Physical therapist clinical reasoning in home care for walking assistive device prescription: A description of practice

References

• Academy of Neurologic Physical Therapy. Stroke EDGE and Brain Injury EDGE recommendations. http://neuropt.org
   Google Scholar
• American Physical Therapy Association - Home Health Section 2020 Home Health Toolbox II Tests and Measures to Use in the Home. https://www.homehealthsection.org/e-documents
   Google Scholar
• Audetat MC, Laurin S, Sanche G, Beique C, Fon NC, Blais G, Charlin B 2013 Clinical reasoning difficulties: A taxonomy for clinical teachers. Medical Teacher 35: e984–989. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2012.733041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin EJ, Muntner P, Alonso A, Bittencourt MS, Callaway CW, Carson AP, Chamberlain AM, Chang AR, Cheng S, Das SR et al. 2019 Heart disease and stroke statistics - 2019 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 139: e56–e528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2016 National center for health statistics. [Home Health Care] United States. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/home-health-care.html.
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2019 Traumatic brain injury and concussion. [TBI-Related Hospitalizations] United States. https://www.cdc.gov/traumaticbraininjury/data/tbi-hospitalizations.html.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen N, Black L, Furze J, Huhn K, Vendrely A, Wainwright S 2017 Clinical reasoning: Survey of teaching methods, integration, and assessment in entry-level physical therapist academic education. Physical Therapy 97(2): 175–186. doi:10.2522/ptj.20150320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demain S, Burridge J, Ellis-Hill C, Hughes AM, Yardly L, Tedesco-Triccas L, Swain I 2013 Assistive technologies after stroke: Self-management of fending for yourself? A focus group study. BMC Health Services Research 13: 334–346. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-13-334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eng AE, Bastuji-Garin S, Paillaud E, Gracies J-M, Skalli W, Decq P 2012 Determinants for the use of ambulation aids in a geriatric rehabilitation care unit: A retrospective study. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 13(3): 279–283. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2010.12.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitlin LN, Luborsky MR, Schemm RL 1998 Emerging concerns of older stroke patients about assistive device use. Gerontologist 38: 169–180. doi:10.1093/geront/38.2.169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramstad A, Storli SL, Hamran T 2014 Older individuals‘ experiences during the assistive technology device service delivery process. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 21(4): 305–312. doi:10.3109/11038128.2013.877070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huhn K, Gilliland SJ, Black LL, Wainwright SF, Christensen N 2019 Clinical reasoning in physical therapy: A concept analysis. Physical Therapy 99: 440–456. doi:10.1093/ptj/pzy148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones AL, Harris-Kojetin L, Valverde R 2012 Characteristics and use of home health care by men and women aged 65 and over [National Health Statistics Reports; no. 52]. Hyattsville, MD. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr052.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jutai J, Coulson S, Teasell R, Bayley M, Garland J, Mayo N, Wood-Dauphinee S 2007 Mobility assistive device utilization in a prospective study of patients with first-ever stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 88(10): 1268–1275. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.06.773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jutai J, Day H, Gelderblom GJ, De Witte LP 2002 Psychosocial impact of assistive devices scale (PIADS). Technology and Disability 14: 107–111. doi:10.3233/TAD-2002-14305.
   Google Scholar
• Lenker JA, Harris F, Taugher M, Smith RO 2013 Consumer perspectives on assistive technology outcomes. Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology 8: 373–380. doi:10.3109/17483107.2012.749429.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mortenson WB, Demers L, Fuhrer MJ, Jutai JW, Lenker J, DeRuyter F 2013 Effects of an assistive technology intervention on older adults with disabilities and their informal caregivers. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 92(4): 297–306. doi:10.1097/PHM.0b013e31827d65bf.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien SR, Durr K, Laubisch E, Losi L, Parrillo V, Pericozzi S, Poirier B, Poirier L, Ray K, Sackett A et al. 2019 Every person is an individual: Physical therapist clinical reasoning used in inpatient rehabilitation for walking assistive device prescription in patients with stroke and brain injury. Disability and Rehabilitation : Assistive Technology. DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2019.1647568.
   Google Scholar
• Oberg GK, Normann B, Gallagher S 2015 Embodied-enactive clinical reasoning in physical therapy. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 31: 244–252. doi:10.3109/09593985.2014.1002873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahlin M, Barnett J, Becker E, Fregosi CM 2019 Development through a lens of a perception-action-cognition connection: Recognizing the need for a paradigm shift in clinical reasoning. Physical Therapy 99: 748–760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik L, Allen S, Isenstadt D, Wasserman M, Iezzoni L 2009 Perspectives on use of mobility aids in a diverse population of seniors: Implications for intervention. Disability and Health Journal 2(2): 77–85. doi:10.1016/j.dhjo.2008.12.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safaz I, Turk H, Yasar E, Alaca R, Tok F, Tugcu I 2015 Use and abandonment rates of assistive devices/orthoses in patients with stroke. Gulhane Medical Journal 57: 142–144. doi:10.5455/gulhane.152325.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer M, Jutai J, Fuhrer M, Demers L, Deruyter F 2007 A framework for modelling the selection of assistive technology devices. Disability and Rehabilitation 2: 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Shirley Ryan Abilitylab Rehabilitation Measures Database. 2021. https://www.sralab.org/rehabilitation-measures.
   Google Scholar
• Skolarus LE, Burke JF, Freedman VA 2014 The role of accommodations in poststroke disability management. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 69(Suppl 1): S26–S34. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbu117.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sorensen HV, Lendal S, Schultz-Larsen K, Uhrskov T 2003 Stroke rehabilitation: Assistive technology devices and environmental modifications following primary rehabilitation in hospital - A therapeutic perspective. Assistive Technology 15: 39–48. doi:10.1080/10400435.2003.10131888.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teasell R, Salbach NM, Foley N, Mountain A, Cameron JI, De Jong A, Acerra NE, Bastasi D, Carter SL, Fung J et al. 2020 Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: rehabilitation, recovery, and community participation following stroke. Part one: rehabilitation and recovery following stroke; 6th Edition update 2019. International Journal of Stroke 15(7): 763–788. doi:10.1177/1747493019897843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verza R, Lopes Carvalho ML, Battaglia MA, Uccelli MM 2006 An interdisciplinary approach to evaluating the need for assistive technology reduces equipment abandonment. Multiple Sclerosis 12: 88–93. doi:10.1191/1352458506ms1233oa.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, Bates B, Cherney LR, Cramer SC, Deruyter F, Eng JJ, Fisher B, Harvey RL et al. 2016 Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery. Stroke 47: e98–e169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar