A Good Lives Model of clinical and community rehabilitation

References

• Ward T, Gannon T. Rehabilitation, etiology and self-regulation: The Good Lives Model of sexual offender treatment. Aggress Violent Behav 2006; 11: 77–94
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegert R J, McPherson K M, Dean S G. Theory development and a science of rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27(24)1493–1501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegert R J, Taylor W J. Theoretical aspects of goal-setting and motivation in rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2004; 26(1)1–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levack W MM, Dean S G, Siegert R J, McPherson K M. Purposes for goal planning in rehabilitation: The need for a critical distinction. Disabil Rehabil 2006; 28(120)741–749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levack W MM, Taylor K, Siegert R J, Dean S G, Weatherall M, McPherson K M. Is goal planning in rehabilitation effective? A systematic review. Clin Rehabil 2006; 20: 1–17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward T, Stewart C. Criminogenic needs and human needs: A theoretical model. Psychol Crime Law 2003; 9: 125–144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kukla A. Methods of theoretical psychology. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts 2001
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. World Health Organisation, Geneva 2001
   Google Scholar
• Leplege A, Gzil F, Cammeli M, Lefeve C, Pachoud B, Ville I. Person-centredness: Conceptual and historical perspectives. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29(20–21)1555–1565
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maclean N, Pound P. A critical review of the concept of patient motivation in the literature on physical rehabilitation. Soc Sci Med 2000; 50: 495–506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod R, McPherson K M. Care and compassion: Part of person-centred rehabilitation, inappropriate response or a forgotten art?. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29(20–21)1589–1595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cott C A, Wiles R, Devitt R. Continuity, transition and participation: Preparing clients for life in the community post-stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29(20–21)1566–1574
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnartt S, Schriner K, Scotch R. Advocacy and political action. Handbook of disability studies, G L Albrecht, K D Seelman, M Bury. Sage Publications Ltd, , California 2001; 430–449
   Google Scholar
• Williams G. Theorising disability. Handbook of disability studies, G L Albrecht, K D Seelman, M Bury. Sage Publications Ltd, , California 2001; 123–144
   Google Scholar
• Patston P. Constructive Functional Diversity: A new paradigm beyond disability and impairment. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29(20–21)1625–1633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, Kinmonth A L, Sandercock P, et al. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ 2000; 321(16 Sept.)694–696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis R S. Values and valuing in rehabilitation. J Rehabil 1998; 42–47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong G, Horn S D, Gassaway J A, Slavin M D, Dijkers M P. Toward a taxonomy of rehabilitation interventions. Using an inductive approach to examine the ‘black box’ of rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehab 2004; 85: 678–686
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson K M, Levack W MM, Kersten P. A new classification for outcomes in illness and injury. Hosp Med 2005; 66(4)210–214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stucki G, Ewert T, Cieza A. Value and application of the ICF in rehabilitation medicine. Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24(17)932–938
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes M P, Ward A B. Textbook of Rehabilitation Medicine. Oxford University Press, Oxford 2000
   Google Scholar
• C R Snyder, Lopez, S J. Handbook of positive psychology. New York, Oxford University Press. 2002
   Google Scholar
• Kekes J. Moral tradition and individuality. Princeton University Press, New Jersey 1989
   Google Scholar
• Arnhart L. Darwinian natural right: the biological ethics of human nature. State University of New York Press, New York 1998
   Google Scholar
• L G Aspinwall, Staudinger, U M. A psychology of human strengths: Fundamental questions and future directions for a positive psychology. Washington, DC, American Psychological Association. 2003
   Google Scholar
• Cummins R A. The domains of life satisfaction: An attempt to order chaos. Soc Indic Res 1996; 38: 303–328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci E L, Ryan R M. The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inq 2000; 11: 227–268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmons R. The psychology of ultimate concerns. Guilford, New York 1999
   Google Scholar
• Linley P A, Joseph S. Positive psychology in practice. Wiley, New York 2004
   Google Scholar
• Murphy M C. Natural law and practical rationality. Cambridge University Press, New York 2001
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum M. Women and human development. Cambridge University Press, New York 2000
   Google Scholar
• DeJong G. Independent living: From social movement to analytical paradigm. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1979; 60(10)435–446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer J A. Personality and psychotherapy: Treating the whole person. Guilford Press, New York 2005
   Google Scholar
• Ylvisaker M, Feeney T. Reflections on Dobermans, poodles, and social rehabilitation for difficult-to-serve individuals with traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology 2000; 24: 407–431
   Google Scholar
• Nochi M. Reconstructing self-narratives in coping with traumatic brain injury. Soc Sci Med 2000; 51(12)1795–1804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis-Hill C, Horn S. Change in identitiy and self-concept: A new theoretical approach to recovery following a stroke. Clin Rehabil 2000; 14(3)299–307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner F. Human ecology: Following nature's lead. Island Press, Washington, DC 2002
   Google Scholar
• Barnatt S, Schriner K, Scotch R. Advocacy and political action. Handbook of disability studies, G L Albrecht, K D Seelman, M Bury. Sage Publications Ltd, , California 2001; 430–449
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan M JL, Main C. Service, advocacy and adjudication: Balancing the ethical challenges of multiple stakeholder agendas in the rehabilitation of chronic pain. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29(20–21)1596–1603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randall K E, McEwen I R. Writing patient-centered functional goals. Phys Ther 2000; 80(12)1197–1203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levack W MM, McPherson K M, McNaughton H. Success in the workplace following traumatic brain injury: Are we evaluating what is most important?. Disabil Rehabil 2004; 26(5)290–298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan T M, Sparkes C. Goal planning and neurorehabilitation: The Wolfson Neurorehabilitation Centre approach. Neuropsychol Rehabil 1999; 9(3/4)241–251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwamm L H, Pancioli A, Acker J E, Goldstein L B, Zorowitz R D, et al. Recommendations for the establishment of stroke systems of care: Recommendations from the American Stroke Association's Task Force on the Development of Stroke Systems. Circulation 2006; 111: 1078–1109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade D T. Evidence relating to goal planning in rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 1998; 12(4)273–275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade D T. Goal planning in stroke rehabilitation: Why?. Top Stroke Rehabil 1999; 6: 1–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nair K PS. Life goals: The concept and its relevance to rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 2003; 17: 192–202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson K M, Brander P, Taylor W J, McNaughton H K. Living with arthritis – what is important?. Disabil Rehabil 2001; 23(16)706–721
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson K M, Brander P, Taylor W J, McNaughton H K. Consequences of stroke, arthritis and chronic pain – are there important similarities?. Disabil Rehabil 2004; 126(16)988–999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruna S, Porter L, Carvalho I. The Liverpool Desistance Study and probation practice: Opening the dialogue. Probation J 2004; 51: 221–232
   Google Scholar
• Oyserman D, Markus H R. Possible selves and delinquency. J Pers Soc Psychol 1990; 59(1)112–125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdams D P. Power, intimacy and the life story: Personological inquiries into identity. Guilford Press, New York 1985
   Google Scholar
• McAdams D P. The redemptive self: Stories Americans live by. Oxford, New York 2006
   Google Scholar
• Presser L. Violent offenders, moral selves: Constructing identities and accounts in the research interview. Soc Probl 2004; 51: 82–101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar