Characteristics of physiotherapy sessions from the patient's and therapist's perspective

References

• Wade DT. Stroke: rehabilitation and long-term care. Lancet 1992; 339: 791– 793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Pedro-Cuesta J, Wide´ n-Holmqvist L, Bach-Y-Rita P. Evalua- tion of stroke rehabilitation by randomised controlled studies. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 1992; 86: 433– 439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenaar RC, Meijer OG. Effects of stroke rehabilitation. Journal of Rehabilitation Science 1991; 4: 61– 73.
   Google Scholar
• Dean CM, Shepherd RB. Task-related training improves perfor- mance of seated reaching tasks after stroke: a randomised controlled trial. Stroke 1997; 28: 722– 728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miltner WHR, Bauder H, Sommer M, Dettmers C, Taub E. Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficit after stroke: a replication. Stroke 1999; 30: 586– 592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visintin M, Barbeaeu H, Korner-Bitensky N, Mayo NE. A new approach to retrain gait in stroke patients through body weight support and treadmill stimulation. Stroke 1998; 29: 1122– 1128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhorne P, Wagenaar R, Partridge C. Physiotherapy after stroke: more is better? Physiotherapy Research International 1996; 1: 75– 88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Koelman TW, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC. Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke. Stroke 1997; 28: 1550– 1556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partridge C, MacKenzie M, Edwards S, Reid A, Jayawardena S, Guck N, Potter J. Is dosage of physiotherapy a critical factor in deciding patterns of recovery from a stroke: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Physiotherapy Research International 2000; 5: 230– 240.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Proot IM, Crebolder HF, Abu-Saad HH, Macor TH, Ter Meulen RH. Stroke patients’ needs and experiences regarding autonomy at discharge from nursing home. Patient Education and Counseling 2000; 41(3): 275– 283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ro¨ ding J, Lindstro¨ m B, Malm J, O¨ hman A. Frustrated and invisible-younger stroke patients’ experience of the rehabilitation process. Disability and Rehabilitation 2003; 25: 867– 874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark F. Occupation embedded in real life: interweaving occupa- tional science and occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1993; 47: 1067– 1078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tham K, Borell L, Gustavsson A. The discovery of disability: a phenomenological study of unilateral neglect. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 2000; 54: 398– 406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pound P, Bury M, Ebrahim S, Gompertz P. A patient centred study of the consequences of stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation 1998; 12: 338– 347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade DT. Personal context as a focus for rehabilitation. Clinical Rehabilitation 2000; 14: 115– 118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton CR. Living with stroke: a phenomenological study. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2000; 32: 301– 311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cant R. Rehabilitation following a stroke: a participant perspec- tive. Disability and Rehabilitation 1997; 19: 297– 304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pound P, Bury M, Gompertz P, Ebrahim S. Views of survivors of stroke benefits of physiotherapy. Quality in Health Care 1994; 3: 69– 74.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nilsson LA, Nordholm LM. Physical therapy in stroke rehabilita- tion: Bases for Swedish physiotherapists’ choice of treatment. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 1992; 8: 49– 55.
   Google Scholar
• Carr JH, Mungovan SF, Shepherd RB, Dean CM, Nordholm LA. Physiotherapy in stroke rehabilitation: Basis for Australian physiotherapists’ choice of treatment. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 1994; 10: 201– 209.
   Google Scholar
• Lewinter M, Mikkelsen S. Therapists and the rehabilitation process after stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation 1995; 17: 211– 216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Koch L, Wide´ n Holmqvist L, Wohlin Wottrich A, Tham K, de Pedro-Cuesta J. Rehabilitation at home after stroke: a descriptive study of an individualised intervention. Clinical Rehabilitation 2000; 14: 574– 583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogdan RC, Biklen SK. Qualitative research for education. An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Bendz M. Rules of relevance after stroke. Social Science in Medicine 2000; 15: 713– 723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Koch L, Wohlin Wottrich A, Wide´ n Holmqvist L. Rehabilita- tion in the home versus the hospital: the importance of context. Disability and Rehabilitation 1998; 20: 367– 372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones F, Partridge MA. Who’s in control after a stroke? Do we disempower our patients? Physiotherapy Research International 2000; 5: 249– 253.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Payton OD, Nelson CE. A preliminary study of patients’ perceptions of certain aspects of their physical therapy experience. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 1996; 12: 27– 38.
   Google Scholar
• Baker SM, Marshak HH, Rice GT, Zimmerman GJ. Patient participation in physical therapy goal-setting. Physical Therapy 2001; 5: 1118– 1126.
   Google Scholar
• Playford ED, Dawson L, Limbert V, Smith M, Ward CD, Wells R. Goal-setting in rehabilitation: report of a workshop to explore professionals’ perceptions of goal-setting. Clinical Rehabilitation 2000; 14: 491– 496.
   Google Scholar
• Ada L, Mackey F, Heard R, Adams R. Stroke rehabilitation: Does the therapy area provide a physical challenge. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 1999; 45: 33– 38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyson SF, Turner G. The process of stroke rehabilitation: what happens and why. Clinical Rehabilitation 1999; 13: 322– 332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook M. Stroke: Social and emotional outcome. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London 1982; 16: 100– 104.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lopopolo RB. Development of the Professional Role Behaviours Survey (PROBES). Physical Therapy 2001; 7: 1317– 1327.
   Google Scholar