When bodies matter: significance of the body in gender constructions in physiotherapy education

References

• Anderson, E. 2005. “Orthodox and Inclusive Masculinity: Competing Masculinities among Heterosexual Men in a Feminized Terrain.” Sociological Perspectives 48 (3): 337–355. doi: 10.1525/sop.2005.48.3.337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjerrum-Nielsen, H. 1984/2011. “Små piger, søte piger, stille piger – Om pigeliv og pigesosialisering” [Little Girls, Cute Girls, Quiet Girls – Life Stories and Socialisation of Girls]. Reprint. Sosilologi i Dag 40 (3): 18–49.
   Google Scholar
• Bjerrum-Nielsen, H. 2006. Moderne jenter [Modern Girls]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 1993. Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex”. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Connerton, P. 1989. How Societies Remember. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahle, R. 1990. “Arbeidsdeling, makt, identitet: betydningen av kjønn i fysioterapiyrket” [Division of Labor, Power and Identity in the Physiotherapy Profession]. PhD, Institutt for sosialt arbeid, Universitetet i Trondheim, Trondheim [PhD., Department of Social Work, University of Trondheim, Trondheim].
   Google Scholar
• Dahle, R. 2008. “Profesjon og kjønn” [Gender and Professions]. In Profesjonsstudier, edited by A. Molander and L. I. Terum, 216–232. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl-Michelsen, T. 2007. Fra tante til ekspert: mensendieck som system og erfaring [From Auntie to Expert. Mensedieck as a System and as Experience]. Oslo: University.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl-Michelsen, T. 2014. “Sportiness and Masculinities among Female and Male Physiotherapy Students.” Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 30 (5): 329–337. doi: 10.3109/09593985.2013.876692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl-Michelsen, T., and A. B. Leseth. 2011. “Treningskultur og profesjonsidentitet i en norsk fysioterapeututdanning” [Training Culture and Professional Identity in a Norwegian Physiotherapy Education]. In profesjon, kjønn og etnisitet edited by A. Leseth and K. N. Solbrække, 121–137. Oslo: Cappelen Damm, Akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, R. M., R. I. Fretz, and L. L. Shaw. 2011. Writing Ethnographic Field Notes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enger, K. J. 2001. “Kjønn og spesialisering i fysioterapi” [Gender and Specialisation in Physiotherapy]. Fysioterapeuten 68 (11): 16–22.
   Google Scholar
• Fangen, K. 2010. Deltagende Observasjon [Participant Observation]. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, B. 2008. “Engendering Debate: How to Formulate a Political Account of the Divide Between Genetic Bodies and Discursive Gender?” Journal of Gender Studies 17 (3): 211–223. doi: 10.1080/09589230802204241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, B. 2010. “Re/Theorising Gender: Female Masculinity and Male Femininity in the Classroom?” Gender & Education 22 (5): 477–490. doi: 10.1080/09540250903341146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, B., and C. Skelton. 2008. “The Self-made Self: Analysing the Potential Contribution to the Field of Gender and Education of Theories that Disembed Selfhood.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 29 (3): 311–323.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, N., and C. Bithell. 2005. “Perceptions of Physiotherapy Compared with Nursing and Medicine Amongst Minority Ethnic and White UK Students: Implications for Recruitment.” Physiotherapy 91 (2): 69–78. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2004.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M., and P. Atkinson. 2007. Ethnography: Principles in Practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, J. A. 2009. “Assessment of Clinical Components of Physiotherapy Undergraduate Education: Are There Any Issues with Gender?” Physiotherapy 95 (4): 266–272. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2009.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haugen, K. H. 1997. En utdanning i bevegelse: 100 år med fysioterapiutdanning i Norge [An Education in Move: 100 Years of Physiotherapy Education in Norway]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Haywood, C., and M. Mac an Ghaill. 2012. “‘What's Next for Masculinity?’ Reflexive Directions for Theory and Research on Masculinity and Education.” Gender and Education 24 (6): 577–592. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2012.685701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hey, V. 1997. The Company She Keeps: An Ethnography of Girls’ Friendships. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holst, C. 2009. Hva er feminisme [What Is Feminism]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Järvinen, M., and N. Mik-Meyer. 2005. Kvalitative metoder i et interaktionistisk perspektiv: Interview, observationer og documenter [Qualitative Methods from an Interactional Perspective: Interview, Observations and Documents]. København: Reitzel.
   Google Scholar
• Kehily, M. J. 2012. “Contextualising the Sexualisation of Girls Debate: Innocence, Experience and Young Female Sexuality.” Gender and Education 24 (3): 255–268. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2012.670391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinnunen, T., and J. Wickman. 2006. “Pin-up Warriors.” Norsk Tidsskrift for Maskulinitetsstuider [Norwegian Journal on Studies of Masculinities] 2 (1): 167–182.
   Google Scholar
• Langaas, A. G. 2013. Å berøre og bli berørt – å bevege og bli beveget. Om fysioterapeutstudenters læring om og gjennom kropp [To Touch and Be Touched – to Move and Become Moved. On Physiotherapy Students Learning about and Through the Body]. Oslo: Det Medisinske Fakultet [The Faculty of Medicine], University of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Langeland, F. 2009. “Den Norske kroppen” [The Norwegian Body]. In Norske seksualiteter [Norwegian Sexualities], edited by W. Muhleisen and Å. Røthing, 37–57. Oslo: Cappelen Akademiske Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., and E. Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacLean, V. M., and C. Rozier. 2009. “From Sport Culture to the Social World of the ‘Good PT’: Masculinities and the Career Development of Physical Therapists.” Men and Masculinities 11 (3): 286–306. doi: 10.1177/1097184X06294619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Mayo, Robert A. 2000. “Patients’ Sexual Behaviour and Sexual Harassment: A Survey of Clinical Supervisors.” Professional Psychology: Research & Practice 31 (6): 706–709. doi: 10.1037/0735-7028.31.6.706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McComas, J., C. Hébert, C. Giacomin, D. Kaplan, and C. Dulberg. 1993. “Experiences of Student and Practicing Physical Therapists with Inappropriate Patient Sexual Behaviour.” Physical Therapy 73 (11): 762–769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McRobbie, A. 2009. The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture and Social Change. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nayak, A., and M. J. Kehily. 2008. Gender, Youth and Culture: Young Masculinities and Femininities. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, D. A., and J. Cheek. 2006. “Physiotherapy and the Shadow of Prostitution: The Society of Trained Masseuses and the Massage Scandals of 1894.” Social Science & Medicine 62 (9): 2336–2348. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.09.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholls, D. A., and B. E. Gibson. 2010. “The Body and Physiotherapy.” Physiotherapy Theory & Practice 26 (8): 497–509. doi: 10.3109/09593981003710316
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nicholls, D. A., and D. Holmes. 2012. “Discipline, Desire, and Transgression in Physiotherapy Practice.” Physiotherapy Theory & Practice 28 (6): 454–465. doi:10.3109/09593985.2012.676940
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Öhman, A. 2001. Profession on the Move: Changing Conditions and Gendered Development in Physiotherapy. Umeå: Umeå University.
   Google Scholar
• Öhman, A., P. Solomon, and E. Finch. 2002. “Career Choice and Professional Preferences in a Group of Canadian Physiotherapy Students.” Advances in Physiotherapy 4 (1): 16–22. doi: 10.1080/140381902317303177
   Google Scholar
• Öhman, A., H. Stenlund, and L. Dahlgren. 2001. Career Choice, Professional Preferences and Gender – the Case of Swedish Physiotherapy Students. Advances in Physiotherapy 3 (3): 94–107. doi: 10.1080/140381901750475348
   Google Scholar
• Ohrn, E. 2000. “Changing Patterns? Reflections on Contemporary Swedish Research and Debate on Gender and Education.” Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 8 (3): 128–136. doi: 10.1080/080387400750054360
   Google Scholar
• Ottosson, A. 2007. Sjukgymnasten – vart tog han vägen?: En undersökning av sjukgymnastyrkets maskulinisering och avmaskulinisering 1813–1934 [The Physiotherapist, Where Did He Go? An Investigation of the Masculinization and Demasculinization of the Physiotherapy Profession 1813–1934]. Göteborg: Göteborgs Universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Paechter, C. 2003a. “Masculinities and Femininities as Communities of Practice.” Women's Studies International Forum 26 (1): 69–77. doi: 10.1016/S0277-5395(02)00356-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paechter, C. 2003b. “Learning Masculinities and Femininities: Power/Knowledge and Legitimate Peripheral Participation.” Women’s Studies International Forum 26 (6): 541–552. doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2003.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paechter, C. 2003c. “Masculinities, Femininities and Physical Education.” In Social Justice, Education and Identity, edited by C. Vincent, 137–152. London: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Paechter, C. 2006a. “Reconceptualising the Gendered Body: Learning and Constructing Masculinities and Femininities in School.” Gender & Education 18 (2): 121–135. doi:10.1080/09540250500380489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paechter, C. 2006b. “Masculine Femininities/Feminine Masculinities: Power, Identities and Gender.” Gender & Education 18 (3): 253–263. doi: 10.1080/09540250600667785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paechter, C. 2007. Being Boys, Being Girls. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paechter, C. 2009. “Response to Mary Lou Rasmussen's ‘Beyond Gender Identity’.” Gender & Education 21 (4): 449–453. doi: 10.1080/09540250902806248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, M. L. 2009. “Beyond Gender Identity?” Gender & Education 21 (4): 431–447. doi: 10.1080/09540250802473958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudberg, M., and H. Bjerrum-Nielsen. 2011. “Gender in Three Generations: Narrative Constructions and Psychological Identifications.” In Development of Self in Culture. Self in Culture in Mind, Vol. 1, edited by K. Jensen de Lopez and T. G. B. Hansens, 169–195. Aalborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag.
   Google Scholar
• Skeggs, B. 2004. Class, Self, Culture. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Slagstad, R. 1998. De nasjonale strateger [The National Strategists]. Oslo: Pax Forlag A/S.
   Google Scholar
• Solbrække, K. N., B.-A. Solvoll, and K. M. Heggen. 2013. “Reframing the Field of Gender and Nursing Education.” Gender and Education 25 (5): 640–653. doi:10.1080/09540253.2013.819969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon-Godeau, A. 1995. “Male Trouble.” In Constructing Masculinity, edited by M. Berger, B. Wallis, and S. Watson, 69–76. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sperandio, J. 2010. “Modeling Cultural Context for Aspiring Women Educational Leaders.” Journal of Educational Administration 48 (6): 716–726. doi: 10.1108/09578231011079575
   Google Scholar
• Sperandio, J. 2011. “Context and the Gendered Status of Teachers: Women's Empowerment Through Leadership of Non-formal Schooling in Rural Bangladesh.” Gender & Education 23 (2): 121–135. doi: 10.1080/09540251003674097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudmann, T. T. 1997. Kjønn er (også) en jobb!: om kvinnelige fysioterapeuters håndtering av kroppslig nærhet med mannlige pasienter i behandling [Gender Is (also) a Job!: On Female Physiotherapists Coping with Bodily Intimacy with Male Patients in Treatment]. Bergen: Det medisinske fakultet og Det psykologiske fakultet, Senter for etter- og videreutdanning, Universitetet i Bergen [Faculty of Medicine and Faculty of Psychology, Centre for Continuing Education, University of Bergen].
   Google Scholar
• Sudmann, T. T. 2009. (En)gendering Body Politics: Physiotherapy as a Window on Health and Illness. Bergen: Department of Public Health and Primary Health Care, Bergen University.
   Google Scholar
• UFD (Utdannings og Forskningsdepartementet). 2004. Rammeplan for fysioterapeututdanning [Overall Plan for Physiotherapy Education] Fastsatt 1.juli 2004 av Utdannings- og forskningsdepartementet [Adopted on 1 July of the Ministry of Education and Research].
   Google Scholar
• Vike, H., H. Lidén, and M. Lien. 2001. Likhetens paradokser: Antropologiske undersøkelser i det moderne Norge [The Paradoxes of Similarities: Anthropological Explorations in the Modern Norway]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Walkerdine, V., H. Lucey, and J. Melody. 2001. Growing up Girl: Psychosocial Explorations of Gender and Class. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, G., M. Skinner, S. Jones, B. Vicenzino, C. Nall, and D. Baxter. 2009. “Physiotherapy in the 21st Century.” In Contexts of Physiotherapy Practice, edited by J. Higgs, M. Smith, G. Webb, M. Skinner, and A. Croker, 3–19. Chatswood: Elsevier Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• West, C., and D. H. Zimmerman. 1987. “Doing Gender.” Gender and Society 1 (2): 125–151. doi: 10.1177/0891243287001002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar