Measuring Contrast Sensitivity in Specific Areas of Vision – A Meaningful Way to Assess Quality of Life and Ability to Perform Daily Activities in Glaucoma

References

• Chan EW, Chiang PP, Liao J, et al. Glaucoma and associated visual acuity and field loss significantly affect glaucoma-specific psychosocial functioning. Ophthalmology. 2015;122:494–501. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.09.030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross JE, Bron AJ, Clarke DD. Contrast sensitivity and visual disability in chronic simple glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1984;68:821–827. doi:10.1136/bjo.68.11.821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velten IM, Korth M, Horn FK, Budde WM. Temporal contrast sensitivity with peripheral and central stimulation in glaucoma diagnosis. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;83:199–205. doi:10.1136/bjo.83.2.199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins AS, Szlyk JP, Ardickas Z, Alexander KR, Wilensky JT. Comparison of contrast sensitivity, visual acuity, and Humphrey visual field testing in patients with glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2003;12:134–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richman J, Lorenzana LL, Lankaranian D, et al. Importance of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in patients with glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010;128:1576–1582. doi:10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.275.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burton R, Crabb DP, Smith ND, Glen FC, Garway-Heath DF. Glaucoma and reading: exploring the effects of contrast lowering of text. Optom Vis Sci Off Publ Am Acad Optom. 2012;89(9):1282–1287. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182686165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szlyk JP, Taglia DP, Paliga J, Edward DP, Wilensky JT. Driving performance in patients with mild to moderate glaucomatous clinical vision changes. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2002;39:467–482.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Richman J, Zangalli C, Lu L, Wizov SS, Spaeth E, Spaeth GL. The Spaeth/Richman contrast sensitivity test (SPARCS): design, reproducibility and ability to identify patients with glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015;99:16–20. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falcao-Reis F, O’Donoghue E, Buceti R, Hitchings RA, Arden GB. Peripheral contrast sensitivity in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Br J Ophthalmol. 1990;74:712–716. doi:10.1136/bjo.74.12.712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faria BM, Duman F, Zheng CX, et al. Evaluating contrast sensitivity in age-related macular degeneration using a novel computer-based test, the spaeth/richman contrast sensitivity test. Retina. 2015;35:1465–1473. doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000000474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekici F, Loh R, Waisbourd M, et al. Relationships between measures of the ability to perform vision-related activities, vision-related quality of life, and clinical findings in patients with glaucoma. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015;133:1377–1385. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.3426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waisbourd M, Parker S, Ekici F, et al. A prospective, longitudinal, observational cohort study examining how glaucoma affects quality of life and visually-related function over 4 years: design and methodology. BMC Ophthalmol. 2015;15:91. doi:10.1186/s12886-015-0088-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaeth GL, Henderer J, Liu C, et al. The disc damage likelihood scale: reproducibility of a new method of estimating the amount of optic nerve damage caused by glaucoma. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2002;100: 181-5-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Henderer JD, Liu C, Kesen M, et al. Reliability of the disk damage likelihood scale. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135:44–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asb AM, Kwag JH, Jung SH, Yim HB, Kim YD, Kang KD. Correlation between disc damage likelihood scale and optical coherence tomography in the diagnosis of glaucoma. Ophthalmol J Int Ophtalmol Int J Ophthalmol Z Augenheilkd. 2010;224(5):274–282. doi:10.1159/000287350.
   Google Scholar
• Kitaoka Y, Tanito M, Yokoyama Y, et al. Estimation of the Disc Damage Likelihood Scale in primary open-angle glaucoma: the Glaucoma Stereo Analysis Study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016;254(3):523–528. doi:10.1007/s00417-015-3239-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warrian KJ, Lorenzana LL, Lankaranian D, Dugar J, Wizov SS, Spaeth GL. The assessment of disability related to vision performance-based measure in diabetic retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;149(5):852–60.e1. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2009.12.028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei H, Sawchyn AK, Myers JS, et al. A clinical method to assess the effect of visual loss on the ability to perform activities of daily living. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96:735–741. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-300093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangione CM, Lee PP, Gutierrez PR, Spritzer K, Berry S, Hays RD. Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:1050–1058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardiner SK, Demirel S, Johnson CA. Perimetric indices as predictors of future glaucomatous functional change. Optom Vis Sci Off Publ Am Acad Optom. 2011;88(1):56–62. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181fc30b6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginsburg AP. Contrast sensitivity and functional vision. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2003;43:5–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Richman J, Spaeth GL, Wirostko B. Contrast sensitivity basics and a critique of currently available tests. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39:1100–1106. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.05.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahav K, Levkovitch-Verbin H, Belkin M, Glovinsky Y, Polat U. Reduced mesopic and photopic foveal contrast sensitivity in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol Chic IL 1960. 2011;129(1):16–22. doi:10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.332.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swanson WH, Malinovsky VE, Dul MW, et al. Contrast sensitivity perimetry and clinical measures of glaucomatous damage. Optom Vis Sci Off Publ Am Acad Optom. 2014;91(11):1302–1311. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amanullah S, Okudolo J, Rahmatnejad K, et al. The relationship between contrast sensitivity and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in patients with glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017;255(12):2415–2422. doi:10.1007/s00417-017-3789-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abe RY, Diniz-Filho A, Costa VP, Gracitelli CPB, Baig S, Medeiros FA. The Impact of Location of Progressive Visual Field Loss on Longitudinal Changes in Quality of Life of Patients with Glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(3):552–557. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.10.046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKean-Cowdin R, Wang Y, Wu J, Azen SP, Varma R. Los Angeles Latino Eye Study Group. Impact of visual field loss on health-related quality of life in glaucoma: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(6):941–948.e1. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.08.037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richman J, Lorenzana LL, Lankaranian D, et al. Relationships in glaucoma patients between standard vision tests, quality of life, and ability to perform daily activities. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2010;17(3):144–151. doi:10.3109/09286581003734878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulkarni KM, Mayer JR, Lorenzana LL, Myers JS, Spaeth GL. Visual field staging systems in glaucoma and the activities of daily living. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;154(3):445–451.e3. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2012.03.030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Y, Lin C, Waisbourd M, et al. The Impact of Visual Field Clusters on Performance-based Measures and Vision-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;163:45–52. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2015.12.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black AA, Wood JM, Lovie-Kitchin JE. Inferior visual field reductions are associated with poorer functional status among older adults with glaucoma. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt J Br Coll Ophthalmic Opt Optom. 2011;31(3):283–291. doi:10.1111/j.1475-1313.2010.00811.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black AA, Wood JM, Lovie-Kitchin JE, Newman BM. Visual impairment and postural sway among older adults with glaucoma. Optom Vis Sci Off Publ Am Acad Optom. 2008;85(6):489–497. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e31817882db.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton R, Saunders LJ, Crabb DP. Areas of the visual field important during reading in patients with glaucoma. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2015;59(2):94–102. doi:10.1007/s10384-014-0359-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu S, Smith ND, Saunders LJ, Crabb DP. Patterns of binocular visual field loss derived from large-scale patient data from glaucoma clinics. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(12):2399–2406. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.08.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marigold DS, Patla AE. Visual information from the lower visual field is important for walking across multi-surface terrain. Exp Brain Res. 2008;188(1):23–31. doi:10.1007/s00221-008-1335-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asaoka R, Crabb DP, Yamashita T, Russell RA, Wang YX, Garway-Heath DF. Patients have two eyes!: binocular versus better eye visual field indices. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(9):7007–7011. doi:10.1167/iovs.11-7643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora KS, Boland MV, Friedman DS, Jefferys JL, West SK, Ramulu PY. The relationship between better-eye and integrated visual field mean deviation and visual disability. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(12):2476–2484. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.07.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones L, Bryan SR, Crabb DP. Gradually then suddenly? decline in vision-related quality of life as glaucoma worsens. J Ophthalmol. 2017;2017. doi:10.1155/2017/1621640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glen FC, Crabb DP. Living with glaucoma: a qualitative study of functional implications and patients’ coping behaviours. BMC Ophthalmol. 2015;15:128. doi:10.1186/s12886-015-0119-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crabb DP. A view on glaucoma—are we seeing it clearly? Eye. 2016;30(2):304–313. doi:10.1038/eye.2015.244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar