REFERENCES
- Hann K L. Inbreeding and fertility in a South Indian population. Ann Hum Biol 1985; 12(3)267–274, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Audinarayana N, Krishnamoorthy S. Contribution of social and cultural factors to the decline in consanguinity in south India. Soc Biol. 2000; 47(3–4)189–200, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Krishnamoorthy S, Audinarayana N. Trends in consanguinity in South India. J Biosoc Sci. 2001; 33(2)185–197, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- Bhat B V, Babu L. Congenital malformations at birth—a prospective study from south India. Indian J Pediatr. 1998; 65(6)873–881, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Kulkarni M L, Kurian M. Consanguinity and its effect on fetal growth and development: a south Indian study. J Med Genet. 1990; 27(6)348–352, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Kumaramanickavel G, Joseph B, Vidhya A, Arokiasamy T, Shridhara Shetty N. Consanguinity and ocular genetic diseases in South India: analysis of a five-year study. Commun Genet 2002; 5(3)182–185, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- http://www.nfhsindia.org/data/india/keyfact.pdf accessed on January 20, 2005
- Dandona R, Dandona L, Naduvilath T J, et al. Design of a population-based study of visual impairment in India: the Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study. Indian J Ophthalmol. 1997; 45: 251–257, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India. Census of India 1991. Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, New Delhi 1992
- Dandona L, Dandona R, Srinivas M, et al. Blindness in the Indian State of Andhra Pradesh. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001; 42: 908–916, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Chylack L T, Wolfe J K, Singer D M, et al. The Lens Opacities Classification System III. Arch Ophthalmol 1993; 111: 831–836, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Taylor H R, West S K. A simple system for the clinical grading of lens opacities. Lens Res. 1988; 5: 175–181, [CSA]
- Bird A C, Bressler N M, Bressler S B, et al. An international classification and grading system for age-related maculopathy and age-related macular degeneration. The International ARM Epidemiological Study Group. Surv Ophthalmol. 1995; 39: 367–374, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Hornby S J, Dandona L, Jones R B, Stewart H, Gilbert C E. The familial contribution to non-syndromic ocular coloboma in south India. Br J Ophthalmol 2003; 87(3)336–340, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- Port K E, Bittles A H. A population based estimate of the prevalence of consanguineous marriages in Western Australia. Commun Genet 2001; 4: 97–101, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- MacKinnon J R, Giubilato A, Elder J E, Craig J E, Mackey D A. Primary infantile glaucoma in an Australian population. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004; 32(1)14–18, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- Holmes J M, Leske D A, Burke J P, Hodge D O. Birth prevalence of visually significant infantile cataract in a defined U.S. population. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2003; 10(2)67–74, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- SanGiovanni J P, Chew E Y, Reed G F, et al. Infantile cataract in the collaborative perinatal project: prevalence and risk factors. Arch Ophthalmol 2002; 120(11)1559–1565, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Centerwall W R, Centerwall S A. Consanguinity and congenital anomalies in south India: A pilot study. Indian J Med Res. 1966; 54: 1160–1167, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Shamanna B R, Dandona L, Rao G N. Economic burden of blindness in India. Indian J Ophthalmol 1998; 46(3)169–172, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]