References
- Aertsen AMHJ, Johannesma PIM. The spectro-temporal receptive field. Biological Cybernetics 1981; 42: 133–143
- Atick JJ. Could information theory provide an ecological theory of sensory processing?. Network 1992; 3: 213–251
- Bell AJ, Sejnowski TJ. The independent components of natural scenes are edge filters. Vision Research 1997; 37(23)3327–3338
- Blackman RB, Tukey JW. The Measurement of Power Spectra, from the Point of View of Communications Engineering. Dover, New York 1959
- Blatter F, Hahnloser R. A sparseness hierarchy models song selectivity. Poster at Society for Neuroscience Meeting. Washington, D.C 2008
- deCharms RC, Blake DT, Merzenich MM. Optimizing sound features for cortical neurons. Science 1998; 280: 1439–1443
- Eggermont JJ, Aertsen AM, Johannesma PI. Prediction of the responses of auditory neurons in the midbrain of the grass frog based on the spectro-temporal receptive field. Hearing Research 1983; 10: 191–202
- Field DJ. What is the goal of sensory coding?. Neural Computation 1994; 6: 559–601
- Heil P, Scheich H. Functional organisation of the avian auditory cortex analogue. i. topographic representation of isointensity bandwidth. Brain Research 1991; 539: 110–12
- Jones JP, Palmer LA. The two-dimensional spatial structure of simple cell receptive fields in cat striate cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 1987; 58: 1187–211
- Lewicki MS. Efficient coding of natural sounds. Nature Neuroscience 2002; 5(4)356–63
- Machens CK, Wehr MS, Zador AM. Linearity of cortical receptive fields measured with natural sounds. Journal of Neuroscience 2004; 24: 1089–1100
- Margoliash D. Acoustic parameters underlying the responses of song-specific neurons in the white-crowned sparrow. Journal of Neuroscience 1983; 3: 1039–1057
- Muller CM, Leppelsack HJ. Feature extraction and tonotopic organization in the avian auditory forebrain. Experimental Brain Research 1985; 59: 587–599
- Olshausen BA, Field DJ. Energence of simple-cell receptive field properies by learning a sparse code for natural images. Nature 1996; 381: 607–609
- Olshausen BA, Field DJ. Sparse coding of sensory inputs. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2004; 14(4)481–487
- Penrose R. A generalized inverse for matrices. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 1955; 51: 17–19
- Sen K, Theunissen FE, Doupe Allison J. Feature analysis of natural sounds in the songbird auditory forebrain. Journal of Neurophysiology 2001; 86: 1445–1458
- Smith EC, Lewicki MS. Efficient auditory coding. Nature 2006; 429: 978–982
- Theunissen FE, David SV, Singh NC, Hsu A, Vinje WE, Gallant JL. Estimating spatio-temporal receptive fields of auditory and visual neurons from their responses to natural stimuli. Network: Computation in Neural Systems 2001; 12: 289–316
- Theunissen FE, Doupe AJ. Temporal and spectral sensitivity of complex auditory neurons in the nucleus hvc of male zebra finches. Journal of Neuroscience 1998; 18(10)3786–3802
- Theunissen FE, Sen K, Doupe AJ. Spectral-temporal receptive fields of nonlinear auditory neurons obtained using natural sounds. Journal of Neuroscience 2000; 20(6)2315–2331
- Vincent BT, Baddeley RJ, Troscianko T, Gilchrist ID. Is the early visual system optmised to be energy efficient?. Network: Computation in Neural Systems 2005; 16: 175–190
- Vinje WE, Gallant JL. Sparse coding and decorrelation in primary visual cortex during natural vision. Science 2000; 287: 1273–1276
- Woolley SMN, Fremouw TE, Hsu A, Theunissen FE. Tuning for spectro-temporal modulations as a mechanism for auditory discrimination of natural sounds. Nature Neuroscience 2005; 8: 1371–1379
- Zaretsky MD, Konishi M. Tonotopic organization in the avian telencephalon. Brain Research 1976; 111: 167–171