Validation of the Participation Strategies Self-Efficacy Scale (PS-SES)

References

• World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. 1st ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001. 299 p.
   Google Scholar
• Heinemann AW, Lai JS, Magasi S, et al. Measuring participation enfranchisement. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:564–571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogner JA, Whiteneck GG, Corrigan JD, et al. Comparison of scoring methods for the Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools-Objective. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:552–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang F-H, Coster WJ, Helfrich CA. Community participation measures for people with disabilities: a systematic review of content from an International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Perspective. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:771–781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyssen IC, Steultjens MP, Dekker J, et al. A systematic review of instruments assessing participation: challenges in defining participation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:983–997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik L, Plow MA. Measuring participation as defined by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: an evaluation of existing measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:856–866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteneck GG, Bogner JA, Heinemann AW. Advancing the measurement of participation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:540–541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magasi S, Wong A, Gray DB, et al. Theoretical foundations for the measurement of environmental factors and their impact on participation among people with disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96:569–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammel J, Magasi S, Heinemann A, et al. What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30:1445–1460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallinson T, Hammel J. Measurement of participation: intersecting person, task, and environment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:S29–S33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammel J, Jones R, Gossett A, et al. Examining barriers and supports to community living and participation after a stroke from a participatory action research approach. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2006;13:43–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke P, Black SE. Quality of life following stroke: negotiating disability, identity, and resources. J Appl Gerontol. 2005;24:319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pound P, Gompertz P, Ebrahim S. Social and practical strategies described by people living at home with stroke. Health Soc Care Community. 1999;7:120–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson S, Whitfield K. An ecological approach to activity after stroke: it takes a community. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011;18:509–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ch’ng AM, French D, McLean N. Coping with the challenges of recovery from stroke: long term perspectives of stroke support group members. J Health Psychol. 2008;13:1136–1146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones F, Mandy A, Partridge C. Changing self-efficacy in individuals following a first time stroke: preliminary study of a novel self-management intervention. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23:522–533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodenheimer T, Lorig K, Holman H, et al. Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. JAMA. 2002;288:2469–2475.
   Google Scholar
• Lorig KR, Holman HR. Self-management education: history, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med. 2003;26:1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Self-efficacy. In: Encyclopedia of human behavior [Internet]. New York: Academic Press; 1994. p. 71–81. Available from: https://www.uky.edu/∼eushe2/Bandura/BanEncy.html.
   Google Scholar
• Lorig K, Laurent DD, Plant K, et al. The components of action planning and their associations with behavior and health outcomes. Chronic Illn. 2014;10:50–59.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lorig K, Chastain RL, Ung E, et al. Development and evaluation of a scale to measure perceived self-efficacy in people with arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1989;32:37–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. 1st ed. New York: Worth Publishers; 1997. 604 p.
   Google Scholar
• Maujean A, Davis P, Kendall E, et al. The Daily Living Self-Efficacy Scale: a new measure for assessing self-efficacy in stroke survivors. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;36:504–511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumrill PD. Increasing the frequency of accommodation requests among persons with multiple sclerosis: a demonstration of the progressive request model. Fayetteville: University of Arkansas; 1993. 222 p.
   Google Scholar
• Adams HP, Davis PH, Leira EC, et al. Baseline NIH Stroke Scale score strongly predicts outcome after stroke: a report of the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST). Neurology. 1999;53:126–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade DT, Vergis E. The Short Orientation-Memory-Concentration Test: a study of its reliability and validity. Clin Rehabil. 1999;13:164–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodglass H, Kaplan E, Barresi B. Boston diagnostic aphasia examination. 3rd ed. Antonio: Pearson; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Heinemann AW, Magasi S, Hammel J, et al. Environmental factors item development for persons with stroke, traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury. Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96:589–595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee D, Hammel J, Wilson T. A community living management program for people with disabilities who have moved out of nursing homes: a pilot study. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38:754–760.
   Google Scholar
• Lorig K, Stewart A, Ritter P, et al. Outcome measures for health education and other health care interventions. 1st ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 1996. 112 p.
   Google Scholar
• Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap) – a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42:377–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plichta SB, Kelvin E. Munro’s statistical methods for health care research. 6th ed. Philadelphia (PA): LWW; 2012. 576 p.
   Google Scholar
• Ghasemi A, Zahediasl S. Normality tests for statistical analysis: a guide for non-statisticians. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2012;10:486–489.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Costello AB, Osborne JW. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2005;10:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Cudeck R. Exploratory factor analysis. In: Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling. San Diego (CA): Academic Press; 2000. p. 265–95.
   Google Scholar
• Comrey AL, Lee HB. A first course in factor analysis. 2nd ed. Hillsdale (NJ): Psychology Press; 1992. 488 p.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16:297–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavakol M, Dennick R. Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. Int J Med Educ. 2011;2:53–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gray DB, Hollingsworth HH, Stark SL, et al. Participation survey/mobility: psychometric properties of a measure of participation for people with mobility impairments and limitations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:189–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinemann AW, Magasi S, Bode RK, et al. Measuring enfranchisement: importance of and control over participation by people with disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:2157–2165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones F, Riazi A. Self-efficacy and self-management after stroke: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33:797–810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar