Beneficial effects of resistant starch on laxation in healthy adults

References

• Aichbichler BW, Wenzl HH, Santa Ana CA, Porter JL, Schiller LR, Fordtran JS. A comparison of stool characteristics from normal and constipated people. Dig Dis Sci 1998; 43: 2353–2362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B 1995; 57: 289–300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird AR, Brown IL, Topping DL. Starches, resistant starches, the gut microflora and human health. Curr Issues Intest Microbiol 2000; 1: 25–37
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Birkett A, Muir J, Phillips J, Jones G, O'Dea K. Resistant starch lowers fecal concentrations of ammonia and phenols in humans. Am J Clin Nutr 1996; 63: 766–772
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouns F, Arrigoni E, Langkilde AM, Verkooijen I, Fassler C, Andersson H, Kettlitz B, van Nieuwenhoven M, Philipsson H, Amado R. Physiological and metabolic properties of a digestion-resistant maltodextrin, classified as type 3 retrograded resistant starch. J Agric Food Chem 2007; 55: 1574–1581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown I, Warhurst M, Arcot J, Playne M, Illman RJ, Topping DL. Fecal numbers of bifidobacteria are higher in pigs fed Bifidobacterium longum with a high amylose cornstarch than with a low amylose cornstarch. J Nutr 1997; 127: 1822–1827
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkitt DP, Walker AR, Painter NS. Effect of dietary fibre on stools and the transit-times, and its role in the causation of disease. Lancet 1972; 30: 1408–1412
   Google Scholar
• Cummings JH, Beatty ER, Kingman S, Bingham S, Englyst HN. Laxative effects of resistant starches. Gastroenterology 1992; 102: A548
   Google Scholar
• Cummings JH, Edwards C, Gee JM, Nagengast FM, Mathers JC. Proceedings of the Concluding Plenary Meeting of EURESTA. Physiological effects of resistant starch in the large bowel, NG Asp, JMM Van Amelsvoort, JGAJ Hautvast. CIP-data Koninklijke Bibliotheek, Den HaagThe Netherlands 1995; 38–55
   Google Scholar
• Cummings JH, Beatty ER, Kingman SM, Bingham SA, Englyst HN. Digestion and physiological properties of resistant starch in the human large bowel. Br J Nutr 1996; 75: 733–747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Games PA. An improved t table for simultaneous control on g contrasts. J Am Stat Assoc 1977; 72: 531–534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabitske HA, Slavin JL. Gastrointestinal effects of low-digestible carbohydrates. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2009; 49: 327–360
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haack VS, Chesters JG, Vollendorf NW, Story JA, Marlett JA. Increasing amounts of dietary fiber provided by foods normalizes physiologic response of the large bowel without altering calcium balance or fecal steroid excretion. Am J Clin Nutr 1998; 68: 615–622
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Health Canada. 2005. Guideline Concerning the Safety and Physiological Effects of Novel Fibre Sources and Food Products Containing Them. Available at, , http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fn-an/legislation/guide-ld/novel_fibre_nouvelle_gui-eng.php. (Accessed 3 August, 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Heijnen M-LA, van Amelsvoort JMM, Deurenberg P, Beynen AC. Limited effect of consumption of uncooked (RS2) or retrograded (RS3) resistant starch on putative risk factors for colon cancer in healthy men. Am J Clin Nutr 1998; 67: 322–331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hylla S, Gostner A, Dusel G, Anger H, Bartram HP, Christl SU, Kasper H, Scheppach W. Effects of resistant starch on the colon in healthy volunteers: Possible implications for cancer prevention. Am J Clin Nutr 1998; 67: 136–142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute of Medicine. 2005. Dietary Reference intakes for energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein, and amino acids (macronutrients). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins DJ, Vuksan V, Kendall CW, Würsch P, Jeffcoat R, Waring S, Mehling CC, Vidgen E, Augustin LS, Wong E. Physiological effects of resistant starches on fecal bulk, short chain fatty acids, blood lipids and glycemic index. J Am Coll Nutr 1998; 17: 609–616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins DJ, Kendall CW, Vuksan V, Augustin LS, Li Y-M, Lee B, Mehling CC, Parker T, Faulkner D, Sevler H, Vidgen E, Fulgoni III V. The effect of wheat bran particle size on laxation and colonic fermentation. J Am Coll Nutr 1999; 18: 339–345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muir JG, Walker KZ, Kaimakamis MA, Cameron MA, Govers MJ, Lu ZX, Young GP, O'Dea K. Modulation of fecal markers relevant to colon cancer risk: A high-starch Chinese diet did not generate expected beneficial changes relative to a Western-type diet. Am J Clin Nutr 1998; 68: 372–379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noakes M, Clifton PM, Nestel PJ, Le Leu R, McIntosh G. Effect of high-amylose starch and oat bran on metabolic variables and bowel function in subjects with hypertriglyceridemia. Am J Clin Nutr 1996; 64: 944–951
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordgaard I, Mortensen PB, Langkilde AM. Small intestinal malabsorption and colonic fermentation of resistant starch and resistant peptides to short-chain fatty acids. Nutrition 1995; 11: 129–137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nugent AP. Health properties of resistant starch. Nutr Bull 2005; 30: 27–54
   Google Scholar
• Phillips J, Muir JG, Birkett A, Lu ZX, Jones GP, O'Dea K, Young GP. Effect of resistant starch on fecal bulk and fermentation-dependent events in humans. Am J Clin Nutr 1995; 62: 121–130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prosky L, Asp NG, Furda I, DeVries JW, Schweizer TF, Harland BF. Determination of total dietary fiber in foods and food products: Collaborative study. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 1985; 68: 677–679
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sallis JF, Haskell WL, Wood PD, Fortmann SP, Rogers T, Blair SN, Paffenbarger RS, Jr. Physical activity assessment methodology in the Five-City Project. Am J Epidemiol 1985; 121: 91–106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneeman BO. Fiber, inulin, and oligofructose: Similarities and differences. J Nutr :S 1999; 129: 1424S–1427
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma A, Yadav BS, Ritika. Resistant starch: Physiological roles and food applications. Food Rev Int 2008; 24: 193–234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shetty PS, Kurpad AV. Increasing starch intake in the human diet increases fecal bulking. Am J Clin Nutr 1986; 43: 210–212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephen AM, Cummings JH. Mechanism of action of dietary fibre in the human colon. Nature 1980; 284: 283–284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storey D, Lee A, Bornet F, Brouns F. Gastrointestinal responses following acute and medium term intake of retrograded resistant maltodextrins, classified as type 3 resistant starch. Eur J Clin Nutr 2007; 61: 1262–1270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlin J, Read NW. The effect of resistant starch on colon function in humans. Br J Nutr 1990; 64: 589–595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Munster IP, de Boer HM, Jansen MC, de Haan AF, Katan MB, van Amelsvoort JM, Nagengast FM. Effect of resistant starch on breath-hydrogen and methane excretion in healthy volunteers. Am J Clin Nutr 1994; 59: 626–630
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wrick KL, Robertson JB, Van Soest Pj, Lewis BA, Rivers JM, Roe DA, Hackler LR. The influence of dietary fiber source on human intestinal transit and stool output. J Nutr 1983; 113: 1464–1479
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar