumar, and S. Das. 2015. “Scientific Misconduct: A Perspective from India.” Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 18 (2): 177–184. doi:10.1007/s11019-014-9603-8.
  • Silva, Jaime A. Teixeira da, and Mohammadamin Erfanmanesh. 2021. “Errata and retractions associated with research papers published by authors with Hungarian affiliations.” European Science Editing 47: e60203. 10.3897/ese.2021.e60203.
  • Singh, G. 2018. “NIRF Ranking: How Govt Plans to Rate India’s Educators and Improve Them.” Accessed 08 October 2021. https://www.business-standard.com/article/current-affairs/nirf-ranking-how-govt-plans-to-rate-India-s-educators-and-improve-them-118041600700_1.html
  • Steen, R. G., A. Casadevall, and F. C. Fang. 2013. “Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased?” PLoS One 8 (7): 1–9. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0068397.
  • Steen, R. G. 2011. “Retractions in the Scientific Literature: Do Authors Deliberately Commit Research Fraud?” Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (2): 113–117. doi:10.1136/jme.2010.038125.
  • Vuong, Q.-H., V.-P. La, M.-T. Ho, T.-T. Vuong, and M.-T. Ho. 2020. “Characteristics of Retracted Articles Based on Retraction Data from Online Sources through February 2019.” Science Editing 7 (1): 34–44. doi:10.6087/kcse.187.
  • Wager, E. 2011. “How Journals Can Prevent, Detect and Respond to Misconduct.” Notfall Rettungsmed 14 (8): 613–615. doi:10.1007/s10049-011-1543-8.
  • Williams, P., and E. Wager. 2011. “Exploring Why and How Journal Editors Retract Articles: Findings from a Qualitative Study.” Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1007/s11948-011-9292-0.
  • Wuchty, S., B. F. Jones, and B. Uzzi. 2007. “The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge.” Science 316 (5827): 1036–1039. doi:10.1126/science.1136099.
  • Yeo-Teh, N., S. Ling, and B. L. Tang. 2021. “An Alarming Retraction Rate for Scientific Publications on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).” Accounting Research 28 (1): 47–53. doi:10.1080/08989621.2020.1782203.
  • Yi, N., B. Nemery, and K. Dierickx. 2019. “Perceptions of Research Integrity and the Chinese Situation: In-depth Interviews with Chinese Biomedical Researchers in Europe.” Accountability in Research 26 (7): 405–426. doi:10.1080/08989621.2019.1652096.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.