Comparing contents of functional outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health

References

• Murray C J, Lopez A D. Global mortality, disability, and the contribution of risk factors: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 1997; 349: 1436–1442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle P J. Measuring health outcomes in stroke survivors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: S39–S43
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salter K, Jutai J W, Teasell R, Foley N C, Bitensky J, Bayley M. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF activity. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27: 315–340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter K, Jutai J W, Teasell R, Foley N C, Bitensky J, Bayley M. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF Participation. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27: 507–528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. 2001
   Google Scholar
• Ustun T B, Chatterji S, Bickenbach J, Kostanjsek N, Schneider M. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: A new tool for understanding disability and health. Disabil Rehabil 2003; 25: 565–571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen M E, Marino R J. The tools of disability outcomes research functional status measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81: S21–S29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stucki G, Ewert T, Cieza A. Value and application of the ICF in rehabilitation medicine. Disabil Rehabil 2003; 25: 628–634
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geyh S, Kurt T, Brockow T, Cieza A, Ewert T, Omar Z, Resch K L. Identifying the concepts contained in outcome measures of clinical trials on stroke using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as a reference. J Rehabil Med 2004; 44: 56–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finch E, Brooks D, Startford P W, Mayo N E. Physical rehabilitation outcome measures. A guide to enhanced clinical decision-making. Oxford University Press, New York 2002
   Google Scholar
• Wade D T. Measurement in neurological rehabilitation2nd ed. BC Dekker Inc., Hamilton, Ont 1992
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney F, Barthel D. Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. Md Med J 1965; 14: 61–65
   Google Scholar
• Berg K O, Wood-Dauphinee S L, Williams J I, Maki B. Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument. Can J Public Health 1992; 83(Suppl 2)S7–S11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams J I. The Balance Scale: Reliability assessment with elderly residents and patients with an acute stroke. Scand J Rehabil Med 1995; 27: 27–36
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gowland C, van Hullenaar S, Torresin W, Moreland J, Vanspall B, Barrecca S, et al. Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment: Development, validation, and administration manual. Chedoke McMaster Hospitals and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont 1995
   Google Scholar
• Gowland C, Stratford P, Ward M, Moreland J, Torresin W, van Hullenaar S, Sanford J, Barreca S, Vanspall B, Plews N. Measuring physical impairment and disability with theChedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment. Stroke 1993; 24: 58–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The EuroQol Group. EuroQol – a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990; 16: 199–208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton B B, Granger C V, Sherwin F S, Zielezny M, Tashman J S. A uniform national data system for medical rehabilitation. Rehabilitation outcomes: Analysis and measurement, M J Fuhrer. Brookes, Baltimore, MD 1987; 115–150
   Google Scholar
• Holbrook M, Skilbeck C E. An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age Ageing 1983; 12: 166–170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt S M, McEwen J. The development of a subjective health indicator. Sociol Health Illn 1980; 2: 231–246
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hunt S M, McKenna S P, McEwen J, Williams J, Papp E. The Nottingham Health Profile: subjective health status and medical consultations. Soc Sci Med [A] 1981; 15: 221–229
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Swieten J C, Koudstaal P J, Visser M C, Schouten H J, van Gijn J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke 1988; 19: 604–607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln N, Leadbitter D. Assessment of motor function in stroke patients. Physiotherapy 1979; 65: 48–51
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Adams S A, Pickering R M, Ashburn A, Lincoln N B. The scalability of the Rivermead Motor Assessment in nonacute stroke patients. Clin Rehabil 1997; 11: 52–59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collen F M, Wade D T, Robb G F, Bradshaw C M. The Rivermead Mobility Index: a further development of the Rivermead Motor Assessment. Int Disabil Stud 1991; 13: 50–54
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Straten A, de-Haan R J, Limburg M, Schuling J, Bossuyt P, van den Bos G A. A stroke-adapted 30-Item version of the Sickness Impact Profile to assess quality of life (SA-SIP30). Stroke 1997; 28: 2155–2161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Port I GL, Ketelaar M, Schepers V PM, van den Bos G AM, Lindeman E. Monitoring the functional health status of stroke patients: The value of the Stroke-Adapted Sickness Impact Profile-30. Disabil Rehabil 2004; 26: 635–640
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware J E, Jr, Sherbourne C D. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473–483
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHorney C A, Ware J E, Jr, Raczek A E. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 1993; 31: 247–263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan P W, Wallace D, Lai S M, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster L J. The Stroke Impact Scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke 1999; 30: 2131–2140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams L S, Weinberger M, Harris L E, Clark D O, Biller J. Development of a stroke-specific quality of life scale. Stroke 1999; 30: 1362–1369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed ‘Up & Go’: A test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991; 39: 142–148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Brockow T, Ewert T, Amman E, Kollerits B, Chatterji S, Ustun T B, Stucki G. Linking health-status measurements to the international classification of functioning, disability and health. J Rehabil Med 2002; 34: 205–210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamm T A, Cieza A, Machold K P, Smolen J S, Stucki G. Content comparison of occupation-based instruments in adult rheumatology and musculoskeletal rehabilitation based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 51: 917–924
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheuringer M, Grill E, Boldt C, Mittrach R, Mullner P, Stucki G. Systematic review of measures and their concepts used in published studies focusing on rehabilitation in the acute hospital and in early post-acute rehabilitation facilities. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27: 419–429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haan R d, Limburg M, Bossuyt P, Meulen J HPvd, Aaronson N. The clinical meaning of Rankin ‘handicap’ grades after stroke. Stroke 1995; 26: 2027–2030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter K, Jutai J W, Teasell R, Foley N C, Bitensky J. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF Body Functions. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27: 191–207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekker J, Dallmeijer A J, Lankhorst G J. Clinimetrics in rehabilitation medicine: Current issues in developing and applying measurement instruments 1. J Rehabil Med 2005; 37: 193–201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Haan R J, Vermeulen M, Holman R, Lindeboom R. [Measuring the functional status of patients in clinical trials using modern clinimetric methods]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2002; 146: 606–611
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duncan P W, Jorgensen H S, Wade D T. Outcome measures in acute stroke trials: A systematic review and some recommendations to improve practice. Stroke 2000; 31: 1429–1438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buck D, Jacoby A, Massey A, Ford G. Evaluation of measures used to assess quality of life after stroke. Stroke 2000; 31: 2004–2010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haan R d, Aaronson N, Limburg M, Hewer R L, Crevel Hv. Measuring quality of life in stroke. Stroke 1993; 24: 320–327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar