Exploring change in a group-based psychological intervention for multiple sclerosis patients

References

• Dennison L, Moss-Morris R, Chalder T. A review of psychological correlates of adjustment in patients with multiple sclerosis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2009;29:141–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sa MJ. Psychological aspects of multiple sclerosis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2008;110:868–877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennison L, Moss-Morris R. Cognitive-behavioral therapy: what benefits can it offer people with multiple sclerosis?. Expert Rev Neurother. 2010;10:1383–1390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forman AC, Lincoln NB. Evaluation of an adjustment group for people with multiple sclerosis: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2010;24:211–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln NB, Yuill F, Holmes J, et al. Evaluation of an adjustment group for people with multiple sclerosis and low mood: a randomized controlled trial. Mult Scler. 2011;17:1250–1257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graziano F, Calandri E, Borghi M, et al. The effects of a group-based cognitive behavioral therapy on people with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehab. 2014;28:264–274
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calandri E, Graziano F, Borghi M, et al. Improving the quality of life and psychological well-being of recently diagnosed multiple sclerosis patients: preliminary evaluation of a group-based cognitive behavioral intervention. Disab Rehab. Forthcoming;[cited 2016 Jul 6]:[8 p.]. DOI:10.1080/09638288.2016.1198430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chwalisz K, Shah SR, Hand KM. Facilitating rigorous qualitative research in rehabilitation psychology. Rehabil Psychol. 2008;53:387–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin S, Glenton C, Oxman AD. Use of qualitative methods alongside randomised controlled trials of complex healthcare interventions: methodological study. BMJ. 2009;339:b3496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennison L, Moss-Morris R, Yardley L, et al. Change and processes of change within interventions to promote adjustment to multiple sclerosis: learning from patient experiences. Psychol Health. 2013;28:973–992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Learmonth YC, Marshall-McKenna R, Paul L, et al. A qualitative exploration of the impact of a 12-week group exercise class for those moderately affected with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35:81–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salminen AL, Kanelisto KJ, Karhula ME. What components of rehabilitation are helpful from the perspective of individuals with multiple sclerosis? Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36:1983–1989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosma HA, Kunnen ES. Identity and emotion: development through self-organization. Paris, France: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Irvine H, Davidson C, Hoy K, et al. Psychosocial adjustment to multiple sclerosis: exploration of identity redefinition. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31:599–606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonovsky A. Unraveling the mystery of health: how people manage stress and stay well. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Pakenham KI. Making sense of multiple sclerosis. Rehabil Psychol. 2007;52:380–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York (NY): Freeman and Company; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt MM, Goverover Y, Deluca J, et al. Self-efficacy as a predictor of self-reported physical, cognitive, and social functioning in multiple sclerosis. Rehabil Psychol. 2014;59:27–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonino S. Vivre avec la maladie chronique: les questions fondamentales que le patient doit aborder. In: AA.VV. Modèles et pratiques en éducation du patient: apports internationaux. Paris: INPES, 2010, p. 64–71.
   Google Scholar
• Calandri E, Graziano F, Borghi M, et al. Depression, positive and negative affect, optimism and health-related quality of life in recently diagnosed multiple sclerosis patients: the role of identity, sense of coherence, and self-efficacy. J Happ Studies. Forthcoming;[cited 2016 Nov 17]:[8 p.]. DOI:10.1080/09638288.2016.1198430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacher KL, Koresawa S, West C, et al. Qualitative research contribution to a randomized clinical trial. Res Nurs Health. 2005;28:268–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haugaard C, Sandberg K. Resistance in cognitive therapy: an analysis of paradigm and contemporary practice. Nord Psychol. 2008;60:24–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman CF. A cognitive perspective on resistance in psychotherapy. J Clin Psychol. 2002;58:165–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beutler LE, Moleiro C, Talebi H. Resistance in psychotherapy: what conclusions are supported by research. J Clin Psychol. 2002;58:207–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Large TR. Resistance in long-term cancer support groups. Int J Group Psychother. 2005;55:551–573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin P. Change agent. In: Lubkin IM, Larsen PD, editors. Chronic illness: impact and intervention. New York (NY): Jones & Bartlett Publishers; 2006. p. 323–350.
   Google Scholar
• Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot. 1997;12:38–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology. 1983;33:1444–1452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M. Combining qualitative and quantitative sampling, data collection, and analysis techniques in mixed-method studies. Res Nurs Health. 2000;23:246–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M. Real qualitative researchers do not count: the use of numbers in qualitative research. Res Nurs Health. 2001;24:230–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shneerson CL, Gale NK. Using mixed methods to identify and answer clinically relevant research questions. Qual Health Res. 2015;25:845–856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie AJ, Dickinson WB, Leech NL, et al. A qualitative framework for collecting and analyzing data in focus group research. Int J Qual Methods. 2009;8:1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Minton K, Ogden P, Pain C. Trauma and the body: a sensorimotor approach to psychotherapy. New York (NY): Norton & Company; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Lejbkowicz I, Caspi O, Miller A. Participatory medicine and patient empowerment towards personalized healthcare in multiple sclerosis. Expert Rev Neurother. 2012;12:343–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar