Defining language goals in EMI: vocabulary demand in a high-stakes assessment in Hong Kong

References

• Anthony, L. 2014. AntWordProfiler (Version 1.4.1). Waseda University. http://www.lauren ceanthony.net/software/antwordprofiler/.
   Google Scholar
• Castellano-Risco, I., R. Alejo-González, and A. M. Piquer-Píriz. 2020. “The Development of Receptive Vocabulary in CLIL vs EFL: Is the Learning Context the Main Variable?” System 91: 102263. doi:10.1016/j.system.2020.102263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, E., and D. Fung. 2023. “I Realised I Only Knew the Word Partly’: Student Beliefs about Vocabulary Knowledge and Learning in Different Grades and Proficiency Levels.” The Language Learning Journal 51 (3): 279–297. doi:10.1080/09571736.2021.2023204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coxhead, A. 2000. “A New Academic Word List.” TESOL Quarterly 34 (2): 213–238. doi:10.2307/3587951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coxhead, A., and T. J. Boutorwick. 2018. “Longitudinal Vocabulary Development in an EMI International School Context: Learners and Texts in EAL, Maths, and Science.” TESOL Quarterly 52 (3): 588–610. doi:10.1002/tesq.450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C. 2007. Discourse in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Classrooms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Devos, N. J. 2016. Peer Interactions in New Content and Language Integrated Settings. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Sanjurjo, J., A. Fernández-Costales, and J. M. A. Blanco. 2019. “Analysing Students’ Content-Learning in Science in CLIL vs. Non-CLIL Programmes: Empirical Evidence from Spain.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 22 (6): 661–674. doi:10.1080/13670050.2017.1294142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gass, S. M., and A. Mackey. 2020. “Input, Interaction, and Output in l2 Acquisition.” In Theories in Second Language Acquisition, edited by B. VanPatten, G. D. Keating, and S. Wulff, 3rd ed., 192–222. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, K. M., Y. Choi, A. Davoodi, S. Razmeh, and L. Q. Dixon. 2018. “Language and Content Outcomes of CLIL and EMI: A Systematic Review.” Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning 11 (1): 19–38. doi:10.5294/laclil.2018.11.1.2.
   Google Scholar
• He, P., and A. M. Y. Lin. 2019. “Co-Developing Science Literacy and Foreign Language Literacy through ‘Concept + Language Mapping’.” Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 7 (2): 261–288. doi:10.1075/jicb.18033.he.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HKEAA (Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority). 2019. 2019 HKDSE Entry Statistics. https://www.hkeaa.edu.hk/DocLibrary/HKDSE/Exam_Report/Examination_Statistics/dseexamstat19_2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, S. P., and D. Madrid. 2020. “The Effects of CLIL on Content Knowledge in Monolingual Contexts.” The Language Learning Journal 48 (1): 48–59. doi:10.1080/09571736.2019.1671483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, A. L., and L. J. Zhang. 2019. “Chinese Students’ Perceptions of English Learning Affordances and Their Agency in an English-Medium Instruction Classroom Context.” Language and Education 33 (4): 322–339. doi:10.1080/09500782.2019.1578789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez Catalán, R. M., and M. P. Agustín Llach. 2017. “CLIL or Time? Lexical Profiles of CLIL and Non-CLIL EFL Learners.” System 66: 87–99. doi:10.1016/j.system.2017.03.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laufer, B., and G. C. Ravenhorst-Kalovski. 2010. “Lexical Threshold Revisited: Lexical Text Coverage, Learners’ Vocabulary Size and Reading Comprehension.” Reading in a Foreign Language 22 (1): 15–30.
   Google Scholar
• Li, L., and L. J. MacGregor. 2010. “Investigating the Receptive Vocabulary Size of University-Level Chinese Learners of English: How Suitable is the Vocabulary Levels Test?” Language and Education 24 (3): 239–249. doi:10.1080/09500781003642478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, Y. Y. 2019. “Development of the Beliefs and Language Awareness of Content Subject Teachers in CLIL: Does Professional Development Help?” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 22 (7): 818–832. doi:10.1080/13670050.2017.1318821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, Y. Y., and D. Fung. 2020. “Assessment in CLIL: The Interplay between Cognitive and Linguistic Demands and Their Progression in Secondary Education.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 23 (10): 1192–1210. doi:10.1080/13670050.2018.1436519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, Y. Y., D. Fung, and X. Qiu. 2021. “Assessing Content Knowledge through L2: Mediating Role of Language of Testing on Students’ Performance.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/01434632.2020.1854274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, Y. Y., and C. Leung. 2022. “Conceptualising Assessment Literacy of Teachers in Content and Language Integrated Learning Programmes.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 25 (10): 3816–3834. doi:10.1080/13670050.2022.2085028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, Y. Y., and E. S. C. Lo. 2014. “A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of English-Medium Education in Hong Kong.” Review of Educational Research 84 (1): 47–73. doi:10.3102/00346543134996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, Y. Y., and V. A. Murphy. 2010. “Vocabulary Knowledge and Growth in Immersion and Regular Language-Learning Programmes in Hong Kong.” Language and Education 24 (3): 215–238. doi:10.1080/09500780903576125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macaro, E. 2018. English Medium Instruction: Content and Language in Policy and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macaro, E. 2020. “Exploring the Role of Language in English Medium Instruction.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 23 (3): 263–276. doi:10.1080/13670050.2019.1620678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macaro, E., J. Briggs Baffoe-Djan, H. Rose, B. di Sabato, B. Hughes, D. Cuccurullo, C. M. Coonan, M. Menegale, and A. Bier. 2019. Transition from Secondary School CLIL to EMI at University: Initial Evidence from Research in Italy. British Council. https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/transition-secondary-school-clil-emi-university-initial-evidence-research-italy.
   Google Scholar
• Massler, U., D. Stotz, and C. Queisser. 2014. “Assessment Instruments for Primary CLIL: The Conceptualisation and Evaluation of Test Tasks.” The Language Learning Journal 42 (2): 137–150. doi:10.1080/09571736.2014.891371.
   Google Scholar
• Miralpeix, I. 2020. “L1 and L2 Vocabulary Size and Growth.” In The Routledge Handbook of Vocabulary Studies, edited by S. Webb, 189–206. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nation, I. S. P. 2016. Making and Using Word Lists for Language Learning and Testing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Nation, I. S. P. 2017. “The BNC/COCA Word Family Lists [Data file].” https://www.wgtn.ac.nz/lals/resources/paul-nations-resources.
   Google Scholar
• Otto, A., and J. L. Estrada. 2019. “Towards an Understanding of CLIL Assessment Practices in a European Context: Main Assessment Tools and the Role of Language in Content Subjects.” CLIL. Journal of Innovation and Research in Plurilingual and Pluricultural Education 2 (1): 31–42. doi:10.5565/rev/clil.11.
   Google Scholar
• Ouazizi, K. 2016. “The Effects of CLIL Education on the Subject Matter (Mathematics) and the Target Language (English).” Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning 9 (1): 110–137. doi:10.5294/laclil.2016.9.1.5.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Cañado, M. L. 2012. “CLIL Research in Europe: Past, Present, and Future.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 15 (3): 315–341. doi:10.1080/13670050.2011.630064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piesche, N., K. Jonkmann, C. Fiege, and J. Keßler. 2016. “CLIL for All? A Randomised Controlled Field Experiment with Sixth-Grade Students on the Effects of Content and Language Integrated Science Learning.” Learning and Instruction 44: 108–116. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, J. C., and J. Pun. 2022. Teaching and Learning in English Medium Instruction: An Introduction. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rieder-Bünemann, A., J. Hüttner, and U. Smit. 2022. “‘Who Would Have Thought That I’d Ever Know That!’: Subject-Specific Vocabulary in CLIL Student Interactions.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 25 (9): 3184–3198. doi:10.1080/13670050.2021.2020211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N., T. Cobb, M. Horst, and D. Schmitt. 2017. “How Much Vocabulary is Needed to Use English? Replication of Van Zeeland & Schmitt (2012), Nation (2006) and Cobb (2007).” Language Teaching 50 (2): 212–226. doi:10.1017/S0261444815000075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N., and D. Schmitt. 2020. Vocabulary in Language Teaching. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N., D. Schmitt, and C. Clapham. 2001. “Developing and Exploring the Behaviour of Two New Versions of the Vocabulary Levels Tests.” Language Testing 18 (1): 55–88. doi:10.1177/026553220101800103.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, S., and H. Imam. 2013. “Assessment of International Students through the Medium of English: Ensuring Validity and Fairness in Content-Based Examinations.” Language Assessment Quarterly 10 (4): 452–475. doi:10.1080/15434303.2013.866117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sylvén, L. K., and S. Ohlander. 2014. “The CLISS Project: Receptive Vocabulary in CLIL versus non-CLIL Groups.” Moderna Språk 108 (2): 80–114. doi:10.58221/mosp.v108i2.8002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tai, K. W. H., and W. Li. 2021. “Co-Learning in Hong Kong English Medium Instruction Mathematics Secondary Classrooms: A Translanguaging Perspective.” Language and Education 35 (3): 241–267. doi:10.1080/09500782.2020.1837860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, M. 2011. “Mathematics and Science Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices regarding the Teaching of Language in Content Learning.” Language Teaching Research 15 (3): 325–342. doi:10.1177/1362168811401153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, E., E. Chung, E. Li, and S. Yeung. 2016. “Independent Vocabulary Building Experience of Hong Kong University Students: A Pedagogical Perspective.” IAFOR Journal of Education 4 (1): 13–29. doi:10.22492/ije.4.1.01.
   Google Scholar
• Uchihara, T., and T. Harada. 2018. “Roles of Vocabulary Knowledge for Success in English-Medium Instruction: Self-Perceptions and Academic Outcomes of Japanese Undergraduates.” TESOL Quarterly 52 (3): 564–587. doi:10.1002/tesq.453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villabona, N., and J. Cenoz. 2022. “The Integration of Content and Language in CLIL: A Challenge for Content-Driven and Language-Driven Teachers.” Language, Culture, and Curriculum 35 (1): 36–50. doi:10.1080/07908318.2021.1910703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, J., and S. Zhang. 2022. “Development of EMI Teacher Language Awareness: Does Team Teaching Help?” Language and Education 36 (4): 362–377. doi:10.1080/09500782.2021.2025244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar