The creation of evidence in ‘evidence-based’ drug prevention: a critique of the Strengthening Families Program Plus Life Skills Training evaluation

References

• Petrosino A. Standards for evidence and evidence for standards: the case of school-based drug prevention. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 2003; 587: 180–207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). National registry of evidence-based programs and practices. Available at http://nrepp.samhsa.gov/ (accessed 5 April 2007)
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Education Safe, Disciplined, and Drug-Free Schools Expert Panel. Exemplary and promising Safe, Disciplined, and Drug-free Schools Programs 2001. US Department of Education, Jessup, MD 2001
   Google Scholar
• Mihalic S, Irwin K, Elliott D, Fagan A, Hansen D. Blueprints for violence prevention (OJJDP Juvenile Justice Bulletin). US Department of Justice, Washington, DC 2001
   Google Scholar
• Schinke S, Brounstein P, Gardner S. Science-based prevention programs and principles. Center for Substance Abuse Prevention, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Rockville, MD 2002
   Google Scholar
• National Institute on Drug Abuse. Preventing drug use among children and adolescents: a research-based guide for parents, educators, and community leaders, 2nd edn. National Institute on Drug Abuse, US Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD 2003
   Google Scholar
• Gorman D M. Defining and operationalizing ‘research-based’ prevention: a critique (with case studies) of the US Department of Education's Safe, Disciplined and Drug-Free Schools Exemplary Programs. Eval Prog Plann 2002; 25: 295–302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorman D M. Does measurement dependence explain the effects of the Life Skills Training program on smoking outcomes?. Prev Med 2005; 40: 479–487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandi A G, Murphy-Graham E, Petrosino A, Chrismer S S, Weiss C H. The devil is in the details: examining the evidence for ‘proven’ school-based drug abuse prevention program. Eval Rev 2007; 31: 43–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallfors D D, Pankratz M, Hartman S. Does federal policy support the use of scientific evidence in school-based prevention programs?. Prev Sci 2007; 8: 75–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorman D M. Drug and violence prevention: rediscovering the critical rational dimension of evaluation research. J Exp Criminol 2005; 1: 1–23
   Google Scholar
• Gerstein D R, Green L W. Preventing drug abuse: what do we know?. National Academy Press, Washington, DC 1993
   Google Scholar
• Brown J H. Youth, drugs and resilience education. J Drug Educ 2001; 31: 83–122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begg C B. Ruminations on the intent-to-treat principle [commentary]. Cont Clin Trials 2000; 21: 241–243
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Campbell D T. The experimenting society. Methodology and epistemology for social science: selected papers—Donald T. Campbell, E S Overman. University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1988; 9–45
   Google Scholar
• Kumpfer K L, Molgaard V, Spoth R. The Strengthening Families Program for the prevention of delinquency and drug use. Preventing childhood disorders, substance abuse, and delinquency, R D Peters, R J McMahon. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 1996; 241–267
   Google Scholar
• Botvin G J, Griffin K W. Life Skills Training: empirical findings and future directions. J Prim Prev 2004; 25: 211–232
   Google Scholar
• Petrie J, Bunn F, Byrne G. Parenting programmes for preventing tobacco, alcohol or drug misuse in children <18: a systematic review. Health Ed Res 2002; 22: 177–191
   Google Scholar
• Foxcroft D R, Ireland D, Lister-Sharp J, Lowe G, Breen R. Longer-term primary prevention for alcohol misuse in young people: a systematic review. Addiction 2003; 98: 397–411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Family Studies. Parenting Influences on Adolescent Alcohol Use. Chapter 8: Prevention/early intervention programs. Australian Institute of Family Studies, Melbourne 2006, Available at: http://www.aifs.gov.au/institute/pubs/resreport10/prevention.pdf (accessed 30 April 2007)
   Google Scholar
• European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA). Annual report 2006: The state of the drug problem in Europe. Chapter 2: Responding to drug problems in Europe—an overview. EMCDDA, Lisbon 2006, Available at: http://ar2006.emcdda.europa.eu/en/page006-en.html (accessed 30 April 2007)
   Google Scholar
• Strengthening Families Program. The SFP 10 – 14 in the UK. United Kingdom: Strengthening Families Project, 2006. Available at: http://www.mystrongfamily.co.uk/SFP_UK.htm (accessed 30 April 2007)
   Google Scholar
• Spoth R L, Redmond C, Trudeau L, Shin C. Longitudinal substance initiation outcomes for a universal preventive intervention combining family and school programs. Psychol Addict Behav 2002; 16: 129–134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spoth R L, Randall K, Shin C, Redmond C. Randomized study of combined universal family and school preventive interventions: patterns of long-term effects on initiation, regular use, and weekly drunkenness. Psychol Addict Behav 2005; 19: 372–381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spoth R L, Clair S, Shin C, Redmond C. Long-term effects of universal preventive interventions on methamphetamine use among adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2006; 160: 876–882
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). SAMHSA model programs: Strengthening Families Program for Parents and Youth 10 – 14. Rockville: SAMHSA. Available at: http://modelprograms.samhsa.gov/pdfs/model/SFP_10_14.pdf (accessed 10 April 2007)
   Google Scholar
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). SAMHSA model programs: LifeSkills Training. Rockville: SAMHSA. Available at: http://modelprograms.samhsa.gov/pdfs/model/lifeskills.pdf (accessed 10 April 2007)
   Google Scholar
• Molgaard V K, Spoth R L, Redmond C. Competency training: the Strengthening Families Program: For Parents and Youth 10 – 14 (OJJDP Juvenile Justice Bulletin 182208). US Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Washington, DC 2000, Available at: http://www.ncjrs.gov/html/ojjdp/2000_8_1/contents.html (accessed 10 April 2007)
   Google Scholar
• Botvin G J, Griffin K W. Prevention science, drug abuse prevention, and Life Skills Training: comments on the state of the science. J Exp Criminol 2005; 1: 63–78
   Google Scholar
• Blalock H M, Jr. Social statistics, revised 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, London 1979
   Google Scholar
• Moye L. Statistical reasoning in medicine: the intuitive P-value primer. Springer, New York 2000
   Google Scholar
• Botvin G J, Baker E, Filazzola A D, Botvin E M. A cognitive-behavioral approach to substance abuse prevention: one-year follow-up. Addict Behav 1990; 15: 47–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollis S, Campbell F. What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomized controlled trials. BMJ 1999; 319: 670–674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachin J M. Statistical considerations in the intent-to-treat principle. Cont Clin Trials 2000; 21: 167–189
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Green S B. Design of randomized trials. Epidemiol Rev 2002; 24: 4–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gail M H. Eligibility exclusions, losses to follow-up, removal of randomized patients, and uncontrolled events in cancer clinical trials. Cancer Treat Rep 1985; 69: 107–113
   Google Scholar