Methods and models for fibre–matrix interface characterisation in fibre-reinforced polymers: a review

References

• Kim J-K, Mai Y-W. Characterization of interfaces. In: J-K Kim, Y-W Mai, editors. Engineered Interfaces in Fiber Reinforced Composites; 1998. tinyurl.com/2p9yra3a
   Google Scholar
• Nath RB, Fenner DN, Galiotis C. Finite element modelling of interfacial failure in model carbon fibre-epoxy composites. J Mater Sci. 1996;31:2879–2883. doi:10.1007/BF00355996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sethi S, Ray BC. Environmental effects on fibre reinforced polymeric composites: evolving reasons and remarks on interfacial strength and stability. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2015;217:43–67. doi:10.1016/j.cis.2014.12.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang S, Fu Q, Yan L, et al. Characterization of interfacial properties between fibre and polymer matrix in composite materials – a critical review. J Mater Res Technol. 2021;13:1441–1484. doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.05.076
   Google Scholar
• Hughes JDH. The carbon fibre/epoxy interface—a review. Compos Sci Technol. 1991;41:13–45. doi:10.1016/0266-3538(91)90050-Y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy ED, Soutis C. Determination of interfacial shear strength in continuous fibre composites by multi-fibre fragmentation: a review. Composites Part A. 2019;118:281–292. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamalis D, Murray JJ, McClements J, et al. Novel carbon-fibre powder-epoxy composites: interface phenomena and interlaminar fracture behaviour. Composites Part B. 2019;174:107012. doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• İnal O, Katnam KB, Potluri P, et al. Progress in interlaminar toughening of aerospace polymer composites using particles and non-woven veils. Aeronaut J. 2022;126:222–248. doi:10.1017/aer.2021.95
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng L, Liu X, Chen X, et al. π - π interaction between carbon fibre and epoxy resin for interface improvement in composites. Composites Part B. 2021;220:108983. doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piggott MR. Why interface testing by single-fibre methods can be misleading. Compos Sci Technol. 1997;57:965–974. doi:10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00036-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez GM, Piggott MR, Bainbridge DMR, et al. The compression strength of composites with kinked, misaligned and poorly adhering fibres. J Mater Sci. 1981;16:2831–2836. doi:10.1007/BF02402847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piggott MR, Xiong Y. Visualization of debonding of fully and partially embedded glass fibres in epoxy resins. Compos Sci Technol. 1994;52:535–540. doi:10.1016/0266-3538(94)90036-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sockalingam S, Nilakantan G. Fiber-matrix interface characterization through the microbond test. Int J Aeronaut Space Sci. 2012;13:282–295. doi:10.5139/IJASS.2012.13.3.282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASTM D2344/D2344M-13: Standard test method for short-beam strength of polymer matrix composite materials and their laminates. ASTM International 2016; 15.03.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 14130:1998: Fibre-reinforced plastic composites - determinations of apparent laminar shear strength by short-beam method. Geneva, Switzerland; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D7264/D7264M-07: Standard test method for flexural properties of polymer matrix composite materials. ASTM International 2015; 15.03.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 14125:1998 Fibre-reinforced plastic composites -determination of flexural properties. 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Camanho PP, Hallett SR. Numerical modelling of failure in advanced composite materials. A Volume in Woodhead Publishing Series in Composites Science and Engineering; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Guocheng Q, Shanyi D, Boming Z, Yalin Y. A new approach to assessing carbon fiber/epoxy interfacial shear strength by tensile test of 45° fiber bundle composites: Experiment, modeling and applicability. Compos Sci Technol. 2016;129:214–221. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.04.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guocheng Q, Boming Z, Shanyi D, Yalin Y Estimation of aramid fiber/epoxy interfacial properties by fiber bundle tests and multiscale modeling considering the fiber skin/core structure. Compos Struct. 2017;167:1–10. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.01.047
   Google Scholar
• Pupurs A, Krasnikovs A, Varna J. Energy release rate based fiber/matrix debond growth in fatigue. Part II: debond growth analysis using Paris law. Mech Adv Mater Struct. 2013;20:288–296. doi:10.1080/15376494.2011.627628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohler S, Cugnoni J, Amacher R, et al. Transverse cracking in the bulk and at the free edge of thin-ply composites: experiments and multiscale modelling. Composites Part A. 2019;124:105468. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.05.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herráez M, Mora D, Naya F, et al. Transverse cracking of cross-ply laminates: a computational micromechanics perspective. Compos Sci Technol. 2015;110:196–204. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen BF, Lilholt H. Fiber pull-out test and single fiber fragmentation test - analysis and modelling. In: IOP conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 37th Risø International Symposium on Materials Science. 2016; Vol. 012009. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/139/1/012009
   Google Scholar
• Pitkethly MJ, Favre JP, Gaur U, et al. A round-robin programme on interfacial test methods. Compos Sci Technol. 1993;48:205–214. doi:10.1016/0266-3538(93)90138-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inkson BJ. 2 - Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) for materials characterization. In: G Hübschen, I Altpeter, R Tschuncky, H-G Herrmann, editors. Materials characterization using nondestructive evaluation (NDE) methods. Woodhead Publishing; 2016, 17–43, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-100040-3.00002-X.
   Google Scholar
• Ismail Y, Sheng Y, Yang D, et al. Discrete element modelling of unidirectional fibre-reinforced polymers under transverse tension. Composites Part B. 2015;73:118–125. doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.12.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• París F, Correa E, Canas J. Micromechanical view of failure of the matrix in fibrous composite materials. Compos Sci Technol. 2003;63:1041–1052. doi:10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00017-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong QL, Meguid SA. Atomistic investigation of the interfacial mechanical characteristics of carbon nanotube reinforced epoxy composite. Eur Polym J. 2015;69:1–15. doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao Y, Xian G. Effects of moisture ingress on the bond between carbon fiber and epoxy resin investigated with molecular dynamics simulation. Polym Compos. 2018;39:E2074–E2083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tam L, He L, Wu C. Molecular dynamics study on the effect of salt environment on interfacial structure, stress, and adhesion of carbon fiber/epoxy interface. Compos Interfaces. 2019;26:431–447. doi:10.1080/09276440.2018.1506901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng H, Zhang W, Li B, et al. Recent advances of interphases in carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composites: a review. Composites Part B. 2022;233:109639. doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson AC, Hayes SA, Jones FR. The role of matrix cracks and fibre/matrix debonding on the stress transfer between fibre and matrix in a single fibre fragmentation test. Composites Part A. 2012;43:65–72. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nath RB, Fenner DN, Galiotis C. Elasto-plastic finite element modelling of interfacial failure in model Kevlar 49 fibre—epoxy composites. Composites Part A. 1996;27:821–832. doi:10.1016/1359-835X(96)00053-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nath RB, Fenner DN, Galiotis C. The progressional approach to interfacial failure in carbon reinforced composites: elasto-plastic finite element modelling of interface cracks. Composites Part A. 2000;31:929–943. doi:10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00047-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guild FJ, Vlattas C, Galiotis C. Modelling of stress transfer in fibre composites. Compos Sci Technol. 1994;50:319–332. doi:10.1016/0266-3538(94)90020-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullin JV, Mazzio VF, Mehan RL. Basic failure mechanisms in advanced composites, NASw-2093. NASA. Philadelphia, PA: General Electric Co.; 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Feih S, Wonsyld K, Minzari D, et al. Testing procedure for the single fiber fragmentation test. Denmark: Risø National Laboratory. Forskningscenter Risoe. Risoe-R No. 1483(EN); 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Paipetis A, Galiotis C. Effect of fibre sizing on the stress transfer efficiency in carbon/epoxy model composites. Composites Part A. 1996;27:755–767. doi:10.1016/1359-835X(96)00054-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ten Busschen A, Selvadurai APS. Mechanics of the segmentation of an embedded fiber, part I: experimental investigations. J Appl Mech. 1995;62:87–97. doi:10.1115/1.2895888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomason JL. Glass fibre sizing: a review. Composites Part A. 2019;127:105619. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Young RJ. Analysis of the fragmentation test for carbon-fibre/epoxy model composites by means of Raman spectroscopy. Compos Sci Technol. 1994;52:505–517. doi:10.1016/0266-3538(94)90033-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuinstra F, Koenig JL. Characterization of graphite fiber surfaces with Raman spectroscopy. J Compos Mater. 1970;4:492–499. doi:10.1177/002199837000400405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu F, Wang D, Liu J, et al. Reviews on interfacial properties of the carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites. J Phys: Conf Ser. 2020;1637:012027. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1637/1/012027
   Google Scholar
• Lacroix T, Keunings R, Desaeger M, et al. A new data reduction scheme for the fragmentation testing of polymer composites. J Mater Sci. 1995;30:683–692. doi:10.1007/BF00356328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desaeger M, Reis MJ, Botelho Do Rego AM, et al. Surface characterization of poly(acrylonitrile) based intermediate modulus carbon fibres. J Mater Sci. 1996;31:6305–6315. doi:10.1007/BF00354454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomason JL, Adzima LJ. Sizing up the interphase: an insider’s guide to the science of sizing. Composites Part A. 2001;32:313–321. doi:10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00124-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan H, Zhang S, Lu C, et al. Improved interfacial adhesion in carbon fiber/polyether sulfone composites through an organic solvent-free polyamic acid sizing. Appl Surf Sci. 2013;279:279–284. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.04.085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue ZR, Jiang W, Wang L, et al. Surface characterization of electrochemically oxidized carbon fibers. Carbon. 1999;37:1785–1796. doi:10.1016/S0008-6223(99)00047-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Severini F, Formaro L, Pegoraro M, et al. Chemical modification of carbon fiber surfaces. Carbon. 2002;40:735–741. doi:10.1016/S0008-6223(01)00180-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Farber M, Gao Y, et al. Mechanisms of surfactant adsorption on non-polar, air-oxidized and ozone-treated carbon surfaces. Carbon. 2003;41:1489–1500. doi:10.1016/S0008-6223(03)00053-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing L, Liu L, Xie F, et al. Mutual irradiation grafting on indigenous aramid fiber-3 in diethanolamine and epichlorohydrin and its effect on interfacially reinforced epoxy composite. Appl Surf Sci. 2016;375:65–73. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.03.073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu L, Huang YD, Zhang ZQ, et al. Ultrasonic modification of aramid fiber-epoxy interface. J Appl Polym Sci. 2001;81:2764–2768. doi:10.1002/app.1722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng L, Wang Y, Qin J, et al. Scalable manufacturing of carbon nanotubes on continuous carbon fibers surface from chemical vapor deposition. Vacuum. 2018;152:84–90. doi:10.1016/j.vacuum.2018.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boccaccini AR, Cho J, Roether JA, et al. Electrophoretic deposition of carbon nanotubes. Carbon. 2006;44:3149–3160. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2006.06.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao M, Meng L, Ma L, et al. Layer-by-layer grafting CNTs onto carbon fibers surface for enhancing the interfacial properties of epoxy resin composites. Compos Sci Technol. 2018;154:28–36. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montes-Morán MA, Van Hattum FWJ, Nunes JP, et al. A study of the effect of plasma treatment on the interfacial properties of carbon fibre-thermoplastic composites. Carbon. 2005;43:1795–1799. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2005.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drzal LT, Rich MJ, Lloyd PF. Adhesion of graphite fibers to epoxy matrices: I. The role of fiber surface treatment. J Adhes. 1983;16:1–30. doi:10.1080/00218468308074901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schadler LS, Laird C, Figueroa JC. Interphase behaviour in graphite-thermoplastic monofilament composites - part I monotonic behaviour. J Mater Sci. 1992;27:4024–4034. doi:10.1007/BF01105100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drzal LT, Rich MJ, Koenig MF, et al. Adhesion of graphite fibers to epoxy matrices: II. The effect of fiber finish. J Adhes. 1983;16:133–152. doi:10.1080/00218468308074911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lv P, Feng YY, Zhang P, et al. Increasing the interfacial strength in carbon fiber/epoxy composites by controlling the orientation and length of carbon nanotubes grown on the fibers. Carbon. 2011;49:4665–4673. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2011.06.064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Bai JB, Wagner HD, et al. Interfacial studies of carbon fiber/epoxy composites using single fiber fragmentation test. In the Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Composite Materials; Venice, Italy; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Qian H, Bismarck A, Greenhalgh ES, et al. Hierarchical composites reinforced with carbon nanotube grafted fibers: the potential assessed at the single fiber level. Chem Mater. 2008;20:1862–1869. doi:10.1021/cm702782j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Lomov S V, Gorbatikh L. When does nanotube grafting on fibers benefit the strength and toughness of composites? Compos Sci Technol. 2020;188:107989. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.107989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godara A, Gorbatikh L, Kalinka G, et al. Interfacial shear strength of a glass fiber/epoxy bonding in composites modified with carbon nanotubes. Compos Sci Technol. 2010;70:1346–1352. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warrier A, Godara A, Rochez O, et al. The effect of adding carbon nanotubes to glass/epoxy composites in the fibre sizing and/or the matrix. Composites Part A. 2010;41:532–538. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terrones M, Martín O, González M, et al. Interphases in graphene polymer-based nanocomposites: achievements and challenges. Adv Mater. 2011;23:5302–5310. doi:10.1002/adma.201102036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnanasekar P, Chen H, Tratnik N, et al. Enhancing performance of phosphorus containing vanillin-based epoxy resins by P–N non-covalently functionalized graphene oxide nanofillers. Composites Part B. 2021;207:108585. doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerf A, He H, Forster M, et al. Structure of graphite oxide revisited. J Phys Chem B. 1998;102:4477–4482. doi:10.1021/jp9731821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain S, Yorucu C, Ahmed I, et al. Surface modification of aramid fibres by graphene oxide nano-sheets for multiscale polymer composites. Surf Coatings Technol. 2014;258:458–466. doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.08.054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomason JL, Nagel U, Yang L, et al. A study of the thermal degradation of glass fibre sizings at composite processing temperatures. Composites Part A. 2019;121:56–63. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivens J, Wevers M, Verpoest I. Influence of carbon fibre surface treatment on composite UD strength. Composites. 1994;25:722–728. doi:10.1016/0010-4361(94)90207-0
   Google Scholar
• Hoecker F, Karger-Kocsis J. Effects of the interface on the mechanical response of CF/EP microcomposites and macrocomposites. Composites. 1994;25:729–738. doi:10.1016/0010-4361(94)90208-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripathi D, Jones FR. Single fibre fragmentation test for assessing adhesion in fibre reinforced composites. J Mater Sci. 1998;33:1–16. doi:10.1023/A:1004351606897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ElKhoury L, Berg JC. The effect of curing schedules on fiber-matrix adhesion in carbon fiber-epoxy resin composites. J Compos Mater. 2022;56:699–712. doi:10.1177/00219983211060467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campana C, Leger R, Sonnier R, et al. Effect of post curing temperature on mechanical properties of a flax fiber reinforced epoxy composite. Composites Part A. 2018;107:171–179. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.12.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haider M, Hubert P, Lessard L. Cure shrinkage characterization and modeling of a polyester resin containing low profile additives. Composites Part A. 2007;38:994–1009. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.06.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W, Lee LJ. Shrinkage control of low-profile unsaturated polyester resins cured at low temperature. Polymer. 1998;39:5677–5687. doi:10.1016/S0032-3861(98)00074-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Yang W, Yu H, et al. Assessment of residual stresses during cure and cooling of epoxy resins. Polym Eng Sci. 1995;35:1895–1898. doi:10.1002/pen.760352309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Xu D, Liu HY, et al. Effects of thermal residual stress on interfacial properties of polyphenylene sulphide/carbon fibre (PPS/CF) composite by microbond test. J Mater Sci. 2016;51:334–343. doi:10.1007/s10853-015-9251-2
   Google Scholar
• Cottrell AH. Strong solids. Proc R Soc A. 1964;282:2–9.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly A, Tyson WR. Tensile properties of fibre-reinforced metals: copper/tungsten and copper/molybdenum. J Mech Phys Solids. 1965;13:329–338. doi:10.1016/0022-5096(65)90035-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao YC, Mai YW, Cotterell B. Fracture of fiber-reinforced materials. J Appl Math Phys. 1988;39:550–572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson JW, Jensen HM. Models of fiber debonding and pullout in brittle composites with friction. Mech Mater. 1990;9:139–163. doi:10.1016/0167-6636(90)90037-G
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graciani E, Mantič V, París F, et al. Numerical analysis of debond propagation in the single fibre fragmentation test. Compos Sci Technol. 2009;69:2514–2520. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim BW, Nairn JA. Observations of fiber fracture and interfacial debonding phenomena using the fragmentation test in single fiber composites. J Compos Mater. 2002;36:1825–1858. doi:10.1177/0021998302036015243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood JR, Wagner HD, Marom G. The compressive fragmentation phenomenon: using microcomposites to evaluate thermal stresses, single fibre compressive strengths, Weibull parameters and interfacial shear strengths. Proc R Soc London Ser A. 1996;452:235–252. doi:10.1098/rspa.1996.0014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verpoest I, Desaeger M, Keunings R. Critical review of direct micromechanical test methods for interfacial strength measurements in composites. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Composite Interfaces (ICCI-III); Cleveland, Ohio, USA; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Netravali AN, Li ZF, Sachse W, et al. Determination of fibre/matrix interfacial shear strength by an acoustic emission technique. J Mater Sci. 1991;26:6631–6638. doi:10.1007/BF02402656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Netravali AN, Topoleski LTT, Sachse WH, et al. An acoustic emission technique for measuring fiber fragment length distributions in the single-fiber- composite test. Compos Sci Technol. 1989;35:13–29. doi:10.1016/0266-3538(89)90068-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz YI. Analyzing single fiber fragmentation test data by using stress transfer model. J Compos Mater. 2002;36:537–551. doi:10.1177/0021998302036005465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodeiro MJ. Single-fibre fragmentation test for the characterisation of interfacial phenomena in PMCs. 2001; NPL Report. MATC(MN)0. http://eprintspublications.npl.co.uk/id/eprint/3252
   Google Scholar
• Khan RA, Parsons AJ, Jones IA, et al. Interfacial properties of phosphate glass fiber/poly(caprolactone)system measured using the single fiber fragmentation test. Compos Interfaces. 2011;18:77–90. doi:10.1163/092764410X554058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohsawa T, Nakayama A, Miwa M, et al. Temperature dependence of critical fiber length for glass fiber-reinforced thermosetting resins. J Appl Polym Sci. 1978;22:3203–3212. doi:10.1002/app.1978.070221115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feillard P, Désarmot G, Favre JP. Theoretical aspects of the fragmentation test. Compos Sci Technol. 1994;50:265–279. doi:10.1016/0266-3538(94)90148-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueroa JC, Carney TE, Schadler LS, et al. Micromechanics of single filament composites. Compos Sci Technol. 1991;42:77–101. doi:10.1016/0266-3538(91)90013-F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drzal LT, Rich MJ, Camping JD, et al. Interfacial shear strength and failure mechanisms in graphite fiber composites. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Technical Conference Reinforced Plastics/Composites Institute, The Society of the Plastics Industry, Inc.; New Orleans, USA; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Tripathi D, Chen F, Jones FR. The effect of matrix yield strain on the data reduction technique of the single-filament fragmentation test. Composites Part A. 1996;27:709–715. doi:10.1016/1359-835X(96)00041-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripathi D, Turton T, Chen F, et al. A new method to normalize the effect of matrix properties on the value of interfacial shear strength obtained from the fragmentation test. J Mater Sci. 1997;32:4759–4765. doi:10.1023/A:1018631030753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodeiro MJ, Maudgal S, McCartney LN, et al. Project CPD3 - report 1 interface characterisation and behaviour: critical review of interface testing methods for composites. Teddington, Middlesex: National Physical Laboratory; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Rich MJ, Drzal LT, Hunston D, et al. Round Robin Assessment of the single fiber fragmentation test. In Proceedings of the American Society for Composites 17th Technical Conference; Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Galiotis C. A study of mechanisms of stress transfer in continuous- and discontinuous-fibre model composites by laser Raman spectroscopy. Compos Sci Technol. 1993;48:15–28. doi:10.1016/0266-3538(93)90116-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishikawa M, Okabe T, Takeda N, et al. Micromechanics of the fragmentation process in single-fiber composites. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng. 2008;16:1–19. doi:10.1088/0965-0393/16/5/055009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Meer FP, Raijmaekers S, Rocha IBCM. Interpreting the single fiber fragmentation test with numerical simulations. Composites Part A. 2019;118:259–266. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowyer WH, Bader MG. On the re-inforcement of thermoplastics by imperfectly aligned discontinuous fibres. J Mater Sci. 1972;7:1315–1321. doi:10.1007/BF00550698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bader MG, Bowyer WH. An improved method of production for high strength fibre-reinforced thermoplastics. Composites. 1973;4:150–156. doi:10.1016/0010-4361(73)90105-5
   Google Scholar
• Aliotta L, Lazzeri A. A proposal to modify the Kelly-Tyson equation to calculate the interfacial shear strength (IFSS) of composites with low aspect ratio fibers. Compos Sci Technol. 2020;186:107920. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox HL. The elasticity and strength of paper and other fibrous materials. Br J Appl Phys. 1952;3:72–79. doi:10.1088/0508-3443/3/3/302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacroix T, Tiimans B, Keunings R, et al. Modelling of critical fibre length and interfacial debonding in the fragmentation testing of polymer composites. Compos Sci Technol. 1992;43:379–387. doi:10.1016/0266-3538(92)90061-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendels DA. Analysis of the single-fibre fragmentation test, NPL report MATC(A)17. Teddington, Middlesex: National Physical Laboratory; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Nairn JA. On the use of shear-lag methods for analysis of stress transfer in unidirectional composites. Mech Mater. 1997;26:63–80. doi:10.1016/S0167-6636(97)00023-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nayfeh AH. Thermomechanically induced interfacial stresses in fibrous composites. Fibre Sci Technol. 1977;10:195–209. doi:10.1016/0015-0568(77)90020-3
   Google Scholar
• McCartney L. Analytical models of stress transfer in unidirectional composites and cross-ply laminates and their applications to the prediction of matrix/transverse cracking, local mechanics concepts for composite material systems. In the Proceedings of the IUTAM Symposia (International Union of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics); 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Nairn JA. Generalized shear-lag analysis including imperfect interfaces. Adv Compos Lett. 2004;13:263–274. doi:10.1177/096369350401300601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camanho PP, Hallett SR, editors. Numerical modelling of failure in advanced composite materials. Cambridge: Elsevier; Woodhead Publishing; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Landis CM, McGlockton MA, McMeeking RM. An improved shear lag model for broken fibers in composite materials. J Compos Mater. 1999;33:667–680. doi:10.1177/002199839903300704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okabe T, Takeda N. Elastoplastic shear-lag analysis of single-fiber composites and strength prediction of unidirectional multi-fiber composites. Composites Part A. 2002;33:1327–1335. doi:10.1016/S1359-835X(02)00170-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis CM, McMeeking RM. A shear-lag model for a broken fiber embedded in a composite with a ductile matrix. Compos Sci Technol. 1999;59:447–457. doi:10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00091-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balacó De Morais A. Stress distribution along broken fibres in polymer-matrix composites. Compos Sci Technol. 2001;61:1571–1580. doi:10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00058-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okabe T, Takeda N, Kamoshida Y, et al. A 3D shear-lag model considering micro-damage and statistical strength prediction of unidirectional fiber-reinforced composites. Compos Sci Technol. 2001;61:1773–1787. doi:10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00079-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Z, Zhang BM, Zhao L, et al. Stress transfer around a broken fiber in unidirectional fiber-reinforced composites considering matrix damage evolution and interface slipping. Sci China Phys Mech Astron. 2011;54:296–302. doi:10.1007/s11433-010-4148-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis CM, Beyerlein IJ, McMeeking RM. Micromechanical simulation of the failure of fiber reinforced composites. J Mech Phys Solids. 2000;48:621–648. doi:10.1016/S0022-5096(99)00051-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyerlein IJ, Leigh Phoenix S. Statistics of fracture for an elastic notched composite lamina containing Weibull fibers— part I. Features from Monte-Carlo simulation. Eng Fract Mech. 1997;57:241–265. doi:10.1016/S0013-7944(97)00012-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drzal LT. The effect of polymeric matrix mechanical properties on the fiber-matrix interfacial shear strength. Mater Sci Eng A. 1990;126:289–293. doi:10.1016/0921-5093(90)90135-P
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okabe T, Takeda N. Estimation of strength distribution for a fiber embedded in a single-fiber composite: experiments and statistical simulation based on the elasto-plastic shear-lag approach. Compos Sci Technol. 2001;61:1789–1800. doi:10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00080-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao FM, Okabe T, Takeda N. Effect of matrix yield properties on fragmentation behavior of single fiber composites. Compos Interfaces. 2002;9:289–308. doi:10.1163/156855402320257366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitney JM, Drzal LT. Axisymmetric stress distribution around an isolated fiber fragment. Toughened composites. ASTM STP 937. American Society for Testing and Materials 1987; p. 179–96.
   Google Scholar
• Nairn JA. A variational mechanics analysis of the stresses around breaks in embedded fibers. Mech Mater. 1992;13:131–154. doi:10.1016/0167-6636(92)90042-C
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu W, Desaeger M, Verpoest I, et al. An improved analysis of the stresses in a single-fibre fragmentation test: I. Two-phase model. Compos Sci Technol. 1997;57:809–819. doi:10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00050-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripathi D, Chen F, Jones FR. A comprehensive model to predict the stress fields in a single fibre composite. J Compos Mater. 1996;30:1514–1538. doi:10.1177/002199839603001401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piggott MR. Failure processes in the fibre-polymer interphase. Compos Sci Technol. 1991;42:57–76. doi:10.1016/0266-3538(91)90012-E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yallee RB, Young RJ. Evaluation of interface fracture energy for single-fibre composites. Compos Sci Technol. 1998;58:1907–1916. doi:10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00008-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nardone VC, Prewo KM. On the strength of discontinuous silicon carbide reinforced aluminum composites. Scr Metall. 1986;20:43–48. doi:10.1016/0036-9748(86)90210-3
   Google Scholar
• Ji S, Zhao P. Location of tensile fracture within rigid-brittle inclusions in a ductile flowing matrix. Tectonophysics. 1993;220:23–31. doi:10.1016/0040-1951(93)90221-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Yan W. A shear-lag model with a cohesive fibre–matrix interface for analysis of fibre pull-out. Mech Mater. 2015;91:119–135. doi:10.1016/j.mechmat.2015.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong X, Shen SZ, Hua L, et al. Predicting tensile behaviors of short flax fiber-reinforced polymer–matrix composites using a modified shear-lag model. J Compos Mater. 2018;52:3701–3713. doi:10.1177/0021998318769128
   Google Scholar
• Tucker N, Lindsey K. An introduction to automotive composites. Shawbury : Rapra Technology Ltd; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Nairn JA, Liu YC. On the use of energy methods for interpretation of results of single-fiber fragmentation experiments. Compos Interfaces. 1996;4:241–261. doi:10.1163/156855497X00028
   Google Scholar
• Detassis M, Frydman E, Vrieling D, et al. Interface toughness in fibre composites by the fragmentation test. Composites Part A. 1996;27:769–773. doi:10.1016/1359-835X(96)00045-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou X, Nairn JA, Wagner HD. Fiber-matrix adhesion from the single-fiber composite test: nucleation of interfacial debonding. Composites Part A. 1999;30:1387–1400. doi:10.1016/S1359-835X(99)00043-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhuang L, Pupurs A, Varna J, et al. Fiber/matrix debond growth from fiber break in unidirectional composite with local hexagonal fiber clustering. Composites Part B. 2016;101:124–131. doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pupurs A, Varna J. Energy release rate based fiber/matrix debond growth in fatigue. Part I: self-similar crack growth. Mech Adv Mater Struct. 2013;20:276–287. doi:10.1080/15376494.2011.627627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner HD, Nairn JA, Detassis M. Toughness of interfaces from initial fiber-matrix debonding in a single fiber composite fragmentation test. Appl Compos Mater. 1995;2:107–117. doi:10.1007/BF00569253
   Google Scholar
• Graciani E, Varna J, Manti V, et al. Evaluation of interfacial fracture toughness and friction coefficient in the single fiber fragmentation test. Procedia Eng. 2011;10:2478–2483. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.408
   Google Scholar
• Kim BW, Nairn JA. Experimental verification of the effects of friction and residual stress on the analysis of interfacial debonding and toughness in single fiber composites. J Mater Sci. 2002;37:3965–3972. doi:10.1023/A:1019684312272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nairn JA. Fracture mechanics of composites with residual stresses, traction-loaded cracks, and imperfect interfaces. Int J Fract. 2000;105:243–271. doi:10.1023/A:1007666426275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen BF. Micromechanical model of the single fiber fragmentation test. Mech Mater. 2017;104:38–48. doi:10.1016/j.mechmat.2016.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budiansky B, Hutchinson JW, Evans AG. Matrix fracture in fiber-reinforced ceramics. J Mech Phys Solids. 1986;34:167–189. doi:10.1016/0022-5096(86)90035-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen BF, Lilholt H. Fiber pull-out test and single fiber fragmentation test - analysis and modelling. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 37th Risø International Symposium on Materials Science 2016; Vol. 139.
   Google Scholar
• Budiman BA, Takahashi K, Inaba K, et al. A new method of evaluating interfacial properties of a fiber/matrix composite. J Compos Mater. 2015;49:465–475. doi:10.1177/0021998314521061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turon A, Dávila CG, Camanho PP, et al. An engineering solution for mesh size effects in the simulation of delamination using cohesive zone models. Eng Fract Mech. 2007;74:1665–1682. doi:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.08.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfano G, Crisfield MA. Finite element interface models for the delamination analysis of laminated composites: mechanical and computational issues. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2001;50:1701–1736. doi:10.1002/nme.93
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper PW, Hallett SR. Cohesive zone length in numerical simulations of composite delamination. Eng Fract Mech. 2008;75:4774–4792. doi:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh G, Duddu R, Annavarapu C. A stabilized finite element method for delamination analysis of composites using cohesive elements. ArXiv:200809015v1; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Daudeville L, Allix O, Ladevèze P. Delamination analysis by damage mechanics: some applications. Compos Eng. 1995;5:17–24. doi:10.1016/0961-9526(95)93976-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou Z, Reid SR, Li S, et al. Modelling interlaminar and intralaminar damage in filament-wound pipes under quasi-static indentation. J Compos Mater. 2002;36:477–499. doi:10.1177/0021998302036004539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camanho PP, Davila C, Moura M. Numerical simulation of mixed-mode progressive delamination in composite materials. J Compos Mater. 2003;37:1415–1438. doi:10.1177/0021998303034505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan H, Li X. Effects of the cohesive law on ductile crack propagation simulation by using cohesive zone models. Eng Fract Mech. 2014;126:1–11. doi:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.04.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao L, Gong Y, Zhang J, et al. Simulation of delamination growth in multidirectional laminates under mode I and mixed mode I/II loadings using cohesive elements. Compos Struct. 2014;116:509–522. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.05.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turon A, Camanho PP, Costa J, et al. Accurate simulation of delamination growth under mixed-mode loading using cohesive elements: definition of interlaminar strengths and elastic stiffness. Compos Struct. 2010;92:1857–1864. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turon A, González EV, Sarrado C, et al. Accurate simulation of delamination under mixed-mode loading using a cohesive model with a mode-dependent penalty stiffness. Compos Struct. 2018;184:506–511. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.10.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dávila CG, Rose CA, Camanho PP. A procedure for superposing linear cohesive laws to represent multiple damage mechanisms in the fracture of composites. Int J Fract. 2009;158:211–223. doi:10.1007/s10704-009-9366-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budiman BA, Takahashi K, Inaba K, et al. Evaluation of interfacial strength between fiber and matrix based on cohesive zone modeling. Composites Part A. 2016;90:211–217. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.06.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez FA, Carlsson LA, Acha BA. A method to measure fracture toughness of the fiber/matrix interface using the single-fiber fragmentation test. Composites Part A. 2009;40:679–686. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varna J, Joffe R, Berglund LA. Interfacial toughness evaluation from the single-fiber fragmentation test. Compos Sci Technol. 1996;56:1105–1109. doi:10.1016/0266-3538(96)00096-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swolfs Y. Hybridisation of self-reinforced composites: modelling and verifying a novel hybrid concept. [PhD thesis]. KU Leuven, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Xia Z, Curtin WA, Okabe T. Green’s function vs. shear-lag models of damage and failure in fiber composites. Compos Sci Technol. 2002;62:1279–1288. doi:10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00073-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia Z, Okabe T, Curtin WA. Shear-lag versus finite element models for stress transfer in fiber-reinforced composites. Compos Sci Technol. 2002;62:1141–1149. doi:10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00072-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babaei R, Farrokhabadi A. Prediction of debonding growth in two-dimensional RVEs using an extended interface element based on continuum damage mechanics concept. Compos Struct. 2020;238:111981. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.111981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cundall PA, Strack ODL. A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Géotechnique. 1979;29:47–65. doi:10.1680/geot.1979.29.1.47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le BD, Dau F, Charles JL, et al. Modeling damages and cracks growth in composite with a 3D discrete element method. Composites Part B. 2016;91:615–630. doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.01.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheng Y, Yang D, Tan Y, et al. Microstructure effects on transverse cracking in composite laminae by DEM. Compos Sci Technol. 2010;70:2093–2101. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang D, Sheng Y, Ye J, et al. Discrete element modeling of the microbond test of fiber reinforced composite. Comput Mater Sci. 2010;49:253–259. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le BD, Dau F, Pham DH, et al. Discrete element modeling of interface debonding behavior in composite material: application to a fragmentation test. Compos Struct. 2021;272:114170. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadvashaghbash S, Breite C, Mehdikhani M, et al. Longitudinal debonding in unidirectional fibre-reinforced composites: numerical analysis of the effect of interfacial properties. Compos Sci Technol. 2021;218:109117. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.109117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AhmadvashAghbash S, Fazlali B, Mehdikhani M, et al. Finite element analysis of the effect of longitudinal debonding on stress redistributions around fibre breaks in randomly packed fibres. Compos Sci Technol. 2022;227:109586. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galiotis C, Batchelder DN. Strain dependences of the first- and second-order Raman spectra of carbon fibres. J Mater Sci Lett. 1988;7:545–547. doi:10.1007/BF01730722
   Google Scholar
• Robinson IM, Zakikhani M, Day RJ, et al. Strain dependence of the Raman frequencies for different types of carbon fibres. J Mater Sci Lett. 1987;6:1212–1214. doi:10.1007/BF01729187
   Google Scholar
• Schadler LS, Galiotis C. Fundamentals and applications of micro Raman spectroscopy to strain measurements in fibre reinforced composites. Int Mater Rev. 1995;40:116–134. doi:10.1179/imr.1995.40.3.116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galiotis C, Read RT, Yeung PHJ, et al. High-modulus polydiacetylene single-crystal fibers. J Polym Sci Part A-2, Polym Phys. 1984;22:1589–1606. doi:10.1002/pol.1984.180220903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galiotis C, Young RJ, Batchelder DN. The solid-state polymerization and physical properties of bis(ethyl urethane) of 2,4-hexadiyne-1,6-diol. II. Resonance Raman spectroscopy. J Polym Sci Part A-2, Polym Phys. 1983;21:2483–2494. doi:10.1002/pol.1983.180211206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galiotis C. Interfacial studies on model composites by laser Raman spectroscopy. Compos Sci Technol. 1991;42:125–150. doi:10.1016/0266-3538(91)90015-H
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahankhani H, Galiotis C. Interfacial shear stress distribution in model composites, part 1: a Kevlar 49® fibre in an epoxy matrix. J Compos Mater. 1991;25:609–631. doi:10.1177/002199839102500508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melanitis N, Galiotis C. Interfacial micromechanics in model composites using laser Raman spectroscopy. Proc R Soc London Ser A. 1993;440:379–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galiotis C, Paipetis A, Mansion C. Unification of fibre/matrix interfacial measurements with Raman microscopy. J Raman Spectrosc. 1999;30:899–912. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4555(199910)30:10<899:AID-JRS465>3.0.CO;2-V
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner HD. Interface mechanics in fiber composites: a short tutorial (FiBreMoD School Lectures, Day 1, Lecture 1-KU Leuven, Belgium). 2019.
   Google Scholar
• van den Heuvel PWJ, Peijs T, Young RJ. Failure phenomena in two-dimensional multifibre microcomposites: 2. A Raman spectroscopic study of the influence of inter-fibre spacing on stress concentrations. Compos Sci Technol. 1997;57:899–911. doi:10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00004-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montes-Morán MA, Young RJ. Raman spectroscopy study of high-modulus carbon fibres: effect of plasma-treatment on the interfacial properties of single-fibre-epoxy composites. Part II - characterisation of the fibre–matrix interface. Carbon. 2002;40:857–875. doi:10.1016/S0008-6223(01)00207-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu M, Wang Y, Wang C, et al. An improved analytical model for inversely determining multiple interfacial parameters from single fiber micro-Raman and fragmentation tests. Compos Sci Technol. 2021;214:108983. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li ZF, Grubb DT, Phoenix SL. Fiber interactions in the multi-fiber composite fragmentation test. Compos Sci Technol. 1995;54:251–266. doi:10.1016/0266-3538(95)00056-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto G, Onodera M, Koizumi K, et al. Considering the stress concentration of fiber surfaces in the prediction of the tensile strength of unidirectional carbon fiber-reinforced plastic composites. Composites Part A. 2019;121:499–509. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner HD, Amer MS, Schadler LS. Fibre interactions in two-dimensional composites by micro-Raman spectroscopy. J Mater Sci. 1996;31:1165–1173. doi:10.1007/BF00353095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schadler LS, Amer MS, Iskandarani B. Experimental measurement of fiber/fiber interaction using micro Raman spectroscopy. Mech Mater. 1996;23:205–216. doi:10.1016/0167-6636(96)00004-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paipetis A, Galiotis C, Liu YC, et al. Stress transfer from the matrix to the fibre in a fragmentation test: Raman experiments and analytical modeling. J Compos Mater. 1999;33:377–399. doi:10.1177/002199839903300404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piggott MR. Expressions governing stress-strain curves in short fibre reinforced polymers. J Mater Sci. 1978;13:1709–1716. doi:10.1007/BF00548734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubb DT, Li ZF, Phoenix SL. Measurement of stress concentration in a fiber adjacent to a fiber break in a model composite. Compos Sci Technol. 1995;54:237–249. doi:10.1016/0266-3538(95)00055-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner HD, Steenbakkers LW. Microdamage analysis of fibrous composite monolayers under tensile stress. J Mater Sci. 1989;24:3956–3975. doi:10.1007/BF01168959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones KD, DiBenedetto AT. Fiber fracture in hybrid composite systems. Compos Sci Technol. 1994;51:53–62. doi:10.1016/0266-3538(94)90156-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mccarthy ED, Kim JH, Heckert NA, et al. The fiber break evolution process in a 2-D epoxy/glass multi-fiber array. Compos Sci Technol. 2015;121:73–81. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.10.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JH, Hettenhouser JW, Moon CK, et al. A fiber placement device and methodology for preparing 2-D and 3-D combinatorial microcomposites. J Mater Sci. 2009;44:3626–3632. doi:10.1007/s10853-009-3362-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goutianos S, Peijs T, Galiotis C. Mechanisms of stress transfer and interface integrity in carbon/epoxy composites under compression loading part I: experimental investigation. Int J Solids Struct. 2002;39:3217–3231. doi:10.1016/S0020-7683(02)00240-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goutianos S, Peijs T. Experimental and numerical investigation into fatigue damage mechanisms in multif ibre microcomposites. Plast Rubber Compos Process Appl. 2001;30:222–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pupurs A, Varna J. Fracture mechanics analysis of debond growth in a single-fiber composite under cyclic loading. Mech Compos Mater. 2011;47:109–124. doi:10.1007/s11029-011-9190-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littell J, Ruggeri C, Goldberg R, et al. Measurement of epoxy resin tension, compression, and shear stress–strain curves over a wide range of strain rates using small test specimens. J Aerosp Eng. 2008;21:162–173. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2008)21:3(162)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiedler B, Hojo M, Ochiai S, et al. Failure behavior of an epoxy matrix under different kinds of static loading. Compos Sci Technol. 2001;61:1615–1624. doi:10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00057-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh TH, Kinloch AJ, Masania K, et al. The mechanisms and mechanics of the toughening of epoxy polymers modified with silica nanoparticles. Polymer. 2010;51:6284–6294. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2010.10.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morelle XP, Chevalier J, Bailly C, et al. Mechanical characterization and modeling of the deformation and failure of the highly crosslinked RTM6 epoxy resin. Mech Time-Depend Mater. 2017;21:419–454. doi:10.1007/s11043-016-9336-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breite C. Aligning fibre break models for composites with the observable micro-scale material behaviour [PhD thesis]. KU Leuven, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Tripathi D, Chen F, Jones FR. The effect of matrix plasticity on the stress fields in a single filament composite and the value of interfacial shear strength obtained from the fragmentation test. Proc R Soc London Ser A. 1996;452:621–653. doi:10.1098/rspa.1996.0032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pisanova EV, Zhandarov SF. On the mechanism of failure in microcomposites consisting of single glass fibres in a thermoplastic matrix. Compos Sci Technol. 1997;57:937–943. doi:10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00022-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piggott MR, Chua PS, Andison D. The interface between glass and carbon fibers and thermosetting polymers. Polym Compos. 1985;6:242–248. doi:10.1002/pc.750060409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chua PS, Piggott MR. The glass fibre-polymer interface: II—work of fracture and shear stresses. Compos Sci Technol. 1985;22:107–119. doi:10.1016/0266-3538(85)90079-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melanitis N, Galiotis C, Tetlow PL, et al. Interfacial shear stress distribution in model composites part 2: fragmentation studies on carbon fibre/epoxy systems. J Compos Mater. 1992;26:574–610. doi:10.1177/002199839202600407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiriajeva GV, Andreevskaya GD. Sov Plast. 1962;4:40.
   Google Scholar
• Favre JP, Perrin J. Carbon fibre adhesion to organic matrices. J Mater Sci. 1972;7:1113–1118. doi:10.1007/BF00550192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampe A. Grundlegende untersuchungen an faserverstärkten polymeren. Amts Mitteilungsblatt BAM. 1988;18:3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Hampe A, Kalinka G, Meretz S, et al. An advanced equipment for single-fibre pull-out test designed to monitor the fracture process. Composites. 1995;26:40–46. doi:10.1016/0010-4361(94)P3628-E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chua PS, Piggott MR. The glass fibre-polymer interface: I-theoretical consideration for single fibre pull-out tests. Compos Sci Technol. 1985;22:33–42. doi:10.1016/0266-3538(85)90089-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piggott MR. Debonding and friction at fibre-polymer interfaces. I: criteria for failure and sliding. Compos Sci Technol. 1987;30:295–306. doi:10.1016/0266-3538(87)90017-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiFrancia C, Ward TC, Claus RO. The single-fibre pull-out test. 1: review and interpretation. Composites: Part A. 1996;27:597–612. doi:10.1016/1359-835X(95)00069-E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang KR, Penn LS. Improved analysis and experimental evaluation of the single filament pull-out test. Compos Sci Technol. 1992;45:89–103. doi:10.1016/0266-3538(92)90031-W
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly A. Interface effects and the work of fracture of a fibrous composite. R Soc London Ser A Math Phys Sci. 1970;319:95–116.
   Google Scholar
• Takaku A, Arridge RGC. The effect of interfacial radial and shear stress on fibre pull-out in composite materials. J Phys D Appl Phys. 1973;6:2038–2047. doi:10.1088/0022-3727/6/17/310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piggott MR. The single-fibre pull-out method: its advantages, interpretation and experimental realization. Compos Interfaces. 1993;1:211–223. doi:10.1163/156855493X00086
   Google Scholar
• Bannister DJ, Andrews MC, Cervenka AJ, et al. Analysis of the single-fibre pull-out test by means of Raman spectroscopy: part II. Micromechanics of deformation for an aramid/epoxy system. Compos Sci Technol. 1995;53:411–421. doi:10.1016/0266-3538(95)00030-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C. Fracture mechanics of single-fibre pull-out test. J Mater Sci. 1997;32:483–490. doi:10.1023/A:1018534323464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung CKY, Li VC. New strength-based model for the debonding of discontinuous fibres in an elastic matrix. J Mater Sci. 1991;26:5996–6010. doi:10.1007/BF01113875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noda NA, Chen D, Zhang G, et al. Single-fiber pull-out analysis comparing the intensities of singular stress fields (ISSFs) at fiber end/entry points. Int J Mech Sci. 2020;165:105196. doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.105196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou L-M, Kim J-K, Mai Y-W. On the single fibre pull-out problem: effect of loading method. Compos Sci Technol. 1992;45:153–160. doi:10.1016/0266-3538(92)90037-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäder E, Mörschei U, Effing M. Quality assessment of composites. JEC Compos Mag. 2016;53:49–51.
   Google Scholar
• Chua PS, Piggott MR. The glass fibre-polymer interface: III—pressure and coefficient of friction. Compos Sci Technol. 1985;22:185–196. doi:10.1016/0266-3538(85)90032-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai K-H, Kim K-S. The micromechanics of fiber pull-out. J Mech Phys Solids. 1996;44:1147–1177. doi:10.1016/0022-5096(96)00019-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhandarov SF, Edith M, Schef C, et al. Investigation of interfacial strength parameters in polymer matrix composites: compatibility and reproducibility. Adv Ind Eng Polym Res. 2018;1:82–92. doi:10.1016/j.aiepr.2018.06.002
   Google Scholar
• Deng S, Ye L, Mai YW. Measurement of interfacial shear strength of carbon fibre/epoxy composites using a single fibre pull-out test. Adv Compos Mater. 1998;7:169–182. doi:10.1163/156855198X00129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrikis AK, Andrews MC, Young RJ. Analysis of the single-fibre pull-out test by the use of Raman spectroscopy. Part I: pull-out of aramid fibres from an epoxy resin. Compos Sci Technol. 1994;52:387–396. doi:10.1016/0266-3538(94)90173-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu XH, Young RJ, Day RJ. Deformation micromechanics in model carbon fiber reinforced composites, part I the single-fibre pull-out test. J Mater Sci. 1995;30:1409–1419. doi:10.1007/BF00375240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pisanova E, Zhandarov SF, Mäder E, et al. Three techniques of interfacial bond strength estimation from direct observation of crack initiation and propagation in polymer-fibre systems. Composites Part A. 2001;32:435–443. doi:10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00054-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong W, Pan N. A computer simulation of single fiber pull out process in a composite. J Compos Mater. 2003;37:1951–1969. doi:10.1177/002199803036267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delfolie C, Depecker C, Lefebvre JM. Interfacial phenomena in glass fibre reinforced polyester resin with low profile additives. part I micromechanical evaluation by pull out testing. J Mater Sci. 1999;34:481–495. doi:10.1023/A:1004582310207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greszczuk LB. Interfaces in composites. ASTM STP. 1969;452:42–58.
   Google Scholar
• Greszczuk LB. Theoretical studies of the mechanics of the fiber-matrix interface in composites. Interface Compos. 1969:42–58. doi:10.1520/STP44699S
   Google Scholar
• Pitkethly MJ, Doble JB. Characterizing the fibre/matrix interface of carbon fibre-reinforced composites using a single fibre pull-out test. Composites. 1990;21:389–395. doi:10.1016/0010-4361(90)90436-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence P. Some theoretical considerations of fibre pull-out from an elastic matrix. J Mater Sci. 1972;7:1–6. doi:10.1007/BF00549541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang XB, Aljewifi H, Li J. Failure mechanism investigation of continuous fibre reinforced cementitious composites by pull-out behaviour analysis. Procedia Mater Sci. 2014;3:1377–1382. doi:10.1016/j.mspro.2014.06.222
   Google Scholar
• Hsueh CH. Interfacial debonding and fiber pull-out stresses of fiber-reinforced composites, III. With residual radial and axial stresses. Mater Sci Eng A. 1991;149:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsueh CH. Interfacial debonding and fiber pull-out stresses of fiber-reinforced composites, X: with an elastic interfacial coating. Mater Sci Eng A. 1993;165:189–195. doi:10.1016/0921-5093(93)90754-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Liu H, Mai Y, et al. On steady-state fibre pull-out: I the stress field. Compos Sci Technol. 1999;59:2179–2189. doi:10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00110-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu SY, Yue CY, Hu X, et al. Analyses of the micromechanics of stress transfer in single- and multi-fiber pull-out tests. Compos Sci Technol. 2000;60:569–579. doi:10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00157-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marotzke C, Qiao L. Interfacial crack propagation arising in single-fiber pull-out tests. Compos Sci Technol. 1997;57:887–897. doi:10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00179-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith AA. The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids. Philos Trans R Soc London Ser A. 1920;221:163–168.
   Google Scholar
• Outwarter JD, Murphy MC. On the fracture energy of unidirectional laminates. In: Proceedings of the 24th Annual Technical Conference of the Reinforced Plastics Composites Institute, SPI; New York; 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Teklal F, Djebbar A, Allaoui S, et al. A review of analytical models to describe pull-out behavior – fiber/matrix adhesion. Compos Struct. 2018;201:791–815. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piggott MR, Sanadi A, Chua PS, et al. Mechanical interactions in the interphasial region of fibre reinforced thermosets. Compos Interfaces. 1986:109–121.
   Google Scholar
• Penn LS, Chou CT. Identification of factors affecting single filament pull-out test results. ASTM Int, Am Soc Test Mater. 1990;12(3). doi:10.1520/CTR10193J
   Google Scholar
• Burn DT, Harper LT, Johnson M, et al. The usability of recycled carbon fibres in short fibre thermoplastics: interfacial properties. J Mater Sci. 2016;51:7699–7715. doi:10.1007/s10853-016-0053-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penn LS, Lee SM. Interpretation of experimental results in the single pull-out filament test. J Compos Technol Res. 1989;11:23–30. doi:10.1520/CTR10145J
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou L-M, Mai Y-W. On the single fibre pullout and pushout problem: effect of fibre anisotropy. ZAMP Zeitschr Angew Math Phys. 1993;44:769–775. doi:10.1007/BF00948488
   Google Scholar
• Liu H-Y, Zhou L-M, Mai Y-W. On fibre pull-out with a rough interface. Philos Mag A. 1994;70:359–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J, Zhou L, Bryan SJ, et al. Effects of fibre volume fraction on the stress transfer in fibre pull-out tests. Composites. 1994;25:470–475. doi:10.1016/0010-4361(94)90171-6
   Google Scholar
• Zhou L-M, Kim J-K, Mai Y-W. Interfacial debonding and fibre pull-out stresses, part II a new model based on the fracture mechanics approach. J Mater Sci. 1992;27:3155–3166. doi:10.1007/BF01116005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J-K, Baillie C, Mai Y-W. Interfacial debonding and fibre pull-out stresses, part I critical comparison of existing theories with experiments. J Mater Sci. 1992;27:3143–3154. doi:10.1007/BF01116004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsueh CH. Theoretical comparison of two loading methods in fiber pull-out tests. Mater Sci Eng A. 1990;130:L11–L15. doi:10.1016/0921-5093(90)90070-J
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JK, Zhou L, Mai YW. Stress transfer in the fibre fragmentation test - part I an improved analysis based on a shear strength criterion. J Mater Sci. 1993;28:6233–6245. doi:10.1007/BF00365049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson C, Avila J, Betz E, et al. The rod pull out problem, theory and experiment. J Mech Phys Solids. 1982;30:97–120. doi:10.1016/0022-5096(82)90019-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckert W, Lauke B. Critical discussion of the single-fibre pull-out test: does it measure adhesion? Compos Sci Technol. 1998;57:1689–1706. doi:10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00107-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun W, Lin F. Computer modeling and FEA simulation for composite single fiber pull-out. J Thermoplast Compos Mater. 2001;14:327–343. doi:10.1106/YKDM-PX8K-NF6Q-L7FK
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai JH, Patra A, Wetherhold R. Finite element simulation of shaped ductile fiber pullout using a mixed cohesive zone/friction interface model. Composites Part A. 2005;36:827–838. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.10.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia YY, Yan W, Liu H-Y. Numerical study on carbon fibre pullout using a cohesive zone model. In: Proceedings of the International Conferences on Composite Materials; Jeju Island, South Korea; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Jia Y, Yan W, Liu H-Y. Carbon fibre pullout under the influence of residual thermal stresses in polymer matrix composites. Comput Mater Sci. 2012;62:79–86. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.05.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoppe L. Numerical simulation of fiber-matrix debonding in single fiber pull-out tests. GAMM Arch Stud. 2020;2:21–35. doi:10.14464/gammas.v2i1.437
   Google Scholar
• Bheemreddy V, Chandrashekhara K, Dharani LR, et al. Modeling of fiber pull-out in continuous fiber reinforced ceramic composites using finite element method and artificial neural networks. Comput Mater Sci. 2013;79:663–673. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.07.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piggott MR, Chua PS. Recent studies of the glass fiber-polymer interphase. Ind Eng Chem Res. 1987;26:672–677. doi:10.1021/ie00064a007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Zhang X, Mai Y, et al. On steady-state fibre pull-out: II computer simulation. Compos Sci Technol. 1999;59:2191–2199. doi:10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00060-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerans RJ, Parthasarathy TA. Theoretical analysis of the fiber pullout and pushout tests. J Am Ceram Soc. 1991;74:1585–1596. doi:10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb07144.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler H, Schüller T, Beckert W, et al. A fracture-mechanics model of the microbond test with interface friction. Compos Sci Technol. 1999;59:2231–2242. doi:10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00078-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nairn JA. Analytical fracture mechanics analysis of the pull-out test including the effects of friction and thermal stresses. Adv Compos Lett. 2000;9:373–383. doi:10.1177/096369350000900601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu W, Verpoest I, Varna J. Prediction of energy release rate due to the growth of an interface crack by variational analysis. Compos Sci Technol. 2000;60:351–360. doi:10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00130-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen BF, Lilholt H. Fiber pull-out test and single fiber fragmentation test - analysis and modelling. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 37th Risø International Symposium on Materials Science 2016; 139.
   Google Scholar
• Zhandarov SF, Mäder E. Characterization of fiber/matrix interface strength: applicability of different tests, approaches and parameters. Compos Sci Technol. 2005;65:149–160. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller B, Muri P, Rebenfeld L. A microbond method for determination of the shear strength of a fiber/resin interface. Compos Sci Technol. 1987;28:17–32. doi:10.1016/0266-3538(87)90059-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ash JT, Cross WM, Svalstad D, et al. Finite element evaluation of the microbond test: meniscus effect, interphase region, and vise angle. Compos Sci Technol. 2003;63:641–651. doi:10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00256-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller B, Gaur U, Hirt DE. Measurement and mechanical aspects of the microbond pull-out technique for obtaining fiber/resin interfacial shear strength. Compos Sci Technol. 1991;42:207–219. doi:10.1016/0266-3538(91)90018-K
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Oss CJ, Chaudhury MK, Good RJ. Interfacial Lifshitz-van der Waals and polar interactions in macroscopic systems. Chem Rev. 1988;88:927–941. doi:10.1021/cr00088a006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu C, Wang J, Lu X, et al. Wettability and interfacial properties of carbon fiber and poly(ether ether ketone) fiber hybrid composite. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11:31520–31531. doi:10.1021/acsami.9b09735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll BJ. The accurate measurement of contact angle, phase contact areas, drop volume, and Laplace excess pressure in drop-on-fiber systems. J Colloid Interface Sci. 1976;57:488–495. doi:10.1016/0021-9797(76)90227-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamaki JI, Katayama Y. New method of determining contact angle between monofilament and liquid. J Appl Polym Sci. 1975;19:2897–2909. doi:10.1002/app.1975.070191025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song B, Bismarck A, Tahhan R, et al. A generalized drop length-height method for determination of contact angle in drop-on-fiber systems. J Colloid Interface Sci. 1998;197:68–77. doi:10.1006/jcis.1997.5218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu XF, Dzenis YA. Droplet on a fiber: geometrical shape and contact angle. Acta Mech. 2006;185:215–225. doi:10.1007/s00707-006-0349-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner HD, Gallis HE, Wiesel E. Spreading of liquid droplets on cylindrical surfaces: accurate determination of contact angle. J Appl Phys. 1990;67:1352–1355. doi:10.1063/1.345689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamaguchi A, Hashimoto T, Uematsu H, et al. Investigation of interfacial adhesion of telechelic polypropylenes for carbon fiber-reinforced plastics. Polym J. 2020;52:413–419. doi:10.1038/s41428-019-0295-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishikawa M, Okabe T, Hemmi K, et al. Micromechanical modeling of the microbond test to quantify the interfacial properties of fiber-reinforced composites. Int J Solids Struct. 2008;45:4098–4113. doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.02.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendels DA, Leterrier Y, Månson JAE. The influence of internal stresses on the microbond test - I: theoretical analysis. J Compos Mater. 2002;36:347–363. doi:10.1177/0021998302036003508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera-Franco PJ, Drzal LT. Comparison of methods for the measurement of fibre/matrix adhesion in composites. Composites. 1992;23:2–27. doi:10.1016/0010-4361(92)90282-Y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurikainen P, Kakkonen M, von Essen M, et al. Identification and compensation of error sources in the microbond test utilising a reliable high-throughput device. Composites Part A. 2020;137:105988. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schüller T, Bahr U, Beckert W, et al. Fracture mechanics analysis of the microbond test. Composites Part A. 1998;29:1083–1089. doi:10.1016/S1359-835X(98)00044-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampe A, Marotzke C. The energy release rate of the fiber/polymer matrix interface: measurement and theoretical analysis. J Reinf Plast Compos. 1997;16:341–352. doi:10.1177/073168449701600405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minnicino MA, Santare MH. Modeling the progressive damage of the microdroplet test using contact surfaces with cohesive behavior. Compos Sci Technol. 2012;72:2024–2031. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sockalingam S, Dey M, Gillespie JW, et al. Finite element analysis of the microdroplet test method using cohesive zone model of the fiber/matrix interface. Composites Part A. 2014;56:239–247. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.10.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi NS, Park JE, Kang SK. Quasi-disk type microbond pull-out test for evaluating fiber/matrix adhesion in composites. J Compos Mater. 2009;43:1663–1677. doi:10.1177/0021998309339636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaur U, Miller B. Microbond method for determination of the shear strength of a fiber/resin interface: evaluation of experimental parameters. Compos Sci Technol. 1989;34:35–51. doi:10.1016/0266-3538(89)90076-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zykaite R, Purgleitner B, Stadlbauer W, et al. Microdebond test development and interfacial shear strength evaluation of basalt and glass fibre reinforced polypropylene composites. J Compos Mater. 2017;51:4091–4099. doi:10.1177/0021998317697810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonon L, Momtaz A, Van Hoyweghen D, et al. Physico-chemical and micromechanical analysis of the interface in a poly(phenylene sulfide)/glass fiber composite—a microbond study. Polym Compos. 1996;17:265–274. doi:10.1002/pc.10611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaur U, Desio G, Miller B. Measuring fiber/matrix adhesion in thermoplastic composites. Plast Eng. 1989;October:43–45.
   Google Scholar
• Yang L, Thomason JL. Development and application of micromechanical techniques for characterising interfacial shear strength in fibre-thermoplastic composites. Polym Test. 2012;31:895–903. doi:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu B, Liu Z, Wang X, et al. Interfacial shear strength of carbon fiber reinforced polyphenylene sulfide measured by the microbond test. Polym Test. 2013;32:724–730. doi:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2013.03.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang SK, Lee DB, Choi NS. Fiber/epoxy interfacial shear strength measured by the microdroplet test. Compos Sci Technol. 2009;69:245–251. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.10.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao V, Herrera-Franco P, Ozzello AD, et al. A direct comparison of the fragmentation test and the microbond pull-out test for determining the interfacial shear strength. J Adhes. 1991;34:65–77. doi:10.1080/00218469108026506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodzic A, Kalyanasundaram S, Lowe A, et al. The microdroplet test: experimental and finite element analysis of the dependence of failure mode on droplet shape. Compos Interfaces. 1998;6:375–389. doi:10.1163/156855498X00379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhandarov SF, Mäder E. Peak force as function of the embedded length in pull-out and microbond tests: effect of specimen geometry. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2005;19:817–855. doi:10.1163/1568561054929937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schober M. On the Characterization and Modeling of Interfaces in Fiber Reinforced Polymer Structures (PhD Thesis). Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Morlin B, Czigany T. Cylinder test: development of a new microbond method. Polym Test. 2012;31:164–170. doi:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2011.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhandarov SF, Pisanova E, Mäder E. Is there any contradiction between the stress and energy failure criteria in micromechanical tests? Part III. Experimental observation of crack propagation in the microbond test. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2005;19:679–704. doi:10.1163/1568561054890462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinck P, Wagner HD, Salmon L, et al. Are microcomposites realistic models of the fibre/matrix interface? II. Physico-chemical approach. Polymer. 2001;42:6641–6650. doi:10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00871-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Yuan X, Beck AJ, et al. Analysis of a modified microbond test for the measurement of interfacial shear strength of an aqueous-based adhesive and a polyamide fibre. Compos Sci Technol. 2011;71:1529–1534. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhandarov SF, Gorbatkina Y, Mäder E. Adhesional pressure as a criterion for interfacial failure in fibrous microcomposites and its determination using a microbond test. Compos Sci Technol. 2006;66:2610–2628. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.03.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi NS, Park JE. Fiber/matrix interfacial shear strength measured by a quasi-disk microbond specimen. Compos Sci Technol. 2009;69:1615–1622. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou Y, Sun T. An improved method to make the microdroplet single fiber composite specimen for determining the interfacial shear strength. J Mater Sci. 2012;47:4775–4778. doi:10.1007/s10853-012-6317-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomason J. An overview of some scaling issues in the sample preparation and data interpretation of the microbond test for fibre–matrix interface characterisation. Polym Test. 2022;111:107591. doi:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haaksma RA, Cehelnik MJ. A critical evaluation of the use of the microbond method for determination of composite interfacial properties. MRS Proc. 1989;170:71–76. doi:10.1557/PROC-170-71
   Google Scholar
• Brahatheeswaran C, Gupta VB. Internal stress in a cured epoxy resin system. Polymer. 1993;34:289–294. doi:10.1016/0032-3861(93)90079-P
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange J, Toll S, Månson JAE, et al. Residual stress build-up in thermoset films cured above their ultimate glass transition temperature. Polymer. 1995;36:3135–3141. doi:10.1016/0032-3861(95)97876-H
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendels DA, Leterrier Y, Manson J-AE, et al. The influence of internal stresses on the microbond test II: physical aging and adhesion. J Compos Mater. 2002;36:1655–1676. doi:10.1177/0021998302036014166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomason JL, Yang L. Temperature dependence of the interfacial shear strength in glass-fibre polypropylene composites. Compos Sci Technol. 2011;71:1600–1605. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhandarov SF, Pisanova E, Lauke B. Is there any contradiction between the stress and energy failure criteria in micromechanical tests? part I. crack initiation: stress-controlled or energy-controlled? Compos Interfaces. 1997;5:387–404. doi:10.1163/156855498X00225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhandarov SF, Pisanova E, Mäder E. Is there any contradiction between the stress and energy failure criteria in micromechanical tests? Part II. Crack propagation: effect of friction on force-displacement curves. Compos Interfaces. 2000;7:149–175. doi:10.1163/156855400300185289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhandarov SF, Pisanova E, Schneider K. Fiber-stretching test: a new technique for characterizing the fiber-matrix interface using direct observation of crack initiation and propagation. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2000;14:381–398. doi:10.1163/156856100742663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhandarov SF, Mäder E. Determining the interfacial toughness from force-displacement curves in the pull-out and microbond tests using the alternative method. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2016;65:11–18. doi:10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.10.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheer RJ, Nairn JA. A comparison of several fracture mechanics methods for measuring interfacial toughness with microbond tests. J Adhes. 1995;53:45–68. doi:10.1080/00218469508014371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu CH, Nairn JA. Analytical and experimental methods for a fracture mechanics interpretation of the microbond test including the effects of friction and thermal stresses. Int J Adhes Adhes. 1999;19:59–70. doi:10.1016/S0143-7496(98)00057-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhandarov SF, Pisanova EV. The local bond strength and its determination by fragmentation and pull-out tests. Compos Sci Technol. 1997;57:957–964. doi:10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00037-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorbatkina YA, Khazanovich TN. In Proceedings of the 5th All-Union Congress on Theoretic and Applied Mechanics; Nauka, Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan; 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Zhandarov SF, Mäder E, Yurkevich OR. Indirect estimation of fiber/polymer bond strength and interfacial friction from maximum load values recorded in the microbond and pull-out tests. Part I: local bond strength. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2002;16:1171–1200. doi:10.1163/156856102320256837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhandarov SF, Mäder E. Indirect estimation of fiber/polymer bond strength and interfacial friction from maximum load values recorded in the microbond and pull-out tests. Part II: critical energy release rate. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2003;17:967–980. doi:10.1163/156856103322112879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marotzke C. Influence of the fiber length on the stress transfer from glass and carbon fibers into a thermoplastic matrix in the pull-out test. Compos Interfaces. 1993;1:153–166. doi:10.1163/156855493X00040
   Google Scholar
• Scheer RJ, Nairn JA. Variational mechanics analysis of stresses and failure in microdrop debond specimens. Compos Eng. 1992;2:641–654. doi:10.1016/0961-9526(92)90022-X
   Google Scholar
• Gu X, Young RJ. Deformation micromechanics in model carbon fiber reinforced composites part II: the microbond test. Text Res J. 1997;67:93–100. doi:10.1177/004051759706700204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu HF, Claypool CM. An analytical approach of the microbond test method used in characterizing the fibre–matrix interface. J Mater Sci Lett. 1991;10:260–262. doi:10.1007/BF00735651
   Google Scholar
• Wu HF, Claypool CM. A finite-element model of the use of the microbond test method for characterization of composite interfacial properties. J Mater Sci Lett. 1991;10:1072–1075. doi:10.1007/BF00720128
   Google Scholar
• Pandey G, Kareliya CH, Singh RP. A study of the effect of experimental test parameters on data scatter in microbond testing. J Compos Mater. 2012;46:275–284. doi:10.1177/0021998311410508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinck P, Wagner HD, Salmon L, et al. Are microcomposites realistic models of the fibre/matrix interface? I. Micromechanical modelling. Polymer. 2001;42:5401–5413. doi:10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00870-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhandarov SF, Mäder E. An alternative method of determining the local interfacial shear strength from force-displacement curves in the pull-out and microbond tests. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2014;55:37–42. doi:10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pisanova E, Zhandarov SF, Mäder E. How can adhesion be determined from micromechanical tests? Composites Part A. 2001;32:425–434. doi:10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00055-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piggott MR. A new model for interface failure in fibre-reinforced polymers. Compos Sci Technol. 1995;55:269–276. doi:10.1016/0266-3538(95)00103-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banholzer B, Brameshuber W. Eine methode zur beschreibung des verbundes zwischen faser und zementgebundener matrix. Beton- und Stahlbetonbau. 2001;96:663–669. doi:10.1002/best.200100850
   Google Scholar
• Brameshuber W, Banholzer B, Brümmer G. Ansatz für eine vereinfachte Auswertung von Faser- Ausziehversuchen. Beton- und Stahlbetonbau. 2000;95:702–706. doi:10.1002/best.200001340
   Google Scholar
• Zhandarov SF, Mäder E. Determination of interfacial parameters in fiber-polymer systems from pull-out test data using a bilinear bond law. Compos Interfaces. 2004;11:361–391. doi:10.1163/1568554042246233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou CT, Gaur U, Miller B. The effect of microvise gap width on microbond pull-out test results. Compos Sci Technol. 1994;51:111–116. doi:10.1016/0266-3538(94)90161-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendels D-A, Leterrier Y, Manson J-AE. Stress transfer model for single fibre and platelet composites. J Compos Mater. 1999;33:1525–1543. doi:10.1177/002199839903301604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dsouza R, Antunes P, Kakkonen M, et al. 3D interfacial debonding during microbond testing: advantages of local strain recording. Compos Sci Technol. 2020;195:108163. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dugdale DS. Yielding of steel sheets containing slits. J Mech Phys Solids. 1960;8:100–104. doi:10.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishikawa M, Okabe T, Takeda N. Numerical simulation of interlaminar damage propagation in CFRP cross-ply laminates under transverse loading. Int J Solids Struct. 2007;44:3101–3113. doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nian G, Li Q, Xu Q, et al. A cohesive zone model incorporating a Coulomb friction law for fiber-reinforced composites. Compos Sci Technol. 2018;157:195–201. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.01.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhi C, Long H, Miao M. Microbond testing and finite element simulation of fibre-microballoon-epoxy ternary composites. Polym Test. 2018;65:450–458. doi:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.12.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu X, Young RJ. Deformation micromechanics in model carbon fiber reinforced composites part I: the single-fibre pull-out test. Text Res J. 1995;30:1409–1419.
   Google Scholar
• Piggott MR. Why the fibre/polymer interface can appear to be stronger than the polymer matrix. Compos Sci Technol. 1997;57:853–857. doi:10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00151-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Järvelä P, Laitinen KW, Purola J, et al. The three-fibre method for measuring glass fibre to resin bond strength. Int J Adhes Adhes. 1983;3:141–147. doi:10.1016/0143-7496(83)90119-7
   Google Scholar
• Bryce D, Thomason J, Yang L. Micromechanical and spectroscopic characterisation of the curing performance of epoxy resins in the microbond test. In: IOP Conf Series: Materials Science and Engineering (41st Risø International Symposium on Materials Science) 2020; 942.
   Google Scholar
• Thomason JL, Jenkins PG, Xypolias G. Microbond testing of the interface in glass fibre vinylester composites. Compos Interfaces. 2022;29:695–709. doi:10.1080/09276440.2021.2011593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang L, Thomason JL, Zhu W. The influence of thermo-oxidative degradation on the measured interface strength of glass fibre-polypropylene. Composites Part A. 2011;42:1293–1300. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomason JL, Yang L. Temperature dependence of the interfacial shear strength in glass-fibre epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol. 2014;96:7–12. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minty RF, Yang L, Thomason JL. The influence of hardener-to-epoxy ratio on the interfacial strength in glass fibre reinforced epoxy composites. Composites Part A. 2018;112:64–70. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.05.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandell JF, Chen JH, McGarry FJ. A microdebonding test for in situ assessment of fibre/matrix bond strength in composite materials. Int J Adhes Adhes. 1980;1:40–44. doi:10.1016/0143-7496(80)90033-0
   Google Scholar
• Gibson RF. A review of recent research on nanoindentation of polymer composites and their constituents. Compos Sci Technol. 2014;105:51–65. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.09.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González C, Vilatela JJ, Molina-Aldareguía JM, et al. Structural composites for multifunctional applications: current challenges and future trends. Prog Mater Sci. 2017;89:194–251. doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalinka G, Leistner A, Hampe A. Characterisation of the fibre/matrix interface in reinforced polymers by the push-in technique. Compos Sci Technol. 1997;57:845–851. doi:10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00159-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall DB, Oliver WC. Measurement of interfacial mechanical properties in fiber-reinforced ceramic composites. J Am Ceram Soc. 1987;70:542–548. doi:10.1111/j.1151-2916.1987.tb05702.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greisel M, Jäger J, Moosburger-Will J, et al. Influence of residual thermal stress in carbon fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composites on interfacial fracture toughness evaluated by cyclic single-fiber push-out tests. Composites Part A. 2014;66:117–127. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall DB. An indentation method for measuring matrix-fiber frictional stresses in ceramic composites. J Am Ceram Soc. 1984;67:C-259–C-260. doi:10.1111/j.1151-2916.1984.tb19690.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall DB. Analysis of fiber debonding and sliding experiments in brittle matrix composites. Acta Metall Mater. 1992;40:427–441. doi:10.1016/0956-7151(92)90391-Q
   Google Scholar
• Kharrat M, Chateauminois A, Carpentier L, et al. On the interfacial behaviour of a glass/epoxy composite during a micro-indentation test: assessment of interfacial shear strength using reduced indentation curves. Composites Part A. 1997;28:39–46. doi:10.1016/S1359-835X(96)00092-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zidi M, Carpentier L, Chateauminois A, et al. Quantitative analysis of the micro-indentation behaviour of fibre-reinforced composites: development and validation of an analytical model. Compos Sci Technol. 2000;60:429–437. doi:10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00143-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desaeger M, Verpoest I. On the use of the micro-indentation test technique to measure the interfacial shear strength of fibre-reinforced polymer composites. Compos Sci Technol. 1993;48:215–226. doi:10.1016/0266-3538(93)90139-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molina-Aldareguía JM, Rodríguez M, González C, et al. An experimental and numerical study of the influence of local effects on the application of the fibre push-in test. Philos Mag. 2011;91:1293–1307. doi:10.1080/14786435.2010.480947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez M, Molina-Aldareguía JM, González C, et al. A methodology to measure the interface shear strength by means of the fiber push-in test. Compos Sci Technol. 2012;72:1924–1932. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medina C, Molina-Aldareguía JM, González C, et al. Comparison of push-in and push-out tests for measuring interfacial shear strength in nano-reinforced composite materials. J Compos Mater. 2016;50:1651–1659. doi:10.1177/0021998315595115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunner AJ, Schwiedrzik JJ, Mohanty G, et al. Fiber push-in failure in carbon fiber epoxy composites. Procedia Struct Integrity. 2020;28:538–545. doi:10.1016/j.prostr.2020.10.063
   Google Scholar
• Wang J, Feng Y, Zhao G, et al. Effect of elastic and thermal mismatch on push-in mechanism and shear strength measurement of fiber/matrix interface. Compos Interfaces. 2020;27:921–935. doi:10.1080/09276440.2020.1712917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe T, Takeichi Y, Niwa Y, et al. Nanoscale in situ observations of crack initiation and propagation in carbon fiber/epoxy composites using synchrotron radiation X-ray computed tomography. Compos Sci Technol. 2020;197:108244. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaffari S, Seon G, Makeev A. In-situ SEM based method for assessing fiber-matrix interface shear strength in CFRPs. Mater Design. 2021;197:109242. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Yang Q, Liu Z. Interfacial mechanics of fiber push-out test: nano-indention technique and cohesive element modeling. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Fracture, 6; Beijing, China; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Jäger J, Sause MGR, Burkert F, et al. Influence of plastic deformation on single-fiber push-out tests of carbon fiber reinforced epoxy resin. Composites Part A. 2015;71:157–167. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramanathan T, Bismarck A, Schulz E, et al. Investigation of the influence of surface-activated carbon fibres on debonding energy and frictional stress in polymer-matrix composites by the micro-indentation technique. Compos Sci Technol. 2001;61:2511–2518. doi:10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00169-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaffari S, Makeev A, Seon G, et al. Understanding compressive strength improvement of high modulus carbon-fiber reinforced polymeric composites through fiber-matrix interface characterization. Mater Design. 2020;193:108798. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrmüller B, Gumbsch P, Hohe J. Calibrating a fiber-matrix interface failure model to single fiber push-out tests and numerical simulations. Composites Part A. 2021;150:106607. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esqué-De Los Ojos D, Ghisleni R, Battisti A, et al. Understanding the mechanical behavior of fiber/matrix interfaces during push-in tests by means of finite element simulations and a cohesive zone model. Comput Mater Sci. 2016;117:330–337. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corujeira Gallo S, Li X, Zhang Z, et al. Viscoelastic response of carbon fibre reinforced polymer during push-out tests. Composites Part A. 2018;112:178–185. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battisti A, Esqué-de los Ojos D, Ghisleni R, et al. Single fiber push-out characterization of interfacial properties of hierarchical CNT-carbon fiber composites prepared by electrophoretic deposition. Compos Sci Technol. 2014;95:121–127. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.02.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller WM, Moosburger-Will J, Sause MGR, et al. Microscopic analysis of single-fiber push-out tests on ceramic matrix composites performed with Berkovich and flat-end indenter and evaluation of interfacial fracture toughness. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2013;33:441–451. doi:10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin G, Geubelle PH, Sottos NR. Simulation of fiber debonding with friction in a model composite pushout test. Int J Solids Struct. 2001;38:8547–8562. doi:10.1016/S0020-7683(01)00085-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakharova NA, Fernandes JV, Antunes JM, et al. Comparison between Berkovich, Vickers and conical indentation tests: a three-dimensional numerical simulation study. Int J Solids Struct. 2009;46:1095–1104. doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.10.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardiman M. Nanoindentation Characterisation of Carbon Fibre Reinforced Plastic Microstructures (PhD Thesis). University of Limerick, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• De Meyere RMG, Song K, Gale L, et al. A novel trench fibre push-out method to evaluate interfacial failure in long fibre composites. J Mater Res. 2021;36:2305–2314. doi:10.1557/s43578-021-00153-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun M, Feng Y, Xu J, et al. Design, analysis and experiment of the fiber push-out device based on piezoelectric actuator. Micromachines (Basel). 2021;12(11):1420. doi:10.3390/mi12111420
   Google Scholar
• Zhao G, Liu H-Y, Du X, et al. Glass fibres coated with flame synthesised carbon nanotubes to enhance interface properties. Compos Commun. 2021;24:100623. doi:10.1016/j.coco.2020.100623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu J, Dong S, Feng Q, et al. Tailoring carbon nanotube/matrix interface to optimize mechanical properties of multiscale composites. Carbon. 2014;69:621–625. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2013.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhamu A, Zhong WH, Stone JJ. Experimental study on adhesion property of UHMWPE fiber/nano-epoxy by fiber bundle pull-out tests. Compos Sci Technol. 2006;66:2736–2742. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorbatkina YA. Adhesive strength in fibre-polymer systems. New York: Ellis Horwood; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Andreevska GD, Gorbatkina YA. Adhesion of polymeric binders to glass fiber. Ind Eng Chem Prod Res Dev. 1972;11:24–26.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Li Y, Li N, et al. Interfacial shear strength of microwave processed carbon fiber/epoxy composites characterized by an improved fiber-bundle pull-out test. Compos Sci Technol. 2016;133:173–183. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.07.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alimuddin MA, Piggott MR. Fracture toughness of fiber-polymer interfaces estimated from single fiber peel tests. Polym Compos. 1999;20:655–663. doi:10.1002/pc.10388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farooq MU, Carlsson LA, Acha BA. Determination of fiber/matrix adhesion using the outwater-Murphy single fiber specimen. Eng Fract Mech. 2009;76:2758–2765. doi:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2009.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorbatkina YA, Ivanova-Mumzhieva VG, Gorenberg AY. Adhesive strength of bonds of polymers with carbon fibres at different loading rates. Fibre Chem. 1999;31:405–409. doi:10.1007/BF02364376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broutman LJ. Measurement of the fiber-polymer matrix interfacial strength. Interfaces Compos ASTM Int. 1969:27–41. doi:10.1520/STP44698S
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair R, Young RJ, Martin RDS. Determination of the axial and radial fibre stress distributions for the Broutman test. Compos Sci Technol. 2004;64:181–189. doi:10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00257-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ageorges C, Friedrich K, Schüller T, et al. Single-fibre Broutman test: fibre–matrix interface transverse debonding. Composites Part A. 1999;30:1423–1434. doi:10.1016/S1359-835X(99)00045-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogtmann J, Klingler A, Rief T, et al. 3D x-ray microscopy as a tool for in depth analysis of the interfacial interaction between a single carbon fiber and an epoxy matrix after mechanical loading. J Compos Sci. 2021;5:121. doi:10.3390/jcs5050121
   Google Scholar
• McDaniel PB, Deitzel JM, Gregory D, et al. Single fiber peel test to assess ultra high molecular weight polyethylene fiber mesostructure interactions. J Appl Polym Sci. 2018;135:1–11. doi:10.1002/app.46156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alimuddin MA. Peel test for the evaluation of environmental effects on fiber-polymer interface (Master Thesis) (PhD Thesis). University of Toronto, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Crocombe AD, Adams RD. Peel analysis using the finite element method. J Adhes. 1981;12:127–139. doi:10.1080/00218468108071194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Outwater JO, Murphy MC. The influences of environment and glass finishes on the fracture energy of glass-epoxy joints. J Adhes. 1970;2:242–253. doi:10.1080/0021846708544598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farooq MU, Carlsson LA, Acha BA. Design analysis of the outwater-Murphy single-fiber specimen. J Compos Mater. 2009;43:2455–2467. doi:10.1177/0021998309345318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jero PD. Interfacial properties of SiC/borosilicate glass systems by indentation pushout. Am Ceram Soc. 1990;69:484.
   Google Scholar
• Jero PD, Kerans RJ. The contribution of interfacial roughness to sliding friction of ceramic fibers in a glass matrix. Scr Metall Mater. 1990;24:2315–2318. doi:10.1016/0956-716X(90)90085-U
   Google Scholar
• Jero PD, Kerans RJ, Parthasarathy TA. Effect of interfacial roughness on the frictional stress measured using pushout tests. J Am Ceram Soc. 1991;74:2793–2801. doi:10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb06845.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherouali H, Fantozzi G, Reynaud P, et al. Analysis of interfacial sliding in brittle-matrix composites during push-out and push-back tests. Mater Sci Eng A. 1998;250:169–177. doi:10.1016/S0921-5093(98)00589-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moosburger-Will J, Greisel M, Schulz M, et al. Investigation of the fiber-matrix interaction in carbon fiber-reinforced polyether ether ketone by cyclic single fiber push-out and push-back tests. Compos Interfaces. 2020;27:227–247. doi:10.1080/09276440.2019.1620542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soutis C. Fibre reinforced composites in aircraft construction. Prog Aerosp Sci. 2005;41:143–151. doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2005.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiBenedetto A. Measurement of the thermomechanical stability of interphases by the embedded single fiber test. Compos Sci Technol. 1991;42:103–123. doi:10.1016/0266-3538(91)90014-G
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graciani E, Balzquez A, Paris F, et al. Numerical analysis of the single fibre fragmentation test using cohesive elements. In: Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Composite Materials; Budapest, Hungary; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Varandas LF, Arteiro A, Catalanotti G, et al. Micromechanical analysis of interlaminar crack propagation between angled plies in mode I tests. Compos Struct. 2019;220:827–841. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.04.050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimenta S, Pinho ST. An analytical model for the translaminar fracture toughness of fibre composites with stochastic quasi-fractal fracture surfaces. J Mech Phys Solids. 2014;66:78–102. doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2014.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reifsnider KL. Modelling of the interphase in polymer–matrix composite material systems. Composites. 1994;25:461–469. doi:10.1016/0010-4361(94)90170-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buxton A, Baillie C. A study of the influence of the environment on the measurement of interfacial properties of carbon fibre/epoxy resin composites. Composites. 1994;25:604–608. doi:10.1016/0010-4361(94)90190-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaur U, Chou CT, Miller B. Effect of hydrothermal ageing on bond strength. Composites. 1994;25:609–612. doi:10.1016/0010-4361(94)90191-0
   Google Scholar
• Schutte CL, McDonough W, Shioya M, et al. The use of a single-fibre fragmentation test to study environmental durability of interfaces/interphases between DGEBA/mPDA epoxy and glass fibre: the effect of moisture. Composites. 1994;25:617–624. doi:10.1016/0010-4361(94)90193-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcea SC, Wang Y, Withers PJ. X-ray computed tomography of polymer composites. Compos Sci Technol. 2018;156:305–319. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.10.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melanitis N, Galiotis C, Tetlow PL, et al. Interfacial shear stress distribution in model composites: the effect of fibre modulus. Composites. 1993;24:459–466. doi:10.1016/0010-4361(93)90015-Z
   Google Scholar
• Ma T, Liu L, Wang C. Interfacial shear strength of opaque resin/carbon fiber based on mapping from energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Polym Composites. 2020;41:2134–2144. doi:10.1002/pc.25526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi G, Du S, Zhang B, et al. Evaluation of carbon fiber/epoxy interfacial strength in transverse fiber bundle composite: experiment and multiscale failure modeling. Compos Sci Technol. 2014;105:1–8. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.09.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi G, Du S, Zhang B, et al. A new approach to assessing carbon fiber/epoxy interfacial shear strength by tensile test of 45° fiber bundle composites: experiment, modeling and applicability. Compos Sci Technol. 2016;129:214–221. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.04.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilandro L, Dibenedetto AT, Groeger J. The effect of fiber-matrix stress transfer on the strength of fiber-reinforced composite materials. Polymer Composites. 1988;9:209–221. doi:10.1002/pc.750090308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boura O, Diamanti EK, Grammatikos SA, et al. Carbon nanotube growth on high modulus carbon fibres: morphological and interfacial characterization. Surf Interface Anal. 2013;45:1372–1381. doi:10.1002/sia.5292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachman N, Carey BJ, Hashim DP, et al. Application of continuously-monitored single fiber fragmentation tests to carbon nanotube/carbon microfiber hybrid composites. Compos Sci Technol. 2012;72:1711–1717. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim KJ, Kim J, Yu WR, et al. Improved tensile strength of carbon fibers undergoing catalytic growth of carbon nanotubes on their surface. Carbon. 2013;54:258–267. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2012.11.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim T, Kameya M, Natori J, et al. Fabrication of CNTs grafted hierarchical multiscale composite and evaluation of its mechanical properties. In the Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Composite Materials; Seville, Spain; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Anthony DB, Sui XM, Kellersztein I, et al. Continuous carbon nanotube synthesis on charged carbon fibers. Composites Part A. 2018;112:525–538. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.05.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian H, Bismarck A, Greenhalgh ES, et al. Carbon nanotube grafted carbon fibres: a study of wetting and fibre fragmentation. Composites Part A. 2010;41:1107–1114. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou XF, Wagner HD, Nutt SR. Interfacial properties of polymer composites measured by push-out and fragmentation tests. Composites Part A. 2001;32:1543–1551. doi:10.1016/S1359-835X(01)00018-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez FA, Carlsson LA. Modified single fiber fragmentation test procedure to study water degradation of the fiber/matrix interface toughness of glass/vinylester. J Mater Sci. 2009;44:3035–3042. doi:10.1007/s10853-009-3400-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahato B, Babarinde VO, Abaimov SG, et al. Interface strength of glass fibers in polypropylene: dependence on the cooling rate and the degree of crystallinity. Polym Composites. 2020;41:1310–1322. doi:10.1002/pc.25456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etcheverry M, Ferreira ML, Capiati NJ, et al. Strengthening of polypropylene-glass fiber interface by direct metallocenic polymerization of propylene onto the fibers. Composites Part A. 2008;39:1915–1923. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.09.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogoeva-Gaceva G, Mäder E, Häußler L, et al. Parameters affecting the interface properties in carbon fibre/epoxy systems. Composites. 1995;26:103–107. doi:10.1016/0010-4361(95)90409-S
   Google Scholar
• Miramini A, Kadkhodaei M, Alipour A, et al. Analysis of interfacial debonding in shape memory alloy wire-reinforced composites. Smart Mater Struct. 2016;25:015032. doi:10.1088/0964-1726/25/1/015032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du X, Xu F, Liu H-Y, et al. Improving the electrical conductivity and interface properties of carbon fiber/epoxy composites by low temperature flame growth of carbon nanotubes. RSC Adv. 2016;6:48896–48904. doi:10.1039/C6RA09839H
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson A, Liao W, Kazemi Y, et al. Fiber-matrix adhesion between high-density polyethylene and carbon fiber. Polym Test. 2022;105:107423. doi:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.107423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zu M, Li Q, Zhu Y, et al. The effective interfacial shear strength of carbon nanotube fibers in an epoxy matrix characterized by a microdroplet test. Carbon. 2012;50:1271–1279. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2011.10.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An F, Lu C, Guo J, et al. Preparation of vertically aligned carbon nanotube arrays grown onto carbon fiber fabric and evaluating its wettability on effect of composite. Appl Surf Sci. 2011;258:1069–1076. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An F, Lu C, Li Y, et al. Preparation and characterization of carbon nanotube-hybridized carbon fiber to reinforce epoxy composite. Mater Design. 2012;33:197–202. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2011.07.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren C, Gong Q, Guo L, et al. Analyses of reinforcing effects of in situ grown CNTs on carbon fibre fabric/epoxy composites at micro- and macroscale. Micro Nano Lett. 2012;7:240–243. doi:10.1049/mnl.2012.0065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Li Y, Tong L, et al. The role of grafting force and surface wettability in interfacial enhancement of carbon nanotube/carbon fiber hierarchical composites. Carbon. 2014;69:239–246. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2013.12.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao X, Jensen RE, Li W, et al. Effect of fiber surface texture created from silane blends on the strength and energy absorption of the glass fiber/epoxy interphase. J Compos Mater. 2008;42:513–534. doi:10.1177/0021998307086203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haldar S, Herráez M, Naya F, et al. Relations between intralaminar micromechanisms and translaminar fracture behavior of unidirectional FRP supported by experimental micromechanics. Composites Part B. 2019;174:107000. doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naya F, Molina-Aldareguía JM, Lopes CS, et al. Interface characterization in fiber-reinforced polymer–matrix composites. JOM. 2017;69:13–21. doi:10.1007/s11837-016-2128-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu T, Luo H, Xu Z, et al. Evaluation of the effect of thermal oxidation and moisture on the interfacial shear strength of unidirectional IM7/BMI composite by fiber push-in nanoindentation. Exp Mech. 2018;58:111–123. doi:10.1007/s11340-017-0335-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, De Greef N, Kalinka G, et al. Carbon nanotube-grafted carbon fiber polymer composites: damage characterization on the micro-scale. Composites Part B. 2017;126:202–210. doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams RD, Lloyd DH. Apparatus for measuring the torsional modulus and damping of single carbon fibres. J Phys E Sci Instrum. 1975;8:475–480. doi:10.1088/0022-3735/8/6/015
   Google Scholar
• Adams RD. The dynamic longitudinal shear modulus and damping of carbon fibres. J Phys D Appl Phys. 1975;8:738–748. doi:10.1088/0022-3727/8/7/006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar