‘Like Pots and Pans Falling Down the Stairs’. Experience of Music Composed for Listeners with Cochlear Implants in a Live Concert Setting

References

• Andres, L. (2012). Designing and doing survey research. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Au, A., Marozeau, J., Innes-Brown, M.H., Schubert, E., & Stevens, C.J. (2012). Music for the cochlear implant: Audience response to six commissioned compositions. Seminars in Hearing, 33(4), 335–345.
   Google Scholar
• Barbour, R., & Kitzinger, J. (Eds.). (1999). Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Behne, K.E., & Wöllner, C. (2011). Seeing or hearing the pianists? A synopsis of an early audiovisual perception experiment and a replication. Musicae Scientiae, 15(3), 324–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloor, M., Thomas, M., Robson, K., & Frankland, J. (2001). Focus groups in social research. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Broughton, M., Stevens, C., & Malloch, S. (2009). Music, movement and marimba: an investigation of the role of movement and gesture in communicating musical expression to an audience. Psychology of Music, 37(2), 137–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carney, D.R., & Banaji, M.R. (2012). First is best. PloS One, 7(6), e35088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charland, L. (2005). The heat of emotion: Valence and the demarcation problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 12(8–10), 82–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J.K.C., Chuang, A.Y.C., McMahon, C., Hsieh, J.C., Tung, T.H., & Li, L.P.H. (2010). Music training improves pitch perception in prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants. Pediatrics, 125(4), e793–e800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombetti, G. (2005). Appraising valence. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 12(8–10), 103–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elo, S. & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of advanced nursing, 62(1), 107–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlandson, D.A., Harris, E.L., Skipper, B.L., & Allen, S.D. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Fu, Q.-J., & Galvin III, J.J. (2011). Auditory training for cochlear implant patients. In F.G. Zeng, A.N. Popper, & R.R. Fay (Eds.), Auditory prostheses: New horizons, Vol. 39 (pp. 257–278). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fujita, S., & Ito, J. (1999). Ability of nucleus cochlear implantees to recognize music. Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology, 108, 634–640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvin III, J.J., Fu, Q.J., & Nogaki, G. (2007). Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners. Ear and Hearing, 28(3), 302–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gfeller, K. (2001). Aural rehabilitation of music listening for adult cochlear implant recipients: Addressing learner characteristics. Music Therapy Perspectives, 19(2), 88–95.
   Google Scholar
• Gfeller, K. (2012). Music perception of cochlear implant recipients and implications for counseling and (re)habilitation. Perspectives on Hearing and Hearing Disorders: Research and Diagnostics, 16(2), 64–73.
   Google Scholar
• Gfeller, K., Christ, A., Knutson, J.F., Witt, S., Murray, K.T., & Tyler, R.S. (2000). Musical backgrounds, listening habits, and aesthetic enjoyment of adult cochlear implant recipients. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 11(7), 390.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gfeller, K., Knutson, J.F., Woodworth, G., Witt, S., & DeBus, B. (1998). Timbral recognition and appraisal by adult cochlear implant users and normal-hearing adults. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 9, 1–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gfeller, K., Witt, S., Stordahl, J., Mehr, M., & Woodworth, G. (2000). The effects of training on melody recognition and appraisal by adult cochlear implant recipients. Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology, 33, 115–138.
   Google Scholar
• Gfeller, K., Witt, S.A., Kim, K.-H., Adamek, M., & Coffman, D. (1999). Preliminary report of a computerized music training program for adult cochlear implant recipients. Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology, 32, 11–27.
   Google Scholar
• Gfeller, K., Woodworth, G., Robin, D.A., Witt, S., & Knutson, J.F. (1997). Perception of rhythmic and sequential pitch patterns by normally hearing adults and adult cochlear implant users. Ear and Hearing, 18(3), 252–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford, R.H., Shallop, J.K., & Peterson, A.M. (2008). Speech recognition materials and ceiling effects: considerations for cochlear implant programs. Audiology and Neurotology, 13(3), 193–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graneheim, U.H. & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse education today, 24(2), 105–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse-Biber, S., Dupuis, P. & Kinder, T. (1991). HYPEResearch: A computer program for the analysis of qualitative data with an emphasis on multimedia analysis and hypothesis testing. Social Science Computer Review, 9, 452–460.
   Google Scholar
• Innes-Brown, H., Marozeau, J., & Blamey, P. (2011). The effect of visual cues on difficulty ratings for segregation of musical streams in listeners with impaired hearing. PloS One, 6(12), e29327.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2012). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Juslin, P.N., & Västfjäll, D. (2008). Emotional responses to music: The need to consider underlying mechanisms. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 559–575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall, G.S. (2010). Spatial perception and cognition in multichannel audio for electroacoustic music. Organised Sound, 15(3), 228–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, Y.Y., Stickney, G.S., & Zeng, F.G. (2005). Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117, 1351–1361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, R.A., & Casey, M.A. (2009). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Looi, V., McDermott, H., McKay, C., & Hickson, L. (2008). Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users. Ear and Hearing, 29(3), 421–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Looi, V., & She, J. (2010). Music perception of cochlear implant users: a questionnaire, and its implications for a music training program. International Journal of Audiology, 49(2), 116–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Looi, V., Winter, P., Anderson, I., & Sucher, C. (2011). A music quality rating test battery for cochlear implant users to compare the FSP and HDCIS strategies for music appreciation. International Journal of Audiology, 50(8), 503–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald, R., & Wilson, G. (2005). Musical identities of professional jazz musicians: a focus group investigation. Psychology of Music, 33(4), 395–417.
   Google Scholar
• Mantel, N., & Fleiss, J.L. (1980). Minimum expected cell size requirements for the Mantel-Haenszel one-degree-of-freedom chi-square test and a related rapid procedure. American Journal of Epidemiology, 112(1), 129–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marin, M.M., Gingras, B., & Bhattacharya, J. (2012). Crossmodal transfer of arousal, but not pleasantness, from the musical to the visual domain. Emotion, 12(3), 618–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marozeau, J., Innes-Brown, H., Grayden, D.B., Burkitt, A.N., & Blamey, P.J. (2010). The effect of visual cues on auditory stream segregation in musicians and non-musicians. PloS One, 5(6), e11297.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, H.J. (2004). Music perception with cochlear implants: a review. Trends in Amplification, 8(2), 49–82.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McDermott, H.J. (2005). Perceiving melody remains challenging for implant wearers. The Hearing Journal, 58(11), 65–66.
   Google Scholar
• Mirza, S., Douglas, S., Lindsey, P., Hildreth, T., & Hawthorne, M. (2003). Appreciation of music in adult patients with cochlear implants: A patient questionnaire. Cochlear Implants International, 4(2), 85–95.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morgan, D.L. (1995). Why things (sometimes) go wrong in focus groups. Qualitative Health Research, 5(4), 516–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nimmons, G.L., Kang, R.S., Drennan, W.R., Longnion, J., Ruffin, C., Worman, T., Rubinstein, J.T. (2008). Clinical assessment of music perception in cochlear implant listeners. Otology & Neurotology: Official Publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology, 29(2), 149–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oates, C. (2000). The use of focus groups in social science research. In D. Burton (Ed.), Research training for social scientists: A handbook for postgraduate researchers (pp. 186–195). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pandelaere, M., Millet, K., & Van den Bergh, B. (2010). Madonna or Don McLean? The effect of order of exposure on relative liking. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(4), 442–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrini, K., Crabbe, F., Sheridan, C., & Pollick, F.E. (2011). The music of your emotions: neural substrates involved in detection of emotional correspondence between auditory and visual music actions. PloS One, 6(4), e19165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philips, B., Vinck, B., De Vel, E., Maes, L., D’haenens, W., Keppler, H., & Dhooge, I. (2012). Characteristics and determinants of music appreciation in adult CI users. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 269(3), 813–821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldana, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schubert, E. (2009–2010). The fundamental function of music. Musicae Scientiae, 13(2, Special Issue), 63–81.
   Google Scholar
• Schubert, E. (2010). Affective, evaluative and collative responses to hated and loved music. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(1), 36–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert, E. (2012). Using affect valence and emotion valence to understand musical experience and response: The case of hated music. In W. L. Sims (Ed.), Proceedings of the 30th ISME World Conference on Music Education Music Pædeia: From ancient Greek philosophers toward global music communities (pp. 317–324). Nedlands, Western Australia: International Society for Music Education.
   Google Scholar
• Schubert, E., Hargreaves, D.J. & North, A.C. (2014). A dynamically minimalist cognitive explanation of musical preference: Is familiarity everything? Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 38. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00038.
   Google Scholar
• Stefani, E., & Lauke, K. (2010). Music, space and theatre: Site-specific approaches to multichannel spatialization. Organised Sound, 15(3), 251–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(17), 137–146.
   Google Scholar
• Vines, B.W., Krumhansl, C.L., Wanderley, M.M., & Levitin, D.J. (2006). Cross-modal interactions in the perception of musical performance. Cognition, 101(1), 80–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar