The effects of empathy and circadian preference on cyberbullying of adolescents in Turkey

References

• Adan A, Archer SN, Hidalgo MP, Di Milia L, Natale V, Randler C. 2012. Circadian typology: a comprehensive review. Chronobiol Int. 29:1153–1175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang RP, Goh DH. 2010. Cyberbullying among adolescents: the role of affective and cognitive empathy, and gender. Child Psychiat Hum D. 41(4):387–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arıcak OT. 2009. Psychiatric symptomatology as a predictor of cyberbullying among university students. Eurasian J Educ R. 34(1):167–184.
   Google Scholar
• Ayas T. 2011. The aspect of on being cyberbully and victim among high school students. XI. National Psychological Conselling and Guidance Congress, İzmir, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Ayas T, Horzum MB. 2010. Cyber bully/victim scale development study. Acad Sight Int Refer Online J Soc Sci. 19:1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Ayas T, Horzum MB. 2012. On being cyber bully and victim among primary school students. Element Educ Online. 11(2):369–380.
   Google Scholar
• Ayas T, Pişkin M. 2011. Investigation of bullying among high school students with regard to sex, grade level and school type. Element Educ Online. 10(2):550–568.
   Google Scholar
• Belsey B. 2006. Bullying.org: a learning journey. Bull Newfoundl Labrador Teach Assoc. 49(4):20.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer G, Kerslake J. 2015. Cyberbullying, self-esteem, empathy and loneliness. Comput Hum Behav. 48:255–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvete E, Orue I, Estévez A, Villardón L, Padilla P. 2010. Cyberbullying in adolescents: modalities and aggressors’ profile. Comput Hum Behav. 26:1128–1135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Ho SS, Lwin MO. 2016. A meta-analysis of factors predicting cyberbullying perpetration and victimization: from the social cognitive and media effects approach. New Media Soc. 19(8):1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehue F, Bolman C, Völlink T. 2008. Cyberbullying: youngsters’ experiences and parental perception. Cyberpsychol Behav. 11(2):217–223.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Demirhan E, Randler C, Horzum MB. 2016. Is problematic mobile phone use explained by chronotype and personality?. Cyberpsychol Behav. 33(7):821–831.
   Google Scholar
• Didden R, Scholte RH, Korzilius H, De Moor JM, Vermeulen A, O’Reilly M, Lang R, Lancioni GE. 2009. Cyberbullying among students with intellectual and developmental disability in special education settings. Dev Neurorehabil. 12(3):146–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilmaç B. 2009. Psychological needs as a predictor of cyber bullying: a preliminary report on college students. Educ Sci Theor Pract. 9(3):1307–1325.
   Google Scholar
• Dökmen Ü. 1988. Empatinin yeni bir modele dayanarak ölçülmesi ve psikodrama ile geliştirilmesi [Measurement of empaty based on a new model and development with psychodrama]. Ankara Üniversitesi Egitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi [J Ankara Univ Educ Sci Faculty]. 21(1–2):155–190.
   Google Scholar
• Dökmen Ü. 2003. İletişim çatışmaları ve empati [Communicational conflicts and emphaty]. İstanbul (TR): Sistem Yayıncılık.
   Google Scholar
• Drogin EY, Young K. 2008. Forensic mental health aspects of adolescent “cyberbullying”: a jurisprudent science perspective. J Psychiat Law. 36(4):679–690.
   Google Scholar
• Erdur-Baker Ö. 2010. Cyber bullying and its correlation to traditional bullying, gender and frequent and risky usage of internet mediated communication tools. New Media Soc. 12(1):109–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdur-Baker O, Kavsut F. 2007. Cyber bullying: a new face of peer bullying. Eurasian J Educ R. 7(27):31–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eroğlu Y. 2011. The investigation relationships among contingencies of self-worth, risky internet behaviors, and cyberbullying/cybervictimization [master‘s thesis]. Sakarya (TR): Sakarya University.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher A, Fitzgerald-Yau N, Jones R, Allen E, Viner RM, Bonell C. 2014. Brief report: cyberbullying perpetration and its associations with socio-demographics, aggressive behaviour at school, and mental health outcomes. J Adolesc. 37(8):1393–1398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gini G, Albiero P, Benelli B, Altoe G. 2007. Does empathy predict adolescents’ bullying and defending behavior?. Aggress Behav. 33(5):467–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomes A, Figueiredo S, Silva B, Ferreira E, Castro-Caldas A, Cercatti J. 2019. Quality of infant sleep, electronic devices and bullying behaviors in schools. Eur Proc Soc Behav Sci EpSBS.LIII. 1–812.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton NA, Nelson CA, Stevens N, Kitzman H. 2007. Sleep and psychological well-being. Soc Indic Res. 82(1):147–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinduja S, Patchin JW. 2010. Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Arch Suicide Res. 14:206–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horzum MB. 2011. Examining computer game addiction level of primary school students in terms of different variables. Educ Sci. 36(159):56–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horzum MB. 2016. Examining the relationship to gender and personality on the purpose of Facebook usage of Turkish university students. Comput Human Behav. 64:319–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horzum MB, Ayas T. 2011. The examination of cyberbullying and victim levels of high school students according to school type and gender. J Educ Sci Pract. 10(20):139–159.
   Google Scholar
• Horzum MB, Demirhan E. 2017. The role of chronotype on Facebook usage aims and attitudes towards Facebook and its features. Comput Human Behav. 73:125–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jankowski KS. 2017. Social jet lag: sleep-corrected formula. Chronobiol Int. 34:531–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolliffe D, Farrington DP. 2004. Empathy and offending: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aggress Violent Behav. 9:441–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonason PK, Jones A, Lyons M. 2013. Creatures of the night: chronotypes and the Dark Triad traits. Pers Indiv Differ. 55:538–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juvonen J, Gross EF. 2008. Extending the school grounds? Bullying experiences in cyberspace. J School Health. 78(9):496–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapatzia A, Syngollitou E 2007. Cyberbullying in middle and high schools: prevalence, gender and age differences [master‘s thesis]. Thessaloniki (GR): Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
   Google Scholar
• Kauderer S, Randler C. 2013. Differences in time use among chronotypes in adolescents. Biol Rhythm Res. 44:601–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith S, Martin ME. 2005. Cyber-Bullying: creating a culture of respect in a cyber world. Reclaim Child Youth J Strength Based Intervent. 13(4):224–228.
   Google Scholar
• Kırcaburun K, Tosuntaş ŞB. 2018. Cyberbullying perpetration among undergraduates: evidence of the roles of chronotype and sleep quality. Biol Rhythm Res. 49(2):247–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalski RM, Limber SP. 2007. Electronic bullying among middle school students. J Adolesc Health. 41(6):S22–S30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee EB. 2017. Cyberbullying: prevalence and predictors among African American young adults. J Black Stud. 48(1):57–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machackova H, Dedkova L, Mezulanikova K. 2015. Brief report: the bystander effect in cyberbullying incidents. J Adolesc. 43:96–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mark L, Ratliffe KT. 2011. Helping students develop online empathy may decrease online bullying. Cyber worlds: new playgrounds for bullying. Comput Schools. 28:92–116.
   Google Scholar
• Mckenna P. 2007. The rise of cyber bullying. New Sci. 195:26–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishna F, Khoury-Kassabri M, Gadalla T, Daciuk J. 2012. Risk factors forinvolvement in cyber bullying: victims, bullies and bully–victims. Child Youth Serv Rev. 34:63–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro K. 2002. Conflict in cyberspace: how to resolve conflict online. Psychol Cybersp. 7(3):321–326.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson M 2003. School bullies going high tech. [accessed 2010 Jul 25]. http://canoe.ca/NewsStand/LondonFreePress/2003/09/02/174030
   Google Scholar
• Nuutinen T, Roos E, Ray C, Villberg J, Välimaa R, Rasmussen M, Tynjälä J. 2014. Computer use, sleep duration and health symptoms: a cross-sectional study of 15-year olds in three countries. Int J Public Health. 59(4):619–628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Önder İ, Beşoluk Ş, Horzum MB. 2013. Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the composite scale of morningness in high school and university students. The Span J Psychol. 16(E67):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Özdemir M, Akar F. 2011. Examination of high school students’ opinions on cyberbullying in terms of various variables. Educ Theor Pract. 17(4):605–626.
   Google Scholar
• Padır MA 2015. Ebeveyn İnternet Stili, Beş Faktör Kişilik Özellikleri İle Sanal Zorba ve Sanal Mağdur Olma Arasındaki İlişkinin Çeşitli Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi [Analysis of the Relationship Between Parental Internet Style, Five Factor Personality, Cyberbullying and Cybervictimization in Terms of Variable Variables] [master‘s thesis]. Sakarya (TR): Sakarya University.
   Google Scholar
• Patchin JW, Hinduja S. 2006. Bullies move beyond the schoolyard. A preliminary look at Cyberbullying. Youth Violence Juv J. 4(2):148–169.
   Google Scholar
• Patchin JW, Hinduja S. 2010. Cyberbullying and self-esteem. J School Health. 80(12):614–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel SR, Malhotra A, Gottlieb DJ, White DP, Hu FB. 2006. Correlates of long sleep duration. Sleep. 29(7):881–889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peker A. 2015. Ergenlerin saldırganlık ve siber zorbalık davranışları arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi [Investigation of the relationship between aggression and cyberbullying behavior of adolescents]. EKEV Akademi Dergisi [EKEV Acad Jl]. 61:323–335.
   Google Scholar
• Peker A, Eroğlu Y. 2010. Erkek öğrencilerde siber zorba ve kurban olmanın yordayıcısı olarak internet bağımlılığı [Internet addiction as a predictor of cyberbully and victim in male students]. 4. International Computer Education and Instructional Technologies Symposium. Selçuk University. Konya (Turkey).
   Google Scholar
• Peker A, Eroğlu Y, Ada Ş. 2012. Ergenlerde siber zorbalığın ve mağduriyetin yordayıcılarının incelenmesi [Investigation the predictors of cyberbullying and victimization in adolescents]. Abant Izzet Baysal Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Abant Izzet Baysal Univ J Educ Faculty]. 12(2):185–206.
   Google Scholar
• Rahafar A, Randler C, Castellana I, Kausch I. 2017. How does chronotype mediate gender effect on Dark Triad?. Pers Indiv Differ. 108:35–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randler C, Faßl C, Kalb N. 2017. From lark to owl: developmental changes in morningness-eveningness from new-borns to early adulthood. Sci Rep. 7:45874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randler C, Horzum MB, Vollmer C. 2014. Internet addiction and its relationship to chronotype and personality in a Turkish university student sample. Soc Sci Comput Rev. 32(4):484–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randler C, Wolfgang L, Matt K, Demirhan E, Horzum MB, Beşoluk Ş. 2016. Smartphone addiction proneness in relation to sleep and morningness–eveningness in German adolescents. J Behav Addict. 5(3):465–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roenneberg T, Allebrandt KV, Merrow M, Vetter C. 2012. Social jetlag and obesity. Curr Biol. 22(10):939–943.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roenneberg T, Kuehnle T, Juda M, Kantermann T, Allebrandt K, Gordijn M, Merrow M. 2007. Epidemiology of the human circadian clock. Sleep Med Rev. 11:429–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rueckert L, Naybar N. 2008. Gender differences in empathy: the role of the right hemisphere. Brain Cognit. 67:162–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampasa-Kanyinga H, Chaput JP, Hamilton HA, Colman I. 2018. Bullying involvement, psychological distress, and short sleep duration among adolescents. Soc Psych Psych Epidemiol. 53:1371–1380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider SK, O‘Donnell L, Stueve A, Coulter RW. 2012. Cyberbullying, school bullying, and psychological distress: a regional census of high school students. Am J Public Health. 102(1):171–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultze-Krumbholz A, Scheithauer H. 2009. Social-behavioral correlates of cyberbullying in a German student sample. Zeitschrift für Psychologie [J Psychol]. 217(4):224–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slonje R, Smith PK. 2008. Cyberbullying: another main type of bullying?. Scand J Psychol. 49(2):147–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slonje R, Smith PK, Frisén A. 2013. The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention. Comput Hum Behav. 29(1):26–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith CS, Reilly C, Midkiff K. 1989. Evaluation of three circadian rhythm questionnaires with suggestions for an improved measure of morningness. J Appl Psychol. 74(5):728–738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith PK, Mahdavi J, Carvalho M, Fisher S, Russell S, Tippett N. 2008. Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. J Child Psychol Psyc. 49:376–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sourander A, Klomek AB, Ikonen M, Lindroos J, Luntamo T, Koskelainen M, Ristkari T, Helenius H. 2010. Psychosocial risk factors associated with cyberbullying among adolescents: a population-based study. Arch Gen Psychiat. 67(7):720–728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffgen G, König A, Pfetsch J, Melzer A. 2011. Are cyberbullies less empathic? Adolescents‘ cyberbullying behavior and empathic responsiveness. Cyberpsych Beh Soc N. 14(11):643–648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strom P, Strom R. 2004. Bullied by a mouse. [accessed 2015 Apr 8]. http://www.childresearch.net/papers/digital/2004_02.html
   Google Scholar
• A Toolkit for Promoting Empathy in Schools. [accessed 2018 Jan 17]. https://www.ashoka.org/tr/file/start-empathy-toolkit
   Google Scholar
• Topçu Ç. 2008. The relationship of cyber bullying to empathy, gender, traditional bullying, internet use and adult monitoring [master‘s thesis]. Ankara (TR): Middle East Technical University.
   Google Scholar
• Topçu Ç, Erdur-Baker Ö. 2012. Affective and cognitive empathy as mediators of gender differences in cyber and traditional bullying. School Psychol Int. 33(5):550–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosuntaş ŞB, Balta S, Emirtekin E, Kırcaburun K, Griffiths MD. 2018. Adolescents’ eveningness chronotype and cyberbullying perpetration: the mediating role of depression-related aggression and anxiety-related aggression. Biol Rhythm Res. doi:10.1080/09291016.2018.1513132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandebosch H, Van Cleemput K. 2009. Cyberbullying among youngsters: profiles of bullies and victims. New Media Soc. 11(8):1349–1371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollmer C, Michel U, Randler C. 2012. Outdoor light at night (LAN) is correlated with eveningness in adolescents. Chronobiol Int. 29(4):502–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollmer C, Randler C, Horzum MB, Ayas T. 2014. Computer game addiction in adolescents and its relationship to chronotype and personality. SAGE Open. 4(1):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Wittmann M, Dinich J, Merrow M, Roenneberg T. 2006. Social jetlag: misalignment of biological and social time. Chronobiol Int. 23(1–2):497–509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong DSW, Chan HCO, Cheng CHK. 2014. Cyberbullying perpetration and victimization among adolescents in Hong Kong. Child Youth Service Rev. 36:133–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ybarra ML, Mitchell KJ. 2004. Online aggressor/targets, aggressor, and targets: a comparison of associated youth characteristics. J Child Psychol Psyc. 45:1308–1316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar