Repair kinetics in pig epidermis: an analysis based on two separate rates of repair

References

• ANG, K. K., JIANG, G. L., GUTTENBERGER, R., THAMES, H. D., STEPHENS, L. C., SMITH, C. D., and EENG, Y., 1993, Impact of spinal cord repair kinetics on the practice of altered fractionation schedules. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 25, 287–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BARENDSEN, G. W., 1982, Dose fractionation, dose rate and iso-effect relationships for normal tissue response. Inter-nationalJournal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics, 8, 1981–1997.
   Google Scholar
• COOK, R. D., and WEISBERG, S., 1982, Criticism and influence analysis in regression. In: Siciological Methodology. Edited by S. Leinhardt (San Francisco, Jossey-Bass), pp. 313–316.
   Google Scholar
• DOUGLAS, R. G., and FowLER, J. F., 1976, The effect of multiple small doses of X rays on skin reactions in the mouse and a basic interpretation. Radiation Research, 66, 401–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ELLIS, F., 1968, The relationship of biological effect to dose- time-fractionation factors in radiotherapy. Current Topics in Radiation Research, 4, 359–97.
   Google Scholar
• EFRON, B., and TBSHIRINI, R., 1986, Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other mea-sures of statistical accuracy. Statistical Science, 1, 54–77.
   Google Scholar
• FIELLER, E. C., 1954, Some problems in interval estimation. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 16, 175–183.
   Google Scholar
• HENDRY, J. H., and THAMES, H. D., 1986, The tissue-rescuing unit. British Journal of Radiology, 59, 628–630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HOPEwELL, J. W., and VAN DEN AARDWEG, G. J. M. J., 1988a, Current concepts of dose fractionation in radiother-apy: Normal tissue tolerance. British Journal of Radiology, 22 (suppl.), 88–94.
   Google Scholar
• HOPEWELL, J. W., and VAN DEN AARDWEG, G. J. M. J., 1988b, Radiobiological studies with pig skin. InternationalJour-nal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics, 14, 1047–1050.
   Google Scholar
• HOPEWELL, J. W., 1991, Biological effects of irradiation on skin and recommended dose limits. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 39, 11–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HOPEWELL, J. W., and VAN DEN AARDWEG, G. J. M. J., 1991, Studies of dose-fractionation on early and later responses in pig skin: a reappraisal of the importance of the overall treatment time and its effect on radiosensitisation and incomplete repair. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics, 21, 1441–1450.
   Google Scholar
• ICRU Report 35, 1984, Radiation Dosimetry: Electron Beams with Energies Between 1 and 50 MeV (International Commis-sion on Radiation Units and Measurements, Bethesda).
   Google Scholar
• JOINER, M. C., MAUGHAN, R. L., FOWLER, J. F., and DENEKAMP, J., 1983, The RBE for mouse skin irradiated with 3-MeV neutrons: single and fractionated doses. Radiation Research, 95, 130–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JOINER, M. C., BREMNER, J., DENEKAMP, J., and MAUGHAN, R. L., 1984, The interaction between X-rays and 3 MeV neu-trons in the skin of the mouse foot. InternationalJournal of Radiation Biology, 46, 625–638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KELLERER, A. M., and Rossi, H. H., 1972, The theory of dual radiation action. Current Topics in Radiation Research, 8, 85–158.
   Google Scholar
• McCuLLAGH, P., and NELDER, J. A., 1989, Generalized Linear Models. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Prob-ability, (Chapman 8c Hall, London).
   Google Scholar
• MILLAR, W. T., and CANNEY, P. A., 1991, The analysis of rodent lung irradiation data reveals a multiple repair process for sublethal damage. In: Radiation Research: A Twenti-eth-Century Perspective, vol. 1. Edited by: J. D. Chapman, W. C. Dewey and G. F. Whitmore (Academic, San Diego), p. 157 (abs).
   Google Scholar
• MILLAR, W. T., and CANNEY, P. A., 1993a, The derivation and application of equations describing the effect of frac-tionated protracted irradiation, based on multiple and incomplete repair processes. 2. Derivation of the equations. International Journal of Radiation Biology, 64, 275–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MILLAR, W. T., and CANNEY, P. A., 1993b, The derivation and application of equations describing the effect of frac-tionated protracted irradiation, based on multiple and incomplete repair processes. 1. Analysis of mouse lung data. International Journal of Radiation Biology, 64, 292–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MILLAR, W. T., HENDRY, J. J., and CANNEY, P. A., 1994, Two components of repair in irradiated kidney colony form- ing cells. InternationalJournal of Radiation Biology, 66, 189–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MORRIS, G. M., and HOPEWELL, J. W., 1989, Cell kinetic changes in the follicular epithelium of pig skin after irradiation with fractionated doses of X-rays. British Journal of Radiology, 62, 41–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MOULDER, J. F., and FISCHER, J. J., 1976, Radiation reaction of rat skin. The role of the number of fractions and the overall treatment time. Cancer, 37, 2762–2767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NILSSON, P., THAMES, H. D., and JOINER, M. C., 1990, A general-ized formulation for the 'incomplete-repair' model for cell survival and tissue response to fractionated low dose-rate irradiation. International Journal of Radiation Biology, 4, 429–443.
   Google Scholar
• PEEL, D. M., and HOPEWELL, J. W., 1984, Nonstochastic effects of different energy beta emitters on pig skin. Radiation Research, 99, 372–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• POTTEN, C. S., 1985, Radiation and Skin (Taylor 8c Francis, London).
   Google Scholar
• POTTEN, C. S., 1986, The cellular basis of skin injury after cytotoxic insult. British Journal of Cancer, 53 (suppl. VII), 47–58.
   Google Scholar
• REISNER, A., 1933, Hauterythem und Röntgenstrahlen. Ergeb-nisse Medizinischen Strahlenforschung, 6, 1–60.
   Google Scholar
• ROJAS, A., and JOINER, M. C., 1989, The influence of dose per fraction on repair kinetics. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 14, 329–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SIEBER, V. K., WELLS, J., REZVANI, M., and HoPEwELL, J. W., 1986, Radiation induced damage to the cells of pig hairs: a biological indicator of radiation dose and dose distri-bution in skin. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 16, 301–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• STRANDQVIST, M., 1944, Studien fiber die kumulative Wirkung der Röntgenstrahlen bei Fractionierung. Acta Radiologica, 55 (suppl.), 1–300.
   Google Scholar
• THAMES, H. D., 1985, An 'incomplete repair' model for survival after fractionated and continuous irradiations. Interna-tional Journal of Radiation Biology, 47, 319–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TROTT, K., 1986, What can the experience of radiation therapy teach us about accidents? British Journal of Radiology, 19 (suppl.), 28–30.
   Google Scholar
• TURESSON, I., and THAMES, H. D., 1989, Repair capacity and kinetics of human skin during fractionated radiother-apy: erythema, desquamation, and telangiectasia after 3 and 5 years follow-up. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 15, 169–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VAN DEN AARDWEG, G. J. M. J., HOPEWELL, J., and SIMMONDS, R. H., 1988, Repair and recovery in the epithelial and vascu-lar connective tissues of pig skin after irradiation. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 11, 73–82.
   Google Scholar
• VAN DEN AARDWEG, G. J. M. J., and HOPEWELL, J., 1992, The kinetics of repair for sublethal radiation-induced damage in the pig epidermis: an interpretation based on a fast and a slow component of repair. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 23, 94–104.
   Google Scholar
• VAN DEN AARDWEG, G. J. M. J., HOPEWELL, J. W., GUTTENBERGER, R., 1995, The influence of multiple radiation doses on the kinetics of repair of sublethal damage to pig skin. In Radiation Research 1895–1995. Edited by V. Hagan, H. Jung and C. Streffer (Universitdtsdruckerie H. Stfirtz AG, Würzburg), p. 259.
   Google Scholar
• VAN KONGEN, E., THAMES, H. D., and TRAVIS, E. L., 1993, Recovery from radiation damage in mouse lung: Inter-pretation in terms of two rates of repair. Radiation Research, 133, 225–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar