Evaluation of the clinical utility of the Home Falls and Accidents Screening Tool (HOME FAST)

References

• Clemson L, Cumming R, Kendig H, et al. The effectiveness of a community-based program for reducing the incidence of falls among the elderly: a randomized trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52:1487–1494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord S. The effect of an individualized fall prevention program on fall risk and falls in older people: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:1296–1304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Queensland Health. Falls prevention: best practice guidelines. Brisbane: Queensland Health; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• McMurdo M, Harper J. Falls, bones and the primary care team. Eur J Gen Pract. 2003;9:10–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moller J. Projected costs of fall related injury to older persons due to demographic change in Australia. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Health & Ageing; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia’s health 2012. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Clemson L, Mackenzie L, Ballinger C, et al. Environmental interventions to prevent falls in community-dwelling older people: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Aging Health. 2008;20:954–971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie L, Robertson M, Gillespie W, et al. Interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community. Cochrane Database System Rev. 2012: Art. No.: CD007146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie L, Byles J, Higginbotham N. Designing the Home Falls and Accidents Screening Tool (HOME FAST): selecting the items. Br J Occup Ther. 2000;63:260–269.
   Google Scholar
• Whitby L. Screening for disease: definitions and criteria. Lancet. 1974;2:819–822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victorian Government Health Information. Melbourne: HOME Falls and Accidents Screening Tool; 2010 [Internet]; [cited 2015 May 20]. Available from: http://www.health.vic.gov.au/agedcare/maintaining/falls_dev/Section_b1c1.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Hassani Mehraban A, Mackenzie L, Byles J. A self-report home environment screening tool identified older women at risk of falls. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:191–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie L, Byles J, Higginbotham N. Reliability of the Home Falls and Accidents Screening Tool (HOME FAST) for identifying older people at increased risk of falls. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24:266–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vu V, Mackenzie L. The inter-rater and test retest reliability of the Home Falls and Accidents Screening Tool. Aust Occup Ther J. 2012;59:235–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie L, Byles J, Higginbotham N. Professional perceptions about home safety: cross-national validation of the Home Falls and Accidents Screening Tool (HOME FAST). J Allied Health. 2002;31:22–28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mackenzie L, Byles J, D’Este C. Longitudinal study of the Home Falls and Accidents Screening Tool in identifying older people at increased risk of falls. Aust J Ageing. 2009;28:64–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law M. (Ed.). Evidence-based rehabilitation: a guide to practice. Thorofare (NJ): Slack Inc.; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Smart A. A multi-dimensional model of clinical utility. Int J Qual Health Care. 2006;18:377–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toomey M, Nicolson D, Carswell A. The clinical utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Can J Occup Ther. 1995;62:242–249.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barbara A, Whiteford G. Clinical utility of the Handicap Assessment and Resource Tool: an investigation of its use with the aged people in hospital. Aust Occup Ther J. 2005;52:17–25.
   Google Scholar
• Innes E, Straker L. Attributes of excellence in work-related assessments. Work. 2003;20:63–76.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• James C, Mackenzie L. The clinical utility of functional capacity evaluations: the opinion of health professionals working within occupational rehabilitation. Work. 2009;33:231–239.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simmonds M. Physical function in patients with cancer: psychometrics characteristics and clinical usefulness of a physical performance test battery. J Pain Symp Manage. 2002;24:404–414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver Fawcett A. Principles of assessment and outcome measurement for occupational therapists and physiotherapists. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Bowyer P, Lee J, Kramer J, et al. Determining the clinical utility of the Short Child Occupational Profile (SCOPE). Br J Occup Ther. 2012;75:19–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atwal A, Money A, Spiliotopoulou G, et al. Occupational therapists’ perceptions about the clinical utility of the 3D interior design software. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013;8:348–355.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gustafsson L, Michell G, Fleming J, et al. Clinical utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in spinal cord injury rehabilitation. Br J Occup Ther. 2012;75:337–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wressle E, Marcusson J, Henriksson C. Clinical utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure-Swedish version. Can J Occup Ther. 2002;69:40–48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rogers E. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Virginia Tech. Virginia, US: Virginia Tech, 2015. The Re-Aim framework [Internet]; [cited 2015 May 20]. Available from: http://www.re-aim.hnfe.vt.edu/.
   Google Scholar
• Alberta Health Services. Health promotion and behavior change theory. Calgary: Alberta Health Services; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Clemson L, Donaldson A, Hill K, et al. Implementing person-environment approaches to prevent falls: a qualitative inquiry in applying the Westmead approach to occupational therapy home visits. Aust Occup Ther J. 2014;61:325–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanson-Fisher R. Diffusion of innovation theory for clinical change. Med J Aust. 2004;180:S55–S56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:1322–1327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson R, Onwuegbuzie A. Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educ Res. 2004;33:14–26.
   Google Scholar
• Barbour R. The case for combining qualitative and quantitative approaches in health services research. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1999;4:39–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Creswell J, Klassen A, Plano Clark V, et al. Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. Bethesda (MD): Office for Behavioral and Social Sciences Research, 2011 [Internet]; [cited 2016 June 3]. Available from: https://obssr-archive.od.nih.gov/scientific_areas/methodology/mixed_methods_research/pdf/Best_Practices_for_Mixed_Methods_Research.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie A, Collins K. A typology of mixed methods sampling designs in social science research. Qual Rep. 2007;12:281–316.
   Google Scholar
• Powell R, Single H. Focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 1996;8:499–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitzinger J. Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups. BMJ. 1995;311:299–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan D. Why things (sometimes) go wrong in focus groups. Qual Health Res. 1995;5:516–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asbury J. Overview of focus group research. Qual Health Res. 1995;5:414–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fereday J, Muir-Cochrane E. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. Int J Qual Methods. 2006;5:80–92.
   Google Scholar
• Rice P, Ezzy D. Qualitative research methods: a health focus. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• O’Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies. Br Med J. 2010;314:c4587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord S, Menz H, Sherrington C. Home environment risk factors for falls in older people and the efficacy of home modifications. Age Ageing. 2006;35:ii55–ii59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. WHO Global report on falls prevention in older age. Geneva: WHO; 2007 [Internet]; [cited 2015 May 20]. Available from: www.who.int/ageing/publications/Falls_prevention7March.pdf.
   Google Scholar