Biological effects of ultrashort electric pulses in a neuroblastoma cell line: the energy density role

References

• Akdag MZ, Dasdag S, Uzunlar AK, Ulukaya E, Oral AY, Çelik N, Akşen F. 2013. Can safe and long-term and extremely low frequency (50 Hz) magnetic field affect apoptosis, reproduction and oxidative stress? Int J Radiat Biol. 89(12):1053–1060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahrami S, Drabløs F. 2016. Gene regulation in the immediate-early response process. Adv Biol Regul. 62:37–49.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Batista Napotnik T, Reberšek M, Vernier PT, Mali B, Miklavčič D. 2016. Effects of high voltage nanosecond electric pulses on eukaryotic cells (in vitro): a systematic review. Bioelectrochemistry. 110:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benassi B, Filomeni G, Montagna C, Merla C, Lopresto V, Pinto R, Marino C, Consales C. 2016. Extremely low frequency magnetic field (ELF-MF) exposure sensitizes SH-SY5Y cells to the pro-Parkinson’s disease toxin MPP(.). Mol Neurobiol. 53(6):4247–4260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blangero C, Rols MP, Teissié J. 1989. Cytoskeletal reorganization during electric-field-induced fusion of Chinese hamster ovary cells grown in monolayers. Biochim Biophys Acta. 981(2):295–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breton M, Mir LM. 2012. Microsecond and nanosecond electric pulses in cancer treatments. Bioelectromagnetics. 33(2):106–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breton M, Mir LM. 2018. Investigation of the chemical mechanisms involved in the electropulsation of membranes at the molecular level. Bioelectrochemistry. 119:76–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casciola M, Xiao S, Pakhomov AG. 2017. Damage-free peripheral nerve stimulation by 12-ns pulsed electric field. Sci Rep. 7(1):10453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang YJ, Hsu CM, Lin CH, Lu MS, Chen L. 2013. Electrical stimulation promotes nerve growth factor-induced neurite outgrowth and signaling. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1830(8):4130–4136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consales C, Cirotti C, Filomeni G, Panatta M, Butera A, Merla C, Lopresto V, Pinto R, Marino C, Benassi B. 2018. Fifty-hertz magnetic field affects the epigenetic modulation of the miR-34b/c in neuronal cells. Mol Neurobiol. 55(7):5698–5714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consales C, Merla C, Marino C, Benassi B. 2012. Electromagnetic fields, oxidative stress, and neurodegeneration. Int J Cell Biol. 2012:683897.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Consales C, Merla C, Marino C, Benassi B. 2018. The epigenetic component of the brain response to electromagnetic stimulation in Parkinson’s disease patients: a literature overview. Bioelectromagnetics. 39(1):3–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Menorval MA, Andre FM, Silve A, Dalmay C, Français O, Le Pioufle B, Mir LM. 2016. Electric pulses: a flexible tool to manipulate cytosolic calcium concentrations and generate spontaneous-like calcium oscillations in mesenchymal stem cells. Sci Rep. 6:32331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Lazzaro V, Capone F, Apollonio F, Borea PA, Cadossi R, Fassina L, Grassi C, Liberti M, Paffi A, Parazzini M, et al. 2013. A consensus panel review of central nervous system effects of the exposure to low-intensity extremely low-frequency magnetic fields. Brain Stimul. 6(4):469–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner AL, Chen N, Yang J, Kolb J, Swanson RJ, Loftin KC, Beebe SJ, Joshi RP, Schoenbach KH. 2004. Time domain dielectric spectroscopy measurements of HL-60 cells suspensions after microsecond and nanosecond electric pulses. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci. 32(5):2073–2084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherardini L, Ciuti G, Tognarelli S, Cinti C. 2014. Searching for the perfect wave: the effect of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields on cells. Int J Mol Sci. 15(4):5366–5387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hristov K, Mangalanathan U, Casciola M, Pakhomova ON, Pakhomov AG. 2018. Expression of voltage-gated calcium channels augments cell susceptibility to membrane disruption by nanosecond pulsed electric field. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr. 1860(11):2175–2183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibey BL, Pakhomov AG, Gregory BW, Khorokhorina VA, Roth CC, Rassokhin MA, Bernhard JA, Wilmink GJ, Pakhomova ON. 2010. Selective cytotoxicity of intense nanosecond-duration electric pulses in mammalian cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1800(11):1210–1219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang C, Davalos RV, Bischof JC. 2015. A review of basic to clinical studies of irreversible electroporation therapy. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 62(1):4–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ke Q, Li C, Wu M, Ge L, Yao C, Yao C, Mi Y. 2019. Electrofusion by a bipolar pulsed electric field: increased cell fusion efficiency for monoclonal antibody production. Bioelectrochemistry. 127:171–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovalevich J, Langford D. 2013. Considerations for the use of SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells in neurobiology. Methods Mol Biol. 1078:9–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li C, Ke Q, Yao C, Mi Y, Liu H, Lv Y, Yao C. 2018. Cell electrofusion based on nanosecond/microsecond pulsed electric fields. PLoS One. 13(5):e0197167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. 2001. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25(4):402–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manikonda PK, Rajendra P, Devendranath D, Gunasekaran B, Channakeshava C, Aradhya SRS, Sashidhar RB, Subramanyam C. 2014. Extremely low frequency magnetic fields induce oxidative stress in rat brain. Gen Physiol Biophys. 33(01):81–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mekid H, Mir LM. 2000. In vivo cell electrofusion. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1524(2–3):118–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merla C, El Amari S, Kenaan M, Liberti M, Apollonio F, Arnaud-Cormos D, Couderc C, Leveque P. 2010. A 10- High-voltage nanosecond pulse generator. IEEE Tmtt. 58(12):4079–4085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merla C, Liberti M, Consales C, Denzi A, Apollonio F, Marino C, Benassi B. 2019. Evidences of plasma membrane-mediated ROS generation upon ELF exposure in neuroblastoma cells supported by a computational multiscale approach. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr. 1861(8):1446–1457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meulenberg CJ, Todorovic V, Cemazar M. 2012. Differential cellular effects of electroporation and electrochemotherapy in monolayers of human microvascular endothelial cells. PLoS One. 7(12):e52713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mir LM. 2009. Nucleic acids electrotransfer-based gene therapy (electrogenetherapy): past, current, and future. Mol Biotechnol. 43(2):167–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan JI, Curran T. 1986. Role of ion flux in the control of c-fos expression. Nature. 322(6079):552–555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuccitelli R. 2019. Application of pulsed electric fields to cancer therapy. Bioelectricity. 1(1):30–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nuccitelli R, McDaniel A, Anand S, Cha J, Mallon Z, Berridge JC, Uecker D. 2017. Nano-pulse stimulation is a physical modality that can trigger immunogenic tumor cell death. J Immunother Cancer. 5:32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okuno H. 2011. Regulation and function of immediate-early genes in the brain: beyond neuronal activity markers. Neurosci Res. 69(3):175–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pakhomova ON, Gregory BW, Semenov I, Pakhomov AG. 2013. Two modes of cell death caused by exposure to nanosecond pulsed electric field. PLoS One. 8(7):e70278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pakhomova ON, Khorokhorina VA, Bowman AM, Rodaitė-Riševičienė R, Saulis G, Xiao S, Pakhomov AG. 2012. Oxidative effects of nanosecond pulsed electric field exposure in cells and cell-free media. Arch Biochem Biophys. 527(1):55–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saliev T, Begimbetova D, Masoud AR, Matkarimov B. 2019. Biological effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields: two sides of a coin. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 141:25–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenbach KH, Joshi RP, Beebe SJ, Baum CE. 2009. A scaling law for membrane permeabilization with nanopulses. IEEE Trans Dielect Electr Insul. 16(5):1224–1235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sher LD, Kresch E, Schwan HP. 1970. On the possibility of nonthermal biological effects of pulsed electromagnetic radiation. Biophys J. 10(10):970–979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silve A, Vezinet R, Mir L. 2012. Nanosecond-duration electric pulse delivery in vitro and in vivo: experimental considerations. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. 61(7):1945–1954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suo L, Wang F, Zhou GB, Shi JM, Wang YB, Zeng SM, Tian JH, Zhu SE, Liu GS. 2009. Optimal concentration of calcium and electric field levels improve tetraploid embryo production by electrofusion in mice. J Reprod Dev. 55(4):383–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teissié J, Rols MP. 1986. Fusion of mammalian cells in culture is obtained by creating the contact between cells after their electropermeabilization. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 140(1):258–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiel G, Mayer SI, Müller I, Stefano L, Rössler OG. 2010. Egr-1-A Ca(2+)-regulated transcription factor. Cell Calcium. 47(5):397–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan X, Liu J, Huang J, Huang M, He F, Ye Z, Xiao W, Hu X, Luo Z. 2014. Electrical stimulation induces calcium-dependent neurite outgrowth and immediate early genes expressions of dorsal root ganglion neurons. Neurochem Res. 39(1):129–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yokus B, Akdag MZ, Dasdag S, Cakir DU, Kizil M. 2008. Extremely low frequency magnetic fields cause oxidative DNA damage in rats. Int J Radiat Biol. 84(10):789–795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar