79
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

PowerPoint presentations in L1-medium and English-medium lectures: examining knowledge-building practices in multimodal slide content

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 22 Nov 2023, Accepted 16 Apr 2024, Published online: 29 Apr 2024

References

  • Alkash K, Al-Dersi Z. 2013. Advantage of using Power Point presentations in EFL classroom. Int J Engl Lang Transl Stud. 1:3–16.
  • Airey J. 2020. The content lecturer and English-medium instruction (EMI): epilogue to the special issue on EMI in higher education. Int J Biling Educ Bilingual. 23(3):340–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2020.1732290.
  • Amua-Sekyi ET, Asare PY. 2016. A survey of information communication technology literacy among lecturers. Information Knowl Manage. 6(8):1–7.
  • Argüelles-Álvarez I, Morton T. 2023. Using the semantics dimension of legitimation code theory to investigate lecturers’ knowledge-building practices in two English-medium university computing courses. J English Acad Purposes. 65:101285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101285.
  • Baker JP, Goodboy AK, Bowman ND, Wright AA. 2018. Does teaching with PowerPoint increase students’ learning? A meta-analysis. Comput Educ. 126:376–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.003.
  • Becher T. 1989. Academic tribes and territories: intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Buckingham, UK: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
  • Bernad-Mechó E, Fortanet-Gómez I. 2017. Semiotic modes in the organization of lectures in English and in Spanish. EPiC Ser Lang Linguist. 2:224–234.
  • Bernstein B. 2000. Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: theory, research, critique (2nd ed.). New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Bezemer J, Jewitt C. 2018. Multimodality: a guide for linguists. In Research methods in linguistics (2nd ed.), ed. L. Litosseliti. New York: Bloomsbury, p. 281–304.
  • Bolton K, Kuteeva M. 2012. English as an academic language at a Swedish university: parallel language use and the ‘threat’ of English. J Multiling Multicult Dev. 33(5):429–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2012.670241.
  • Bozbıyik M, Morton T. 2023a. Lecturers’ use of examples in online university English-medium instruction: a micro-analytic classroom interaction and knowledge-building perspective. Lang Educ. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2023.2173528.
  • Bozbiyik M, Morton T. 2023b. Transitioning between ‘outside’ and ‘inside’ knowledge in an online university EMI chemistry course. Appl Linguist. 44(2):265–286. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amac068.
  • Cabero-Almenara J, Guillén-Gámez FD, Ruiz-Palmero J, Palacios-Rodríguez A. 2021. Digital competence of higher education professor according to DigCompEdu. Statistical research methods with ANOVA between fields of knowledge in different age ranges. Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 26(4):4691–4708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10476-5.
  • Clarence S. 2016a. Exploring the nature of disciplinary teaching and learning using legitimation code theory semantics. Teach Higher Educ. 21(2):123–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2015.1115972.
  • Clarence S. 2016b. Surfing the waves of learning: enacting a semantics analysis of teaching in a first-year law course. Higher Educ Res Dev. 36(5):920–933. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1263831.
  • Cosgun Ögeyik M. 2017. The effectiveness of PowerPoint presentation and conventional lecture on pedagogical content knowledge attainment. Innov Educ Teach Int. 54(5):503–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2016.1250663.
  • Cranwell PB, Whiteside KL. 2020. Investigation into the semantic density and semantic gravity wave profile of teachers when discussing electrophilic aromatic substitution (sear). J Chem Educ. 97(10):3540–3550. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00571.
  • Curzon P, Waite J, Maton K, Donohue J. 2020. Using semantic waves to analyse the effectiveness of unplugged computing activities. Proceedings of the 15th Workshop on Primary and Secondary Computing Education (pp. 1–10). https://doi.org/10.1145/3421590.3421606.
  • Dandekar PD, Dandekar DR, Parlewar C. 2017. Use of Power point presentation for teaching-­perception of undergraduate Ayurveda Students. Joinsysmed. 5(2):81–85.
  • Doiz A, Lasagabaster D, Sierra J. 2013. Globalisation, internationalisation, multilingualism and ­linguistic strains in higher education. Stud High Educ. 38(9):1407–1421. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.642349.
  • Fortanet-Gómez I, Crawford Camiciottoli B. 2015. Introduction. In Multimodal analysis in academic settings: from research to teaching, eds. B. Crawford Camiciottoli & I. Fortanet-Gómez. New York: Routledge, p. 1–14.
  • Ghomi M, Redecker C. 2019. Digital competence of educators (DigCompEdu): Development and evaluation of a self-assessment instrument for teachers’ digital competence. CSEDU. 1:541–548.
  • González-Mujico F, Lasagabaster D. 2019. Enhancing L2 motivation and English proficiency through technology. Complu J Eng Stud. 27: 59–78. https://dx.doi.org/10.5209/cjes.62990.
  • Hallewell MJ, Lackovic N. 2017. Do pictures ‘tell’ a thousand words in lectures? How lecturers vocalize photographs in their presentations. Higher Educ Res Dev. 36(6):1166–1180. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1303454.
  • Johnson R, Bourdieu P. 1993. The field of cultural production: essays on art and literature. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Johnson DA, Christensen J. 2011. A comparison of simplified-visually rich and traditional presentation styles. Teach Psychol. 38(4):293–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628311421333.
  • Jiang L, Zhang LJ, May S. 2016. Implementing English-medium instruction (EMI) in China: teachers’ practices and perceptions, and students’ learning motivation and needs. Int J Biling Educ Bilingual. 22(2):107–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2016.1231166.
  • Jurado JV. 2015. A multimodal approach to persuasion in conference presentations. In Multimodal analysis in academic settings: from research to teaching, eds. B. Crawford Camiciottoli and I. Fortanet-Gómez. New York: Routledge, p. 108–130.
  • Kirk S. 2017. Waves of reflection: seeing knowledge(s) in academic writing. In EAP in a rapidly changing landscape: issues, challenges and solutions. Proceedings of the 2015 BALEAP Conference. Garnet Education.
  • Kuteeva M, Airey J. 2014. Disciplinary differences in the use of English in higher education: Reflections on recent language policy developments. High Educ. 67(5):533–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9660-6.
  • Lasagabaster D. 2022. Teacher preparedness for English-Medium instruction. J Eng Med Inst. 1: 48–64. https://doi.org/10.1075/jemi.21011.las
  • Lasagabaster D, Doiz A. (Eds.). 2021. Language Use in English-Medium Instruction at University: International Perspectives on Teacher Practice. New York: Routledge.
  • LeFebvre L, Parsons M, Entwistle C, Boyd R, Allen M. 2022. Rethinking PowerPoint slide design for multimedia learning. J Educ Technol Syst. 50(4):503–520. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395221077628.
  • León SP, García-Martínez I. 2021. Impact of the provision of PowerPoint slides on learning. Comput Educ. 173:104283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104283.
  • Lewis P. 2016. Brain friendly teaching – reducing learner’s cognitive load. Acad Radiol. 23(7):877–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2016.01.018.
  • Maton K. 2013. Making semantic waves: A key to cumulative knowledge-building. Linguist Educ. 24(1):8–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2012.11.005.
  • Maton K. 2014. Building powerful knowledge: The significance of semantic waves. In Knowledge and the future of the curriculum. palgrave studies in excellence and equity in global education, eds. B. Barrett, and E. Rata. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137429261_12.
  • Maton K. 2016. Legitimation code theory: building knowledge about knowledge-building. In Knowledge-building: educational studies in legitimation code theory, eds. K. Maton, S. Hood and S. Shay. London: Routledge, p. 1–23.
  • Maton K. 2019. Semantic waves: context, complexity and academic discourse. In Accessing academic discourse: systemic functional linguistics and legitimation code theory, eds. J. R. Martin, K. Maton, and Y. J. Doran. London: Routledge, p. 59–85. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429280726.
  • Mayer R. 2014. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed.). University of California: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mora-Cantallops M, Inamorato dos Santos A, Villalonga-Gómez C, Lacalle Remigio JR, Camarillo Casado J, Sota Eguzábal JM, Velasco JR, Ruiz Martínez PM. 2022. Competencias Digitales del Profesorado Universitario en España. Un Estudio Basado en los Marcos Europeos DigCompEdu y OpenEdu. EUR 31127 ES, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.2760/448078.
  • Morell T. 2018. Multimodal competence and effective interactive lecturing. System. 77:70–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.12.006.
  • Morell T, Norte N, Beltran-Palanques V. 2020. How do trained EMI lecturers combine multimodal ensembles to engage students? In La Docencia en la Enseñanza Superior. Nuevas Aportaciones Desde la Investigación e Innovación Educativas, ed. R. Roig. Barcelona: Octaedro, p. 308–321. http://hdl.handle.net/10045/110076.
  • Mouton M. 2020. A case for project based learning to enact semantic waves: towards cumulative knowledge building. J Biol Educ. 54(4):363–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2019.1585379.
  • Querol-Julián M. 2023. Multimodal interaction in English-medium instruction: How does a lecturer promote and enhance students’ participation in a live online lecture? J Engl Acad Purposes. 61:101207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101207.
  • Redecker C. 2017. European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu. EUR 28775 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2017, ISBN 978-92-79-73718-3 (print),978-92-79-73494-6 (pdf), doi:10.2760/178382 (print),10.2760/159770 (online), JRC107466.
  • Roberts D. 2017. The engagement agenda, multimedia learning and the use of images in higher education lecturing: or, how to end death by PowerPoint. J Further High Educ. 42(7):969–985. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2017.1332356.
  • Ruiz-Madrid MN, Fortanet-Gómez I. 2022. Teacher professional development for the integration of content and language in higher education. Innov Lang Learn Teach. 16(4-5):277–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2022.2123678.
  • Sánchez RB, Cejudo CL, Gavira SA, Gavira RB. 2021. Autopercepción inicial y nivel de competencia digital del profesorado universitario. Texto Livre, Linguagem e Tecnologia. 15:1–24. http://hdl.handle.net/10498/26227.
  • Sánchez-Caballé A, Esteve-Mon FM. 2022. Digital teaching competence of university teachers: a comparative study at two European universities. AJET. 38(3):50–61. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7408.
  • Santos C, Pedro N, Mattar J. 2022. Digital competence of higher education professors in the European context: a scoping review study. Int J Emerg Technol Learn. 17(18), 222–242.
  • Velilla-Sánchez MA. 2021. Bilingual resources in English-medium instruction lectures: the role lecturer’s L1 is playing in EMI courses. Lang Value. 14(2):45–67. http://www.languagevalue.uji.es.
  • Wecker C. 2012. Slide presentations as speech suppressors: when and why learners miss oral information. Comput Educ. 59(2):260–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.01.013.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.