Using technology to overcome the language barrier: the Cognitive Assessment for Aphasia App

References

• Wall KJ, Isaacs ML, Copland DA, et al. Assessing cognition after stroke. Who misses out? A systematic review. Int J Stroke. 2015;10:665–671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lees R, Fearon P, Harrison JK, et al. Cognitive and mood assessment in stroke research: Focused review of contemporary studies. Stroke. 2012;43:1678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lezak M, Howieson D, Loring D, et al. Neuropsychological Assessment. New York (US): Oxford University Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Pendlebury ST, Chen P-J, Bull L, et al. Methodological factors in determining rates of dementia in transient ischemic attack and stroke: impact of baseline selection bias. Stroke. 2015;46:641–646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lees RA, Hendry Ba K, Broomfield N, et al. Cognitive assessment in stroke: feasibility and test properties using differing approaches to scoring of incomplete items. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. Forthcoming 2017. doi: 10.1002/gps.4568
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelter ST, Gostynski M, Papa S, et al. Epidemiology of aphasia attributable to first ischemic stroke: Incidence, severity, fluency, etiology, and thrombolysis. Stroke. 2006;37:1379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harnish SM, Lundine JP. Nonverbal working memory as a predictor of anomia treatment success. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015;24:S880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambon Ralph M, Snell C, Fillingham JK, et al. Predicting the outcome of anomia therapy for people with aphasia post CVA: Both language and cognitive status are key predictors. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2010;20:289–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flowers HL, Skoretz SA, Silver FL, et al. Poststroke aphasia frequency, recovery, and outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97:2188–2201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickey L, Kagan A, Lindsay MP, et al. Incidence and profile of inpatient stroke-induced aphasia in Ontario, Canada. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:196–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalbe E, Reinhold N, Brand M, et al. A new test battery to assess aphasic disturbances and associated cognitive dysfunctions — German normative data on the Aphasia Check List. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2005;27:779–794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie N, Worrall L, Murray LL, et al. The top ten: best practice recommendations for aphasia. Aphasiology. 2016;31:1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rand D, Katz N, Tamar Weiss PL. Evaluation of virtual shopping in the VMall: comparison of post-stroke participants to healthy control groups. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:1710–1719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raspelli S, Pallavicini F, Carelli L, et al. Validating the neuro VR-based virtual version of the Multiple Errands Test: preliminary results. Presence. 2012;21:31–42.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss PL, Naveh Y, Katz N. Design and testing of a virtual environment to train stroke patients with unilateral spatial neglect to cross a street safely. Occup Ther Int. 2003;10:39–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tinga AM, Visser-Meily JMA, van der Smagt MJ, et al. Multisensory stimulation to improve low- and higher-level sensory deficits after stroke: a systematic review. Neuropsychol Rev. 2016;26:73–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson BB. Multisensory stimulation in stroke rehabilitation. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012;6:60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzo AS, Kim GJ. A SWOT analysis of the field of virtual reality rehabilitation and therapy. Presence. 2005;14:119–146.
   Google Scholar
• Morris M, Davis G, Davis F. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarter. 2003;27:425–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amma K, Panicker S. Senior citizens' acceptance of information communication technology: a study of e-banking in India. J Inform Technol Econ Develop. 2013;4:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Czaja SJ, Charness N, Fisk AD, et al. Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). Psychol Aging. 2006;21:333–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heart T, Kalderon E. Older adults: Are they ready to adopt health-related ICT? Int J Med Inform. 2013;82:e209–ee31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton C, Acres K, Bruce C. A comparison of computerized and paper-based language tests with adults with aphasia. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013;22:185–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finch E, Hill AJ. Computer use by people with aphasia: a survey investigation. Brain Impairment. 2014;15:107–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison J, McArthur KS, Quinn T. Assessment scales in stroke: Clinimetric and clinical considerations. Clin Interv Aging 2013;2013:201–211.
   Google Scholar
• Yan W, Wu W, Shao Y, et al. Achievement of virtual reality system by hardware/software co-design. SENS Lett. 2014;12:260–263.
   Google Scholar
• Craven MP, De Filippis ML, Dening T. Quality of life tools to inform co-design in the development of assistive technologies for people with dementia and their carers. Lecture Notes Comput Sci. 2014;8868:394–397.
   Google Scholar
• Murray LL. Attention and other cognitive deficits in aphasia: presence and relation to language and communication measures. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012;21:S51–S64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timpert DC, Weiss PH, Vossel S, et al. Apraxia and spatial inattention dissociate in left hemisphere stroke. Cortex. 2015;71:349–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalmaijer E, Van der Stigchel S, Nijboer T, et al. Cancellation tools: all-in-one software for administration and analysis of cancellation tasks. Behav Res Methods. 2015;47:1065–1075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang YJ, Ku J, Han K, et al. Development and clinical trial of virtual reality-based cognitive assessment in people with stroke: preliminary study. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2008;11:329–339.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Viirre E, Ellisman M. Vertigo in virtual reality with haptics: case report. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2003;6:429.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martin J, Ramsay J, Hughes C, et al. Age and grip strength predict hand dexterity in adults. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0117598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muskens L, Van Lent R, Vijfvinkel A, et al. Never too old to use a tablet: designing tablet applications for the cognitively and physically impaired elderly. Lecture Notes Comput Sci. 2014;8547:391–398.
   Google Scholar
• Gerritsen MJJ, Berg IJ, Deelman BG, et al. Speed of information processing after unilateral stroke. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2003;25:1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming TB, Brodtmann A, Darby D, et al. Cutting a long story short: reaction times in acute stroke are associated with longer term cognitive outcomes. J Neurol Sci. 2012;322:102–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee C, Coughlin J. Perspective: older adults' adoption of technology: an integrated approach to identifying determinants and barriers. J Prod Innov Manag. 2015;32:747–759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nys GMS, Van Zandvoort MJE, De Kort PLM, et al. Domain-specific cognitive recovery after first-ever stroke: a follow-up study of 111 cases. J Inter Neuropsych Soc. 2005;11:795–806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blacker KJ, Curby KM, Klobusicky E, et al. Effects of action video game training on visual working memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014;40:1992–2004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs P. Designing an ecological and adaptable virtual task in the context of executive functions. Front Neuroeng. 2009;2:248–252.
   Google Scholar
• Swinburn K, Porter G, Howard D. The comprehensive aphasia test. Hove, United Kingdom: Psychology Press; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:606–613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas AJ, O’Brien JT. Depression and cognition in older adults. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2008;21:8–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Blazer DG. Depression and cognition in the elderly. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2015;11:331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flamand-Roze C, Falissard B, Roze E, et al. Validation of a new language screening tool for patients with acute stroke: the language screening test (LAST). Stroke. 2011;42:1224–1229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent PS, Luszcz MA. A review of the Boston Naming Test and multiple-occasion normative data for older adults on 15-item versions. Clin Neuropsychol. 2002;16:555–574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen WG. Verbal fluency in aging and dementia. J Clin Neuropsychol. 1980;2:135–146.
   Google Scholar
• Hachinski V, Iadecola C, Petersen RC, et al. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Canadian Stroke Network vascular cognitive impairment harmonization standards. Stroke. 2006;37:2220–2241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess PW, Shallice T. The Hayling and Brixton Tests. Thurston, Suffolk: Thames Valley Test Company: 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey MJ, Riddoch MJ, Crome P. Test-retest stability of three tests for unilateral visual neglect in patients with stroke: star cancellation, line bisection, and the baking tray task. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2004;14:403–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reitan RW, Wolfson D. The Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological test battery: theory and clinical interpretation Tucson, Arazona: Neuropsychology Press; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. WAIS-III Administration and scoring manual. New York: The Psychological Corporation; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt J, Benedict R. Verbal learning test-revised professional manual. Lutz, Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Osterrieth P. Le Test de copie d’une figure complexe. Arch Psychol (Geneve). 1944;30:206–356.
   Google Scholar
• Cuzick J. A Wilcoxon-type test for trend. Stat Med. 1985;4:87–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Rose TA, Worrall LE, Hickson LM, et al. Aphasia friendly written health information: content and design characteristics. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011;13:335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons TD, Rizzo AA. Initial validation of a virtual environment for assessment of memory functioning: virtual reality cognitive performance assessment test. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2008;11:17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hansen TI, Haferstrom ECD, Brunner JF, et al. Initial validation of a web-based self-administered neuropsychological test battery for older adults and seniors. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2015;37:581–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buxbaum LJ, Dawson AM, Linsley D. Reliability and validity of the virtual reality lateralized attention Test in assessing hemispatial neglect in right-hemisphere stroke. Neuropsychology. 2012;26:430–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montague EH, Winchester W, Kleiner B. Trust in medical technology by patients and health care providers in obstetric work systems. Behav Inf Technol. 2010;29:541–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogata K, Ueda K, Suto S, et al. Relationship between age-related decline of cognitive functions and willingness to work using a computer. Procedia Comput Sci. 2012;8:255–260.
   Google Scholar
• Franzen MD, Wilhelm KL. Conceptual foundations of ecological validity in neuropsychology. In: Sbordone RJ, Long CJ, editors. Ecological validity of neuropsychological testing. Delray Beach, FL: GR Press/St. Lucie Press; 1996: 91–112.
   Google Scholar
• Fazeli PL, Ross LA, Vance DE, et al. The relationship between computer experience and computerized cognitive test performance among older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2013;68:337–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar