Beatrice Edgell’s myth of the given

Bibliography

• Atiq, Emad. “Acquaintance, Knowledge, and Value”. Synthese 199 (2021): 14035–62. doi:10.1007/s11229-021-03409-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broad, C. D. “Is There ‘Knowledge by Acquaintance’?”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 2 (1919): 206–20. doi: 10.2307/2105664.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, Siobhan. Susan Stebbing and the Language of Common Sense. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, Matt. “Knowledge of Things”. Synthese 197 (2020): 3559–92. doi:10.1007/s11229-018-01904-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgell, Beatrice. “Is There ‘Knowledge by Acquaintance’?”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 2 (1919): 194–205. doi: 10.2307/2105664.
   Google Scholar
• Edgell, Beatrice. “The Implications of Recognition”. Mind 27, no. 106 (1918): 174–87. doi: 10.1093/mind/xxvii.2.174.
   Google Scholar
• Edgell, Beatrice. “The Implications of Recognition”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 16, no. 1 (1915): 179–89. doi: 10.1093/aristotelian/16.1.179.
   Google Scholar
• von Ehrenfels, Christian. “On Gestalt Qualities”. In Foundations of Gestalt Theory. Translated by Barry Smith, edited by Barry Smith. Munich and Vienna: Philosophia Verlag, 1988. (Originally published 1890)
   Google Scholar
• Felappi, Giulia. “‘It is Quite Conceivable that Judgment is a Very Complicated Phenomenon’: Dorothy Wrinch, Nonsense and the Multiple Relation Theory of Judgement”. British Journal of the History of Philosophy 30, no. 2 (2022): 250–66. doi:10.1080/09608788.2021.1888694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, Cristopher. “Phenomenal Presence”. In Phenomenal Intentionality, edited by Uriah Kriegel, 71–92. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Giustina, Anna. “Introspective Knowledge by Acquaintance”. Synthese 200 (2022): 128. doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03578-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, H. L. A. “Is There Knowledge by Acquaintance?” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary 23 (1949): 69–90. doi: 10.1093/aristoteliansupp/23.1.69.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, G. Dawes. “Is There ‘Knowledge by Acquaintance’?”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 2 (1919): 159–78. doi: 10.2307/2105664.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, G. Dawes. “The Basis of Critical Realism”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 17, no. 1 (1917): 300–59. doi:10.1093/aristotelian/17.1.300.
   Google Scholar
• Katzav, Joel. “Grace de Laguna’s Analytic and Speculative Philosophy”. Australasian Philosophical Review (forthcoming).
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, Jonathan, and Thomas Raleigh. Acquaintance: New Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, G. E. “Is There ‘Knowledge by Acquaintance’?”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 2 (1919): 179–93. doi: 10.2307/2105664.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, G. E. “The Implications of Recognition”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 16, no. 1 (1915): 201–23. doi: 10.1093/aristotelian/16.1.179.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, DeWitt H. “Knowledge by Acquaintance”. Philosophical Review 54, no. 1 (1945): 1–18. doi: 10.2307/2181584.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, Josh. “Distributional Properties”. In Lewisian Themes: The Philosophy of David K. Lewis, edited by Frank Jackson, and Graham Priest, 173–80. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Ranalli, Chris. “Knowledge of Things and Aesthetic Testimony”. Inquiry forthcoming. doi: 10.1080/0020174X.2023.2177339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, Bertrand. “Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 11, no. 1 (1910): 108–28. doi: 10.1093/aristotelian/11.1.108.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, Bertrand. “The Ultimate Constituents of Matter”. The Monist 25, no. 3 (1915): 399–417. doi:10.5840/monist191525326.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, Bertrand. Our Knowledge of the External World. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1914.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, Bertrand. The Problems of Philosophy. New York: Holt and London: William and Norgate, 1912.
   Google Scholar
• Sellars, Wilfrid. “Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind”. In Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, I: Foundations of Science and the Concepts of Psychology and Psychoanalysis, edited by Herbert Feigl, and Michael Scriven, 253–329. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1956. Reprinted as Ch.5 in Wilfrid Sellars, Science, Perception, and Reality, 127–196. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Press, 1963.
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, Elizabeth R. “Beatrice Edgell: An Appreciation”. British Journal of Psychology 92, no. 1 (2001): 23–36. doi:10.1348/000712601162086.
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, Elizabeth R. Beatrice Edgell: Pioneer Woman Psychologist. New York: Nova Science Publishers, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Wertheimer, Max. “Experimental Studies on Seeing Motion”. In On Perceived Motion and Figural Organization. Translated by ⁣Michael Wertheimer and K.W. Watkins. Ch.1 in Max Wertheimer, 1–92. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1912/2012.
   Google Scholar