471
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The reliability of evaluating conversations between people with traumatic brain injury and their communication partners via videoconferencing

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1074-1091 | Received 29 Aug 2018, Accepted 26 Nov 2018, Published online: 06 Dec 2018

References

  • Behn, N., Togher, L., Power, E., & Heard, R. (2012). Evaluating communication training for paid carers of people with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 26(13–14), 1702–1715.
  • Bogart, E., Togher, L., Power, E., & Docking, K. (2012). Casual conversations between individuals with traumatic brain injury and their friends. Brain Injury, 26(3), 221–233.
  • Bond, F., & Godfrey, H. P. D. (1997). Conversation with traumatically brain-injured individuals: A controlled study of behavioural changes and their impact. Brain Injury, 11(5), 319–329.
  • Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6, 284–290.
  • Coelho, C., Ylvisaker, M., & Turkstra, L. (2005). Nonstandardized assessment approaches for individuals with traumatic brain injuries. Seminars in Speech and Language, 26(4), 223–241.
  • Cohn, E. R., & Watzlaf, V. J. M. (2011). Privacy and internet-based telepractice. SIG 18 Perspectives on Telepractice, 1(1), 26–37.
  • Eriksson, K., Bergström, S., Carlsson, E., Hartelius, L., Johansson, C., Schwarz, A., & Saldert, C. (2014). Aspects of rating communicative interaction: Effects on reliability and agreement. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 5(2), 245–267.
  • Eriksson, K., Hartelius, L., & Saldert, C. (2016). On the diverse outcome of communication partner training of significant others of people with aphasia: An experimental study of six cases. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 51(4), 402–414.
  • Frith, M., Togher, L., Ferguson, A., Levick, W., & Docking, K. (2014). Assessment practices of speech-language pathologists for cognitive communication disorders following traumatic brain injury in adults: An international survey. Brain Injury, 28(13–14), 1657–1666. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2014.947619
  • Gan, C., Gargaro, J., Brandys, C., Gerber, G., & Boschen, K. (2010). Family caregivers’ support needs after brain injury: A synthesis of perspectives from caregivers, programs, and researchers. NeuroRehabilitation, 27(1), 5–18.
  • Georgeadis, A., Brennan, D., Barker, L. M., & Baron, C. R. (2004). Telerehabilitation and its effect on story retelling by adults with neurogenic communication disorders. Aphasiology, 18(5/6/7), 639–652.
  • Honan, C. A., McDonald, S., Tate, R., Ownsworth, T., Togher, L., Fleming, J., … Ponsford, J. (2017). Outcome instruments in moderate-to-severe adult traumatic brain injury: Recommendations for use in psychosocial research. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 1–21. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2017.1339616
  • Horton, S., Clark, A., Barton, G., Lane, K., & Pomeroy, V. M. (2016). Methodological issues in the design and evaluation of supported communication for aphasia training: A cluster-controlled feasibility study. BMJ Open, 6(4), e011207.
  • Kagan, A., Black, S. E., Duchan, J. F., Simmons-Mackie, N., & Square, P. (2001). Training volunteers as conversational partners using “supported conversation with Adults with aphasia” (SCA): A controlled trial. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 44, 624–638.
  • Kagan, A., Winckel, J., Black, S., Duchan, J. F., Simmons-Mackie, N., & Square, P. (2004). A set of observational measures for rating support and participation in conversation between adults with aphasia and their conversation partners. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 11(1), 67–83.
  • Kottner, J., Audigé, L., Brorson, S., Donner, A., Gajeweski, B. J., Hróbjartsson, A., … Streiner, D. L. (2011). Guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies (GRRAS) were proposed. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64(1), 96–106.
  • Luxton, D. D., Pruitt, L. D., & Osenbach, J. E. (2014). Best practices for remote psychological assessment via telehealth technologies. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 45(1), 27–35.
  • Mast, J. E., Antonini, T. N., Raj, S. P., Oberjohn, K. S., Cassedy, A., Makoroff, K. L., & Wade, S. L. (2014). Web-based parenting skills to reduce behavior problems following abusive head trauma: A pilot study. Child Abuse and Neglect, 38(9), 1487–1495.
  • Mozeiko, J., Le, K., Coelho, C., Krueger, F., & Grafman, J. (2011). The relationship of story grammar and executive function following TBI. Aphasiology, 25(6–7), 826–835.
  • Murphy, A., Huang, H., Montgomery, E. B., & Turkstra, L. S. (2014). Conversational turn-taking in adults with acquired brain injury. Aphasiology, 29(2), 151–168.
  • PASS 14 Power Analysis and Sample Size Software. (2015). [Computer software]. Kaysville, UT: NCSS, LLC. Retrieved from ncss.com/software/pass
  • Rietdijk, R., Power, E., Brunner, M., & Togher, L. (2018). A single case experimental design study on improving social communication skills after traumatic brain injury using communication partner telehealth training. Brain Injury, 1–11. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2018.1531313
  • Rietdijk, R., Togher, L., & Power, E. (2012). Supporting family members of people with traumatic brain injury using telehealth: A systematic review. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 44, 913–921.
  • Rousseaux, M., Verigneaux, C., & Kozlowski, O. (2010). An analysis of communication in conversation after severe traumatic brain injury. European Journal of Neurology, 17(7), 922–929.
  • Sabesan, S., & Kelly, J. (2015). Implementing telehealth as core business in health services. Medical Journal of Australia, 202(5), 231–233.
  • Saldert, C., Backman, E., & Hartelius, L. (2013). Conversation partner training with spouses of persons with aphasia: A pilot study using a protocol to trace relevant characteristics. Aphasiology, 27(3), 271–292.
  • Saldert, C., Jensen, L. R., Blom Johansson, M., & Simmons-Mackie, N. (2018). Complexity in measuring outcomes after communication partner training: Alignment between goals of intervention and methods of evaluation. Aphasiology, 32(10), 1167–1193.
  • Sim, P., Power, E., & Togher, L. (2013). Describing conversations between individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and communication partners following communication partner training: Using exchange structure analysis. Brain Injury, 27(6), 717–742.
  • Simpson, G. K., Daher, M., Hodgkinson, A., & Strettles, B. (2016). Comparing the injury profile, service use, outcomes, and comorbidities of people with severe TBI across urban, regional, and remote populations in New South Wales: A multicentre study. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 31(2), E26–E38. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000160
  • Speech Pathology Australia. (2014). Telepractice in speech pathology position statement. Melbourne: The Speech Pathology Association of Australia Ltd.
  • Steel, J., & Togher, L. (2018). Social communication assessment after TBI: A narrative review of innovations in pragmatic and discourse assessment methods. Brain Injury, 1–14. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2018.1531304
  • Togher, L., Hand, L., & Code, C. (1997). Analysing discourse in the traumatic brain injury population: Telephone interactions with different communication partners. Brain Injury, 11(3), 169–189.
  • Togher, L., McDonald, S., Tate, R., Power, E., & Rietdijk, R. (2013). Training communication partners of people with severe traumatic brain injury improves everyday conversations: A multicenter single blind clinical trial. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 45(7), 637–645.
  • Togher, L., Power, E., McDonald, S., Tate, R., & Rietdijk, R. (2009). Training communication partners of people with traumatic brain injury: Reporting the protocol for a clinical trial. Brain Impairment, 10(2), 188–204.
  • Togher, L., Power, E., Tate, R., McDonald, S., & Rietdijk, R. (2010). Measuring the social interactions of people with traumatic brain injury and their communication partners: The adapted Kagan scales. Aphasiology, 24(6–8), 914–927.
  • Togher, L., Wiseman-Hakes, C., Douglas, J., Stergiou-Kita, M., Ponsford, J., Teasell, R., … Panel, I. E. (2014). INCOG recommendations for management of cognition following traumatic brain injury, part IV: Cognitive communication. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 29(4), 353–368.
  • Tucker, J. K. (2012). Perspectives of speech-language pathologists on the use of telepractice in schools: Quantitative survey results. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 4(2), 61–72.
  • Turkstra, L. S., Quinn-Padron, M., Johnson, J. E., Workinger, M. S., & Antoniotti, N. (2012). In-person versus telehealth assessment of discourse ability in adults with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 27(6), 424–432.
  • Turner-Stokes, L., Williams, H., & Johnson, J. (2009). Goal attainment scaling: Does it provide added value as a person-centred measure for evaluation of outcome in neurorehabilitation following acquired brain injury? Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 41(7), 528–535.
  • Wade, S. L., Oberjohn, K., Burkhardt, A., & Greenberg, I. (2009). Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a web-based parenting skills program for young children with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 24(4), 239–247.
  • WHO. (2006). Traumatic brain injuries. In World Health Organization (WHO) (Ed.), Neurological disorders: Public health challenges (pp. 164–175). Geneva: WHO Press.
  • WHO. (2011). World report on disability. Geneva: WHO Press.
  • Wiltshire, G. E., & Ehrlich, C. (2014). Is conversation partner training effective in assisting individuals with a traumatic brain injury to display improved communication outcomes. Journal of Social Inclusion, 5(2), 9–26.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.