Non-ionizing radiation as possible carcinogen

References

• Abdelati MM. 2015. Electromagnetic radiation from mobile phone base stations at Gaza. IUG J Nat Studies. 13(2):129–146.
   Google Scholar
• Adey WR, Byus CV, Cain CD, Higgins RJ, Jones RA, Kean CJ, Kuster N, MacMurray A, Stagg RB, Zimmerman G. 2002. Spontaneous and nitrosourea-induced primary tumors of the central nervous system in Fischer 344 rats exposed to frequency-modulated microwave fields. Cancer Res. 60(7):1857–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akhavan-Sigari R, Baf Morteza Mazloum Farsi., Ariabod V, Rohde V, Rahighi S. 2014. Connection between Cell Phone use, p53 Gene Expression in Different Zones of Glioblastoma Multiforme and Survival Prognoses. Rare Tumors. 6(3):116–120. doi: https://doi.org/10.4081/rt.2014.5350.
   Google Scholar
• Amoon AT, Oksuzyan S, Crespi CM, Arah OA, Cockburn M,Vergara X, Kheifets L. 2018. Residential mobility and childhood leukemia. Environmental Research. 164:459–466. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.03.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson LE, Sheen DM, Wilson BW, Grumbein SL, Creim JA, Sasser LB. 2004.Two-year chronic bioassay study of rats exposed to a 1.6 GHz radiofrequency signal. Radiation Research. 162(2):201–210. doi: https://doi.org/10.1667/RR3208. 2004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auvinen A, Toivo T, Tokola K. 2006. Epidemiological risk assessment of mobile phones and cancer: where can we improve? European Journal of Cancer Prevention. 15(6):516–523. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/01.cej.0000203617.54312.08
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baan R, Grosse Y, Lauby-Secretan B, El Ghissassi F, Bouvard V, Benbrahim-Tallaa L, Guha N, Islami F, Galichet L, Straif K, et al. 2011. Carcinogenicity of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. Lancet Oncol. 12(7):624–626. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70147-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çiğ B, Nazıroğlu M. 2015. Investigation of the effects of distance from sources on apoptosis, oxidative stress and cytosolic calcium accumulation via TRPV1 channels induced by mobile phones and Wi-Fi in breast cancer cells. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr. 1848(10):2756–2765. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2015.02.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balmori A. 2005. Possible effects of electromagnetic fields from phone masts on a population of white stork (Ciconia ciconia). Electromag Biol Med. 24:109–119. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15368370500205472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balmori A, Hallberg O. 2007. The urban decline of the house sparrow (Passer domesticus): a possible link with electromagnetic radiation. Electromag Biol Med. 26:141–151. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15368370701410558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee S, Singh NN, Sreedhar G, Mukherjee S. 2016. Analysis of the Genotoxic Effects of Mobile Phone Radiation using Buccal Micronucleus Assay: A Comparative Evaluation. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 10(3):ZC82–85. doi: https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2016/17592.7505.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bartsch H, Bartsch C, Seebald E, Deerberg F, Dietz K, Vollrath L, Mecke D. 2002. Chronic exposure to a GSM-like signal (mobile phone) does not stimulate the development of DMBA-induced mammary tumors in rats: results of three consecutive studies. Radiat Res. 157(2):183–190. doi:https://doi.org/10.1667/0033-7587(2002)157[0183:CETAGL]2.0.CO;2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belpomme D, Hardell L, Belyaev I, Burgio E, Carpenter DO. 2018. Thermal and non-thermal health effects of low intensity non-ionizing radiation: an international perspective. Environ Pollut. 242:643–658. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.07.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhargavi K, Balachandrudu KE, Nageswar P. 2013. Mobile Phone Radiation Effects on Human Health. Int J Computational Eng Res. 3:196–203.
   Google Scholar
• Bortkiewicz A. 2019. Health effects of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields (RF EMF). Ind Health. 57(4):403–405. doi:https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.57_400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buldak RJ, Polaniak R, Buldak L, Zwirska-Korczala K, Skonieczna M, Monsiol A, Kukla M, Dulawa-Buldak A, Birkner E. 2012. Short-term exposure to 50 Hz ELF-EMF alters the cisplatin-induced oxidative response in AT478 murine squamous cell carcinoma cells. Bioelectromagnetics. 33:641–651. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.21732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campisi A, Gulino M, Acquaviva R, Bellia P, Raciti G, Grasso R, Musumeci F, Vanella A, Triglia A. 2010. Reactive oxygen species levels and DNA fragmentation on astrocytes in primary culture after acute exposure to low intensity microwave electromagnetic field. Neurosci Lett. 473:52–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2010.02.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlberg M, Hardell L. 2017. Evaluation of mobile phone and cordless phone use and glioma risk using the Bradford Hill viewpoints form 1965 on association or causation. Biomed Res Int. 2017:1–17. Article ID 9218486. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9218486.
   Google Scholar
• Chen C, Ma X, Zhong M, Yu Z. 2010. Extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields exposure and female breast cancer risk: A meta-analysis based on 24,338 cases and 60,628 controls. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 123:569–576. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-0782-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, Qu Z, Liu W. 2016. Effects of Simulated Mobile Phone Electromagnetic Radiation on Fertilization and Embryo Development. Fetal and Pediatric Pathology. 36(2):123–129. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15513815.2016.1261974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou C.-K., Guy AW, Kunz LL, Johnson RB, Crowley JJ, Krupp JH. 1992. Long term low-level microwave irradiation of rats. Bioelectromagnetics. 13(6):469–496. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1521-186X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen HC, Schüz J, Kosteljanetz M, Poulsen HS, Thomsen J, Johansen C. 2004. Cellular telephone use and risk of acoustic neuroma. American Journal of Epidemiology 159(3):277–283. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwh032
   Google Scholar
• Clegg FM, Sears M, Friesen M, Scarato T, Metzinger R, Lee Russell C, Miller AB. 2019. Building science and radiofrequency Radiation: what makes smart and healthy buildings. Build Environ. 176(106324):0360–1323.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke R, Laing S, Swerdlow AJ. 2010. A case-control study of risk of leukaemia in relation to mobile phone use. Br. J. Canc. 103(11): 1729–1735. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605948
   Google Scholar
• D’Silva MH, Swer RT, Anbalagan J, Rajesh B. 2017. Effect of radiofrequency radiation emitted from 2G and 3G cell phone on developing liver of chick embryo - a comparative study. J Clin Diagn Res. 11:AC05eAC09.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deshmukh PS, Nasare N, Megha K, Banerjee BD, Ahmed RS, Singh D, Abegaonkar MP, Tripathi AK, Mediratta PK. 2015. Cognitive impairment and neurogenotoxic effects in rats exposed to low-intensity microwave radiation. Int. J. Toxicol. 34(3):284–290. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1091581815574348.
   Google Scholar
• Dhami AK. 2012. Study of electromagnetic radiation pollution in an Indian city. Environ Monit Assess. 184:6507–6512. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-2436-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan W, Liu C, Zhang L, He M, Xu S, Chen C, Pi H, Gao P, Zhang Y, Zhong, M, Yu Z, Zhou Z. 2015 Comparison of the Genotoxic Effects Induced by 50 Hz Extremely Low-Frequency Electromagnetic Fields and 1800 MHz Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields in GC-2 Cells. Radiat. Res. 183(3):305–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1667/RR13851.1.
   Google Scholar
• Eger H, Hagen KU, Lucas B, Vogel P, Voit H. 2004. The Influence of Being Physically Near to a Cell Phone Transmission Mast on the Incidence of Cancer. Umwelt-Medizin-Gesellschaft.17(4):326–332.
   Google Scholar
• El-Abd SF, Eltoweissy MY. 2012. Cytogenetic alterations in human lymphocyte culture following exposure to radiofrequency field of mobile phone. J Appl Pharm Sci. 2:16–20.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott P, Toledano MB, Bennett J, Beale L, De Hoogh K, Best N, Briggs DJ. 2010. Mobile phone base stations and early childhood cancers: case-control study. BMJ. 340:c3077. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c3077.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Esmekaya MA, Seyhan N, Kayhan H, Tuysuz MZ, Kursun AC, Yagci M. 2013. Investigation of the effects of 2.1 GHz microwave radiation on mitochondrial membrane potential (DeltaPsim), apoptotic activity and cell viability in human breast fibroblast cells. Cell Biochem Biophys. 67:1371–1378. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12013-013-9669-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fadiloglu E, Tapisiz OL, Unsal M, Fadiloglu S, Celik B, Mollamahmutoglu L. 2019. Non-ionizing radiation created by mobile phone progresses endometrial hyperplasia: an experimental rat study. Arch Med Res. 50(2):36–43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcmed.2019.05.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falcioni L, Bua L, Tibaldi E, Lauriola M, De Angelis L, Gnudi F, Mandrioli D, Manservigi M, Manservisi F, Manzoli I, et al. 2018. Report of final results regarding brain and heart tumors in Sprague-Dawley rats exposed from prenatal life until natural death to mobile phone radiofrequency field representative of a 1.8 GHz GSM base station environmental emission. Environ Res. 165:496–503. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.01.037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fam WZ, Mikhail EL. 1996. Lymphoma induced in mice chronically exposed to very strong low-frequency electromagnetic field. Cancer Letters. 105:257–269. 2 doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3835(96)04324-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fojt L, Strasák L, Vetterl V, Smarda J. 2004. Comparison of the low-frequency magnetic field effects on bacteria Escherichia coli, Leclercia adecarboxylata and Staphylococcus aureus. Bioelectrochemistry. 63:337–341. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioelechem.2003.11.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyde M, Cesta M, Blystone C, Elmore S, Foster P, Hooth M, Kissling G, Malarkey D, Sills R, Stout M et al. 2016. Report of Partial Findings from the National Toxicology Program Carcinogenesis Studies of Cell Phone Radiofrequency Radiation in Hsd: Sprague Dawley® SD rats (Whole Body Exposures). US National Toxicology Program (NTP). BioRxiv preprint doi:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1101/055699.
   Google Scholar
• Gajski G, Garaj-Vrhovac V. 2009. Radioprotective effects of honeybee venom (Apis mellifera) against 915-MHz microwave radiationinduced DNA damage in wistar rat lymphocytes: in vitro study. Int J Toxicol. 28:88–98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1091581809335051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandhi OP, Morgan LL, de Salles AA, Han YY, Herberman RB, Davis DL. 2012. Exposure limits: the underestimation of absorbed cell phone radiation, especially in children. Electromagn Biol Med. 31:34–51. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/15368378.2011.622827.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg VK, IS-95 CDMA and cdma2000: cellular/pcs system implementation.2000 [accessed 2020 Jul 20]. https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/whatwestudy/topics/cellphones/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Golmohammadi R, Kamalinia M, Abedi K, Karimi S, Eshaghi M. 2014. An investigation on commercial cell phones radiation and self-report symptoms of users. J Ergon. 2(1):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Graham John D, Susan P. 1996. EMFs and childhood cancer: are you convinced? Harvard Centre Risk Anal. 4-2. https://cdn1.sph.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/1273/2013/06/EMFs-and-Childhood-Cancer-Mar-96.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Greenland S, Sheppard AR, Kaune WT, Poole C, Kelsh MA. 2000. A pooled analysis of magnetic fields, wire codes, and childhood leukemia. Childhood Leukemia-EMF Study Group. Epidemiology. 11(6): 624–634. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/00001648-200011000-00003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groves FD. 2002. Cancer in Korean War Navy Technicians: Mortality Survey after 40 Years. American journal of epidemiology. 155(9):810–818. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/155.9.810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GSMA Intelligence. 2020. The mobile economy report 2020; [accessed 2019 Apr 26]. https://www.gsma.com/mobileeconomy/
   Google Scholar
• Gulati S, Yadav A, Kumar N, Kanupriya ANK, Kumar R, Gupta R. 2016. Effect of GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms on genetic damage in humans populations exposed to radiation from mobile towers. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 70:615–625. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-015-0195-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guler G, Tomruk A, Ozgur E, Seyhan N. 2010. The effect of radiofrequency radiation on DNA and lipid damage in nonpregnant and pregnant rabbits and their newborns. Gen Physiol Biophys. 29(1):59–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.4149/gpb_2010_01_59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ha M, Im H, Lee M, Kim HJ, Kim B-C, Gimm Y-M, Pack J-K. 2007. Radio-frequency radiation exposure from AM radio transmitters and childhood leukemia and brain cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 166(3):270–279. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwm083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halgamuge MN, Skafidas E, Davis D. 2020. A meta-analysis of in vitro exposures to weak radiofrequency radiation exposure from mobile phones (1990–2015). Environmental Research. 1-65. 184 doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardell, L. 2017. World Health Organization, radiofrequency radiation and health - a hard nut to crack (Review). Int. J. Oncol. 51:405–413. doi:https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2017.4046. 2 51
   Google Scholar
• Hardell L. 2018. Effects of mobile phones on children’s and adolescents’ health: a commentary. Child Dev. 89(1):137–140. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardell L, Carlberg M, Hansson K. 2013. Use of mobile phones and cordless phones is associated with increased risk for glioma and acoustic neuroma. Pathophysiology. 20:85–110. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pathophys.2012.11.001.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hardell L, Carlberg M, Hansson Mild K. 2006. Pooled analysis of two case–control studies on use of cellular and cordless telephones and the risk for malignant brain tumours diagnosed in 1997–2003. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 79(8):630–639. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-006-0088-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardell L, Carlberg M, Mild HK. 2011. Pooled analysis of case-control studies on malignant brain tumours and the use of mobile and cordless phones including living and deceased subjects. Int J Oncol. 38:1465–1474. doi:https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2011.947.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardell L, Hansson Mild K, Sandström M, Carlberg M, Hallquist A, Påhlson A. 2003. Vestibular schwannoma, tinnitus and cellular telephones. Neuroepidemiology. 22(2):124–129. doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000068745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardell L, Mild KH, Carlberg M, Hallquist A. 2004. Cellular and cordless telephone use and the association with brain tumors in different age groups. Archives of Environmental Health: An International Journal. 59(3):132–137. doi: https://doi.org/10.3200/AEOH.59.3.132-137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocking B, Gordon I. 2003. Decreased survival for childhood leukemia in proximity to television towers. Arch Environ Health. 58(9):560–564. doi:https://doi.org/10.3200/AEOH.58.9.560-564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, Q, Wang M, Wu S, Ma X, An G, Liu H, Xie F. 2015. Oxidative changes and apoptosis induced by 1800-MHz electromagnetic radiation in NIH/3t3 cells. Electromagn. Biol. Med. 34(1):85–92. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/15368378.2014.900507.
   Google Scholar
• Houston BJ, Nixon B, King BV, Aitken RJ, De Iuliis GN. 2018. Probing the origins of 1,800 MHz radio frequency electromagnetic radiation induced damage in mouse immortalized germ cells and spermatozoa in vitro. Front Public Health. 6:270. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang TQ, Lee MS, Oh EH, Kalinec F, Zhang BT, Seo JS, Park WY. 2008. Characterization of biological effect of 1763 MHz radiofrequency exposure on auditory hair cells. Int J Radiat Biol. 84:909–915. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09553000802460123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huss A, Spoerri A, Egger M, Kromhout H, Vermeulen, Vermeulen R. 2018. Occupational extremely low frequency magnetic fields (ELF-MF) exposure and hematolymphopoietic cancers - Swiss National Cohort analysis and updated meta-analysis. Environ Res. 164:467–474. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.03.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussein S, El-Saba A-A., Galal MK. 2016. Biochemical and histological studies on adverse effects of mobile phone radiation on rat's brain. J. Chem. Neuroanat. 78:10–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchemneu.2016.07.009.
   Google Scholar
• ICNIRP. 1998. International commission on non-ionizing radiation protection. Guidelines on limits of exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). Health Phys. 74:494–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Agency of Research on Cancer (IARC). 2019. Urged to revisit RF risk microwave nNews, a report on non-ionizing radiation. [accessed 2020 May 02]. https://microwavenews.com/short-takes-archive/iarc-urged-reassess-rf.
   Google Scholar
• International commission on non-ionizing radiation protection(ICNIRP). 2009. Exposure to high frequency electromagnetic fields, biological effects and health consequences (100 kHz-300 GHz)-Review of the Scientific Evidence and Health Consequences. Munich: International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection.16.
   Google Scholar
• Jastaniah SD. 2016. Is long-term cell phone use linked to breast cancer? A review of the evidence. Adv Breast Cancer Res. 5(4):136–141. doi:https://doi.org/10.4236/abcr.2016.54016.
   Google Scholar
• Johansen C, Boice JD Jr, McLaughlin JK, Olsen JH. 2001. Cellular telephones and cancer – a nationwide cohort study in Denmark. J Natl Cancer Inst. 93:203–207. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/93.3.203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joubert V, Leveque P, Cueille M, Bourthoumieu S, Yardin C. 2007. No apoptosis is induced in rat cortical neurons exposed to GSM phone fields. Bioelectromagnetics. 28:115–121. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.20274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joubert V, Leveque P, Rametti A, Collin A, Bourthoumieu S, Yardin C. 2006. Microwave exposure of neuronal cells in vitro: study of apoptosis. Int J Radiat Biol. 82(4):267–275. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09553000600649232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahya MC, Nazıroğlu M, Çiğ B. 2014. Selenium reduces mobile phone (900 MHz)- induced oxidative stress, mitochondrial function, and apoptosis in breast cancer cells. Biol Trace Elem Res. 160:285–293. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-014-0032-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapdi M, Hoskote SS, Joshi SR. 2008. Health hazards of mobile phones: an Indian perspective. J Assoc Physicians India. 56:893–897.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kapoor NS, Shamonki J, Sim M-S., Chung CT, Giuliano AE. 2013. Impact of Multifocality and Lymph Node Metastasis on the Prognosis and Management of Microinvasive Breast Cancer. Annals of surgical oncology. 20(8):2576–2581. doi: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-2924-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karipidis K, Elwood M, Benke G, Sanagou M, Tjong L, Croft RJ. 2018. Mobile phone use and incidence of brain tumour histological types, grading or anatomical location: a population based ecological study. BMJ Open. 8:024–489. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesari KK, Agarwal A, Henkel R. 2018. Radiations and male fertility. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 16:1. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-018-0431-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesari KK, Juutilainen J, Luukkonen J, Naarala J. 2016. Induction of micronuclei and superoxide production in neuroblastoma and glioma cell lines exposed to weak 50 Hz magnetic fields. J. R. Soc. Interface. 13(114):20150995. doi: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2015.0995.
   Google Scholar
• Kheifets L, Crespi CM, Hooper C, Cockburn M, Amoon AT, Vergara XP. 2017. Residential magnetic fields exposure and childhood leukemia: a population-based case-control study in California. Cancer Causes Control. 28:1117–1123. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-017-0951-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kheifets L, Shimkhada R. 2005. Childhood leukemia and EMF: Review of the epidemiologic evidence. Bioelectromagnetics. 26(7 S7):S51–S59. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1521-186X.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschenlohr H, Ellis P, Hesketh R, Metcalfe J.2012. Gene expression profiles in white blood cells of volunteers exposed to a 50 Hz electromagnetic field. Radiat. Res. 178(3):138–149. doi:https://doi.org/10.1667/rr2859.1
   Google Scholar
• Klaeboe L, Blaasaas KG, Tynes T. 2007. Use of mobile phones in Norway and risk of intracranial tumours. Eur J Cancer Prev. 16:158–164. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/01.cej.0000203616.77183.4c.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocaman A, Altun G, Kaplan AA, Deniz OG, Yurt KK, Kaplan S. 2018. Genotoxic and carcinogenic effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields. Elsevier Inc. p. 0013–9351.
   Google Scholar
• Kohli DR, Sachdev A, Vats HS. 2009. Cell phones and tumor: still in no man’s land. Indian J Cancer. 46:5–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-509X.48589.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koyama S, Takashima Y, Sakurai T, Suzuki Y,Taki M, Miyakoshi J. 2007. Effects of 2.45 GHz electromagnetic fields with a wide range of SARs on bacterial and HPRT gene mutations. J Radiat Res. 48(1): 69–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1269/jrr.06085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Regina M, Moros EG, Pickard WF, Straube WL, Baty J, Roti Roti JL. 2003. The effect of chronic exposure to 835.62 MHz FDMA or 847.74 MHz CDMA radiofrequency radiation on the incidence of spontaneous tumors in rats. Radiat Res. 160:143–151. doi:https://doi.org/10.1667/RR3028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagorio S, Röösli M. 2013. Mobile phone use and risk of intracranial tumors: A consistency analysis. Bioelectromagnetics. 35(2):79–90. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.21829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerchl A, Klose M, Grote K, Wilhelm AF, Spathmann O, Fiedler T, Streckert J, Hansen V, Clemens M, et al. 2015. Tumor promotion by exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields below exposure limits for humans. Biochemica Biophys Res Commun. 459:585–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin JC. 2017. Cancer occurrences in laboratory rats from exposure to RF and microwave radiation. IEEE J Electromagn RF Microw Med Biol. 1:2–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/JERM.2017.2721427.
   Google Scholar
• Litvak E, Foster KR, Repacholi MH. 2002. Health and safety implications of exposure to electromagnetic fields in the frequency range 300 Hz to 10 MHz. Bioelectromagnetics. 23(1):68–82.
   Google Scholar
• Liu YX., Li GQ., Fu XP., Xue JH., Ji SP., Zhang ZW., Zhang Y, Li AM. 2015. Exposure to 3g mobile phone signals does not affect the biological features of brain tumor cells. BMC Public Health. 15(1):764. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1996-7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lönn S, Ahlbom A, Christensen HC, Johansen C, Schüz J, Edström S, Feychting M. 2006. Mobile Phone Use and Risk of Parotid Gland Tumor. American Journal of Epidemiology. 164(7):637–643. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwj242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lönn S, Ahlbom A, Hall P, Feychting M. 2004. Mobile phone use and the risk of acoustic neuroma. Epidemiology. 15(6):653–659. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ede.0000142519.00772.bf.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowenthal RM, Truck DM, Bray IC. 2007. Residential exposure to electric power transmission lines and risk of lymphoproliferative and myeloproliferative disorders: a case-control study. Intern Med J. 37:614–619. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-5994.2007.01389.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu Y-S., Huang B-T., Huang, Y-X. 2012. Reactive Oxygen Species Formation and Apoptosis in Human Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell Induced by 900 MHz Mobile Phone Radiation. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity. 2012:1–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/740280.
   Google Scholar
• Luo J, Li H, Deziel NC, Huang H, Zhao N, Ma S, Ni X, Udelsman R, Zhang Y. 2020. Genetic susceptibility may modify the association between cell phone use and thyroid cancer: A population-based case-control study in Connecticut. Environ Res. 182:1–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.109013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luukkonen J, Juutilainen J, Naarala J. 2010. Combined effects of 872 MHz radiofrequency radiation and ferrous chloride on reactive oxygen species production and DNA damage in human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells cells. Bioelectromagnetics. 31(6):417–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1521-186X.
   Google Scholar
• Maffei ME. 2014. Magnetic field effects on plant growth, development, and 1808 evolution. Front Plant Sci. 5:445. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandeville. 1997. Evaluation of the potential carcinogenicity of 60Hz liner sinusoidal continuous-wave magnetic fields in Fischer F344 rats. FASEBJ. 11:1127–1136. doi:https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.11.13.9367347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormick DL, Boorman GA, Findlay JC, Hailey JR, Johnson TR, Gauger JR, Pletcher JM, Sills RC, Haseman JK. 1999. Chronic toxicity/oncogenicity evaluation of 60 Hz (power frequency) magnetic fields in B6C3F1 mice. Toxicol Pathol. 27(3):279–285. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/019262339902700302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merzenich H, Schmiedel S, Bennack S, Brüggemeyer H, Philipp J, Blettner M, Schuz J. 2008. Childhood leukemia in relation to radio frequency electromagnetic fields in the vicinity of television and radio broadcast transmitters. Am J Epidemiol. 168(10):1169–1178. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwn230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelozzi P, Capon A, Kirchmayer U, Forastiere F, Biggeri A, Barca A, et al. 2002. Adult and childhood leukemia near a high-power radio station in Rome, Italy. Am J Epidemiol. 155:1096–1103. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/155.12.1096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihai CT, Rotinberg P, Brinza F, Vochita G. 2014. Extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields cause DNA strand breaks in normal cells. J Environ Health Sci Eng. 12(1):12–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mild KH, Hardell L, Carlberg M. 2007. Pooled analysis of two Swedish case-control studies on the use of mobile and cordless telephones and the risk of brain tumours diagnosed during 1997-2003. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 13(1):63–71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2007.11076709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller AB, Morgan LL, Udasin I, Davis DL. 2018. Cancer epidemiology update, following the 2011 IARC evaluation of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (Monograph 102). Environmental Research. 167:673–683. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.06.043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moraitis N, Christopoulou M, Nikita KS, Voulgaridou G-P., Anestopoulos I, Panagiotidis MI, Pappa A. 2015. In-vitro assessment of jurkat t-cells response to 1966 mhz electromagnetic fields in a gtem cell. Conf. Proc. Ieee. Eng. Med. Biol. Soc.2015, 2592–2595. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2015.7318922
   Google Scholar
• Morgan LL, Miller AB, Sasco A, Davis DL. 2015. Mobile phone radiation causes brain tumors and should be classified as a probable human carcinogen (2A). Int J Oncol. 46(5):1865–1871. doi:https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2015.2908.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan RW, Kelsh, K Zhao MA, Exuzides KA, Heringer S, Negrete W. 2000. Radiofrequency exposure and mortality from cancer of the brain and lymphatic/hematopoietic systems. Epidemiology. 11(2):118–127.
   Google Scholar
• Muscat JE, Malkin MG, Thompson S, et al. 2000. Handheld cellular telephone use and risk of brain cancer. JAMA. 284:3001–3007. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.284.23.3001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Toxicology Program (NTP). 2011. Specifications for the conduct of studies to evaluate the toxic and carcinogenic potential of chemical, biological and physical agents in laboratory animals for the national toxicology program (NTP). RTP, NC. 196296. http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/Test_Info/FinalNTP_ReproSpecsMay2011_508.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Nazıroğlu M, ÇIğ B, Doğan S, Uğuz A, et al. 2012. 2.45-Gz wireless devices induce oxidative stress and proliferation through cytosolic Ca2+influx in human leukemia cancer cells. Int J Radiat Biol. 88(6):449–456. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/09553002.2012.682192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NTP TR 595. NTP Technical Report on the Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies in Hsd: Sprague Dawley SD Rats Exposed to Whole-Body Radio Frequency Radiation at a Frequency (900 MHz) and Modulations (GSM and CDMA) Used by Cell Phones. 2018a. National Toxicology Program, US Department of Health and Human Services. [accessed 2019 Dec 4]. https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/results/areas/cellphones/index.html
   Google Scholar
• NTPTR 596. 2018b. Technical report on the toxicology and carcinogenesis studies in b6c3f1/n mice exposed to whole-body radio frequency radiation at a frequency (1,900 MHz) and modulations (GSM and CDMA) used by cell phones. [assessed 2020 Jul 20]. https://tellusventure.com/downloads/federal/nih/ntp_technical_report_rf_mice_1nov2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oberto G, Rolfo K, Yu P, Carbonatto M, Peano S, Kuster N, Ebert S, Tofani S. 2007. Carcinogenicity study of 217 Hz pulsed 900 MHz electromagnetic fields in Pim1 transgenic mice. Radiat Res. 168:316–326. doi:https://doi.org/10.1667/rr0425.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2018. Test No. 453: combined Chronic Toxicity/Carcinogenicity Studies, OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4. Paris (France):OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Ouadah NS, Lecomte A, Robidel F, Olsson A, Deltour I, Schüz J, Villégier A-S. 2018. Possible effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields on in vivo C6 brain tumors in Wistar rats. J Neurooncol. 140:539–546. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-018-03012-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozgur E, Güler G. 2010. Measurement of output radio frequency field generated by mobile phones with applied sound in different strengths & frequencies. Gazi Univ J Sci. 23(3):281–286.
   Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos DJ. 2019. Chromosome damage in human cells induced by UMTS mobile telephony radiation. Gen Physiol Biophys. 38:445–454. doi:https://doi.org/10.4149/gpb_2019032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pareja-Peña F, Burgos-Molina AM, Sendra-Portero F, Ruiz-Gómez MJ. 2020. Evidences of the (400 MHz – 3 GHz) radiofrequency electromagnetic field influence on brain tumor induction. Int J Environ Health Res. 1–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2020.1738352.
   Google Scholar
• Paulraj R, Behari J. 2011. Effects of low level microwave radiation on carcinogenesis in Swiss Albino mice. Mol Cell Biochem. 348(1–2):191–197. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11010-010-0654-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce JM. 2020. Limiting liability with positioning to minimize negative health effects of cellular phone towers. Environ Res. 181:1–3. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.108845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prabhakara A, Tiwarib A, Pathak VK. 2017. Study of various generation and bandwidth sharing issues in mobile network. Adv Wireless Mobile Commun. 10(5):913–924.
   Google Scholar
• Prasad M, Kathuria P, Nair P, Kumar A, Prasad K. 2017. Mobile phone use and risk of brain tumours: a systematic review of association between study quality, source of funding, and research outcomes. Neurol Scie. 38:797–810. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-017-2850-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rafiqi SI, Kumar S, Chaudhary R, Farooq UB, Kirthika P. 2016. Mobile Phone Radiations and Its Impact on Birds, Animals and Human Beings. Trends in Veterinary and Animal Sciences. 3:24–27.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, A, Glass DC, Bailey HD, Milne E, de Klerk NH, Fritschi L. 2011. Risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia following parental occupational exposure to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields. British Journal of Cancer. 105(9):1409–1413. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Repacholi MH. 1998. Low-level exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields: health effects and research needs. Bioelectromagnetics. 19:1–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-186X(1998)19:1<1::AID-BEM1>3.0.CO;2-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Repacholi MH, Basten A, Gebski V, Noonan D, Finnie J, Harris AW. 1997. Lymphomas in E mu-Pim1 transgenic mice exposed to pulsed 900 MHZ electromagnetic fields. Radiat Res. 147:631–640. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3579630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter ED, Berman T, Levy O. 2002. Brain cancer with induction periods of less than 10 years in young military radar workers. Arch Environ Health. 57:270–272. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00039890209601409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman KJ, Loughlin JE, Funch DP, Dreyer NA. 1996. Overall mortality of cellular telephone customers. Epidemiology. 7:303–305. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00001648-199605000-00015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roux D, Vian A, Girard S, Bonnet P, Paladian F, Davies E, Ledoigt G. 2008. High frequency (900 MHz) low amplitude (5 V m-1) electromagnetic field: a genuine environmental stimulus that affects transcription, translation, calcium and energy charge in tomato. Planta. 227:883–891. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-007-0664-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadetzki S, Chetrit A, Jarus-Hakak A, Cardis E, Deutch Y, Duvdevani S, Zultan A, Novikov I, Freedman L, Wolf M, et al. 2002. Cellular phone use and risk of benign and malignant parotid gland tumors—a nationwide case-control study. Am J Epidemiol. 167:457–467. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwm325.
   Google Scholar
• Sadetzki S, Langer CE, Bruchim R, Kundi M, Merletti F, Vermeulen R, Sim MR. 2014. The MOBI-kids study protocol: challenges in assessing childhood and adolescent exposure to electromagnetic fields from wireless telecommunication technologies and possible association with brain tumor risk. Fron Public Health. 2:124. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2014.00124.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Safian F, Khalili MA, Khoradmehr A, Anbari F, Soltani S, Halvaei I. 2016. Survival assessment of mouse preimplantation embryos after exposure to cell phone radiation. J. Reprod. Infertil. 17:138–143.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sage C, Carpenter DO, editors. 2012. A rationale for a biologically-based exposure standard for electromagneticfields (ELF and RF) BioInitiative Working Group. 2012. [accessed Dec 23 2019]. http://www.bioinitiative.org.
   Google Scholar
• Sahin D, Ozgur E, Guler G, Tomruk A, Unlu I, Sepici-Dinçel A, Seyhan N. 2016. The 2100 mhz radiofrequency radiation of a 3g-mobile phone and the DNA oxidative damage in brain.  J. Chem. Neuroanat. 75:94–98. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchemneu.2016.01.002.
   Google Scholar
• Sajedifar J, Nassiri P, Monazzam MR, Shamsipour M, Ramezani R. 2019. The effect of battery charge levels of Mobile phone on the amount of Electromagnetic waves emission. J Environ Health Sci Eng. 17(1):151–159. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-019-00336-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saliev T, Begimbetova D, Masoud AR, Matkarimov B. 2019. Biological effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields: two sides of a coin. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 141:25–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2018.07.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sannino A, Zeni O, Romeo S, Massa R, Scarfi MR. 2017. Adverse and beneficial effects in Chinese hamster lung fibroblast cells following radiofrequency exposure. Bioelectromagnetics. 38(4):245–254. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.22034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sannino A, Zeni O, Sarti M, Romeo S, Reddy SB, Belisario MA, Prihoda TJ, Vijayalaxmi, Scarfi MR. 2011. Induction of adaptive response in human blood lymphocytes exposed to 900 MHz radiofrequency fields: influence of cell cycle. Int J Radiat Biol. 87:993–999. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/09553002.2011.574779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoemaker MJ, Swerdlow AJ, Ahlbom A, Auvinen A, Blaasaas KG, Cardis E, Christensen HC, Feychting M, Hepworth SJ, Johansen C, et al. 2005. Mobile phone use and risk of acoustic neuroma: results of the Interphone case-control study in five North European countries. Br J Cancer. 93:842–848. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602764.
   Google Scholar
• Schoeni A, Roser K, Röösli M. 2015. Symptoms and cognitive functions in adolescents in relation to mobile phone use during night. PloS One. 10(7):e0133528. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seada MA, Elkholy SE, Meshrif WS. 2016. Does the cellphone radio-frequency electromagnetic radiation during ringing or talking modes induce locomotor disturbance in Drosophila melanogaster? Afr Zool. 51(1):53–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15627020.2016.1151828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin JC, Kim J, Grigsby-Toussaint D. 2017. Mobile phone interventions for sleep disorders and sleep quality: systematic review Journal of Medical Internet Research. 5 9(9):131. 5 193 doi:https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.7244
   Google Scholar
• Shirai T, Ichihara T, Wake K, Watanabe S, Yamanaka Y, Kawabe M, Taki M, Fujiwara O, Wang J, Takahashi S, et al. 2007. Lack of promoting effects of chronic exposure to 1.95-GHz W-CDMA signals for IMT-2000 cellular system on development of N-ethylnitrosourea-induced central nervous system tumors in F344 rats. Bioelectromagnetics. 28(7):562–572. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.20324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shojaeifard MB, Jarideh S, Owjfard M, Nematollahii S, Talaei-Khozani T, Malekzadeh S. 2018. Electromagnetic fields of mobile phone jammer exposure on blood factors in rats. J Biomed Phys Eng. 8(4):403–408. doi:https://doi.org/10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.912.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Singh R, Nath R, Mathur AK, Sharma RS. 2018. Effect of radiofrequency radiation on reproductive health. Indian J Med Res. 148(1):92–99.
   Google Scholar
• Smith P, Kuster N, Ebert S, Chevalier HJ. 2007. GSM and DCS wireless communication signals: combined chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity study in the Wistar rat. Radiat Res. 168:480–492. doi:https://doi.org/10.1667/RR0680.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith-Roe SL, Wyde ME, Stout MD, Winters JW, Hobbs CA, Shepard KG, Green AS, Kissling GE, Shockley KR, Tice RR, et al. 2020. Evaluation of the genotoxicity of cell phone radiofrequency radiation in male and female rats and mice following subchronic exposure. Environ Mol Mutagen. 61:276–290. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/em.22343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommer AM, Bitz AK, Streckert J, Hansen VW, Lerchl A. 2007. Lymphoma development in mice chronically exposed to UMTS-modulated radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. Radiation Research. 168(1):72–80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1667/RR0857.1.
   Google Scholar
• Sommer AM, Streckert J, Bitz AK, Hansen VW, Lerchl A. 2004. No effects of GSM-modulated 900 MHz electromagnetic fields on survival rate and spontaneous development of lymphoma in female AKR/J mice. BMC Cancer. 4:77. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-4-77. 1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sun C, Wei X, Fei Y, Su L, Zhao X, Chen G, Xu Z. 2016. Mobile phone signal exposure triggers a hormesis-like effect in Atm +/+ and Atm −/− mouse embryonic fibroblasts. Scientific Reports. 6:37423. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep37423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabrizi MM, Hosseini SA. 2015. Role of Electromagnetic Field Exposure in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and No Impact of Urinary Alpha-Amylase - a Case Control Study in Tehran, Iran. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 16(17):7613–7618. doi:https://doi.org/10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.17.7613.
   Google Scholar
• Talib SH, Pritam P, Nikam P. 2010. Mobile phone and health hazards. Journal, Indian Academy of Clinical Medicine. 11(3):212–219.
   Google Scholar
• Teepen, JC, van Dijck Jos A.A.M. 2012. Impact of high electromagnetic field levels on childhood leukemia incidence. Int. J. Canc.  131(4):769–778. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.27542.
   Google Scholar
• Terwilliger T, Abdul-Hay M. 2017. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a comprehensive review and 2017 update. Blood Cancer Journal. 7(6):577. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/bcj.2017.53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). 2011. Monographs on the identification of carcinogenic hazards to humans. International Agency for Research on Cancer. [accessed 2020 May 02].
   Google Scholar
• Thun-Battersby S, Mevissen M, Loscher W. 1999. Exposure of Sprague-Dawley rats to a 50-hertz, 100-microtesla magnetic field for 27 weeks facilitates mammary tumorigenesis in the 7, 12-dimethylbenz[a]-anthracene model of breast cancer. Cancer Research 59(15):3627–3633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillmann T, Ernst H, Ebert S, Kuster N, Behnke W, Rittinghausen S, Dasenbrock C. 2007. Carcinogenicity study of GSM and DCS wireless communication signals in B6C3F1 mice. Bioelectromagnetics. 28:173–187. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.20283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillmann T, Ernst H, Streckert J, Zhou Y, Taugner F, Hansen V, Dasenbrock C. 2010. Indication of cocarcinogenic potential of chronic UMTS-modulated radiofrequency exposure in an ethyl-nitrosourea mouse model. Int J Radiat Bio. l86:529–541. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/09553001003734501.
   Google Scholar
• Tynes T, Hannevik M, Andersen A, Vistnes AI, Haldorsen T. 1996. Incidence of breast cancer in Norwegian female radio and telegraph operators. Cancer Causes Control. 7(2):197–204. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00051295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valera ET, Brassesco MS, Tone LG. 2014. Electromagnetic fields at extremely low frequencies and the risk for childhood leukemia: Do we have enough information to warrant this association?. Leuk. Res.  38(3):289. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2013.12.024.
   Google Scholar
• Volkow ND, Tomasi D, Wang G-J. 2011. Effects of cell phone radiofrequency signal exposure on brain glucose metabolism. J Am Med Assoc. 305:808–813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldmann P, Bohnenberger S, Greinert R, Hermann-Then B, Heselich A, Klug SJ, Koenig J, Kuhr K, Kuster N, Merker M, et al. 2013. Influence of GSM signals on human peripheral lymphocytes: study of Genotoxicity. Radiat Res. 179(2):243–253. doi:https://doi.org/10.1667/RR2914.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Su H, Xie W, Yu S. 2017. Mobile Phone Use and The Risk of Headache: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cross-sectional Studies. Sci Rep. 7(1):12595. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12802-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang X, Liu C, Ma Q, Feng W, Yang L, Lu Y, Zhang L. 2015. 8-oxoG DNA Glycosylase-1 Inhibition Sensitizes Neuro-2a Cells to Oxidative DNA Base Damage Induced by 900 MHz Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation. Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry. 37(3):1075–1088. doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000430233.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• West JG, Kapoor NS, Liao S-Y., Chen JW, Bailey L, Nagourney RA. 2013. Multifocal breast cancer in young women with prolonged contact between their breasts and their cellular phones. Case Reports in Medicine. 354682 354682 2013:1-5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/354682
   Google Scholar
• Williams PA, Ingebretsen RJ, Dawson RJ. 2006. 14.6 mT ELF magnetic field exposure yields no DNA breaks in model system Salmonella, but provides evidence of heat stress protection. Bioelectromagnetics. 27:445–450. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.20210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyde M, Cesta M, Blystone C, Elmore S, Foster P, Hooth M, Kissling G, Malarkey D, Sills R, Stout M. 2016. Report of partial findings from the national toxicology program carcinogenesis studies of cell phone radiofrequency radiation in Hsd: Sprague Dawley® SD rats (Whole Body Exposures). US National Toxicology Program (NTP).
   Google Scholar
• Yang M, Guo W, Yang C, Tang J, Huang Q, Feng S, Jiang A, Xu X, Jiang G. 2017. Mobile phone use and glioma risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 12(5):e0175136. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz F, Dasdag S, Akdag MZ, Kilinc N. 2008. Whole-body exposure of radiation emitted from 900 MHz mobile phones does not seem to affect the levels of anti-apoptotic bcl-2 protein. Electromagn Biol Med. 27:65–72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15368370701878978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao TY, Zou SP, Knapp PE. 2007. Exposure to cell phone radiation up-regulates apoptosis genes in primary cultures of neurons and astrocytes. Neurosci Lett. 412(1):34–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2006.09.092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zilberlicht A, Wiener-Megnazi Z, Sheinfeld Y, Grach B, Lahav-Baratz S, Dirnfeld M. 2015. Habits of cell phone usage and sperm quality – does it warrant attention? Reprod Biomed Online. 31(3):421–426. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.06.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman JW, Pennison MJ, Brezovich I, Yi N, Yang CT, Ramaker R, Absher D, Myers RM, Kuster N, Costa FP, et al. 2012. Cancer cell proliferation is inhibited by specific modulation frequencies. Br J Cancer. 106(2):307–313. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zook BC, Simmens SJ. 2001. The effects of 860 MHz radiofrequency radiation on the induction or promotion of brain tumors and other neoplasms in rats. Radiation Research. 155:572–583. 4 doi:https://doi.org/10.1667/0033-7587(2001)155[0572:TEOMRR]2.0.CO;2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zook BC, Simmens SJ. 2006. The effects of pulsed 860 MHz radiofrequency radiation on the promotion of neurogenic tumors in rats. Radiat Res. 165(5):608–615. doi:https://doi.org/10.1667/RR3551.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zothansiama ZM, Lalramdinpuii M, Jagetia GC. 2017. Impact of radiofrequency radiation on DNA damage and antioxidants in peripheral blood lymphocytes of humans residing in the vicinity of mobile phone base stations. Electromagn Biol Med. 36:295–305. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15368378.2017.1350584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar