The potential of wearable technology to support stroke survivors’ motivation for home exercise – Focus group discussions with stroke survivors and physiotherapists

References

• Barbour R 2018 Doing focus groups, 2nd. Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett M, Snow JC, Kirkland MC, Kelly LP, Gehue M, Downer MB, McCarthy J, Ploughman M 2018 Excessive sedentary time during in-patient stroke rehabilitation. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 25: 366–374. 10.1080/10749357.2018.1458461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boukhennoufa I, Zhai X, Utti V, Jackson J, McDonald-Maier K 2021 A comprehensive evaluation of state-of-the-art time-series deep learning models for activity-recognition in post-stroke rehabilitation assessment. Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 2021 Mexico: 2242–2247.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V 2022 Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Brouns B, Meesters JJ, Wentink MM, de Kloet AJ, Arwert HJ, Boyce LW, Vliet Vlieland TP, van Bodegom-Vos L 2019 Factors associated with willingness to use eRehabilitation after stroke: A cross-sectional study among patients, informal caregivers and healthcare professionals. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 51: 665–674. 10.2340/16501977-2586
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braakhuis HE, Bussmann JB, Ribbers GM, Berger MA 2021 Wearable activity monitoring in day-to-day stroke care: A promising tool but not widely used. Sensors 21: 4066. 10.3390/s21124066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen CC, Bode RK 2011 Factors influencing therapists’ decision-making in the acceptance of new technology devices in stroke rehabilitation. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 90: 415–425. 10.1097/PHM.0b013e318214f5d8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell JW, Poth CN 2018 Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, 4th. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dimaguila GL, Batchelor F, Merolli M, Gray K 2020 ‘We are very individual’: Anticipated effects on stroke survivors of using their person-generated health data. BMJ Health & Care Informatics 27: e100149. 10.1136/bmjhci-2020-100149
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dobkin BH 2016 Behavioral self-management strategies for practice and exercise should be included in neurologic rehabilitation trials and care. Current Opinion in Neurology 29: 693–699. 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobkin BH, Martinez C 2018 Wearable sensors to monitor, enable feedback, and measure outcomes of activity and practice. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports 18: 87. 10.1007/s11910-018-0896-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• English C, Healy GN, Coates A, Lewis L, Olds T, Bernhardt J 2016 Sitting and activity time in people with stroke. Physical Therapy 96: 193–201. 10.2522/ptj.20140522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glowinski S, Blazejewski A, Krzyzynski T 2017 Inertial sensors and wavelets analysis as a tool for pathological gait identification. In: Gzik M, Tkacz E, Paszenda Z Pietka E (Eds) Innovations in biomedical engineering: advances in intelligent systems and computing, pp. 106–114. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hassett L, Ada L, Hellweg S, Paul S, Alzahrani M, Dean C 2020 Active and sedentary bouts in people after stroke and healthy controls: An observational study. Physiotherapy Research International 25: e1845. 10.1002/pri.1845
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung S, Michaud M, Oudre L, Dorveaux E, Gorintin L, Vayatis N, Ricard D 2020 The use of inertial measurement units for the study of free living environment activity assessment: A literature review. Sensors 20: 5625. 10.3390/s20195625
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger RA, Casey MA 2015 Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research, 5th. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Louie DR, Bird ML, Menon C, Eng JJ 2020 Perspectives on the prospective development of stroke-specific lower extremity wearable monitoring technology: A qualitative focus group study with physical therapists and individuals with stroke. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation 17: 31. 10.1186/s12984-020-00666-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luker J, Lynch E, Bernhardsson S, Bennett L, Bernhardt J 2015 Stroke survivors’ experiences of physical rehabilitation: A systematic review of qualitative studies. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 96: 1698–1708. e1610. 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.03.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch EA, Jones TM, Simpson DB, Fini NA, Kuys SS, Borschmann K, Kramer S, Johnson L, Callisaya ML, Mahendran N, et al. 2018 Activity monitors for increasing physical activity in adult stroke survivors. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 7: Cd012543. 10.1002/14651858.CD012543.pub2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maceira-Elvira P, Popa T, Schmid AC, Hummel FC 2019 Wearable technology in stroke rehabilitation: Towards improved diagnosis and treatment of upper-limb motor impairment. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation 16: 142. 10.1186/s12984-019-0612-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmood A, Solomon JM, English C, Bhaskaran U, Menon G, Manikandan N 2020 Measurement of adherence to home-based exercises among community-dwelling stroke survivors in India. Physiotherapy Research International 25: e1827. 10.1002/pri.1827
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD 2016 Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research 26: 1753–1760. 10.1177/1049732315617444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marwaa MN, Guidetti S, Ytterberg C, Kristensen HK 2022 Use of mobile/tablet and web-based applications to support rehabilitation after stroke: A scoping seview. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 54: jrm00269. 10.2340/jrm.v54.452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller KK, Porter RE, DeBaun-Sprague E, Van Puymbroeck M, Schmid AA 2017 Exercise after stroke: Patient adherence and beliefs after discharge from rehabilitation. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 24: 142–148. 10.1080/10749357.2016.1200292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris JH, Oliver T, Kroll T, Joice S, Williams B 2015 From physical and functional to continuity with pre-stroke self and participation in valued activities: A qualitative exploration of stroke survivors’, carers’ and physiotherapists’ perceptions of physical activity after stroke. Disability & Rehabilitation 37: 64–77. 10.3109/09638288.2014.907828
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mura A, Maier M, Ballester BR, De la Torre Costa J, López-Luque J, Gelineau A, Mandigout S, Ghatan PH, Fiorillo R, Antenucci F, et al. 2022 Bringing rehabilitation home with an e-health platform to treat stroke patients: Study protocol of a randomized clinical trial (Rgs@home). Trials 23: 518. 10.1186/s13063-022-06444-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholson S, Donaghy M, Johnston M, Sniehotta F, van Wijck F, Johnston D, Greig C, McMurdo ME, Mead G 2014 A qualitative theory guided analysis of stroke survivors’ perceived barriers and facilitators to physical activity. Disability & Rehabilitation 36: 1857–1868. 10.3109/09638288.2013.874506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien MK, Shawen N, Mummidisetty C, Kaur S, Bo X, Poellabauer C, Kording K, Jayaraman A 2017 Activity recognition for persons with stroke using mobile phone technology: Toward improved performance in a home setting. Journal of Medical Internet Research 19: e184. 10.2196/jmir.7385
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peiris CL, Taylor NF, Shields N 2012 Patients value patient-therapist interactions more than the amount or content of therapy during inpatient rehabilitation: A qualitative study. Journal of Physiotherapy 58: 261–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poltawski L, Boddy K, Forster A, Goodwin VA, Pavey AC, Dean S 2015 Motivators for uptake and maintenance of exercise: Perceptions of long-term stroke survivors and implications for design of exercise programmes. Disability & Rehabilitation 37: 795–801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porciuncula F, Roto AV, Kumar D, Davis I, Roy S, Walsh CJ, Awad LN 2018 Wearable movement sensors for rehabilitation: A focused review of technological and clinical advances. PM&R 10: S220–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosewilliam S, Sintler C, Pandyan AD, Skelton J, Roskell CA 2016 Is the practice of goal-setting for patients in acute stroke care patient-centred and what factors influence this? A qualitative study. Clinical Rehabilitation 30: 508–519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan KE, Gandha T, Culbertson MJ, Carlson C 2014 Focus group evidence: Implications for design and analysis. American Journal of Evaluation 35: 328–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarfo F, Ulasavets U, Opare-Sem O, Ovbiagele B 2018 Tele-rehabilitation after stroke: An updated systematic review of the literature. Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases 27: 2306–2318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöholm A, Skarin M, Churilov L, Nilsson M, Bernhardt J, Lindén T 2014 Sedentary behaviour and physical activity of people with stroke in rehabilitation hospitals. Stroke Research and Treatment 2014: 591897.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vahlberg B, Bring A, Hellström K, Zetterberg L 2019 Level of physical activity in men and women with chronic stroke. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 35: 947–955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dongen L, Hafsteinsdottir TB, Parker E, Bjartmarz I, Hjaltadottir I, Jonsdottir H 2021 Stroke survivors’ experiences with rebuilding life in the community and exercising at home: A qualitative study. Nursing Open 8: 2567–2577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wentink M, van Bodegom-Vos L, Brouns B, Arwert H, Houdijk S, Kewalbansing P, Boyce L, Vliet Vlieland T, de Kloet A, Meesters J 2019 How to improve eRehabilitation programs in stroke care? A focus group study to identify requirements of end-users. BMC Medical Informatics & Decision Making 19: 145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar