First-order and second-order statistical analysis of 3d and 2d image structure

References

• Anderson BL, Singh M, Fleming RW. The interpolation of object and surface structure. Cognitive Psychology 2002; 44(43)148–190
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barrow HG, Tenenbaum JM. Interpreting line drawings as three-dimensional surfaces. Artificial Intelligence 1981; 17: 75–116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolle RM, Vemuri BC. On three-dimensional surface reconstruction methods. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1991; 13(1)1–13
   Google Scholar
• Bruce V, Green PR, Georgeson MA. Visual perception: Physiology, psychology and ecology, 4th ed. Psychology Press, East SussexUK 2003
   Google Scholar
• Brunswik E, Kamiya J. Ecological cue–validity of proximity and of other Gestalt factors. American Journal of Psychologie, 1953; LXVI: 20–32
   Google Scholar
• Collett TS. Extrapolating and Interpolating Surfaces in Depth. Royal Society of London Proceedings Series B 1985; 224: 43–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coxeter H. Introduction to geometry, 2nd ed. Wiley & Sons, New York 1969
   Google Scholar
• Elder H, Goldberg R. Ecological statistics of gestalt laws for the perceptual organization of contours. Journal of Vision 2002; 2(4)324–353
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elder JH, Krupnik A, Johnston LA. Contour grouping with prior models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2003; 25(25)1–14
   Google Scholar
• Felsberg M, Krüger N. A probablistic definition of intrinsic dimensionality for images. Pattern Recognition, 24th DAGM Symposium. Springer Berlin/Heidelberg. 2003
   Google Scholar
• Field DJ, Hayes A, Hess RF. Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local association field. Vision Research 1993; 33(2)173–193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallant JL, Essen DCV, Nothdurft HC. Early vision and beyond, chapter: Two-dimensional and three-dimensional texture processing in visual cortex of the macaque monkey. MIT Press, MA 1994; 89–98
   Google Scholar
• Grimson WEL. A computational theory of visual surface interpolation. Royal Society of London Philosophical Transactions Series B 1982; 298: 395–427
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimson WEL. Surface consistency constraints in vision. Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing 1983; 24(1)28–51
   Google Scholar
• Guzman A. Decomposition of a visual scene into three-dimensional bodies. AFIPS Fall Joint Conference Proceedings 1968; 33: 291–304
   Google Scholar
• Hoover A, Jean-Baptiste G, Jiang X, Flynn PJ, Bunke H, Goldgof DB, Bowyer K, Eggert DW, Fitzgibbon A, Fisher RB. An experimental comparison of range image segmentation algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1996; 18(7)673–689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe CQ, Purves D. Range image statistics can explain the anomalous perception of length. PNAS 2002; 99(20)13184–13188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe CQ, Purves D. Size contrast and assimilation explained by the statistics of natural scene geometry. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2004; 16(1)90–102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J, Lee AB, Mumford D. Statistics of range images. CVPR 2000; 1(1)1324–1331
   Google Scholar
• Hubel D, Wiesel T. Anatomical demonstration of columns in the monkey striate cortex. Nature 1969; 221: 747–750
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalkan S, Calow D, Wörgötter F, Lappe M, Krüger N. Local image structures and optic flow estimation. Network: Computation in Neural Systems 2005; 16(4)341–356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalkan S, Wörgötter F, Krüger N. Statistical analysis of local 3d structure in 2d images. CVPR 2006; 1: 1114–1121
   Google Scholar
• Kalkan S, Wörgötter F, Krüger N. Statistical analysis of second-order relations of 3d structures. Int. Conference on Computer Vision Theory and Applications (VISAPP), BarcelonaSpain, 2007
   Google Scholar
• Kellman P, Arterberry M. The cradle of knowledge. MIT-Press, Cambridge, Mass 1998
   Google Scholar
• Knill DC, Richards W. Perception as bayesian inference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1996
   Google Scholar
• Koenderink J, Dorn A. The shape of smooth objects and the way contours end. Perception 1982; 11: 129–173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger N. Collinearity and parallelism are statistically significant second order relations of complex cell responses. Neural Processing Letters 1998; 8(2)117–129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krüger N, Felsberg M. A continuous formulation of intrinsic dimension. Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference, NorwichUK, 2003
   Google Scholar
• Krüger N, Lappe M, Wörgötter F. Biologically motivated multi-modal processing of visual primitives. Proc. the AISB 2003 Symposium on Biologically inspired Machine Vision, Theory and Application. Wales. 2003; 53–59
   Google Scholar
• Krüger N, Wörgötter F. Multi-modal primitives as functional models of hyper-columns and their use for contextual integration. Proc. 1st Int. Symposium on Brain, Vision and Artificial Intelligence, Naples, Italy, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, LNCS 3704 2005; 157–166
   Google Scholar
• Laycock RG, Day AM. Image registration in a coarse three dimensional virtual environment. Computer Graphics Forum 2006; 25(1)69–82
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee TS, Mumford D, Romero R, Lamme VAF. The role of the primary visual cortex in higher level vision. Vision Research 1998; 38: 2429–2454
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik J. Interpreting line drawings of curved objects. International Journal of Computer Vision 1987; 1: 73–103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marr D. Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. Freeman, San Fransisco, CA 1982
   Google Scholar
• Olshausen B, Field D. Natural image statistics and efficient coding. Network 1996; 7: 333–339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potetz B, Lee TS. Statistical correlations between two-dimensional images and three-dimensional structures in natural scenes. Journal of the Optical Society of America 2003; 20(7)1292–1303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugeault N, Krüger N, Wörgötter F. A non-local stereo similarity based on collinear groups. Proceedings of the Fourth International ICSC Symposium on Engineering of Intelligent Systems, Island of MadeiraPortugal, 2004
   Google Scholar
• Purves D, Lotto B. Why we see what we do: An empirical theory of vision. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA 2002
   Google Scholar
• Rao RPN, Olshausen BA, Lewicki MS. Probabilistic models of the brain. MIT Press, MA 2002
   Google Scholar
• Rubin N. The role of junctions in surface completion and contour matching. Perception 2001; 30: 339–366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sereno ME, Trinath T, Augath M, Logothetis NK. Three-dimensional shape representation in monkey cortex. Neuron 2002; 33(4)635–652
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirai Y. Three-dimensional computer vision. Springer-Verlag, Inc, New York 1987
   Google Scholar
• Simoncelli EP. Vision and the statistics of the visual environment. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2003; 13(2)144–149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terzopoulos D. The computation of visible-surface representations. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1988; 10(4)417–438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres-Mendez LA, Dudek G. Statistics of visual and partial depth data for mobile robot environment modeling. Mexican International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (MICAI), ApizacoMexico, 2006
   Google Scholar
• Tuceryan M, Jain NK. Texture analysis. The handbook of pattern recognition and computer vision. 2nd ed. 1998; 207–248
   Google Scholar
• Yang Z, Purves D. Image/source statistics of surfaces in natural scenes. Network: Computation in Neural Systems 2003; 14: 371–390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zetzsche C, Barth E. Fundamental limits of linear filters in the visual processing of two dimensional signals. Vision Research 1990; 30(7)1111–1117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu SC. Embedding gestalt laws in markov random fields. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1999; 21(11)1170–1187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar