Buckwheat starch: structure, functionality and enzyme in vitro susceptibility upon the roasting process

References

• AACC Report. 2001. The definition of dietary fibre. Cereal Foods World, 46:112–126.
   Google Scholar
• Acquistucci R, Fornal J. Italian buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum) starch: Physico-chemical and functional characterization and in vitro digestibility. Nahrung 1997; 41: 281–284
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Akerberg A, Liljeberg H, Granfeldt Y, Drews A, Bjorck I. An in vitro method, based on chewing, to predict resistant starch content in foods allows parallel determination of potentially available starch and dietary fiber. J Nutr 1998; 128: 651–660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AOAC. 1975. Official methods of analysis. 12th ed. Washington, DC: AOAC.
   Google Scholar
• AOAC. 1990. Official methods of analysis. 15th ed. Arlington, VA: AOAC.
   Google Scholar
• Asp N, Johansson C, Hallmer H, Siljeström M. Rapid enzymatic assay of insoluble and soluble dietary fiber. J Agric Food Chem 1983; 31: 476–482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camire ME, Camire A, Krumhar K. Chemical and nutritional changes in foods during extrusion. Food Sci Nutr 1990; 29(1)35–37
   Google Scholar
• Champ M. Definition, analysis, physical and chemical characterization of RS. EURASTA. Riet Hoog-kamer, Wageningen 1995; 1–14
   Google Scholar
• Champ M, Martin L, Gratas M. Analytical metods for resistant starch. Complex carbohydrates in food, S Sungsoo Cho, L Prosky, M Dreher. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York 1999; 184–187
   Google Scholar
• Christa K, Soral-Smietana M. Buckwheat grains and buckwheat products—nutritional and prophylactic value of their components—a review. Czech J Food Sci 2008; 26: 153–162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallant DJ, Bouchet B, Buleon A, Perez S. Physical characteristics of starch granules and susceptibility to enzymatic degradation. Eur J Clin Nutr 1992; 46(Suppl 2)3–16
   Google Scholar
• Gallant DJ, Bouchet B, Baldvin PM. Microscopy of starch: Evidence of a new level of granule organization. Carbohydr Polym 1997; 32: 177–191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krkošková B, Mrázová Z. Prophylactic components of buckwheat. Food Res Int 2005; 38: 561–568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach HW, McCowen LO, Schoch TJ. Structure of the starch granule I. Swelling and solubility paterns of various starches. Cereal Chem 1959; 36: 534–544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowicz G, Soral-Smietana M. Starch modification by iterated syneresis. Carbohydr Polym 2004; 56: 403–413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowicz G, Fornal J, Walkowski A, Maczynski M, Urbaniak G, Szymanska G. Starch esters obtained by microwave radiation—structure and functionality. Ind Crops Products 2000; 11: 249–257
   Google Scholar
• Lorenz K, Dilsaver W. Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum) starch—physico-chemical properties and fuctional characteristics. Starch/Stärke 1982; 7: 217–220
   Google Scholar
• Mishra S, Rai T. Morphology and functional properties of corn, potato and tapioca starches. Food Hydrocoll 2006; 20: 557–566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison WR, Laignelet B. An improved colorimetric procedure for determining apparent and total amylose in cereal and other starches. J Cereal Sci 1983; 1: 9–20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian J, Kuhn M. Physical properties of buckwheat starches from various origins. Starch/Stärke 1999; 51(2–3)81–85
   Google Scholar
• Singh N, Singh J, Kaur L, Sodhi N, Gill B. Morphological, thermal and rheological properties of starches from different botanical sources. Food Chem 2003; 81: 219–231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soral-Smietana M. Charakterystyka fizykochemiczna skrobi bobiku. Acta Acad Agric Tech Olstenensis 1993; 25: 137–150
   Google Scholar
• Soral-Smietana M. Resistant starch—nutritional or non-nutritional component of food. Pol J Food Nutr Sci 2000; 9/50(3S)15–21
   Google Scholar
• Soral- Śmietana M, Wronkowska M. Resistant starch of pea origin. Żywność Nauka Technol Jako 2000; 2(23)204–212
   Google Scholar
• Soral-Śmietana M, Wronkowska M. Resistant starch—nutritional biological activity. Pol J Food Nutr Sci 2004; 13/54(SI 1)51–64
   Google Scholar
• Soral-Śmietana M, Fornal Ł, Fornal J. Characteristics of buckwheat grain starch and the effect of hydrothermal processing upon its chemical composition, properties and structure. Starch/Stärke 1984; 36: 153–158
   Google Scholar
• Soral-Śmietana M, Świgon A, Amarowicz R, Sijtsma L. Chemical composition, microstructure and physicochemical characteristic of two commercial pea protein isolates. Pol J Food Nutr Sci 1998; 2: 193–200
   Google Scholar
• Stempinska K, Soral-Śmietana M. Skladniki chemiczne i ocena fizykochemiczna ziarniaków gryki—porównanie trzech odmian krajowych. Żywność Nauka Technol Jako 2006; 2(47, Suppl)348–357
   Google Scholar
• Stempińska K, Soral-Śmietana M, Zieliński H, Michalska A. Wpływ obróbki termicznej na właściwości fizykochemiczne i przeciwutleniajace ziarniaków gryki. Żywność. Nauka Technol Jakość 2007; 5(54)64–74
   Google Scholar
• Tester RF, Karkalas J, Qi X. Starch—composition, fine structure and architecture. J Cereal Sci 2004; 39: 151–165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomotake H, Yamamoto N, Yanaka N, Ohinata H, Yamazaki R, Kayashita J, Kato N. High protein flour supresses hypercholesterolemia in rats and gallstone formation in mice by hypercholesterolemic diet and body fat in rats because of its low protein digestibility. Nutrition 2006; 22: 166–173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang SS, Chiang WC, Zhao B, Zheng HG, Kim IH. Experimental analysis and computer simulation of starch-water interactions during phase transition. J Food Sci 1991; 56(1)121–125
   Google Scholar
• Wronkowska M, Soral-Śmietana M, Bielecka M, Biedrzycka E. Physically-modified wheat and potato starches, their physico-chemical properties and metabolism by Bifidobacteria. Żywność Nauka Technol Jakość 2002; 4(33, Suppl)74–83
   Google Scholar
• Wronkowska M, Soral-Śmietana M, Krupa U, Biedrzycka E. In vitro fermentation of new modified starch preparations—changes of microstructure and bacterial end-products. Enzyme Microbial Technol 2006; 40: 93–99
   Google Scholar