The Participation Scale: psychometric properties of a South Indian translation with hearing-impaired respondents

References

• Magalhaes R, Iorio MCM. Evaluating participation restriction in elderly patients before and after audiological rehabilitation. Rev CEFAC. 2012;14:816–825.
   Google Scholar
• BSA. Practice Guidance: Common principles of rehabilitation for adults with hearing- and/or balance-related problems in routine audiology services [Internet]: United Kingdom: British Society of Audiology; 2016 [cited 2016 Dec 3]. Available from: http://www.thebsa.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/BSA_PPC_Rehab_Final_30August 2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Manchaiah VKC, Stephens D. Perspectives in defining ‘hearing loss’ and its consequences. Hearing Balance Commun. 2013;11:6–16.
   Google Scholar
• Erdman S, Demorest M. Adjustment to hearing impairment I: description of a heterogeneous clinical population. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998;41:107–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fougeyrollas P, Noreau L, Bergeron H, et al. Social consequences of long term impairments and disabilities: conceptual approach and assessment of handicap. Int J Rehabil Res. 1998;21:127–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteneck GG, Charlifue SW, Gerhart KA, et al. Quantifying handicap: a new measure of long-term rehabilitation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73:519–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Post MW, de Witte LP, Reichrath E, et al. Development and validation of IMPACT-S, an ICF-based questionnaire to measure activities and participation. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40:620–627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardol M, de Haan RJ, van den Bos GA, et al. The development of a handicap assessment questionnaire: the Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA). Clin Rehabil. 1999;13:411–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkie R, Peat G, Thomas E, et al. The Keele assessment of participation: a new instrument to measure participation restriction in population studies. Combined qualitative and quantitative examination of its psychometric properties. Qual Life Res. 2005;14:1889–1899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harwood RH, Rogers A, Dickinson E, et al. Measuring handicap: the London Handicap Scale, a new outcome measure for chronic disease. Qual Health Care. 1994;3:11–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tate D, Forchheimer M, Maynard F, et al. Predicting depression and psychological distress in persons with spinal cord injury based on indicators of handicap. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;73:175–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood-Dauphinee SL, Opzoomer A, Williams JI, et al. Assessment of global function: the Reintegration to Normal Living Index. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1988;69:583–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostir GV, Granger CV, Black T, et al. Preliminary results for the PAR-PRO: a measure of home and community participation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:1043–1051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray DB, Hollingsworth HH, Stark SL, et al. Participation survey/mobility: psychometric properties of a measure of participation for people with mobility impairments and limitations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:189–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandek B, Sinclair SJ, Jette AM, et al. Development and initial psychometric evaluation of the participation measure for post-acute care (PM-PAC). Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;86:57–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown M, Dijkers MP, Gordon WA, et al. Participation Objective, Participation Subjective: a measure of participation combining outsider and insider perspectives. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2004;19:459–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallant JF, Misajon R, Bennett E, et al. Measuring the impact and distress of health problems from the individual’s perspective: development of the Perceived Impact of Problem Profile (PIPP). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4:36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Brakel WH, Anderson AM, Mutatkar RK, et al. The Participation Scale: measuring a key concept in public health. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28:193–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001 [cited 2017 Mar 7]. Available from: http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/
   Google Scholar
• Stevelink SAM, van Brakel WH. The cross-cultural equivalence of participation instruments: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35:1256–1268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Infolep: Participation Scale. Amsterdam: Leprosy Information services [Internet], 2016 [cited 2016 Dec 3]. Available from: https://www.leprosy-information.org/keytopic/participation-scale
   Google Scholar
• Magasi S, Post MW. A comparative review of contemporary participation measures’ psychometric properties and content coverage. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;Suppl 9:17–28.
   Google Scholar
• Rensen C, Bandyopadhyay S, Gopal PK, et al. Measuring leprosy-related stigma – a pilot study to validate a toolkit of instruments. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;33:711–719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevelink SAM, Terwee CB, Banstola N, et al. Testing the psychometric properties of the Participation Scale in Eastern Nepal. Qual Life Res. 2013;22:137–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelders R, van Brakel WH, Beise K, et al. Testing and validating a simplified scale to measure social participation of people with disabilities in Indonesia. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(8):638–646.
   Google Scholar
• Thammaiah S, Manchaiah V, Easwar V, et al. Translation and adaptation of five English language self-report health measures to South-Indian Kannada language. Audiol Res. 2016;6:22–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25:3186–3191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roach KE. Measurement of health outcomes: reliability, validity and responsiveness. J Prosthet Orthot. 2006;18:8–12.
   Google Scholar
• Thammaiah S, Manchaiah V, Easwar V, et al. Community-based hearing rehabilitation: implementation and outcome evaluation. ASHA Perspectives. Forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Clark JG. Uses and abuses of hearing loss classification. ASHA. 1981;23:493–500.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goffaux P, Boudrias M, Mathieu D, et al. Development of a concise QOL questionnaire for brain tumor patients. Can J Neurol Sci. 2009;36:340–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatehouse S, Noble W. The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol. 2004;43:85–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawthorne G, Richardson J, Osborne R. The Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) instrument: a psychometric measure of health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res. 1999;8:209–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Brakel WH. Participation Scale user’s manual version 6.0. Amsterdam. 2010 [cited 2016 Dec 3]. Available from: https://www.leprosy-information.org/files/Participation%20Scale%20Users%20Manual%20v.%206.0.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Noble W, Tyler R, Dunn C, et al. Hearing handicap ratings among different profiles of adult cochlear implant users. Ear Hear. 2008;29:112–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thammaiah S, Manchaiah V, Easwar V, et al. Psychometric properties of the Hearing Handicap Questionnaire: a Kannada (South-Indian) translation. Int J Audiol. 2016;56:194–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Bot SDM, De Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement of health status questionnaire. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dziuban CD, Shirkey EC. When is a correlation matrix appropriate for factor analysis? Some decision rules. Psychol Bull. 1974;81:358–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleiss JL, Cohen J. The equivalence of weighted kappa and the interclass correlation coefficient as measure of reliability. Educ Psychol Meas. 1973;33:613–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman & Hall; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Hickson L, Allen J, Beswick R, et al. Relationships between hearing disability, quality of life and wellbeing in older community-based Australians. Aust N Z J Audiol. 2008;30:99–112.
   Google Scholar
• Manchaiah V. Role of self-reported hearing disability and measured hearing sensitivity in understanding participation restrictions and health-related quality of life: a study with hundred and three older adults with hearing loss. Clin Otolarnygol 2016[Oct 17]. [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1111/coa.12758
   Google Scholar
• Anastasi A. Psychological testing, 4th ed. New York: Macmillan Publishing; 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Helvik AS, Jacobson GW, Hallberg LRM. Life consequences of hearing loss in terms of activity limitation and participation restriction. Scand J Disabil Res. 2006;8:53–66.
   Google Scholar
• Gill P, Stewart K, Treasure E, et al. Methods of data collection in qualitative research: interviews and focus groups. Br Dent J. 2008;204:291–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar