The role of non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation on female fertility: A review

References

• Aburawi S, Abusaida H, El Jaafari H, Alkayed F, Shibani N, Dali A, Shalabi, S, Ayad, M, Altaboni O. 2020. Effect of mobile phone radiation on reproductive system and behavior using female albino mice. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4289221–AJMAS.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmadi SS, Khaki AA, Ainehchi N, Alihemmati A, Khatooni AA, Khaki A, Asghari A. 2016. Effect of non-ionizing electromagnetic field on the alteration of ovarian follicles in rats. Electron Physician. 8(3):2168–2174. doi:10.19082/2168.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ahmadi SS, Khaki AA, Alihemmati A, Rajabzadeh A, Giasi GS. 2017. The effects of 50 Hz electromagnetic fields induction of apoptosis in rat follicles. Crescent J Med Biol Sci. 4:64–68.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Akhras MA. 2008. Influence of 50 Hz magnetic field on sex hormones and body, uterine, and ovarian weights of adult female rats. Electromagn Biol Med. 27(2):155–163. doi:10.1080/15368370802072125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Akhras MA, Elbetieha A, Hasan MK, Al-Omari I, Darmani H, Albiss B. 2001. Effects of extremely low frequency magnetic field on fertility of adult male and female rats. Bioelectromagnetics. 22(5):340–344. doi:10.1002/bem.59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Asmakh M. 2007. Reproductive functions of progesterone. Middle East Fertil Soc J. 12(3):147.
   Google Scholar
• Alekperov SI, Suetov AA, Efremov VI, Kimstach AN, Lavrenenok LV. 2019. The effect of electromagnetic fields of extremely low frequency 30 Hz on rat ovaries. Bull Exp Biol Med. 166(5):704–707. doi:10.1007/s10517-019-04422-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asghari A, Khaki AA, Rajabzadeh A, Khaki A. 2016. A review on Electromagnetic fields (EMFs) and the reproductive system. Electron Physician. 8(7):2655–2662. doi:10.19082/2655.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aydin M, Cevik A, Kandemir FM, Yuksel M, Apaydin AM. 2009. Evaluation of hormonal change, biochemical parameters, and histopathological status of uterus in rats exposed to 50-Hz electromagnetic field. Toxicol Ind Health. 25(3):153–158. doi:10.1177/0748233709102717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azimipour F, Zavareh S, Lashkarbolouki T. 2020. The effect of radiation emitted by cell phone on the gelatinolytic activity of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -9 of mouse pre-antral follicles during in vitro culture. Cell J. 22(1):1–8. doi:10.22074/cellj.2020.6548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagavandoss P. 1998. Differential distribution of gelatinases and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 in the rat ovary. J Endocrinol. 158(2):221–228. doi:10.1677/joe.0.1580221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakacak M, Bostancı MS, Attar R, Yıldırım ÖK, Yıldırım G, Bakacak Z, Sayar H, Han A. 2015. The effects of electromagnetic fields on the number of ovarian primordial follicles: an experimental study. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 31(6):287–292. doi:10.1016/j.kjms.2015.03.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belyaev I. 2005. Nonthermal biological effects of microwaves: current knowledge, further perspective, and urgent needs. Electromagn Biol Med. 24(3):375–403. doi:10.1080/15368370500381844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernabò N, Tettamanti E, Russo V, Martelli A, Turriani M, Mattoli M, Barboni B. 2010. Extremely low frequency electromagnetic field exposure affects fertilization outcome in swine animal model. Theriogenology. 73(9):1293–1305. doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.12.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biri A, Bozkurt N, Turp A, Kavutcu M, Himmetoglu Ö, Durak İ. 2007. Role of oxidative stress in intrauterine growth restriction. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 64(4):187–192. doi:10.1159/000106488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borhani N, Rajaei F, Salehi Z, Javadi A. 2011. Analysis of DNA fragmentation in mouse embryos exposed to an extremely low-frequency electromagnetic field. Electromagn Biol Med. 30(4):246–252. doi:10.3109/15368378.2011.589556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budani MC, Tiboni GM. 2021. Novel insights on the role of nitric oxide in the ovary: a review of the literature. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 18(3):980. doi:10.3390/ijerph18030980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchard JF, Nguyen DH, Block E. 1998. Progesterone concentrations during estrous cycle of dairy cows exposed to electric and magnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics. 19(7):438–443. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1521-186X(1998)19:7<438:AID-BEM6>3.0.CO;2-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burcu A, Nevin E, Ilkay A, Amac K, Alper BH, Muge K. 2020. The effects of prenatal and postnatal exposure to electromagnetic field on rat ovarian tissue. Toxicol Ind Health. 36(12):1010–1018. doi:10.1177/0748233720973136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao Y-N, Zhang Y, Liu Y. 2006. Effects of exposure to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields on reproduction of female mice and development of offsprings. Chin J Ind Hyg Occup Dis. 24(8):468–470.
   Google Scholar
• Cecconi S, Gualtieri G, Di Bartolomeo A, Troiani G, Cifone MG, Canipari R. 2000. Evaluation of the effects of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields on mammalian follicle development. Hum Reprod. 15(11):2319–2325. doi:10.1093/humrep/15.11.2319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cinelli MA, Do HT, Miley GP, Silverman RB. 2020. Inducible nitric oxide synthase: Regulation, structure, and inhibition. Med Res Rev. 40(1):158–189. doi:10.1002/med.21599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke RG 3rd, Nothnick WB, Komar C, Burns P, Curry TE Jr. 1999. Collagenase and gelatinase messenger ribonucleic acid expression and activity during follicular development in the rat ovary. Biol Reprod. 61(5):1309–1316. doi:10.1095/biolreprod61.5.1309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Ambrosio G, Massa R, Scarfi MR, Zeni O 2002. Cytogenetic damage in human lymphocytes following GMSK phase modulated microwave exposure. Bioelectromagnetics. 23(1):7–13. doi:10.1002/bem.93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasdag S, Taş M, Akdag MZ, Yegin K. 2015. Effect of long-term exposure of 2.4 ghz radiofrequency radiation emitted from Wi-Fi equipment on testes functions. Electromagn Biol Med. 34(1):37–42. doi:10.3109/15368378.2013.869752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson BV, Robertson IG, Wilson WR, Zwi LJ, Boys JT, Green AW. 1998. Evaluation of potential health effects of 10 kHz magnetic fields: a rodent reproductive study. Bioelectromagnetics. 19(3):162–171. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1521-186X(1998)19:3%3C162::AID-BEM4%3E3.0.CO;2-%23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirel S, Doganay S, Turkoz Y, Dogan Z, Turan B, Firat PG. 2012. Effects of third generation mobile phone-emitted electromagnetic radiation on oxidative stress parameters in eye tissue and blood of rats. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 31(2):89–94. doi:10.3109/15569527.2012.657725.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diem E, Schwarz C, Adlkofer F, Jahn O, Rüdiger H. 2005. Non-Thermal DNA breakage by mobile-phone radiation (1800 MHz) in human fibroblasts and in transformed GFSH-R17 rat granulosa cells in vitro. Mutat Res. 583(2):178–183. doi:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2005.03.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drummond AE, Findlay JK. 1999. The role of estrogen in folliculogenesis. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 151(1–2):57–64. doi:10.1016/s0303-7207(99)00038-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durusoy R, Hassoy H, Özkurt A, Karababa AO. 2017. Mobile phone use, school electromagnetic field levels and related symptoms: a cross-sectional survey among 2150 high school students in Izmir. Environ Health. 16(1):51. doi:10.1186/s12940-017-0257-x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eskander EF, Estefan SF, Abd-Rabou AA. 2012. How does long term exposure to base stations and mobile phones affect human hormone profiles? Clin Biochem. 45(1–2):157–161. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2011.11.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esmailzadeh S, Delavar MA, Aleyassin A, Gholamian SA, Ahmadi A. 2019. Exposure to electromagnetic fields of high voltage overhead power lines and female infertility. Int J Occup Environ Med. 10(1):11–16. doi:10.15171/ijoem.2019.1429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gul A, Celebi H, Uğraş S. 2009. The effects of microwave emitted by cellular phones on ovarian follicles in rats. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 280(5):729–733. doi:10.1007/s00404-009-0972-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guney M, Ozguner F, Oral B, Karahan N, Mungan T. 2007. 900 MHz radiofrequency-induced histopathologic changes and oxidative stress in rat endometrium: protection by vitamins E and C. Toxicol Ind Health. 23(7):411–420. doi:10.1177/0748233707080906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Agarwal A, Banerjee J, Alvarez JG. 2007. The role of oxidative stress in spontaneous abortion and recurrent pregnancy loss: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 62(5):335–354. doi:10.1097/01.ogx.0000261644.89300.df.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Sharma RS, Singh R. 2020. Non-Ionizing radiation as possible carcinogen. Int J Environ Health Res. 1–25 . Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/09603123.2020.1806212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gye MC, Park CJ. 2012. Effect of electromagnetic field exposure on the reproductive system. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 39(1):1–9. doi:10.5653/cerm.2012.39.1.1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Han J, Cao Z, Liu X, Zhang W, Zhang S. 2010. Effect of early pregnancy electromagnetic field exposure on embryo growth ceasing. J Hyg Res. 39(3):349–352.
   Google Scholar
• IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. 2013. Non-Ionizing radiation, part 2: radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 102(Pt 2):1–460.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. 2020. Guidelines for limiting exposure to electromagnetic fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz). Health Phys. 118(5):483–524. doi:10.1097/HP.0000000000001210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson LW, Schisterman EF, Dey-Rao R, Browne R, Armstrong D. 2005. Oxidative stress and endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 20(7):2014–2020. doi:10.1093/humrep/dei001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung KA, Ahn HS, Lee YS, Gye MC. 2007. Effect of a 20 kHz sawtooth magnetic field exposure on the estrous cycle in mice. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 17(3):398–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juutilainen J. 2005. Developmental effects of electromagnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics. Suppl 26(S7):S107–S115. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.20125.
   Google Scholar
• Kesari KK, Agarwal A, Henkel R. 2018. Radiations and male fertility. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 16(1):118. doi:10.1186/s12958-018-0431-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khaki AA, Khaki A, Ahmadi SS. 2016. The effect of non- ionizing electromagnetic field with a frequency of 50 Hz in rat ovary: a transmission electron microscopy study. Int J Reprod Biomed. 14(2):125–132.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khalil AM, Abu Khadra KM, Aljaberi AM, Gagaa MH, Issa HS. 2014. Assessment of oxidant/antioxidant status in saliva of cell phone users. Electromagn Biol Med. 33(2):92–97. doi:10.3109/15368378.2013.783855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SH, Song JE, Kim SR, Oh H, Gimm YM, Yoo DS, Pack JK, Lee YS. 2004. Teratological studies of prenatal exposure of mice to a 20 kHz sawtooth magnetic field. Bioelectromagnetics. 25(2):114–117. doi:10.1002/bem.10164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasley BL, Wang CF, Yen SS. 1975. The effects of estrogen and progesterone on the functional capacity of the gonadotrophs. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 41(5):820–826. doi:10.1210/jcem-41-5-820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis RC, Hauser R, Maynard AD, Neitzel RL, Wang L, Kavet R, Meeker JD. 2016. Exposure to power-frequency magnetic fields and the risk of infertility and adverse pregnancy outcomes: update on the human evidence and recommendations for future study designs. J Toxicol Environ Health Part B. 19(1):29–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2015.1134370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marci R, Mallozzi M, Di Benedetto L, Schimberni M, Mossa S, Soave I, Palomba S, Caserta D. 2018. Radiations and female fertility. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 16(1):112. doi:10.1186/s12958-018-0432-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mitchell LM, Kennedy CR, Hartshorne GM. 2004. Expression of nitric oxide synthase and effect of substrate manipulation of the nitric oxide pathway in mouse ovarian follicles. Hum Reprod. 19(1):30–40. doi:10.1093/humrep/deh032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negi P, Singh R. 2021. Association between reproductive health and nonionizing radiation exposure. Electromagn Biol Med. 40(1):92–102. doi:10.1080/15368378.2021.1874973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohnishi Y, Mizuno F, Sato T, Yasui M, Kikuchi T, Ogawa M. 2002. Effects of power frequency alternating magnetic fields on reproduction and pre-natal development of mice. J Toxicol Sci. 27(3):131–138. doi:10.2131/jts.27.131.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Okatan DÖ, Kaya H, Aliyazıcıoğlu Y, Demir S, Çolakoğlu S, Odacı E. 2018. Continuous 900-megahertz electromagnetic field applied in middle and late-adolescence causes qualitative and quantitative changes in the ovarian morphology, tissue and blood biochemistry of the rat. Int J Radiat Biol. 94(2):186–198. doi:10.1080/09553002.2018.1420924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oral B, Guney M, Ozguner F, Karahan N, Mungan T, Comlekci S, Cesur G. 2006. Endometrial apoptosis induced by a 900-MHz mobile phone: preventive effects of vitamins E and C. Adv Ther. 23(6):957–973. doi:10.1007/BF02850217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos DJ, Chavdoula ED, Nezis IP, Margaritis LH. 2007. Cell death induced by GSM 900-MHz and DCS 1800-MHz mobile telephony radiation. Mutat Res. 626(1–2):69–78. doi:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2006.08.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos DJ, Karabarbounis A, Margaritis LH. 2004. Effect of GSM 900-MHz mobile phone radiation on the reproductive capacity of Drosophila melanogaster. Electromagn Biol Med. 23(1):29–43. doi:10.1081/JBC-120039350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulletier de Gannes F, Billaudel B, Haro E, Taxile M, Le Montagner L, Hurtier A, Ait Aissa S, Masuda H, Percherancier Y, Ruffié G, et al. 2013. Rat fertility and embryo fetal development: influence of exposure to the Wi-Fi signal. Reprod Toxicol. 36:1–5. doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2012.11.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezk AY, Abdulqawi K, Mustafa RM, Abo El-Azm TM, Al-Inany H. 2008. Fetal and neonatal responses following maternal exposure to mobile phones. Saudi Med J. 29(2):218–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez M, Petitclerc D, Burchard JF, Nguyen DH, Block E. 2004. Blood melatonin and prolactin concentrations in dairy cows exposed to 60 Hz electric and magnetic fields during 8 h photoperiods. Bioelectromagnetics. 25(7):508–515. doi:10.1002/bem.20024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez M, Petitclerc D, Burchard JF, Nguyen DH, Block E, Downey BR. 2003. Responses of the estrous cycle in dairy cows exposed to electric and magnetic fields (60 Hz) during 8-h photoperiods. Anim Reprod Sci. 77(1–2):11–20. doi:10.1016/s0378-4320(02)00273-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roshangar L, Hamdi BA, Khaki AA, Rad JS, Soleimani-Rad S. 2014. Effect of low-frequency electromagnetic field exposure on oocyte differentiation and follicular development. Adv Biomed Res. 3(1):76. https://doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.125874.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roushangar L, Rad JS. 2007. Ultrastructural alterations and occurrence of apoptosis in developing follicles exposed to low frequency electromagnetic field in rat ovary. Pak J Biol Sci. 10(24):4413–4419. doi:10.3923/pjbs.2007.4413.4419.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sadeghi T, Ahmadi A, Javadian M, Gholamian SA, Delavar MA, Esmailzadeh S, Ahmadi B, Hadighi M. 2017. Preterm birth among women living within 600 meters of high voltage overhead power lines: a case-control study. Rom J Intern Med. 55(3):145–150. doi:10.1515/rjim-2017-0017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagioglou NE, Manta AK, Giannarakis IK, Skouroliakou AS, Margaritis LH. 2016. Apoptotic cell death during Drosophila oogenesis is differentially increased by electromagnetic radiation depending on modulation, intensity and duration of exposure. Electromagn Biol Med. 35(1):40–53. doi:10.3109/15368378.2014.971959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sangun O, Dundar B, Darici H, Comlekci S, Doguc DK, Celik S. 2015. The effects of long-term exposure to a 2450 mhz electromagnetic field on growth and pubertal development in female Wistar rats. Electromagn Biol Med. 34(1):63–71. doi:10.3109/15368378.2013.871619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahin S, Singh SP, Chaturvedi CM. 2017. Mobile phone (1800mhz) radiation impairs female reproduction in mice, Mus musculus, through stress induced inhibition of ovarian and uterine activity. Reprod Toxicol. 73:41–60. doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2017.08.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirai T, Wang J, Kawabe M, Wake K, Watanabe SI, Takahashi S, Fujiwara O. 2017. No adverse effects detected for simultaneous whole-body exposure to multiple-frequency radiofrequency electromagnetic fields for rats in the intrauterine and pre- and post-weaning periods. J Radiat Res. 58(1):48–58. doi:10.1093/jrr/rrw085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh R, Nath R, Mathur AK, Sharma RS. 2018. Effect of radiofrequency radiation on reproductive health. Indian J Med Res. 148(Suppl):S92–S99 . PMID: 30964085; PMCID: PMC6469375. doi:10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1056_18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tenorio FD, Simões M, Teixeira VW, Teixeira ÁA. 2015. Effects of melatonin and prolactin in reproduction: review of literature. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 61(3):269–274. doi:10.1590/1806-9282.61.03.269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Türedi S, Hancı H, Çolakoğlu S, Kaya H, Odacı E. 2016. Disruption of the ovarian follicle reservoir of prepubertal rats following prenatal exposure to a continuous 900-MHz electromagnetic field. Int J Radiat Biol. 92(6):329–337. doi:10.3109/09553002.2016.1152415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu YQ, Zheng NX, Li BH, Zhang WC, Lin XG, Wang JL, Chen GX. 2009. Zhonghua lao dong wei sheng zhi ye bing za zhi = Zhonghua laodong weisheng zhiyebing zazhi =. Chin J Ind Hyg Occup Dis. 27(9):544–548.
   Google Scholar
• Yadav H, Rai U, Singh R. 2021. Radiofrequency radiation: a possible threat to male fertility. Reprod Toxicol. 100:90–100. doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2021.01.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamashita H, Hata K, Yamaguchi H, Tsurita G, Wake K, Watanabe S, Taki M, Ueno S, Nagawa H. 2010. Short-Term exposure to a 1439-MHz TDMA signal exerts no estrogenic effect in rats. Bioelectromagnetics. 31(7):573–575. doi:10.1002/bem.20593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yüksel M, Nazıroğlu M, Özkaya MO. 2016. Long-Term exposure to electromagnetic radiation from mobile phones and Wi-Fi devices decreases plasma prolactin, progesterone, and estrogen levels but increases uterine oxidative stress in pregnant rats and their offspring. Endocrine. 52(2):352–362. doi:10.1007/s12020-015-0795-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar