Why We Have Special Education Law: Legal Challenges to the IDEA

References

• Anastasiou, D., Burke, M. D., Wiley, A., & Kauffman, J. M. (in press). The telos of special education: A tripartite approach. Exceptionality.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanck, P. (2019). Why America is better off because of the Americans with disabilities act and the individuals with disabilities education act. Touro Law Review, 35(1), 605–618. https://digitalcommons.tourolaw.edu/lawreview/vol35/iss1/22
   Google Scholar
• Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka Kansas, 471 U.S. 359 (1954).
   Google Scholar
• Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176 (1982).
   Google Scholar
• Burlington School Committee v. Massachusetts Board of Education, 471 U.S. 369 (1985).
   Google Scholar
• Colker, R. (2013). Disabled education: A critical analysis of the individuals with education act. NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Congressional Record. (1975). Remarks of Senator Williams. https://www.congress.gov/bound-congressional-record/1975/04/24/extensions-of-remarks-section
   Google Scholar
• Conroy, T. & Yell, M. L. (2019). Free appropriate public education after Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District(2017). Touro Law Review, 35(1), 100–169. https://digitalcommons.tourolaw.edu/lawreview/vol35/iss1/7
   Google Scholar
• D’Agostinio, J. V., Rodgers, R. M., & Karpinski, A. C. (2020). The role of formative assessment in student achievement. In J. Hattie & E. M. Anderman (Eds.), Visible learning guide to student achievement: Schools edition (pp. 126–131). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Elementary, & Secondary Education Act, H. R. 2362, 89th cong., 1st sess., public law 89-10. Reports, bills, debate and act. U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District, 580 U.S. 386 (2017).
   Google Scholar
• Espin, C., & Deno, S. (2016). Oral reading fluency or reading aloud from text: An analysis through a unified view of construct validity. In K. Cummings & Y. Petscher (Eds.), The fluency construct. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2803-3_13
   Google Scholar
• Espin, C. A., McMaster, K., Rose, S., & Wayman, M. M. (2012). A measure of success: The influence of curriculum-based measurement on education. University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816679706.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., & Stecker, P. M. (2021). Bringing data-based individualization to scale: A call for the next-generation technology of teacher supports. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 54(5), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219420950654
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilhool, T. K. (2011). Visionary voices, leaders, lessons, and legacy: An interview with Thomas K. Gilhool. Institute on Disability at Temple University. http://www.temple.edu/instituteondisabilities/voices/detailVideo.html?media=006-01
   Google Scholar
• Hallahan, D. P., Pullen, P. C., & Kauffman, J. M. (2023). Exceptional learners: An introduction to special education (15th ed.). Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Harbaugh, W. H. (1973). Lawyer’s lawyer: The life of John W. Davis. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herr, S. (1972). Retarded children and the law: Enforcing the constitutional rights of the mentally retarded. Syracuse Law Review, 23, 995–1036.
   Google Scholar
• Hulett, K. E.(2009). Legal aspects of special education. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Individuals with Disabilities Act. (2004). 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
   Google Scholar
• Individuals with Disabilities Act Regulations, (2006). 34 C.F.R. § 300.301 et seq.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J. R., & Fuchs, L. S. (2012). Curriculum-based measurement: The paradigm, history, and legacy. In C. A. Espin, K. McMaster, S. Rose, & M. M. Wayman (Eds.), A measure of success: The influence of curriculum-based in education (pp. 7–23). University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lennon, T. (2007). The Supreme Court. [Film; four-disc DVD]. Public Broadcasting System.
   Google Scholar
• MacFarlane, M. A. (2017). In search of meaning on the meaning of an appropriate education: Ponderings on the fry and endrew decisions. Journal of Law and Education, 46, 539–557.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, E. W. (2013). Breakthrough: Federal special education legislation 1965-1981. Bardolf.
   Google Scholar
• Mills v. Board of Education of the District of Columbia, 348 Supp. 866 (D.D.C. 1972).
   Google Scholar
• Pennsylvania Association of Retarded Citizens (PARC) v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 343 F. Supp. 279 (E.D. Pa 1972).
   Google Scholar
• Perez, v. Sturgis County Public School. (2023). https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-887_k53m.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Petition for a Writ of Certiorari. (2017). https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/15-827-Petition-for-Certiorari.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896).
   Google Scholar
• Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, (1973) 29 U.S.C. §794 et seq.
   Google Scholar
• Section 504 Regulations,(2006). 34 C.F.R. § 104.1 et seq.
   Google Scholar
• Stafford, R. T. (1978). Education for the handicapped: A senator’s perspective. Vermont Law Review, 3, 71–82.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Senate Committee on Appropriations. (2022 December, 19). https://appropriations.senate.gov
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. C. (2019). Endrew. F. Clairvoyance. Touro Law Review, 35(1), 591–602. https://digitalcommons.tourolaw.edu/lawreview/vol35/iss1/21
   Google Scholar
• Winzer, M. A. (1993). The history of special education: From isolation to integration. Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yell, M. L. (2019). The law and special education (5th ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Yell, M. L., Katsiyannis, A., Ennis, R. P., & Losinski, M. (2013). Avoiding procedural errors in IEP development. Teaching Exceptional Children, 46(1), 56–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005991304600107
   Google Scholar
• Ysseldyke, J. Y., Chaparro, E. A., & VanDerheyden, A. M. (2023). Assessment in special and inclusive education (14th ed.). ProEd.
   Google Scholar
• Zettel, J. J., & Ballard, J. (1982). The Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975 (P.L. 94-142): Its history, origins, and concepts. In J. Ballard, B. Ramirez, & F. Weintraub (Eds.), Special education in America: Its legal and governmental foundations (pp. 11–22). Council for Exceptional Children.
   Google Scholar
• Zirkel, P. A. (2017). The Supreme Court’s decision in Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District. Education Law Report, 3(41), 545–555.
   Google Scholar
• Zirkel, P. A.(2019). The aftermath of endrew F.: An outcomes analysis two years later. West”s Education Law Report Reporter, I363, 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Zirkel, P. A. (2022). Which progress indicators do courts use in applying the Endrew F. substantive standard for FAPE under the IDEA? West’s Education Law Reporter, 399, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Zirkel, P. A., & Yell, M. L. (2024). Indicators of progress in the wake of endrew F.: The distinction between professional recommendations and judicial rulings. Exceptional Children, 90(2), 110–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029231165500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar